Loading…
Multi-criteria sustainability performance assessment of horticultural crops using DEA and ELECTRE IV methods
This paper presents a novel approach to multi-criteria sustainability performance assessment of horticultural crops. The crops are ranked by the decision-making method ELECTRE IV with environmental, energy and technological criteria. In total eight indicators are taken into consideration and calcula...
Saved in:
Published in: | Renewable agriculture and food systems 2022-12, Vol.37 (6), p.649-659 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c247t-619723060cc2502697342cb72546bece0fa1a147868bbf57c1d5cf75afbbb1ea3 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c247t-619723060cc2502697342cb72546bece0fa1a147868bbf57c1d5cf75afbbb1ea3 |
container_end_page | 659 |
container_issue | 6 |
container_start_page | 649 |
container_title | Renewable agriculture and food systems |
container_volume | 37 |
creator | Banaeian, Narges Zangeneh, Morteza Golinska-Dawson, Paulina |
description | This paper presents a novel approach to multi-criteria sustainability performance assessment of horticultural crops. The crops are ranked by the decision-making method ELECTRE IV with environmental, energy and technological criteria. In total eight indicators are taken into consideration and calculated based on primary data collected from over 260 farms in northern Iran. Additionally, Data Envelopment Analysis is used to calculate the technical efficiency and potential for energy saving by different management of the production units. The novel contribution of this study is the comparison of several horticultural products (oranges, kiwis, persimmons and tangerines), when most of the previous studies have focused on one product. Moreover, novel calculations of the carbon footprint are presented for oranges, tangerines and persimmons. This paper also includes the first study on the environmental impact of persimmon fruit's production. The obtained results show that energy efficiency for orange, tangerine, kiwi and persimmon products: 1.1, 0.84, 0.53 and 1.22, respectively. In each hectare of kiwi orchards, the amount of CO2 emissions of 1219 kg and the ecological footprint of 3.21 hectares have been calculated, which is statistically significant compared to orange, tangerine and persimmon. The chemical and fuel inputs have the greatest potential for reducing energy consumption in the studied products. Results of ELECTRE IV showed that kiwi is the most sustainable selection for the studied region followed by orange, persimmon and tangerine, respectively. Kiwi has also relatively low technical efficiency. This means that this product has the greatest potential for a reduction of energy consumption, while maintaining the same amount of crop. It is recommended to include the development of kiwi orchards in the policies of Guilan, but with more careful management of the production inputs. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1017/S1742170522000242 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2740426159</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><cupid>10_1017_S1742170522000242</cupid><sourcerecordid>2740426159</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c247t-619723060cc2502697342cb72546bece0fa1a147868bbf57c1d5cf75afbbb1ea3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kE9LAzEQxYMoWKsfwFvA82qSTTbtsdS1FiqCVq9Lkk3alP1nJnvot3dLix7E0wzD-715PIRuKbmnhMqHdyo5o5IIxgghjLMzNDqcEippev6zE3GJrgB2g2QylekIVS99FX1igo82eIWhh6h8o7SvfNzjzgbXhlo1xmIFYAFq20TcOrxtQ_RmgPugKmxC2wHuwTcb_JjPsGpKnK_y-fotx8tPXNu4bUu4RhdOVWBvTnOMPp7y9fw5Wb0ulvPZKjGMy5hkdCpZSjJiDBOEZUNQzoyWTPBMW2OJU1RRLifZRGsnpKGlME4K5bTW1Kp0jO6Ovl1ov3oLsdi1fWiGlwWTnHCWUTEdVPSoGsIDBOuKLvhahX1BSXEotfhT6sCkJ0bVOvhyY3-t_6e-AUrHeWk</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2740426159</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Multi-criteria sustainability performance assessment of horticultural crops using DEA and ELECTRE IV methods</title><source>Cambridge Journals Online</source><creator>Banaeian, Narges ; Zangeneh, Morteza ; Golinska-Dawson, Paulina</creator><creatorcontrib>Banaeian, Narges ; Zangeneh, Morteza ; Golinska-Dawson, Paulina</creatorcontrib><description>This paper presents a novel approach to multi-criteria sustainability performance assessment of horticultural crops. The crops are ranked by the decision-making method ELECTRE IV with environmental, energy and technological criteria. In total eight indicators are taken into consideration and calculated based on primary data collected from over 260 farms in northern Iran. Additionally, Data Envelopment Analysis is used to calculate the technical efficiency and potential for energy saving by different management of the production units. The novel contribution of this study is the comparison of several horticultural products (oranges, kiwis, persimmons and tangerines), when most of the previous studies have