Loading…

Meteorological analysis of the relationship between climatic parameters: understanding the dynamics of the troposphere

Understanding the relationship between the variations of meteorological parameters is vital in tackling the climatic problem. This paper presents methods for analyzing parameters that directly or indirectly relate to each other, and accurate methods for interpreting their results. Using obtained and...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Theoretical and applied climatology 2022-11, Vol.150 (3-4), p.1677-1698
Main Authors: Agbo, Emmanuel P., Edet, Collins O.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c322t-845ae74d8c4498b6ed6bb4d2ebb9681a6f2041d9f7f32d9bd1f2addf7fd89c2c3
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c322t-845ae74d8c4498b6ed6bb4d2ebb9681a6f2041d9f7f32d9bd1f2addf7fd89c2c3
container_end_page 1698
container_issue 3-4
container_start_page 1677
container_title Theoretical and applied climatology
container_volume 150
creator Agbo, Emmanuel P.
Edet, Collins O.
description Understanding the relationship between the variations of meteorological parameters is vital in tackling the climatic problem. This paper presents methods for analyzing parameters that directly or indirectly relate to each other, and accurate methods for interpreting their results. Using obtained and calculated data for 14 years, we adopt the Mann–Kendall (M–K) test for the trend analysis; the Pettit and the standard normal homogeneity test (SNHT) was also used to test for homogeneity or change points for the annual series. Using the Python programming software, the correlation matrixes and linear regression pair plots have been adopted to discern the relationship between all parameters. To crystalize results, partial derivatives relating to the equivalent potential temperature (EPT) for a pseudo-adiabatic process with parameters affecting its variation from equations are obtained. The magnitude of these derivatives’ gradients was used to bolster regression results, showing the mixing ratio (MR) of air as the parameter with the most effect on EPT variation. The MK test results show that the atmospheric pressure (AP) and average ambient temperature (AT) were all increasing significantly for all variations (annual, dry and wet seasons). In contrast, others varied between dry and wet seasons after adopting a benchmark significance level of 5% (0.05). The correlation matrixes and linear regression pair plots show a strong relationship between the variations of refractivity, EPT, the temperature at the lifting condensation level (T L ), MR, vapor pressure (VP), specific humidity (SH), and the dew point temperature (DPT). The potential temperature (PT), saturated vapor pressure (SVP), saturated mixing ratio (SMR), and the AT relationships showed a robust positive correlation/regression. This correlation offers a connection between the AT and the PT. The processes, including the partial derivatives, pair plots, correlation matrixes, and tests for trends, provide a solution to the meteorological analysis problem. Results and methods can be applied in other regions. Graphical abstract Highlights The gradient of the partial differential equations relating the equivalent potential temperature with all parameters affecting her variability shows the direct effect of these parameters on the variation of the equivalent potential temperature. The correlation matrixes and linear regression pair plots shows the similarity between the trends of all meteorological parameters.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s00704-022-04226-x
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2734425900</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A726048524</galeid><sourcerecordid>A726048524</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c322t-845ae74d8c4498b6ed6bb4d2ebb9681a6f2041d9f7f32d9bd1f2addf7fd89c2c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kU9LJDEQxYPsgrOuX8BTgycPrenqTKfbm8iuCoqwf8BbSCeVnkhP0ptk1plvv9EWxcsSSFHF-z0qeYQcVfS0opSfxXxRVlKAkjKAptzukUXFalYy1tafyIJWnJe8ax_2yZcYHyml0DR8Qf7eYUIf_OgHq-RYSCfHXbSx8KZIKywCjjJZ7-LKTkWP6QnRFWq06zxVxSSDXGeDEM-LjdO5Jum0dcMLq3dOrq1680rBTz5OKwz4lXw2cox4-FoPyO_v335dXpe391c3lxe3paoBUtmypUTOdKsY69q-Qd30PdOAfd81bSUbA5RVujPc1KC7XlcGpNa51W2nQNUH5Hj2nYL_s8GYxKPfhPzGKIDXjMGyozSrTmfVIEcU1hmfglT5aMz7e4fG5vkFh4aydgksAycfgKxJuE2D3MQobn7--KiFWauCjzGgEVPI3xd2oqLiOTwxhydyeOIlPLHNUD1DMYvdgOF97_9Q_wAHrqAD</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2734425900</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Meteorological analysis of the relationship between climatic parameters: understanding the dynamics of the troposphere</title><source>Springer Nature</source><creator>Agbo, Emmanuel P. ; Edet, Collins O.