Loading…
Personality and Intelligence: A Meta-Analysis
This study provides a comprehensive assessment of the associations of personality and intelligence. It presents a meta-analysis (N = 162,636, k = 272) of domain, facet, and item-level correlations between personality and intelligence (general, fluid, and crystallized) for the major Big Five and HEXA...
Saved in:
Published in: | Psychological bulletin 2022-05, Vol.148 (5-6), p.301-336 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a292t-f153ded24149cc38b4061a67cda0cd9ad6832f1b1df5e24b4b8ee9e9ab9b6773 |
---|---|
cites | |
container_end_page | 336 |
container_issue | 5-6 |
container_start_page | 301 |
container_title | Psychological bulletin |
container_volume | 148 |
creator | Anglim, Jeromy Dunlop, Patrick D. Wee, Serena Horwood, Sharon Wood, Joshua K. Marty, Andrew |
description | This study provides a comprehensive assessment of the associations of personality and intelligence. It presents a meta-analysis (N = 162,636, k = 272) of domain, facet, and item-level correlations between personality and intelligence (general, fluid, and crystallized) for the major Big Five and HEXACO hierarchical frameworks of personality: NEO Personality Inventory-Revised, Big Five Aspect Scales, Big Five Inventory-2, and HEXACO Personality Inventory-Revised. It provides the first meta-analysis of personality and intelligence to comprehensively examine (a) facet-level correlations for these hierarchical frameworks of personality, (b) item-level correlations, (c) domain- and facet-level predictive models. Age and sex differences in personality and intelligence, and study-level moderators, are also examined. The study was complemented by four of our own unpublished data sets (N = 26,813) which were used to assess the ability of item-level models to provide generalizable prediction. Results showed that openness (ρ = .20) and neuroticism (ρ = −.09) were the strongest Big Five correlates of intelligence and that openness correlated more with crystallized than fluid intelligence. At the facet level, traits related to intellectual engagement and unconventionality were more strongly related to intelligence than other openness facets, and sociability and orderliness were negatively correlated with intelligence. Facets of gregariousness and excitement seeking had stronger negative correlations, and openness to aesthetics, feelings, and values had stronger positive correlations with crystallized than fluid intelligence. Facets explained more than twice the variance of domains. Overall, the results provide the most nuanced and robust evidence to date of the relationship between personality and intelligence.
Public Significance Statement
This meta-analysis provides a comprehensive examination of the relationship between personality traits and general intelligence. It is the first to meta-analytically compare how intelligence relates to domains, facets, and items on the major hierarchical measures of personality. In so doing, it provides a robust empirical basis for informing discussion of the reciprocal pathways through which personality and intelligence interact. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1037/bul0000373 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2732559568</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2732559568</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a292t-f153ded24149cc38b4061a67cda0cd9ad6832f1b1df5e24b4b8ee9e9ab9b6773</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp90MtKw0AUBuBBFKzVjU8QcCekzjWTcVeKl0JFF90PczmRlJjEmckib--UCu48mwOHj5_Dj9AtwSuCmXywU4fzMMnO0IIopkrChThHi3xjJVVYXaKrGA_ZSFGxBSo_IMShN12b5sL0vtj2Cbqu_YTewWOxLt4gmXKdwRzbeI0uGtNFuPndS7R_ftpvXsvd-8t2s96VhiqayoYI5sFTTrhyjtWW44qYSjpvsPPK-KpmtCGW-EYA5ZbbGkCBMlbZSkq2RHen2DEM3xPEpA_DFPIPUVPJqBBK5IT_FeE1pkxldX9SLgwxBmj0GNovE2ZNsD52pv86y3h1wmY0eoyzMyG1roPophCgT0erc7IWutIME_YD-RxtOw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2731480239</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Personality and Intelligence: A Meta-Analysis</title><source>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><source>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</source><source>EBSCOhost APA PsycARTICLES</source><creator>Anglim, Jeromy ; Dunlop, Patrick D. ; Wee, Serena ; Horwood, Sharon ; Wood, Joshua K. ; Marty, Andrew</creator><contributor>Johnson, Blair T</contributor><creatorcontrib>Anglim, Jeromy ; Dunlop, Patrick D. ; Wee, Serena ; Horwood, Sharon ; Wood, Joshua K. ; Marty, Andrew ; Johnson, Blair T</creatorcontrib><description>This study provides a comprehensive assessment of the associations of personality and intelligence. It presents a meta-analysis (N = 162,636, k = 272) of domain, facet, and item-level correlations between personality and intelligence (general, fluid, and crystallized) for the major Big Five and HEXACO hierarchical frameworks of personality: NEO Personality Inventory-Revised, Big Five Aspect Scales, Big Five Inventory-2, and HEXACO Personality Inventory-Revised. It provides the first meta-analysis of personality and intelligence to comprehensively examine (a) facet-level correlations for these hierarchical frameworks of personality, (b) item-level correlations, (c) domain- and facet-level