focused on one product. Moreover, novel calculations of the carbon footprint are presented for oranges, tangerines and persimmons. This paper also includes the first study on the environmental impact of persimmon fruit's production. The obtained results show that energy efficiency for orange, tangerine, kiwi and persimmon products: 1.1, 0.84, 0.53 and 1.22, respectively. In each hectare of kiwi orchards, the amount of CO2 emissions of 1219 kg and the ecological footprint of 3.21 hectares have been calculated, which is statistically significant compared to orange, tangerine and persimmon. The chemical and fuel inputs have the greatest potential for reducing energy consumption in the studied products. Results of ELECTRE IV showed that kiwi is the most sustainable selection for the studied region followed by orange, persimmon and tangerine, respectively. Kiwi has also relatively low technical efficiency. This means that this product has the greatest potential for a reduction of energy consumption, while maintaining the same amount of crop. It is recommended to include the development of kiwi orchards in the policies of Guilan, but with more careful management of the production inputs.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1742-1705</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1742-1713</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1017/S1742170522000242</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press</publisher><subject>Agriculture ; Carbon dioxide ; Carbon dioxide emissions ; Carbon footprint ; Citrus fruits ; Climate change ; Crops ; Data envelopment analysis ; Decision making ; Diospyros ; Ecological footprint ; Efficiency ; Emissions ; Energy conservation ; Energy consumption ; Energy efficiency ; Environmental impact ; Environmental studies ; Farms ; Fertility ; Footprint analysis ; Fruits ; Horticultural crops ; Horticulture ; Mathematical analysis ; Methods ; Multiple criteria decision making ; Multiple criterion ; Natural resources ; Optimization ; Oranges ; Orchards ; Performance assessment ; Persimmons ; Questionnaires ; Statistical analysis ; Sustainability ; Sustainable development ; Tangerines</subject><ispartof>Renewable agriculture and food systems, 2022-12, Vol.37 (6), p.649-659</ispartof><rights>Copyright © The Author(s), 2022. Published by Cambridge University Press</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c247t-619723060cc2502697342cb72546bece0fa1a147868bbf57c1d5cf75afbbb1ea3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c247t-619723060cc2502697342cb72546bece0fa1a147868bbf57c1d5cf75afbbb1ea3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-5821-3805 ; 0000-0001-5618-1654 ; 0000-0002-6510-2396</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S1742170522000242/type/journal_article$$EHTML$$P50$$Gcambridge$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,72960</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Banaeian, Narges</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zangeneh, Morteza</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Golinska-Dawson, Paulina</creatorcontrib><title>Multi-criteria sustainability performance assessment of horticultural crops using DEA and ELECTRE IV methods</title><title>Renewable agriculture and food systems</title><addtitle>Renew. Agric. Food Syst</addtitle><description>This paper presents a novel approach to multi-criteria sustainability performance assessment of horticultural crops. The crops are ranked by the decision-making method ELECTRE IV with environmental, energy and technological criteria. In total eight indicators are taken into consideration and calculated based on primary data collected from over 260 farms in northern Iran. Additionally, Data Envelopment Analysis is used to calculate the technical efficiency and potential for energy saving by different management of the production units. The novel contribution of this study is the comparison of several horticultural products (oranges, kiwis, persimmons and tangerines), when most of the previous studies have focused on one product. Moreover, novel calculations of the carbon footprint are presented for oranges, tangerines and persimmons. This paper also includes the first study on the environmental impact of persimmon fruit's production. The obtained results show that energy efficiency for orange, tangerine, kiwi and persimmon products: 1.1, 0.84, 0.53 and 1.22, respectively. In each hectare of kiwi orchards, the amount of CO2 emissions of 1219 kg and the ecological footprint of 3.21 hectares have been calculated, which is statistically significant compared to orange, tangerine and persimmon. The chemical and fuel inputs have the greatest potential for reducing energy consumption in the studied products. Results of ELECTRE IV showed that kiwi is the most sustainable selection for the studied region followed by orange, persimmon and tangerine, respectively. Kiwi has also relatively low technical efficiency. This means that this product has the greatest potential for a reduction of energy consumption, while maintaining the same amount of crop. It is recommended to include the development of kiwi orchards in the policies of Guilan, but with more careful management of the production inputs.