Loading…

Personality and Intelligence: A Meta-Analysis

This study provides a comprehensive assessment of the associations of personality and intelligence. It presents a meta-analysis (N = 162,636, k = 272) of domain, facet, and item-level correlations between personality and intelligence (general, fluid, and crystallized) for the major Big Five and HEXA...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Psychological bulletin 2022-05, Vol.148 (5-6), p.301-336
Main Authors: Anglim, Jeromy, Dunlop, Patrick D., Wee, Serena, Horwood, Sharon, Wood, Joshua K., Marty, Andrew
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a292t-f153ded24149cc38b4061a67cda0cd9ad6832f1b1df5e24b4b8ee9e9ab9b6773
cites
container_end_page 336
container_issue 5-6
container_start_page 301
container_title Psychological bulletin
container_volume 148
creator Anglim, Jeromy
Dunlop, Patrick D.
Wee, Serena
Horwood, Sharon
Wood, Joshua K.
Marty, Andrew
description This study provides a comprehensive assessment of the associations of personality and intelligence. It presents a meta-analysis (N = 162,636, k = 272) of domain, facet, and item-level correlations between personality and intelligence (general, fluid, and crystallized) for the major Big Five and HEXACO hierarchical frameworks of personality: NEO Personality Inventory-Revised, Big Five Aspect Scales, Big Five Inventory-2, and HEXACO Personality Inventory-Revised. It provides the first meta-analysis of personality and intelligence to comprehensively examine (a) facet-level correlations for these hierarchical frameworks of personality, (b) item-level correlations, (c) domain- and facet-level predictive models. Age and sex differences in personality and intelligence, and study-level moderators, are also examined. The study was complemented by four of our own unpublished data sets (N = 26,813) which were used to assess the ability of item-level models to provide generalizable prediction. Results showed that openness (ρ = .20) and neuroticism (ρ = −.09) were the strongest Big Five correlates of intelligence and that openness correlated more with crystallized than fluid intelligence. At the facet level, traits related to intellectual engagement and unconventionality were more strongly related to intelligence than other openness facets, and sociability and orderliness were negatively correlated with intelligence. Facets of gregariousness and excitement seeking had stronger negative correlations, and openness to aesthetics, feelings, and values had stronger positive correlations with crystallized than fluid intelligence. Facets explained more than twice the variance of domains. Overall, the results provide the most nuanced and robust evidence to date of the relationship between personality and intelligence. Public Significance Statement This meta-analysis provides a comprehensive examination of the relationship between personality traits and general intelligence. It is the first to meta-analytically compare how intelligence relates to domains, facets, and items on the major hierarchical measures of personality. In so doing, it provides a robust empirical basis for informing discussion of the reciprocal pathways through which personality and intelligence interact.
doi_str_mv 10.1037/bul0000373
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2732559568</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2732559568</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a292t-f153ded24149cc38b4061a67cda0cd9ad6832f1b1df5e24b4b8ee9e9ab9b6773</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp90MtKw0AUBuBBFKzVjU8QcCekzjWTcVeKl0JFF90PczmRlJjEmckib--UCu48mwOHj5_Dj9AtwSuCmXywU4fzMMnO0IIopkrChThHi3xjJVVYXaKrGA_ZSFGxBSo_IMShN12b5sL0vtj2Cbqu_YTewWOxLt4gmXKdwRzbeI0uGtNFuPndS7R_ftpvXsvd-8t2s96VhiqayoYI5sFTTrhyjtWW44qYSjpvsPPK-KpmtCGW-EYA5ZbbGkCBMlbZSkq2RHen2DEM3xPEpA_DFPIPUVPJqBBK5IT_FeE1pkxldX9SLgwxBmj0GNovE2ZNsD52pv86y3h1wmY0eoyzMyG1roPophCgT0erc7IWutIME_YD-RxtOw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2731480239</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Personality and Intelligence: A Meta-Analysis</title><source>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><source>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</source><source>EBSCOhost APA PsycARTICLES</source><creator>Anglim, Jeromy ; Dunlop, Patrick D. ; Wee, Serena ; Horwood, Sharon ; Wood, Joshua K. ; Marty, Andrew</creator><contributor>Johnson, Blair T</contributor><creatorcontrib>Anglim, Jeromy ; Dunlop, Patrick D. ; Wee, Serena ; Horwood, Sharon ; Wood, Joshua K. ; Marty, Andrew ; Johnson, Blair T</creatorcontrib><description>This study provides a comprehensive assessment of the associations of personality and intelligence. It presents a meta-analysis (N = 162,636, k = 272) of domain, facet, and item-level correlations between personality and