Loading…
Hydro Economic Asymmetries and Common‐Pool Overdraft in Transboundary Aquifers
The common‐pool nature of groundwater resources creates incentives to over pump that contribute to their rapid global depletion. In transboundary aquifers, users are separated by a territorial border and might face substantially different economic and hydrogeologic conditions that can alternatively...
Saved in:
Published in: | Water resources research 2022-11, Vol.58 (11), p.n/a |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a3257-f7cacb9a1c4144f62382fd8652ac29489ca94639e787ba3c04dc7635825f81d83 |
container_end_page | n/a |
container_issue | 11 |
container_start_page | |
container_title | Water resources research |
container_volume | 58 |
creator | Mullen, Connor Müller, Marc F. Penny, Gopal Hung, Fengwei Bolster, Diogo |
description | The common‐pool nature of groundwater resources creates incentives to over pump that contribute to their rapid global depletion. In transboundary aquifers, users are separated by a territorial border and might face substantially different economic and hydrogeologic conditions that can alternatively dampen or amplify incentives to over pump. We develop a theoretical model that couples principles of game theory and groundwater flow to capture the combined effect of well locations and user asymmetries on pumping incentives. We find that heterogeneities across users (here referred to as asymmetries) in terms of either energy cost, groundwater profitability or aquifer response tend to dampen incentives to over pump. However, combinations of two or more types of asymmetry can substantially amplify common‐pool overdraft, particularly when the same user simultaneously faces comparatively higher costs (or aquifer response) and profitability. We use this theoretical insight to interpret the emergence of the Disi agreement between Saudi Arabia and Jordan in association with the Disi‐Amman water pipeline. By using bounded non‐dimensional parameters to encode user asymmetries and groundwater connectivity, the theory provides a tractable generalized framework to understand the premature depletion of shared aquifers, whether transboundary or not.
Key Points
Economic and hydrogeologic differences between users affect common‐pool externalities in shared aquifers
When combined, asymmetries in energy cost, groundwater profitability and aquifer response can exacerbate incentives to overpump
Changing asymmetry conditions might have facilitated the world's first distance‐based groundwater treaty |
doi_str_mv | 10.1029/2022WR032136 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2740532758</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2740532758</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a3257-f7cacb9a1c4144f62382fd8652ac29489ca94639e787ba3c04dc7635825f81d83</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp90MtKAzEYBeAgCtbqzgcIuHU0t5kkyzLUVii0lEqXIc0FpnQmbdJRZucj-Iw-iVPqwpWrf_Pxn8MB4B6jJ4yIfCaIkPUSUYJpcQEGWDKWccnpJRggxGiGqeTX4CalLUKY5QUfgMW0szHAsQlNqCsDR6mra3eMlUtQNxaWoa5D8_35tQhhB-fvLtqo_RFWDVxF3aRNaBurYwdHh7byLqZbcOX1Lrm73zsEby_jVTnNZvPJazmaZZqSnGeeG202UmPDMGO-IFQQb0WRE22IZEIaLVlBpeOCbzQ1iFnDC5oLknuBraBD8HD-u4_h0Lp0VNvQxqaPVIQzlFPC85N6PCsTQ0rRebWPVd33VRip02bq72Y9p2f-Ue1c969V62W5JEUfQ38Af0dt4w</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2740532758</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Hydro Economic Asymmetries and Common‐Pool Overdraft in Transboundary Aquifers</title><source>Wiley-Blackwell AGU Digital Library</source><creator>Mullen, Connor ; Müller, Marc F. ; Penny, Gopal ; Hung, Fengwei ; Bolster, Diogo</creator><creatorcontrib>Mullen, Connor ; Müller, Marc F. ; Penny, Gopal ; Hung, Fengwei ; Bolster, Diogo</creatorcontrib><description>The common‐pool nature of groundwater resources creates incentives to over pump that contribute to their rapid global depletion. In transboundary aquifers, users are separated by a territorial border and might face substantially different economic and hydrogeologic conditions that can alternatively dampen or amplify incentives to over pump. We develop a theoretical model that couples principles of game theory and groundwater flow to capture the combined effect of well locations and user asymmetries on pumping incentives. We find that heterogeneities across users (here referred to as asymmetries) in terms of either energy cost, groundwater profitability or aquifer response tend to dampen incentives to over pump. However, combinations of two or more types of asymmetry can substantially amplify common‐pool overdraft, particularly when the same user simultaneously faces comparatively higher costs (or aquifer response) and profitability. We use this theoretical insight to interpret the emergence of the Disi agreement between Saudi Arabia and Jordan in association with the Disi‐Amman water pipeline. By using bounded non‐dimensional parameters to encode user asymmetries and groundwater connectivity, the theory provides a tractable generalized framework to understand the premature depletion of shared aquifers, whether transboundary or not.
