Reply to "Masanes-Galley-Müller and the State-Update Postulate"

In a recent comment on the arXiv, Blake C. Stacey criticizes our derivation of the quantum state update rule in Nat. Commun. 10, 1361 (2019). Here we argue that the criticism is unfounded. In particular, and in contrast to Stacey's claims, our proof does not assume linearity.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:arXiv.org 2022-12
Main Authors: Galley, Thomas D, Masanes, Lluís, Müller, Markus P
Format: Article
Language:English
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by
cites
container_end_page
container_issue
container_start_page
container_title arXiv.org
container_volume
creator Galley, Thomas D
Masanes, Lluís
Müller, Markus P
description In a recent comment on the arXiv, Blake C. Stacey criticizes our derivation of the quantum state update rule in Nat. Commun. 10, 1361 (2019). Here we argue that the criticism is unfounded. In particular, and in contrast to Stacey's claims, our proof does not assume linearity.
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2748033953</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2748033953</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-proquest_journals_27480339533</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpjYuA0MjY21LUwMTLiYOAtLs4yMDAwMjM3MjU15mRwCEotyKlUKMlXUPJNLE7MSy3WdU_MyUmt1PU9vAdIFykk5qUolGSkKgSXJJak6oYWpAAphYD84pLSHCBLiYeBNS0xpziVF0pzMyi7uYY4e-gWFOUXlqYWl8Rn5ZcW5QGl4o3MTSwMjI0tTY2NiVMFABfoONE</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2748033953</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Reply to "Masanes-Galley-Müller and the State-Update Postulate"</title><source>Publicly Available Content Database</source><creator>Galley, Thomas D ; Masanes, Lluís ; Müller, Markus P</creator><creatorcontrib>Galley, Thomas D ; Masanes, Lluís ; Müller, Markus P</creatorcontrib><description>In a recent comment on the arXiv, Blake C. Stacey criticizes our derivation of the quantum state update rule in Nat. Commun. 10, 1361 (2019). Here we argue that the criticism is unfounded. In particular, and in contrast to Stacey's claims, our proof does not assume linearity.</description><identifier>EISSN: 2331-8422</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Ithaca: Cornell University Library, arXiv.org</publisher><ispartof>arXiv.org, 2022-12</ispartof><rights>2022. This work is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2748033953?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>780,784,25752,37011,44589</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Galley, Thomas D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Masanes, Lluís</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Müller, Markus P</creatorcontrib><title>Reply to "Masanes-Galley-Müller and the State-Update Postulate"</title><title>arXiv.org</title><description>In a recent comment on the arXiv, Blake C. Stacey criticizes our derivation of the quantum state update rule in Nat. Commun. 10, 1361 (2019). Here we argue that the criticism is unfounded. In particular, and in contrast to Stacey's claims, our proof does not assume linearity.</description><issn>2331-8422</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>PIMPY</sourceid><recordid>eNpjYuA0MjY21LUwMTLiYOAtLs4yMDAwMjM3MjU15mRwCEotyKlUKMlXUPJNLE7MSy3WdU_MyUmt1PU9vAdIFykk5qUolGSkKgSXJJak6oYWpAAphYD84pLSHCBLiYeBNS0xpziVF0pzMyi7uYY4e-gWFOUXlqYWl8Rn5ZcW5QGl4o3MTSwMjI0tTY2NiVMFABfoONE</recordid><startdate>20221207</startdate><enddate>20221207</enddate><creator>Galley, Thomas D</creator><creator>Masanes, Lluís</creator><creator>Müller, Markus P</creator><general>Cornell University Library, arXiv.org</general><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20221207</creationdate><title>Reply to "Masanes-Galley-Müller and the State-Update Postulate"</title><author>Galley, Thomas D ; Masanes, Lluís ; Müller, Markus P</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-proquest_journals_27480339533</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Galley, Thomas D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Masanes, Lluís</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Müller, Markus P</creatorcontrib><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>Materials Science &amp; Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Galley, Thomas D</au><au>Masanes, Lluís</au><au>Müller, Markus P</au><format>book</format><genre>document</genre><ristype>GEN</ristype><atitle>Reply to "Masanes-Galley-Müller and the State-Update Postulate"</atitle><jtitle>arXiv.org</jtitle><date>2022-12-07</date><risdate>2022</risdate><eissn>2331-8422</eissn><abstract>In a recent comment on the arXiv, Blake C. Stacey criticizes our derivation of the quantum state update rule in Nat. Commun. 10, 1361 (2019). Here we argue that the criticism is unfounded. In particular, and in contrast to Stacey's claims, our proof does not assume linearity.</abstract><cop>Ithaca</cop><pub>Cornell University Library, arXiv.org</pub><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier EISSN: 2331-8422
ispartof arXiv.org, 2022-12
issn 2331-8422
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2748033953
source Publicly Available Content Database
title Reply to "Masanes-Galley-Müller and the State-Update Postulate"
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-11T19%3A34%3A13IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:book&rft.genre=document&rft.atitle=Reply%20to%20%22Masanes-Galley-M%C3%BCller%20and%20the%20State-Update%20Postulate%22&rft.jtitle=arXiv.org&rft.au=Galley,%20Thomas%20D&rft.date=2022-12-07&rft.eissn=2331-8422&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cproquest%3E2748033953%3C/proquest%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-proquest_journals_27480339533%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2748033953&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true