</creator><creatorcontrib>Agbo, Emmanuel P. ; Edet, Collins O.</creatorcontrib><description>Understanding the relationship between the variations of meteorological parameters is vital in tackling the climatic problem. This paper presents methods for analyzing parameters that directly or indirectly relate to each other, and accurate methods for interpreting their results. Using obtained and calculated data for 14 years, we adopt the Mann–Kendall (M–K) test for the trend analysis; the Pettit and the standard normal homogeneity test (SNHT) was also used to test for homogeneity or change points for the annual series. Using the Python programming software, the correlation matrixes and linear regression pair plots have been adopted to discern the relationship between all parameters. To crystalize results, partial derivatives relating to the equivalent potential temperature (EPT) for a pseudo-adiabatic process with parameters affecting its variation from equations are obtained. The magnitude of these derivatives’ gradients was used to bolster regression results, showing the mixing ratio (MR) of air as the parameter with the most effect on EPT variation. The MK test results show that the atmospheric pressure (AP) and average ambient temperature (AT) were all increasing significantly for all variations (annual, dry and wet seasons). In contrast, others varied between dry and wet seasons after adopting a benchmark significance level of 5% (0.05). The correlation matrixes and linear regression pair plots show a strong relationship between the variations of refractivity, EPT, the temperature at the lifting condensation level (T L ), MR, vapor pressure (VP), specific humidity (SH), and the dew point temperature (DPT). The potential temperature (PT), saturated vapor pressure (SVP), saturated mixing ratio (SMR), and the AT relationships showed a robust positive correlation/regression. This correlation offers a connection between the AT and the PT. The processes, including the partial derivatives, pair plots, correlation matrixes, and tests for trends, provide a solution to the meteorological analysis problem. Results and methods can be applied in other regions. Graphical abstract Highlights The gradient of the partial differential equations relating the equivalent potential temperature with all parameters affecting her variability shows the direct effect of these parameters on the variation of the equivalent potential temperature. The correlation matrixes and linear regression pair plots shows the similarity between the trends of all meteorological parameters. The correlation matrixes and linear regression pair plots show a strong relationship between the variations of refractivity, equivalent potential temperature, temperature at the lifting condensation level, mixing ratio, vapor pressure, specific humidity, and the dew point temperature. The Standard Normal Homogeneity test (SNHT) and the Pettitt test were applied to test for homogeneity and both tests agree that the atmospheric pressure and maximum temperature data are inhomogeneous and have significant change points. The potential temperature, saturated vapor pressure, saturated mixing ratio, and the average temperature relationships showed a robust positive correlation/regression. Linear regression pair plots as well as the results from the correlation matrixes show a strong relationship between the parameters relating to equivalent potential temperature and refractivity.