Key Points
Economic and hydrogeologic differences between users affect common‐pool externalities in shared aquifers
When combined, asymmetries in energy cost, groundwater profitability and aquifer response can exacerbate incentives to overpump
Changing asymmetry conditions might have facilitated the world's first distance‐based groundwater treaty</description><identifier>ISSN: 0043-1397</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1944-7973</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1029/2022WR032136</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Washington: John Wiley & Sons, Inc</publisher><subject>Amplification ; Aquifers ; Asymmetry ; coupled human‐water systems ; Depletion ; Economics ; Energy costs ; Game theory ; Groundwater ; Groundwater flow ; Groundwater resources ; Hydrogeology ; Incentives ; Overdraft ; Profitability ; transboundary aquifer ; Transboundary waters ; Water pipelines ; Water resources</subject><ispartof>Water resources research, 2022-11, Vol.58 (11), p.n/a</ispartof><rights>2022. American Geophysical Union. All Rights Reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-a3257-f7cacb9a1c4144f62382fd8652ac29489ca94639e787ba3c04dc7635825f81d83</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-1996-2536 ; 0000-0001-6406-8184 ; 0000-0003-3960-4090 ; 0000-0001-6628-1026</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1029%2F2022WR032136$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1029%2F2022WR032136$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,11514,27924,27925,46468,46892</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Mullen, Connor</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Müller, Marc F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Penny, Gopal</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hung, Fengwei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bolster, Diogo</creatorcontrib><title>Hydro Economic Asymmetries and Common‐Pool Overdraft in Transboundary Aquifers</title><title>Water resources research</title><description>The common‐pool nature of groundwater resources creates incentives to over pump that contribute to their rapid global depletion. In transboundary aquifers, users are separated by a territorial border and might face substantially different economic and hydrogeologic conditions that can alternatively dampen or amplify incentives to over pump. We develop a theoretical model that couples principles of game theory and groundwater flow to capture the combined effect of well locations and user asymmetries on pumping incentives. We find that heterogeneities across users (here referred to as asymmetries) in terms of either energy cost, groundwater profitability or aquifer response tend to dampen incentives to over pump. However, combinations of two or more types of asymmetry can substantially amplify common‐pool overdraft, particularly when the same user simultaneously faces comparatively higher costs (or aquifer response) and profitability. We use this theoretical insight to interpret the emergence of the Disi agreement between Saudi Arabia and Jordan in association with the Disi‐Amman water pipeline. By using bounded non‐dimensional parameters to encode user asymmetries and groundwater connectivity, the theory provides a tractable generalized framework to understand the premature depletion of shared aquifers, whether transboundary or not.
Key Points
Economic and hydrogeologic differences between users affect common‐pool externalities in shared aquifers
When combined, asymmetries in energy cost, groundwater profitability and aquifer response can exacerbate incentives to overpump
Changing asymmetry conditions might have facilitated the world's first distance‐based groundwater treaty</description><subject>Amplification</subject><subject>Aquifers</subject><subject>Asymmetry</subject><subject>coupled human‐water systems</subject><subject>Depletion</subject><subject>Economics</subject><subject>Energy costs</subject><subject>Game theory</subject><subject>Groundwater</subject><subject>Groundwater flow</subject><subject>Groundwater resources</subject><subject>Hydrogeology</subject><subject>Incentives</subject><subject>Overdraft</subject><subject>Profitability</subject><subject>transboundary aquifer</subject><subject>Transboundary waters</subject><subject>Water pipelines</subject><subject>Water resources</subject><issn>0043-1397</issn><issn>1944-7973</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp90MtKAzEYBeAgCtbqzgcIuHU0t5kkyzLUVii0lEqXIc0FpnQmbdJRZucj-Iw-iVPqwpWrf_Pxn8MB4B6jJ4yIfCaIkPUSUYJpcQEGWDKWccnpJRggxGiGqeTX4CalLUKY5QUfgMW0szHAsQlNqCsDR6mra3eMlUtQNxaWoa5D8_35tQhhB-fvLtqo_RFWDVxF3aRNaBurYwdHh7byLqZbcOX1Lrm73zsEby_jVTnNZvPJazmaZZqSnGeeG202UmPDMGO-IFQQb0WRE22IZEIaLVlBpeOCbzQ1iFnDC5oLknuBraBD8HD-u4_h0Lp0VNvQxqaPVIQzlFPC85N6PCsTQ0rRebWPVd33VRip02bq72Y9p2f-Ue1c969V62W5JEUfQ38Af0dt4w</recordid><startdate>202211</startdate><enddate>202211</enddate><creator>Mullen, Connor</creator><creator>Müller, Marc F.