Spatial Comparative Analysis of Landscape Fragmentation Metrics in a Watershed with Diverse Land Uses in Iran

• Published in: Sustainability 2022-11, Vol.14 (22), p.14876
• Main Authors: Alaei, Nazila, Mostafazadeh, Raoof, Esmali Ouri, Abazar, Hazbavi, Zeinab, Sharari, Mearaj, Huang, Guangwei
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Clustering; Cold; Comparative analysis; Dryland farming; Environment; Environmental aspects; Fragmentation; Habitat destruction; Hydrology; Iran; Land degradation; Land management; Land use; Landscape; Lowlands; National parks; Principal components analysis; Spatial analysis; Sustainability; Sustainability management; Trend analysis; Urban planning; Watersheds
• ISSN: 2071-1050; 2071-1050
• DOI: 10.3390/su142214876

Knowledge of landscape fragmentation is known to be important in ecological integrity, hydrological processes, urban planning, sustainable land management, and policymaking. Recent anecdotal studies reveal a need for analytical quantification of landscape fragmentation at different levels. Therefore, the present study was conducted at KoozehTopraghi Watershed, Ardabil Province, Iran, where covers by different land uses/covers, to (a) explore the spatial pattern of landscape fragmentation metrics comprehensively in different scales, (b) distinguish the landscape fragmentation hot spots, and (c) investigate the spatial clustering of landscape fragmentation metrics. The behaviors of 7, 10, and 13 fragmentation metrics concerning three levels of patch, class, and landscape across 36 sub-watersheds were explored using principal component analysis (PCA) and expert elicitation. The Getis-Ord Gi* and local Moran’s I indices were also used to analyze the hot spots and clusters of landscape fragmentation, respectively. The results verified the high degree of spatial variability of the metrics in the three levels of fragmentation analysis. The class-level fragmentation analysis showed that the watershed is characterized by high-fragmented residential land use and low-fragmented dry farming land use. The spatial trend analysis at the landscape level further indicated that sub-watersheds 1, 2, 11, 21, to 26, and 34 to 36, mainly located in lowlands and central parts, allocated better status considering the fragmentation metrics rather than other parts of the watershed. The significant hot spots and high clusters of fragmentation also were distributed in different parts of the watershed in terms of various landscape metrics.