intelligence (general, fluid, and crystallized) for the major Big Five and HEXACO hierarchical frameworks of personality: NEO Personality Inventory-Revised, Big Five Aspect Scales, Big Five Inventory-2, and HEXACO Personality Inventory-Revised. It provides the first meta-analysis of personality and intelligence to comprehensively examine (a) facet-level correlations for these hierarchical frameworks of personality, (b) item-level correlations, (c) domain- and facet-level predictive models. Age and sex differences in personality and intelligence, and study-level moderators, are also examined. The study was complemented by four of our own unpublished data sets (N = 26,813) which were used to assess the ability of item-level models to provide generalizable prediction. Results showed that openness (ρ = .20) and neuroticism (ρ = −.09) were the strongest Big Five correlates of intelligence and that openness correlated more with crystallized than fluid intelligence. At the facet level, traits related to intellectual engagement and unconventionality were more strongly related to intelligence than other openness facets, and sociability and orderliness were negatively correlated with intelligence. Facets of gregariousness and excitement seeking had stronger negative correlations, and openness to aesthetics, feelings, and values had stronger positive correlations with crystallized than fluid intelligence. Facets explained more than twice the variance of domains. Overall, the results provide the most nuanced and robust evidence to date of the relationship between personality and intelligence. Public Significance Statement This meta-analysis provides a comprehensive examination of the relationship between personality traits and general intelligence. It is the first to meta-analytically compare how intelligence relates to domains, facets, and items on the major hierarchical measures of personality. In so doing, it provides a robust empirical basis for informing discussion of the reciprocal pathways through which personality and intelligence interact.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0033-2909</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1939-1455</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1037/bul0000373</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Washington: American Psychological Association</publisher><subject>Aesthetics ; Cognitive Ability ; Five factor model ; Five Factor Personality Model ; Fluid Intelligence ; Human ; Intelligence ; Meta-analysis ; Moderators ; Neo Personality Inventory ; Neuroticism ; Openness ; Openness to Experience ; Orderliness ; Personality ; Personality Measures ; Personality Traits ; Prediction models ; Sex differences ; Sociability</subject><ispartof>Psychological bulletin, 2022-05, Vol.148 (5-6), p.301-336</ispartof><rights>2022 American Psychological Association</rights><rights>2022, American Psychological Association</rights><rights>Copyright American Psychological Association May/Jun 2022</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a292t-f153ded24149cc38b4061a67cda0cd9ad6832f1b1df5e24b4b8ee9e9ab9b6773</citedby><orcidid>0000-0003-1943-643X ; 0000-0002-1809-9315 ; 0000-0002-9546-1373 ; 0000-0002-3432-3401 ; 0000-0002-1609-7359 ; 0000-0002-5225-6409</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,30999,33223</link.rule.ids></links><search><contributor>Johnson, Blair T</contributor><creatorcontrib>Anglim, Jeromy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dunlop, Patrick D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wee, Serena</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Horwood, Sharon</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wood, Joshua K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Marty, Andrew</creatorcontrib><title>Personality and Intelligence: A Meta-Analysis</title><title>Psychological bulletin</title><description>This study provides a comprehensive assessment of the associations of personality and intelligence. It presents a meta-analysis (N = 162,636, k = 272) of domain, facet, and item-level correlations between personality and intelligence (general, fluid, and crystallized) for the major Big Five and HEXACO hierarchical frameworks of personality: NEO Personality Inventory-Revised, Big Five Aspect Scales, Big Five Inventory-2, and HEXACO Personality Inventory-Revised. It provides the first meta-analysis of personality and intelligence to comprehensively examine (a) facet-level correlations for these hierarchical frameworks of personality, (b) item-level correlations, (c) domain- and facet-level predictive models. Age and sex differences in personality and intelligence, and study-level moderators, are also examined. The study was complemented by four of our own unpublished data sets (N = 26,813) which were used to assess the ability