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0177-798X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1434-4483</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s00704-022-04226-x</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Vienna: Springer Vienna</publisher><subject>Adiabatic ; Adiabatic processes ; Ambient temperature ; Analysis ; Aquatic Pollution ; Atmospheric pressure ; Atmospheric Protection/Air Quality Control/Air Pollution ; Atmospheric Sciences ; Climate ; Climate science ; Climatology ; Condensation ; Correlation ; Correlation analysis ; Derivatives ; Dew ; Dew point ; Differential equations ; Earth and Environmental Science ; Earth Sciences ; Equivalence ; Equivalent potential temperature ; Homogeneity ; Humidity ; Lifting ; Lifting condensation level ; Mathematical analysis ; Maximum temperatures ; Meteorological parameters ; Methods ; Mixing ratio ; Original Paper ; Parameters ; Partial differential equations ; Potential temperature ; Process parameters ; Programming languages ; Rainy season ; Refractive index ; Refractivity ; Regression ; Regression analysis ; Robustness (mathematics) ; Specific humidity ; Temperature data ; Trend analysis ; Trends ; Troposphere ; Vapor pressure ; Vapors ; Vapour pressure ; Variation ; Waste Water Technology ; Water Management ; Water Pollution Control ; Weather ; Wet season</subject><ispartof>Theoretical and applied climatology, 2022-11, Vol.150 (3-4), p.1677-1698</ispartof><rights>The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Austria, part of Springer Nature 2022. Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2022 Springer</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c322t-845ae74d8c4498b6ed6bb4d2ebb9681a6f2041d9f7f32d9bd1f2addf7fd89c2c3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c322t-845ae74d8c4498b6ed6bb4d2ebb9681a6f2041d9f7f32d9bd1f2addf7fd89c2c3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-0215-2492</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Agbo, Emmanuel P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Edet, Collins O.</creatorcontrib><title>Meteorological analysis of the relationship between climatic parameters: understanding the dynamics of the troposphere</title><title>Theoretical and applied climatology</title><addtitle>Theor Appl Climatol</addtitle><description>Understanding the relationship between the variations of meteorological parameters is vital in tackling the climatic problem. This paper presents methods for analyzing parameters that directly or indirectly relate to each other, and accurate methods for interpreting their results. Using obtained and calculated data for 14 years, we adopt the Mann–Kendall (M–K) test for the trend analysis; the Pettit and the standard normal homogeneity test (SNHT) was also used to test for homogeneity or change points for the annual series. Using the Python programming software, the correlation matrixes and linear regression pair plots have been adopted to discern the relationship between all parameters. To crystalize results, partial derivatives relating to the equivalent potential temperature (EPT) for a pseudo-adiabatic process with parameters affecting its variation from equations are obtained. The magnitude of these derivatives’ gradients was used to bolster regression results, showing the mixing ratio (MR) of air as the parameter with the most effect on EPT variation. The MK test results show that the atmospheric pressure (AP) and average ambient temperature (AT) were all increasing significantly for all variations (annual, dry and wet seasons). In contrast, others varied between dry and wet seasons after adopting a benchmark significance level of 5% (0.05). The correlation matrixes and linear regression pair plots show a strong relationship between the variations of refractivity, EPT, the temperature at the lifting condensation level (T L ), MR, vapor pressure (VP), specific humidity (SH), and the dew point temperature (DPT). The potential temperature (PT), saturated vapor pressure (SVP), saturated mixing ratio (SMR), and the AT relationships showed a robust positive correlation/regression. This correlation offers a connection between the AT and the PT. The processes, including the partial derivatives, pair plots, correlation matrixes, and tests for trends, provide a solution to the meteorological analysis problem. Results and methods can be applied in other regions. Graphical abstract Highlights The gradient of the partial differential equations relating the equivalent potential temperature with all parameters affecting her variability shows the direct effect of these parameters on the variation of the equivalent potential temperature. The correlation matrixes and linear regression pair plots shows the similarity between the trends of all meteorological parameters. The correlation matrixes and linear regression pair plots show a strong relationship between the variations of refractivity, equivalent potential temperature, temperature