Assessment of Seasonal Changes on the Carbon Cycle in the Critical Zone of a Surface Water (SW)–Groundwater (GW) System

• Published in: Water (Basel) 2022-11, Vol.14 (21), p.3372
• Main Authors: Karlović, Igor, Marković, Tamara, Kanduč, Tjaša, Vreča, Polona
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Aquifers; Atmosphere; Biogeochemistry; Carbon; Carbon cycle; Carbon dioxide; Carbon sources; Creeks & streams; Dissolved organic carbon; Geochemistry; Gravel; Gravel pits; Groundwater; Groundwater discharge; Groundwater quality; Hydroelectric plants; Hydroelectric power; Hydrology; Indicators; Photosynthesis; Precipitation; Respiration; Sand & gravel; Seasonal variations; Surface water; Surface-groundwater relations; Sustainability management; Sustainable use; Water management; Water quality
• ISSN: 2073-4441; 2073-4441
• DOI: 10.3390/w14213372

Groundwater is a valuable source of water for human consumption, and its quality is a current issue worldwide. Understanding carbon and water cycling presents the basis of biogeochemical reactions occurring in the aquifer; therefore, understanding their interaction is imperative for sustainable water management. In the paper, this interaction was investigated within the complex surface water (SW)–groundwater (GW) system in the Varaždin region (Croatia) by using a multi-parameter approach: δ13CDIC values, carbon species (DIC, DOC), δ18O and δ2H values, geochemical indicators (T, pH, DO, EC), and δ13C measurements in solids. Both δ18O/δ2H and δ13CDIC were recognized as good indicators to differentiate shallow and deep GW. Transit time of water (TT) was evaluated as an important parameter in controlling carbon cycling within the SW–GW system. Shallow GW is characterized by shorter TT, seasonal changes in carbon species and δ13CDIC, and lower possibility of carbon capture in the system. Deep GW has longer TT without pronounced seasonal changes in carbon species and δ13CDIC. The conceptual model of the carbon cycle revealed major sources and sinks of CO2 in the study area. Our results suggest that GW acts as both source and sink for CO2, depending on the prevailing geochemical process. Surface waters are primarily a source of CO2, excluding the gravel pit, which acts primarily as a sink for CO2. Our study shows that the current SW–GW dynamics regulate carbon balance without having negative impacts on groundwater quality but also demonstrates that implementing carbon cycle in water management studies is of vital importance for sustainable use of groundwater.