Fit for Purpose: Can Southeast Asian Minilateralism Deter?

• Published in: Asia policy 2022-10, Vol.17 (4), p.35-42
• Main Author: Laksmana, Evan A.
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Aggression (International law); Asymmetry; Cooperation; Deterrence; International cooperation; Minilateral Deterrence in the Indo-Pacific; Power; Quality; Robbery; Security; Tourism
• ISSN: 1559-0968; 1559-2960
• DOI: 10.1353/asp.2022.0064

In examining the development of minilaterals anchored in Southeast Asia, this essay considers whether and, if so, how this subregion could contribute to broader capabilities to deter military aggression. The essay argues that Southeast Asia's experience with minilateralism is much more limited, focused, and functionally driven by specific security challenges such as armed robbery. It is unlikely that Southeast Asian states will be comfortable with a broader minilateral arrangement involving extraregional powers designed to deter China or sideline existing mechanisms led by the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN). For better or worse, a more limited and functionally driven minilateralism gives Southeast Asian states more control over the direction, scope, and quality of cooperation. As well, analysts from the subregion have warned of the possibility that Indo-Pacific minilateral arrangements could become platforms for major powers to extend their influence.1The essay is divided into three parts. First, it provides an overview of the recent history of minilateralism in Southeast Asia, with a focus on the Malacca Straits Patrol (MSP) between Indonesia, Singapore, Malaysia, and Thailand as well as trilateral security cooperation between Indonesia, Malaysia, and the Philippines. It also briefly notes other experiences of minilateralism involving Southeast Asian states beyond the security realm. Next, the essay highlights the different features of minilateralism anchored in Southeast Asia in contrast to U.S.-anchored minilateralism and assesses the likelihood of Southeast Asian-led arrangements contributing to a broader deterrence effort against China. Finally, the essay offers several policy considerations regarding whether and, if so, how Southeast Asian-led minilateralism can be of strategic salience in the Indo-Pacific security landscape.