at the lifting condensation level, mixing ratio, vapor pressure, specific humidity, and the dew point temperature. The Standard Normal Homogeneity test (SNHT) and the Pettitt test were applied to test for homogeneity and both tests agree that the atmospheric pressure and maximum temperature data are inhomogeneous and have significant change points. The potential temperature, saturated vapor pressure, saturated mixing ratio, and the average temperature relationships showed a robust positive correlation/regression. Linear regression pair plots as well as the results from the correlation matrixes show a strong relationship between the parameters relating to equivalent potential temperature and refractivity.</description><subject>Adiabatic</subject><subject>Adiabatic processes</subject><subject>Ambient temperature</subject><subject>Analysis</subject><subject>Aquatic Pollution</subject><subject>Atmospheric pressure</subject><subject>Atmospheric Protection/Air Quality Control/Air Pollution</subject><subject>Atmospheric Sciences</subject><subject>Climate</subject><subject>Climate science</subject><subject>Climatology</subject><subject>Condensation</subject><subject>Correlation</subject><subject>Correlation analysis</subject><subject>Derivatives</subject><subject>Dew</subject><subject>Dew point</subject><subject>Differential equations</subject><subject>Earth and Environmental Science</subject><subject>Earth Sciences</subject><subject>Equivalence</subject><subject>Equivalent potential temperature</subject><subject>Homogeneity</subject><subject>Humidity</subject><subject>Lifting</subject><subject>Lifting condensation level</subject><subject>Mathematical analysis</subject><subject>Maximum temperatures</subject><subject>Meteorological parameters</subject><subject>Methods</subject><subject>Mixing ratio</subject><subject>Original Paper</subject><subject>Parameters</subject><subject>Partial differential equations</subject><subject>Potential temperature</subject><subject>Process parameters</subject><subject>Programming languages</subject><subject>Rainy season</subject><subject>Refractive index</subject><subject>Refractivity</subject><subject>Regression</subject><subject>Regression analysis</subject><subject>Robustness (mathematics)</subject><subject>Specific humidity</subject><subject>Temperature data</subject><subject>Trend analysis</subject><subject>Trends</subject><subject>Troposphere</subject><subject>Vapor pressure</subject><subject>Vapors</subject><subject>Vapour pressure</subject><subject>Variation</subject><subject>Waste Water Technology</subject><subject>Water Management</subject><subject>Water Pollution Control</subject><subject>Weather</subject><subject>Wet season</subject><issn>0177-798X</issn><issn>1434-4483</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kU9LJDEQxYPsgrOuX8BTgycPrenqTKfbm8iuCoqwf8BbSCeVnkhP0ptk1plvv9EWxcsSSFHF-z0qeYQcVfS0opSfxXxRVlKAkjKAptzukUXFalYy1tafyIJWnJe8ax_2yZcYHyml0DR8Qf7eYUIf_OgHq-RYSCfHXbSx8KZIKywCjjJZ7-LKTkWP6QnRFWq06zxVxSSDXGeDEM-LjdO5Jum0dcMLq3dOrq1680rBTz5OKwz4lXw2cox4-FoPyO_v335dXpe391c3lxe3paoBUtmypUTOdKsY69q-Qd30PdOAfd81bSUbA5RVujPc1KC7XlcGpNa51W2nQNUH5Hj2nYL_s8GYxKPfhPzGKIDXjMGyozSrTmfVIEcU1hmfglT5aMz7e4fG5vkFh4aydgksAycfgKxJuE2D3MQobn7--KiFWauCjzGgEVPI3xd2oqLiOTwxhydyeOIlPLHNUD1DMYvdgOF97_9Q_wAHrqAD</recordid><startdate>20221101</startdate><enddate>20221101</enddate><creator>Agbo, Emmanuel P.</creator><creator>Edet, Collins O.</creator><general>Springer Vienna</general><general>Springer</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>ISR</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QH</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7TN</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>BKSAR</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H96</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>PCBAR</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0215-2492</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20221101</creationdate><title>Meteorological analysis of the relationship between climatic parameters: understanding the dynamics of the troposphere</title><author>Agbo, Emmanuel P. ; Edet, Collins O.