of item-level models to provide generalizable prediction. Results showed that openness (ρ = .20) and neuroticism (ρ = −.09) were the strongest Big Five correlates of intelligence and that openness correlated more with crystallized than fluid intelligence. At the facet level, traits related to intellectual engagement and unconventionality were more strongly related to intelligence than other openness facets, and sociability and orderliness were negatively correlated with intelligence. Facets of gregariousness and excitement seeking had stronger negative correlations, and openness to aesthetics, feelings, and values had stronger positive correlations with crystallized than fluid intelligence. Facets explained more than twice the variance of domains. Overall, the results provide the most nuanced and robust evidence to date of the relationship between personality and intelligence. Public Significance Statement This meta-analysis provides a comprehensive examination of the relationship between personality traits and general intelligence. It is the first to meta-analytically compare how intelligence relates to domains, facets, and items on the major hierarchical measures of personality. In so doing, it provides a robust empirical basis for informing discussion of the reciprocal pathways through which personality and intelligence interact.</description><subject>Aesthetics</subject><subject>Cognitive Ability</subject><subject>Five factor model</subject><subject>Five Factor Personality Model</subject><subject>Fluid Intelligence</subject><subject>Human</subject><subject>Intelligence</subject><subject>Meta-analysis</subject><subject>Moderators</subject><subject>Neo Personality Inventory</subject><subject>Neuroticism</subject><subject>Openness</subject><subject>Openness to Experience</subject><subject>Orderliness</subject><subject>Personality</subject><subject>Personality Measures</subject><subject>Personality Traits</subject><subject>Prediction models</subject><subject>Sex differences</subject><subject>Sociability</subject><issn>0033-2909</issn><issn>1939-1455</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><sourceid>8BJ</sourceid><recordid>eNp90MtKw0AUBuBBFKzVjU8QcCekzjWTcVeKl0JFF90PczmRlJjEmckib--UCu48mwOHj5_Dj9AtwSuCmXywU4fzMMnO0IIopkrChThHi3xjJVVYXaKrGA_ZSFGxBSo_IMShN12b5sL0vtj2Cbqu_YTewWOxLt4gmXKdwRzbeI0uGtNFuPndS7R_ftpvXsvd-8t2s96VhiqayoYI5sFTTrhyjtWW44qYSjpvsPPK-KpmtCGW-EYA5ZbbGkCBMlbZSkq2RHen2DEM3xPEpA_DFPIPUVPJqBBK5IT_FeE1pkxldX9SLgwxBmj0GNovE2ZNsD52pv86y3h1wmY0eoyzMyG1roPophCgT0erc7IWutIME_YD-RxtOw</recordid><startdate>202205</startdate><enddate>202205</enddate><creator>Anglim, Jeromy</creator><creator>Dunlop, Patrick D.</creator><creator>Wee, Serena</creator><creator>Horwood, Sharon</creator><creator>Wood, Joshua K.</creator><creator>Marty, Andrew</creator><general>American Psychological Association</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7RZ</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1943-643X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1809-9315</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9546-1373</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3432-3401</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1609-7359</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5225-6409</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202205</creationdate><title>Personality and Intelligence: A Meta-Analysis</title><author>Anglim, Jeromy ; Dunlop, Patrick D. ; Wee, Serena ; Horwood, Sharon ; Wood, Joshua K. ; Marty, Andrew</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a292t-f153ded24149cc38b4061a67cda0cd9ad6832f1b1df5e24b4b8ee9e9ab9b6773</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Aesthetics</topic><topic>Cognitive Ability</topic><topic>Five factor model</topic><topic>Five Factor Personality Model</topic><topic>Fluid Intelligence</topic><topic>Human</topic><topic>Intelligence</topic><topic>Meta-analysis</topic><topic>Moderators</topic><topic>Neo Personality Inventory</topic><topic>Neuroticism</topic><topic>Openness</topic><topic>Openness to Experience</topic><topic>Orderliness</topic><topic>Personality</topic><topic>Personality Measures</topic><topic>Personality Traits</topic><topic>Prediction models</topic><topic>Sex differences</topic><topic>Sociability</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Anglim, Jeromy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dunlop, Patrick D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wee, Serena</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Horwood, Sharon</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wood, Joshua K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Marty, Andrew</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>APA PsycArticles®</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><jtitle>Psychological bulletin</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Anglim, Jeromy</au><au>Dunlop, Patrick D.