predictive models. Age and sex differences in personality and intelligence, and study-level moderators, are also examined. The study was complemented by four of our own unpublished data sets (N = 26,813) which were used to assess the ability of item-level models to provide generalizable prediction. Results showed that openness (ρ = .20) and neuroticism (ρ = −.09) were the strongest Big Five correlates of intelligence and that openness correlated more with crystallized than fluid intelligence. At the facet level, traits related to intellectual engagement and unconventionality were more strongly related to intelligence than other openness facets, and sociability and orderliness were negatively correlated with intelligence. Facets of gregariousness and excitement seeking had stronger negative correlations, and openness to aesthetics, feelings, and values had stronger positive correlations with crystallized than fluid intelligence. Facets explained more than twice the variance of domains. Overall, the results provide the most nuanced and robust evidence to date of the relationship between personality and intelligence.
Public Significance Statement
This meta-analysis provides a comprehensive examination of the relationship between personality traits and general intelligence. It is the first to meta-analytically compare how intelligence relates to domains, facets, and items on the major hierarchical measures of personality. In so doing, it provides a robust empirical basis for informing discussion of the reciprocal pathways through which personality and intelligence interact.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0033-2909</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1939-1455</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1037/bul0000373</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Washington: American Psychological Association</publisher><subject>Aesthetics ; Cognitive Ability ; Five factor model ; Five Factor Personality Model ; Fluid Intelligence ; Human ; Intelligence ; Meta-analysis ; Moderators ; Neo Personality Inventory ; Neuroticism ; Openness ; Openness to Experience ; Orderliness ; Personality ; Personality Measures ; Personality Traits ; Prediction models ; Sex differences ; Sociability</subject><ispartof>Psychological bulletin, 2022-05, Vol.148 (5-6), p.301-336</ispartof><rights>2022 American Psychological Association</rights><rights>2022, American Psychological Association</rights><rights>Copyright American Psychological Association May/Jun 2022</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a292t-f153ded24149cc38b4061a67cda0cd9ad6832f1b1df5e24b4b8ee9e9ab9b6773</citedby><orcidid>0000-0003-1943-643X ; 0000-0002-1809-9315 ; 0000-0002-9546-1373 ; 0000-0002-3432-3401 ; 0000-0002-1609-7359 ; 0000-0002-5225-6409</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,30999,33223</link.rule.ids></links><search><contributor>Johnson, Blair T</contributor><creatorcontrib>Anglim, Jeromy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dunlop, Patrick D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wee, Serena</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Horwood, Sharon</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wood, Joshua K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Marty, Andrew</creatorcontrib><title>Personality and Intelligence: A Meta-Analysis</title><title>Psychological bulletin</title><description>This study provides a comprehensive assessment of the associations of personality and intelligence. It presents a meta-analysis (N = 162,636, k = 272) of domain, facet, and item-level correlations between personality and intelligence (general, fluid, and crystallized) for the major Big Five and HEXACO hierarchical frameworks of personality: NEO Personality Inventory-Revised, Big Five Aspect Scales, Big Five Inventory-2, and HEXACO Personality Inventory-Revised. It provides the first meta-analysis of personality and intelligence to comprehensively examine (a) facet-level correlations for these hierarchical frameworks of personality, (b) item-level correlations, (c) domain- and facet-level predictive models. Age and sex differences in personality and intelligence, and study-level moderators, are also examined. The study was complemented by four of our own unpublished data sets (N = 26,813) which were used to assess the ability of item-level models to provide generalizable prediction. Results showed that openness (ρ = .20) and neuroticism (ρ = −.09) were the strongest Big Five correlates of intelligence and that openness correlated more with crystallized than fluid intelligence. At the facet level, traits related to intellectual engagement and unconventionality were more strongly related to intelligence than other openness facets, and sociability and orderliness were negatively correlated with intelligence. Facets of gregariousness and excitement seeking had stronger negative correlations, and openness to aesthetics, feelings, and values had stronger positive correlations with crystallized than fluid intelligence. Facets explained more than twice the variance of domains. Overall, the results provide the most nuanced and robust evidence to date of the relationship between personality and intelligence.