</creator><creator>Penny, Gopal</creator><creator>Hung, Fengwei</creator><creator>Bolster, Diogo</creator><general>John Wiley & Sons, Inc</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QH</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>H96</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>P64</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1996-2536</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6406-8184</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3960-4090</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6628-1026</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202211</creationdate><title>Hydro Economic Asymmetries and Common‐Pool Overdraft in Transboundary Aquifers</title><author>Mullen, Connor ; Müller, Marc F. ; Penny, Gopal ; Hung, Fengwei ; Bolster, Diogo</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a3257-f7cacb9a1c4144f62382fd8652ac29489ca94639e787ba3c04dc7635825f81d83</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Amplification</topic><topic>Aquifers</topic><topic>Asymmetry</topic><topic>coupled human‐water systems</topic><topic>Depletion</topic><topic>Economics</topic><topic>Energy costs</topic><topic>Game theory</topic><topic>Groundwater</topic><topic>Groundwater flow</topic><topic>Groundwater resources</topic><topic>Hydrogeology</topic><topic>Incentives</topic><topic>Overdraft</topic><topic>Profitability</topic><topic>transboundary aquifer</topic><topic>Transboundary waters</topic><topic>Water pipelines</topic><topic>Water resources</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Mullen, Connor</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Müller, Marc F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Penny, Gopal</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hung, Fengwei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bolster, Diogo</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Aqualine</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 2: Ocean Technology, Policy & Non-Living Resources</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Water resources research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Mullen, Connor</au><au>Müller, Marc F.</au><au>Penny, Gopal</au><au>Hung, Fengwei</au><au>Bolster, Diogo</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Hydro Economic Asymmetries and Common‐Pool Overdraft in Transboundary Aquifers</atitle><jtitle>Water resources research</jtitle><date>2022-11</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>58</volume><issue>11</issue><epage>n/a</epage><issn>0043-1397</issn><eissn>1944-7973</eissn><abstract>The common‐pool nature of groundwater resources creates incentives to over pump that contribute to their rapid global depletion. In transboundary aquifers, users are separated by a territorial border and might face substantially different economic and hydrogeologic conditions that can alternatively dampen or amplify incentives to over pump. We develop a theoretical model that couples principles of game theory and groundwater flow to capture the combined effect of well locations and user asymmetries on pumping incentives. We find that heterogeneities across users (here referred to as asymmetries) in terms of either energy cost, groundwater profitability or aquifer response tend to dampen incentives to over pump. However, combinations of two or more types of asymmetry can substantially amplify common‐pool overdraft, particularly when the same user simultaneously faces comparatively higher costs (or aquifer response) and profitability. We use this theoretical insight to interpret the emergence of the Disi agreement between Saudi Arabia and Jordan in association with the Disi‐Amman water pipeline. By using bounded non‐dimensional parameters to encode user asymmetries and groundwater connectivity, the theory provides a tractable generalized framework to understand the premature depletion of shared aquifers, whether transboundary or not.
Key Points
Economic and hydrogeologic differences between users affect common‐pool externalities in shared aquifers
When combined, asymmetries in energy cost, groundwater profitability and aquifer response can exacerbate incentives to overpump
Changing asymmetry conditions might have facilitated the world's first distance‐based groundwater treaty</abstract><cop>Washington</cop><pub>John Wiley & Sons, Inc</pub><doi>10.1029/2022WR032136</doi><tpages>18</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1996-2536</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6406-8184</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3960-4090</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6628-1026</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0043-1397 |
ispartof | Water resources research, 2022-11, Vol.58 (11), p.n/a |
issn | 0043-1397 1944-7973 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2740532758 |
source | Wiley-Blackwell AGU Digital Library |
subjects | Amplification Aquifers Asymmetry coupled human‐water systems Depletion Economics Energy costs Game theory Groundwater Groundwater flow Groundwater resources Hydrogeology Incentives Overdraft Profitability transboundary aquifer Transboundary waters Water pipelines Water resources |
title | Hydro Economic Asymmetries and Common‐Pool Overdraft in Transboundary Aquifers |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-08T01%3A44%3A03IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Hydro%20Economic%20Asymmetries%20and%20Common%E2%80%90Pool%20Overdraft%20in%20Transboundary%20Aquifers&rft.jtitle=Water%20resources%20research&rft.au=Mullen,%20Connor&rft.date=2022-11&rft.volume=58&rft.issue=11&rft.epage=n/a&rft.issn=0043-1397&rft.eissn=1944-7973&rft_id=info:doi/10.1029/2022WR032136&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2740532758%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a3257-f7cacb9a1c4144f62382fd8652ac29489ca94639e787ba3c04dc7635825f81d83%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2740532758&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |