Public Library Building and Development: Understanding Community Consultation and the Design Process

There is an increasing focus on the public library's role as a place of and for the community that should have at its heart the needs of that community. In this respect, the development of new or renovated public libraries offers an opportunity for the design of these new buildings to reflect t...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of the Australian Library and Information Association 2022-10, Vol.71 (4), p.308-327
Main Authors: Wakeling, S., Shephard, M. T., Hider, P., Jamali, H. R., Coe, M., Garner, J.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Architects
Architecture
Australia
Buildings
co-design
community
consultation
Design
Design and construction
Librarians
Library buildings
Library users
participatory design
Planning
Political participation
Public libraries
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:There is an increasing focus on the public library's role as a place of and for the community that should have at its heart the needs of that community. In this respect, the development of new or renovated public libraries offers an opportunity for the design of these new buildings to reflect the needs and wants of the communities they serve. The aim of this project was to develop an in-depth understanding of the views and approaches of both librarians and architects involved in public library development projects in Australia. Using data gathered through semi-structured interviews this paper explores notions of community-focused design and co-design and the implications of involving the community in the process of library design for six public library development projects. Participants described a range of community engagement activities, relating benefits and challenges to the community consultation process. However, it was noted that there was also a curated nature to this input, and there was little evidence of community engagement extending beyond consultation to truly participatory design.
ISSN:2475-0158
2475-0166
DOI:10.1080/24750158.2022.2115587