Loading…

Empowering Lone Parents to Progress towards Employability

Policymakers in liberal welfare states like the UK have prioritised extending the reach of compulsory activation to target vulnerable jobseeker groups, such as lone parents. However, such interventions – especially when combined with intensified welfare conditionality – appear to have had limited po...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of social policy 2022-10, Vol.51 (4), p.856-875
Main Authors: LINDSAY, COLIN, PEARSON, SARAH, BATTY, ELAINE, CULLEN, ANNE MARIE, EADSON, WILL
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c360t-7490c5693470b9604d3f8dc90c242c74dc15b2e53678edc5091f24cf029834623
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c360t-7490c5693470b9604d3f8dc90c242c74dc15b2e53678edc5091f24cf029834623
container_end_page 875
container_issue 4
container_start_page 856
container_title Journal of social policy
container_volume 51
creator LINDSAY, COLIN
PEARSON, SARAH
BATTY, ELAINE
CULLEN, ANNE MARIE
EADSON, WILL
description Policymakers in liberal welfare states like the UK have prioritised extending the reach of compulsory activation to target vulnerable jobseeker groups, such as lone parents. However, such interventions – especially when combined with intensified welfare conditionality – appear to have had limited positive effects on lone parents’ employability, while often negatively impacting wellbeing. This article argues that the problem is a disconnect between the complex barriers to employability faced by lone parents (including their need to balance work and caring) and the content of ‘work-first’ activation favoured by successive UK Governments. We report positive findings from in-depth interviews with lone parents and key stakeholders involved in more person-centred, non-compulsory local employability services. Multi-agency service delivery, collaborative governance and a clear role for user voice in programme design were important facilitators of positive experiences. Our analysis points to the need for services that empower lone parents to make choices to progress towards employment while supporting family life.
doi_str_mv 10.1017/S0047279421000283
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2736070158</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><cupid>10_1017_S0047279421000283</cupid><sourcerecordid>2736070158</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c360t-7490c5693470b9604d3f8dc90c242c74dc15b2e53678edc5091f24cf029834623</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kEtLw0AUhQdRMFZ_gLuA6-idR-axlFKtELCgrkMymYSUJBNnUkr-vRNacCGu7uWe75wDF6F7DI8YsHj6AGCCCMUIBgAi6QWKMOMqEZLQSxQtcrLo1-jG-31gOJNphNSmH-3RuHZo4swOJt4VzgyTjycb75xtnPHLfixc5ePAdnYuyrZrp_kWXdVF583dea7Q18vmc71NsvfXt_VzlmjKYUoEU6BTrigTUCoOrKK1rHQ4Eka0YJXGaUlMSrmQptIpKFwTpmsgSlLGCV2hh1Pu6Oz3wfgp39uDG0JlTkSoEIBTGSh8orSz3jtT56Nr-8LNOYZ8-VD-50PBQ8-eoi9dWzXmN_p_1w8FWGXz</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2736070158</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Empowering Lone Parents to Progress towards Employability</title><source>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><source>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</source><source>Cambridge Journals Online</source><source>Social Science Premium Collection</source><source>ABI/INFORM Global</source><source>Politics Collection</source><source>Sociology Collection</source><source>PAIS Index</source><source>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</source><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><creator>LINDSAY, COLIN ; PEARSON, SARAH ; BATTY, ELAINE ; CULLEN, ANNE MARIE ; EADSON, WILL</creator><creatorcontrib>LINDSAY, COLIN ; PEARSON, SARAH ; BATTY, ELAINE ; CULLEN, ANNE MARIE ; EADSON, WILL</creatorcontrib><description>Policymakers in liberal welfare states like the UK have prioritised extending the reach of compulsory activation to target vulnerable jobseeker groups, such as lone parents. However, such interventions – especially when combined with intensified welfare conditionality – appear to have had limited positive effects on lone parents’ employability, while often negatively impacting wellbeing. This article argues that the problem is a disconnect between the complex barriers to employability faced by lone parents (including their need to balance work and caring) and the content of ‘work-first’ activation favoured by successive UK Governments. We report positive findings from in-depth interviews with lone parents and key stakeholders involved in more person-centred, non-compulsory local employability services. Multi-agency service delivery, collaborative governance and a clear role for user voice in programme design were important facilitators of positive experiences. Our analysis points to the need for services that empower lone parents to make choices to progress towards employment while supporting family life.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0047-2794</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1469-7823</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1017/S0047279421000283</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press</publisher><subject>Employability ; Employment ; Empowerment ; Families &amp; family life ; Family work relationship ; Governance ; Intervention ; Labor market ; Parents &amp; parenting ; Policy making ; Poverty ; Self-efficacy ; Single parents ; Social policy ; Welfare ; Well being ; Work</subject><ispartof>Journal of social policy, 2022-10, Vol.51 (4), p.856-875</ispartof><rights>The Author(s), 2021. Published by Cambridge University Press</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c360t-7490c5693470b9604d3f8dc90c242c74dc15b2e53678edc5091f24cf029834623</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c360t-7490c5693470b9604d3f8dc90c242c74dc15b2e53678edc5091f24cf029834623</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-2493-6797</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2736070158/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2736070158?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,11688,12845,12846,12847,21387,21394,21395,27344,27866,27924,27925,30999,33223,33611,33774,33985,34530,36060,43733,43948,44115,44363,72960,74221,74468,74639,74895</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>LINDSAY, COLIN</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>PEARSON, SARAH</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>BATTY, ELAINE</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>CULLEN, ANNE MARIE</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>EADSON, WILL</creatorcontrib><title>Empowering Lone Parents to Progress towards Employability</title><title>Journal of social policy</title><addtitle>J. Soc. Pol</addtitle><description>Policymakers in liberal welfare states like the UK have prioritised extending the reach of compulsory activation to target vulnerable jobseeker groups, such as lone parents. However, such interventions – especially when combined with intensified welfare conditionality – appear to have had limited positive effects on lone parents’ employability, while often negatively impacting wellbeing. This article argues that the problem is a disconnect between the complex barriers to employability faced by lone parents (including their need to balance work and caring) and the content of ‘work-first’ activation favoured by successive UK Governments. We report positive findings from in-depth interviews with lone parents and key stakeholders involved in more person-centred, non-compulsory local employability services. Multi-agency service delivery, collaborative governance and a clear role for user voice in programme design were important facilitators of positive experiences. Our analysis points to the need for services that empower lone parents to make choices to progress towards employment while supporting family life.</description><subject>Employability</subject><subject>Employment</subject><subject>Empowerment</subject><subject>Families &amp; family life</subject><subject>Family work relationship</subject><subject>Governance</subject><subject>Intervention</subject><subject>Labor market</subject><subject>Parents &amp; parenting</subject><subject>Policy making</subject><subject>Poverty</subject><subject>Self-efficacy</subject><subject>Single parents</subject><subject>Social policy</subject><subject>Welfare</subject><subject>Well being</subject><subject>Work</subject><issn>0047-2794</issn><issn>1469-7823</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><sourceid>7TQ</sourceid><sourceid>7UB</sourceid><sourceid>8BJ</sourceid><sourceid>ALSLI</sourceid><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><sourceid>DPSOV</sourceid><sourceid>HEHIP</sourceid><sourceid>M0C</sourceid><sourceid>M2L</sourceid><sourceid>M2R</sourceid><sourceid>M2S</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kEtLw0AUhQdRMFZ_gLuA6-idR-axlFKtELCgrkMymYSUJBNnUkr-vRNacCGu7uWe75wDF6F7DI8YsHj6AGCCCMUIBgAi6QWKMOMqEZLQSxQtcrLo1-jG-31gOJNphNSmH-3RuHZo4swOJt4VzgyTjycb75xtnPHLfixc5ePAdnYuyrZrp_kWXdVF583dea7Q18vmc71NsvfXt_VzlmjKYUoEU6BTrigTUCoOrKK1rHQ4Eka0YJXGaUlMSrmQptIpKFwTpmsgSlLGCV2hh1Pu6Oz3wfgp39uDG0JlTkSoEIBTGSh8orSz3jtT56Nr-8LNOYZ8-VD-50PBQ8-eoi9dWzXmN_p_1w8FWGXz</recordid><startdate>20221001</startdate><enddate>20221001</enddate><creator>LINDSAY, COLIN</creator><creator>PEARSON, SARAH</creator><creator>BATTY, ELAINE</creator><creator>CULLEN, ANNE MARIE</creator><creator>EADSON, WILL</creator><general>Cambridge University Press</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7TQ</scope><scope>7U3</scope><scope>7UB</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88J</scope><scope>8BF</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AN0</scope><scope>AXJJW</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DHY</scope><scope>DON</scope><scope>DPSOV</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>FREBS</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HEHIP</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>KC-</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M0Q</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2L</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2R</scope><scope>M2S</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2493-6797</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20221001</creationdate><title>Empowering Lone Parents to Progress towards Employability</title><author>LINDSAY, COLIN ; PEARSON, SARAH ; BATTY, ELAINE ; CULLEN, ANNE MARIE ; EADSON, WILL</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c360t-7490c5693470b9604d3f8dc90c242c74dc15b2e53678edc5091f24cf029834623</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Employability</topic><topic>Employment</topic><topic>Empowerment</topic><topic>Families &amp; family life</topic><topic>Family work relationship</topic><topic>Governance</topic><topic>Intervention</topic><topic>Labor market</topic><topic>Parents &amp; parenting</topic><topic>Policy making</topic><topic>Poverty</topic><topic>Self-efficacy</topic><topic>Single parents</topic><topic>Social policy</topic><topic>Welfare</topic><topic>Well being</topic><topic>Work</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>LINDSAY, COLIN</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>PEARSON, SARAH</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>BATTY, ELAINE</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>CULLEN, ANNE MARIE</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>EADSON, WILL</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database</collection><collection>PAIS Index</collection><collection>Social Services Abstracts</collection><collection>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Proquest)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Social Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>European Business Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>British Nursing Database</collection><collection>Asian &amp; European Business Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>PAIS International</collection><collection>PAIS International (Ovid)</collection><collection>Politics Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Asian &amp; European Business Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>Sociology Collection</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Politics Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>European Business Database</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Political Science Database (Proquest)</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Social Science Database (ProQuest)</collection><collection>Sociology Database (ProQuest)</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>One Business (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Journal of social policy</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>LINDSAY, COLIN</au><au>PEARSON, SARAH</au><au>BATTY, ELAINE</au><au>CULLEN, ANNE MARIE</au><au>EADSON, WILL</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Empowering Lone Parents to Progress towards Employability</atitle><jtitle>Journal of social policy</jtitle><addtitle>J. Soc. Pol</addtitle><date>2022-10-01</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>51</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>856</spage><epage>875</epage><pages>856-875</pages><issn>0047-2794</issn><eissn>1469-7823</eissn><abstract>Policymakers in liberal welfare states like the UK have prioritised extending the reach of compulsory activation to target vulnerable jobseeker groups, such as lone parents. However, such interventions – especially when combined with intensified welfare conditionality – appear to have had limited positive effects on lone parents’ employability, while often negatively impacting wellbeing. This article argues that the problem is a disconnect between the complex barriers to employability faced by lone parents (including their need to balance work and caring) and the content of ‘work-first’ activation favoured by successive UK Governments. We report positive findings from in-depth interviews with lone parents and key stakeholders involved in more person-centred, non-compulsory local employability services. Multi-agency service delivery, collaborative governance and a clear role for user voice in programme design were important facilitators of positive experiences. Our analysis points to the need for services that empower lone parents to make choices to progress towards employment while supporting family life.</abstract><cop>Cambridge, UK</cop><pub>Cambridge University Press</pub><doi>10.1017/S0047279421000283</doi><tpages>20</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2493-6797</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0047-2794
ispartof Journal of social policy, 2022-10, Vol.51 (4), p.856-875
issn 0047-2794
1469-7823
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2736070158
source Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA); International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS); Cambridge Journals Online; Social Science Premium Collection; ABI/INFORM Global; Politics Collection; Sociology Collection; PAIS Index; Worldwide Political Science Abstracts; Sociological Abstracts
subjects Employability
Employment
Empowerment
Families & family life
Family work relationship
Governance
Intervention
Labor market
Parents & parenting
Policy making
Poverty
Self-efficacy
Single parents
Social policy
Welfare
Well being
Work
title Empowering Lone Parents to Progress towards Employability
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-06T18%3A56%3A52IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Empowering%20Lone%20Parents%20to%20Progress%20towards%20Employability&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20social%20policy&rft.au=LINDSAY,%20COLIN&rft.date=2022-10-01&rft.volume=51&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=856&rft.epage=875&rft.pages=856-875&rft.issn=0047-2794&rft.eissn=1469-7823&rft_id=info:doi/10.1017/S0047279421000283&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2736070158%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c360t-7490c5693470b9604d3f8dc90c242c74dc15b2e53678edc5091f24cf029834623%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2736070158&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_cupid=10_1017_S0047279421000283&rfr_iscdi=true