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c322t-845ae74d8c4498b6ed6bb4d2ebb9681a6f2041d9f7f32d9bd1f2addf7fd89c2c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Adiabatic</topic><topic>Adiabatic processes</topic><topic>Ambient temperature</topic><topic>Analysis</topic><topic>Aquatic Pollution</topic><topic>Atmospheric pressure</topic><topic>Atmospheric Protection/Air Quality Control/Air Pollution</topic><topic>Atmospheric Sciences</topic><topic>Climate</topic><topic>Climate science</topic><topic>Climatology</topic><topic>Condensation</topic><topic>Correlation</topic><topic>Correlation analysis</topic><topic>Derivatives</topic><topic>Dew</topic><topic>Dew point</topic><topic>Differential equations</topic><topic>Earth and Environmental Science</topic><topic>Earth Sciences</topic><topic>Equivalence</topic><topic>Equivalent potential temperature</topic><topic>Homogeneity</topic><topic>Humidity</topic><topic>Lifting</topic><topic>Lifting condensation level</topic><topic>Mathematical analysis</topic><topic>Maximum temperatures</topic><topic>Meteorological parameters</topic><topic>Methods</topic><topic>Mixing ratio</topic><topic>Original Paper</topic><topic>Parameters</topic><topic>Partial differential equations</topic><topic>Potential temperature</topic><topic>Process parameters</topic><topic>Programming languages</topic><topic>Rainy season</topic><topic>Refractive index</topic><topic>Refractivity</topic><topic>Regression</topic><topic>Regression analysis</topic><topic>Robustness (mathematics)</topic><topic>Specific humidity</topic><topic>Temperature data</topic><topic>Trend analysis</topic><topic>Trends</topic><topic>Troposphere</topic><topic>Vapor pressure</topic><topic>Vapors</topic><topic>Vapour pressure</topic><topic>Variation</topic><topic>Waste Water Technology</topic><topic>Water Management</topic><topic>Water Pollution Control</topic><topic>Weather</topic><topic>Wet season</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Agbo, Emmanuel P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Edet, Collins O.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Science</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Aqualine</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Oceanic Abstracts</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Materials Science &amp; Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric &amp; Aquatic Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 2: Ocean Technology, Policy &amp; Non-Living Resources</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric &amp; Aquatic Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Engineering collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Theoretical and applied climatology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Agbo, Emmanuel P.</au><au>Edet, Collins O.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Meteorological analysis of the relationship between climatic parameters: understanding the dynamics of the troposphere</atitle><jtitle>Theoretical and applied climatology</jtitle><stitle>Theor Appl Climatol</stitle><date>2022-11-01</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>150</volume><issue>3-4</issue><spage>1677</spage><epage>1698</epage><pages>1677-1698</pages><issn>0177-798X</issn><eissn>1434-4483</eissn><abstract>Understanding the relationship between the variations of meteorological parameters is vital in tackling the climatic problem. This paper presents methods for analyzing parameters that directly or indirectly relate to each other, and accurate methods for interpreting their results. Using obtained and calculated data for 14 years, we adopt the Mann–Kendall (M–K) test for the trend analysis; the Pettit and the standard normal homogeneity test (SNHT) was also used to test for homogeneity or change points for the annual series. Using the Python programming software, the correlation matrixes and linear regression pair plots have been adopted to discern the relationship between all parameters. To crystalize results, partial derivatives relating to the equivalent potential temperature (EPT) for a pseudo-adiabatic process with parameters affecting its variation from equations are obtained. The magnitude of these derivatives’ gradients was used to bolster regression results, showing the mixing ratio (MR) of air as the parameter with the most effect on EPT variation. The MK test results show that the atmospheric pressure (AP) and average ambient temperature (AT) were all increasing significantly for all variations (annual, dry and wet seasons). In contrast, others varied between dry and wet seasons after adopting a benchmark significance level of 