Public Significance Statement
This meta-analysis provides a comprehensive examination of the relationship between personality traits and general intelligence. It is the first to meta-analytically compare how intelligence relates to domains, facets, and items on the major hierarchical measures of personality. In so doing, it provides a robust empirical basis for informing discussion of the reciprocal pathways through which personality and intelligence interact.</description><subject>Aesthetics</subject><subject>Cognitive Ability</subject><subject>Five factor model</subject><subject>Five Factor Personality Model</subject><subject>Fluid Intelligence</subject><subject>Human</subject><subject>Intelligence</subject><subject>Meta-analysis</subject><subject>Moderators</subject><subject>Neo Personality Inventory</subject><subject>Neuroticism</subject><subject>Openness</subject><subject>Openness to Experience</subject><subject>Orderliness</subject><subject>Personality</subject><subject>Personality Measures</subject><subject>Personality Traits</subject><subject>Prediction models</subject><subject>Sex differences</subject><subject>Sociability</subject><issn>0033-2909</issn><issn>1939-1455</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><sourceid>8BJ</sourceid><recordid>eNp90MtKw0AUBuBBFKzVjU8QcCekzjWTcVeKl0JFF90PczmRlJjEmckib--UCu48mwOHj5_Dj9AtwSuCmXywU4fzMMnO0IIopkrChThHi3xjJVVYXaKrGA_ZSFGxBSo_IMShN12b5sL0vtj2Cbqu_YTewWOxLt4gmXKdwRzbeI0uGtNFuPndS7R_ftpvXsvd-8t2s96VhiqayoYI5sFTTrhyjtWW44qYSjpvsPPK-KpmtCGW-EYA5ZbbGkCBMlbZSkq2RHen2DEM3xPEpA_DFPIPUVPJqBBK5IT_FeE1pkxldX9SLgwxBmj0GNovE2ZNsD52pv86y3h1wmY0eoyzMyG1roPophCgT0erc7IWutIME_YD-RxtOw</recordid><startdate>202205</startdate><enddate>202205</enddate><creator>Anglim, Jeromy</creator><creator>Dunlop, Patrick D.</creator><creator>Wee, Serena</creator><creator>Horwood, Sharon</creator><creator>Wood, Joshua K.</creator><creator>Marty, Andrew</creator><general>American Psychological Association</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7RZ</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1943-643X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1809-9315</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9546-1373</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3432-3401</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1609-7359</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5225-6409</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202205</creationdate><title>Personality and Intelligence: A Meta-Analysis</title><author>Anglim, Jeromy ; Dunlop, Patrick D. ; Wee, Serena ; Horwood, Sharon ; Wood, Joshua K. ; Marty, Andrew</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a292t-f153ded24149cc38b4061a67cda0cd9ad6832f1b1df5e24b4b8ee9e9ab9b6773</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Aesthetics</topic><topic>Cognitive Ability</topic><topic>Five factor model</topic><topic>Five Factor Personality Model</topic><topic>Fluid Intelligence</topic><topic>Human</topic><topic>Intelligence</topic><topic>Meta-analysis</topic><topic>Moderators</topic><topic>Neo Personality Inventory</topic><topic>Neuroticism</topic><topic>Openness</topic><topic>Openness to Experience</topic><topic>Orderliness</topic><topic>Personality</topic><topic>Personality Measures</topic><topic>Personality Traits</topic><topic>Prediction models</topic><topic>Sex differences</topic><topic>Sociability</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Anglim, Jeromy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dunlop, Patrick D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wee, Serena</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Horwood, Sharon</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wood, Joshua K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Marty, Andrew</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>APA PsycArticles®</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><jtitle>Psychological bulletin</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Anglim, Jeromy</au><au>Dunlop, Patrick D.</au><au>Wee, Serena</au><au>Horwood, Sharon</au><au>Wood, Joshua K.