</au><au>Wee, Serena</au><au>Horwood, Sharon</au><au>Wood, Joshua K.</au><au>Marty, Andrew</au><au>Johnson, Blair T</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Personality and Intelligence: A Meta-Analysis</atitle><jtitle>Psychological bulletin</jtitle><date>2022-05</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>148</volume><issue>5-6</issue><spage>301</spage><epage>336</epage><pages>301-336</pages><issn>0033-2909</issn><eissn>1939-1455</eissn><abstract>This study provides a comprehensive assessment of the associations of personality and intelligence. It presents a meta-analysis (N = 162,636, k = 272) of domain, facet, and item-level correlations between personality and intelligence (general, fluid, and crystallized) for the major Big Five and HEXACO hierarchical frameworks of personality: NEO Personality Inventory-Revised, Big Five Aspect Scales, Big Five Inventory-2, and HEXACO Personality Inventory-Revised. It provides the first meta-analysis of personality and intelligence to comprehensively examine (a) facet-level correlations for these hierarchical frameworks of personality, (b) item-level correlations, (c) domain- and facet-level predictive models. Age and sex differences in personality and intelligence, and study-level moderators, are also examined. The study was complemented by four of our own unpublished data sets (N = 26,813) which were used to assess the ability of item-level models to provide generalizable prediction. Results showed that openness (ρ = .20) and neuroticism (ρ = −.09) were the strongest Big Five correlates of intelligence and that openness correlated more with crystallized than fluid intelligence. At the facet level, traits related to intellectual engagement and unconventionality were more strongly related to intelligence than other openness facets, and sociability and orderliness were negatively correlated with intelligence. Facets of gregariousness and excitement seeking had stronger negative correlations, and openness to aesthetics, feelings, and values had stronger positive correlations with crystallized than fluid intelligence. Facets explained more than twice the variance of domains. Overall, the results provide the most nuanced and robust evidence to date of the relationship between personality and intelligence. Public Significance Statement This meta-analysis provides a comprehensive examination of the relationship between personality traits and general intelligence. It is the first to meta-analytically compare how intelligence relates to domains, facets, and items on the major hierarchical measures of personality. In so doing, it provides a robust empirical basis for informing discussion of the reciprocal pathways through which personality and intelligence interact.</abstract><cop>Washington</cop><pub>American Psychological Association</pub><doi>10.1037/bul0000373</doi><tpages>36</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1943-643X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1809-9315</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9546-1373</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3432-3401</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1609-7359</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5225-6409</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0033-2909
ispartof Psychological bulletin, 2022-05, Vol.148 (5-6), p.301-336
issn 0033-2909
1939-1455
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2732559568
source Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA); International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS); EBSCOhost APA PsycARTICLES
subjects Aesthetics
Cognitive Ability
Five factor model
Five Factor Personality Model
Fluid Intelligence
Human
Intelligence
Meta-analysis
Moderators
Neo Personality Inventory
Neuroticism
Openness
Openness to Experience
Orderliness
Personality
Personality Measures
Personality Traits
Prediction models
Sex differences
Sociability
title Personality and Intelligence: A Meta-Analysis
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-29T09%3A25%3A37IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Personality%20and%20Intelligence:%20A%20Meta-Analysis&rft.jtitle=Psychological%20bulletin&rft.au=Anglim,%20Jeromy&rft.date=2022-05&rft.volume=148&rft.issue=5-6&rft.spage=301&rft.epage=336&rft.pages=301-336&rft.issn=0033-2909&rft.eissn=1939-1455&rft_id=info:doi/10.1037/bul0000373&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2732559568%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a292t-f153ded24149cc38b4061a67cda0cd9ad6832f1b1df5e24b4b8ee9e9ab9b6773%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2731480239&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true