5% (0.05). The correlation matrixes and linear regression pair plots show a strong relationship between the variations of refractivity, EPT, the temperature at the lifting condensation level (T L ), MR, vapor pressure (VP), specific humidity (SH), and the dew point temperature (DPT). The potential temperature (PT), saturated vapor pressure (SVP), saturated mixing ratio (SMR), and the AT relationships showed a robust positive correlation/regression. This correlation offers a connection between the AT and the PT. The processes, including the partial derivatives, pair plots, correlation matrixes, and tests for trends, provide a solution to the meteorological analysis problem. Results and methods can be applied in other regions. Graphical abstract Highlights The gradient of the partial differential equations relating the equivalent potential temperature with all parameters affecting her variability shows the direct effect of these parameters on the variation of the equivalent potential temperature. The correlation matrixes and linear regression pair plots shows the similarity between the trends of all meteorological parameters. The correlation matrixes and linear regression pair plots show a strong relationship between the variations of refractivity, equivalent potential temperature, temperature at the lifting condensation level, mixing ratio, vapor pressure, specific humidity, and the dew point temperature. The Standard Normal Homogeneity test (SNHT) and the Pettitt test were applied to test for homogeneity and both tests agree that the atmospheric pressure and maximum temperature data are inhomogeneous and have significant change points. The potential temperature, saturated vapor pressure, saturated mixing ratio, and the average temperature relationships showed a robust positive correlation/regression. Linear regression pair plots as well as the results from the correlation matrixes show a strong relationship between the parameters relating to equivalent potential temperature and refractivity.</abstract><cop>Vienna</cop><pub>Springer Vienna</pub><doi>10.1007/s00704-022-04226-x</doi><tpages>22</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0215-2492</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0177-798X
ispartof Theoretical and applied climatology, 2022-11, Vol.150 (3-4), p.1677-1698
issn 0177-798X
1434-4483
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2734425900
source Springer Nature
subjects Adiabatic
Adiabatic processes
Ambient temperature
Analysis
Aquatic Pollution
Atmospheric pressure
Atmospheric Protection/Air Quality Control/Air Pollution
Atmospheric Sciences
Climate
Climate science
Climatology
Condensation
Correlation
Correlation analysis
Derivatives
Dew
Dew point
Differential equations
Earth and Environmental Science
Earth Sciences
Equivalence
Equivalent potential temperature
Homogeneity
Humidity
Lifting
Lifting condensation level
Mathematical analysis
Maximum temperatures
Meteorological parameters
Methods
Mixing ratio
Original Paper
Parameters
Partial differential equations
Potential temperature
Process parameters
Programming languages
Rainy season
Refractive index
Refractivity
Regression
Regression analysis
Robustness (mathematics)
Specific humidity
Temperature data
Trend analysis
Trends
Troposphere
Vapor pressure
Vapors
Vapour pressure
Variation
Waste Water Technology
Water Management
Water Pollution Control
Weather
Wet season
title Meteorological analysis of the relationship between climatic parameters: understanding the dynamics of the troposphere
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-01T21%3A35%3A27IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Meteorological%20analysis%20of%20the%20relationship%20between%20climatic%20parameters:%20understanding%20the%20dynamics%20of%20the%20troposphere&rft.jtitle=Theoretical%20and%20applied%20climatology&rft.au=Agbo,%20Emmanuel%20P.&rft.date=2022-11-01&rft.volume=150&rft.issue=3-4&rft.spage=1677&rft.epage=1698&rft.pages=1677-1698&rft.issn=0177-798X&rft.eissn=1434-4483&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s00704-022-04226-x&rft_dat=%3Cgale_proqu%3EA726048524%3C/gale_proqu%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c322t-845ae74d8c4498b6ed6bb4d2ebb9681a6f2041d9f7f32d9bd1f2addf7fd89c2c3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2734425900&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_galeid=A726048524&rfr_iscdi=true