</au><au>Marty, Andrew</au><au>Johnson, Blair T</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Personality and Intelligence: A Meta-Analysis</atitle><jtitle>Psychological bulletin</jtitle><date>2022-05</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>148</volume><issue>5-6</issue><spage>301</spage><epage>336</epage><pages>301-336</pages><issn>0033-2909</issn><eissn>1939-1455</eissn><abstract>This study provides a comprehensive assessment of the associations of personality and intelligence. It presents a meta-analysis (N = 162,636, k = 272) of domain, facet, and item-level correlations between personality and intelligence (general, fluid, and crystallized) for the major Big Five and HEXACO hierarchical frameworks of personality: NEO Personality Inventory-Revised, Big Five Aspect Scales, Big Five Inventory-2, and HEXACO Personality Inventory-Revised. It provides the first meta-analysis of personality and intelligence to comprehensively examine (a) facet-level correlations for these hierarchical frameworks of personality, (b) item-level correlations, (c) domain- and facet-level predictive models. Age and sex differences in personality and intelligence, and study-level moderators, are also examined. The study was complemented by four of our own unpublished data sets (N = 26,813) which were used to assess the ability of item-level models to provide generalizable prediction. Results showed that openness (ρ = .20) and neuroticism (ρ = −.09) were the strongest Big Five correlates of intelligence and that openness correlated more with crystallized than fluid intelligence. At the facet level, traits related to intellectual engagement and unconventionality were more strongly related to intelligence than other openness facets, and sociability and orderliness were negatively correlated with intelligence. Facets of gregariousness and excitement seeking had stronger negative correlations, and openness to aesthetics, feelings, and values had stronger positive correlations with crystallized than fluid intelligence. Facets explained more than twice the variance of domains. Overall, the results provide the most nuanced and robust evidence to date of the relationship between personality and intelligence.
Public Significance Statement
This meta-analysis provides a comprehensive examination of the relationship between personality traits and general intelligence. It is the first to meta-analytically compare how intelligence relates to domains, facets, and items on the major hierarchical measures of personality. In so doing, it provides a robust empirical basis for informing discussion of the reciprocal pathways through which personality and intelligence interact.</abstract><cop>Washington</cop><pub>American Psychological Association</pub><doi>10.1037/bul0000373</doi><tpages>36</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1943-643X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1809-9315</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9546-1373</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3432-3401</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1609-7359</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5225-6409</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0033-2909 |
ispartof | Psychological bulletin, 2022-05, Vol.148 (5-6), p.301-336 |
issn | 0033-2909 1939-1455 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2732559568 |
source | Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA); International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS); EBSCOhost APA PsycARTICLES |
subjects | Aesthetics Cognitive Ability Five factor model Five Factor Personality Model Fluid Intelligence Human Intelligence Meta-analysis Moderators Neo Personality Inventory Neuroticism Openness Openness to Experience Orderliness Personality Personality Measures Personality Traits Prediction models Sex differences Sociability |
title | Personality and Intelligence: A Meta-Analysis |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-29T09%3A25%3A37IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Personality%20and%20Intelligence:%20A%20Meta-Analysis&rft.jtitle=Psychological%20bulletin&rft.au=Anglim,%20Jeromy&rft.date=2022-05&rft.volume=148&rft.issue=5-6&rft.spage=301&rft.epage=336&rft.pages=301-336&rft.issn=0033-2909&rft.eissn=1939-1455&rft_id=info:doi/10.1037/bul0000373&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2732559568%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a292t-f153ded24149cc38b4061a67cda0cd9ad6832f1b1df5e24b4b8ee9e9ab9b6773%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2731480239&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |