A Comparative Study of Diagnosis and Treatment of Pott's Spine Amongst Specialists and Super Specialists in India

• Published in: Neurology India 2022-09, Vol.70 (8), p.200-205
• Main Authors: Warrier, Siddharth, Chaudhary, Sarvesh, Kalita, Jayantee, Tripathi, Abhilasha, Misra, Usha
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Biopsy; Evaluation; Evidence-based medicine; Medical diagnosis; Methods; Questionnaires; Spine; Surgeons; Tuberculosis
• ISSN: 0028-3886; 1998-4022
• DOI: 10.4103/0028-3886.360937

Background and Objective: There is a paucity of guidelines about the diagnosis and management of Pott's spine. In this study, we report the pattern of practice of diagnosis and treatment of Pott's spine among the specialists and super-specialists in India. Subject and Methods: Response to a 22-item questionnaire regarding the diagnosis and treatment of Pott's spine has been reported. The responses were compared between medical and surgical specialists, residents and consultants, and specialists and super-specialists. There were 84 responders: 42 physicians and 42 surgeons; 48 residents and 36 faculty or consultants; 53 specialists and 31 super-specialists. Results: Thirty-eight responders rarely recommended biopsy whereas others recommended biopsy more frequently, especially the surgeons (P < 0.007). Twenty-five responders recommended immobilization even in an asymptomatic patient whereas 38 would immobilize those with neurological involvement only. All but 4 responders would repeat imaging at different time points. The response of medical treatment was judged at 1 month by 53, and 3 months by 26 responders. Surgery was recommended in a minority of patients-in those with neurological involvement or abscess. Surgeons more frequently biopsied, immobilized the patients, and recommended surgery compared to the physicians. The residents also recommended biopsy and recommended immobilization more frequently compared to consultants or faculty members. Super-specialists more frequently recommended biopsy compared to specialists. Conclusion: There is marked variation in investigations and treatment of Pott's spine patients, suggesting the need for consensus or evidence-based guidelines.