</description><subject>Agriculture</subject><subject>Carbon dioxide</subject><subject>Carbon dioxide emissions</subject><subject>Carbon footprint</subject><subject>Citrus fruits</subject><subject>Climate change</subject><subject>Crops</subject><subject>Data envelopment analysis</subject><subject>Decision making</subject><subject>Diospyros</subject><subject>Ecological footprint</subject><subject>Efficiency</subject><subject>Emissions</subject><subject>Energy conservation</subject><subject>Energy consumption</subject><subject>Energy efficiency</subject><subject>Environmental impact</subject><subject>Environmental studies</subject><subject>Farms</subject><subject>Fertility</subject><subject>Footprint analysis</subject><subject>Fruits</subject><subject>Horticultural crops</subject><subject>Horticulture</subject><subject>Mathematical analysis</subject><subject>Methods</subject><subject>Multiple criteria decision making</subject><subject>Multiple criterion</subject><subject>Natural resources</subject><subject>Optimization</subject><subject>Oranges</subject><subject>Orchards</subject><subject>Performance assessment</subject><subject>Persimmons</subject><subject>Questionnaires</subject><subject>Statistical analysis</subject><subject>Sustainability</subject><subject>Sustainable development</subject><subject>Tangerines</subject><issn>1742-1705</issn><issn>1742-1713</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kE9LAzEQxYMoWKsfwFvA82qSTTbtsdS1FiqCVq9Lkk3alP1nJnvot3dLix7E0wzD-715PIRuKbmnhMqHdyo5o5IIxgghjLMzNDqcEippev6zE3GJrgB2g2QylekIVS99FX1igo82eIWhh6h8o7SvfNzjzgbXhlo1xmIFYAFq20TcOrxtQ_RmgPugKmxC2wHuwTcb_JjPsGpKnK_y-fotx8tPXNu4bUu4RhdOVWBvTnOMPp7y9fw5Wb0ulvPZKjGMy5hkdCpZSjJiDBOEZUNQzoyWTPBMW2OJU1RRLifZRGsnpKGlME4K5bTW1Kp0jO6Ovl1ov3oLsdi1fWiGlwWTnHCWUTEdVPSoGsIDBOuKLvhahX1BSXEotfhT6sCkJ0bVOvhyY3-t_6e-AUrHeWk</recordid><startdate>202212</startdate><enddate>202212</enddate><creator>Banaeian, Narges</creator><creator>Zangeneh, Morteza</creator><creator>Golinska-Dawson, Paulina</creator><general>Cambridge University Press</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RQ</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PADUT</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>R05</scope><scope>SOI</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5821-3805</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5618-1654</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6510-2396</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202212</creationdate><title>Multi-criteria sustainability performance assessment of horticultural crops using DEA and ELECTRE IV methods</title><author>Banaeian, Narges ; Zangeneh, Morteza ; Golinska-Dawson, Paulina</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c247t-619723060cc2502697342cb72546bece0fa1a147868bbf57c1d5cf75afbbb1ea3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Agriculture</topic><topic>Carbon dioxide</topic><topic>Carbon dioxide emissions</topic><topic>Carbon footprint</topic><topic>Citrus fruits</topic><topic>Climate change</topic><topic>Crops</topic><topic>Data envelopment analysis</topic><topic>Decision making</topic><topic>Diospyros</topic><topic>Ecological footprint</topic><topic>Efficiency</topic><topic>Emissions</topic><topic>Energy conservation</topic><topic>Energy consumption</topic><topic>Energy efficiency</topic><topic>Environmental impact</topic><topic>Environmental studies</topic><topic>Farms</topic><topic>Fertility</topic><topic>Footprint analysis</topic><topic>Fruits</topic><topic>Horticultural crops</topic><topic>Horticulture</topic><topic>Mathematical analysis</topic><topic>Methods</topic><topic>Multiple criteria decision making</topic><topic>Multiple criterion</topic><topic>Natural resources</topic><topic>Optimization</topic><topic>Oranges</topic><topic>Orchards</topic><topic>Performance assessment</topic><topic>Persimmons</topic><topic>Questionnaires</topic><topic>Statistical analysis</topic><topic>Sustainability</topic><topic>Sustainable development</topic><topic>Tangerines</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Banaeian, Narges</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zangeneh, Morteza</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Golinska-Dawson, Paulina</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Career & Technical Education Database</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Materials Science & Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Agriculture Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Research Library China</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Engineering collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>University of Michigan</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Renewable agriculture and food systems</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Banaeian, Narges</au><au>Zangeneh, Morteza</au><au>Golinska-Dawson, Paulina</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Multi-criteria sustainability performance assessment of horticultural crops using DEA and ELECTRE IV methods</atitle><jtitle>Renewable agriculture and food systems</jtitle><addtitle>Renew. Agric. Food Syst</addtitle><date>2022-12</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>37</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>649</spage><epage>659</epage><pages>649-659</pages><issn>1742-1705</issn><eissn>1742-1713</eissn><abstract>This paper presents a novel approach to multi-criteria sustainability performance assessment of horticultural crops. The crops are ranked by the decision-making method ELECTRE IV with environmental, energy and technological criteria. In total eight indicators are taken into consideration and calculated based on primary data collected from over 260 farms in northern Iran. Additionally, Data Envelopment Analysis is used to calculate the technical efficiency and potential for energy saving by different management of the production units. The novel contribution of this study is the comparison of several horticultural products (oranges, kiwis, persimmons and tangerines), when most of the previous studies have focused on one product. Moreover, novel calculations of the carbon footprint are presented for oranges, tangerines and persimmons. This paper also includes the first study on the environmental impact of persimmon fruit's production. The obtained results show that energy efficiency for orange, tangerine, kiwi and persimmon products: 1.1, 0.84, 0.53 and 1.22, respectively. In each hectare of kiwi orchards, the amount of CO2 emissions of 1219 kg and the ecological footprint of 3.21 hectares have been calculated, which is statistically significant compared to orange, tangerine and persimmon. The chemical and fuel inputs have the greatest potential for reducing energy consumption in the studied products. Results of ELECTRE IV showed that kiwi is the most sustainable selection for the studied region followed by orange, persimmon and tangerine, respectively. Kiwi has also relatively low technical efficiency. This means that this product has the greatest potential for a reduction of energy consumption, while maintaining the same amount of crop. It is recommended to include the development of kiwi orchards in the policies of Guilan, but with more careful management of the production inputs.</abstract><cop>Cambridge, UK</cop><pub>Cambridge University Press</pub><doi>10.1017/S1742170522000242</doi><tpages>11</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5821-3805</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5618-1654</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6510-2396</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1742-1705 |
ispartof | Renewable agriculture and food systems, 2022-12, Vol.37 (6), p.649-659 |
issn | 1742-1705 1742-1713 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2740426159 |
source | Cambridge Journals Online |
subjects | Agriculture Carbon dioxide Carbon dioxide emissions Carbon footprint Citrus fruits Climate change Crops Data envelopment analysis Decision making Diospyros Ecological footprint Efficiency Emissions Energy conservation Energy consumption Energy efficiency Environmental impact Environmental studies Farms Fertility Footprint analysis Fruits Horticultural crops Horticulture Mathematical analysis Methods Multiple criteria decision making Multiple criterion Natural resources Optimization Oranges Orchards Performance assessment Persimmons Questionnaires Statistical analysis Sustainability Sustainable development Tangerines |
title | Multi-criteria sustainability performance assessment of horticultural crops using DEA and ELECTRE IV methods |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-26T22%3A58%3A38IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Multi-criteria%20sustainability%20performance%20assessment%20of%20horticultural%20crops%20using%20DEA%20and%20ELECTRE%20IV%20methods&rft.jtitle=Renewable%20agriculture%20and%20food%20systems&rft.au=Banaeian,%20Narges&rft.date=2022-12&rft.volume=37&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=649&rft.epage=659&rft.pages=649-659&rft.issn=1742-1705&rft.eissn=1742-1713&rft_id=info:doi/10.1017/S1742170522000242&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2740426159%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c247t-619723060cc2502697342cb72546bece0fa1a147868bbf57c1d5cf75afbbb1ea3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2740426159&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_cupid=10_1017_S1742170522000242&rfr_iscdi=true |