Absent ecology in the terrestrial ecological risk assessment process and an absent need for assessment

While the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's ecological risk assessment process was devised with the best of intentions, including fashioning it to be isomorphic with the human health risk assessment process, longtime existing biological information demonstrating ecological receptors to be...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Human and ecological risk assessment 2022-10, Vol.28 (10), p.1083-1104
Main Author: Tannenbaum, Lawrence V.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
animal density
Biological activity
birds
Ecological risk assessment
Environmental protection
Environmental risk
Evaluation
Health risks
Home range
Information processing
mammals
Pollution abatement
Receptors
Risk assessment
Soil contamination
Soil pollution
spatial
Superfund
terrestrial
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:While the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's ecological risk assessment process was devised with the best of intentions, including fashioning it to be isomorphic with the human health risk assessment process, longtime existing biological information demonstrating ecological receptors to be irrelevant for evaluation, was evidently overlooked. Owing to the spatial dynamics of density and home range, birds and mammals as the only terrestrial species routinely evaluated, occur in numbers far too small to legitimize their inclusion in assessments. These receptors would also not be expected to sufficiently contact contaminated media, principally soil, to trigger the development of concerning toxicological effects. The ecotoxicological manifestation of brief lifespans constitutes yet another reality not considered in applied ecological risk assessment. The decades-old nature of sites obviates any need for assessment; were toxicological effects to be elicited, they would have necessarily already arisen, yet they have consistently failed to appear. The analysis presented argues that in the haste to develop an ecological assessment process, the interplay of contaminated sites being relatively small, and species of seeming interest traveling over relatively vast spaces, has been ignored. The data assembled and reviewed demonstrate Superfund-type sites to house insufficient ecological resources to warrant a risk assessment process altogether.
ISSN:1080-7039
1549-7860
DOI:10.1080/10807039.2022.2132378