Environmental Life Cycle Assessment of a Novel Cultivated Meat Burger Patty in the United States

The meat industry has a substantial negative impact on the environment. As a result, this industry is in a period of change to alternative meat to mitigate the environmental issues caused by conventional meat production. Cultivated meat is highlighted as an alternative to conventional meat-based die...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Sustainability 2022-12, Vol.14 (23), p.16133
Main Authors: Kim, Sunghoon, Beier, Adam, Schreyer, H. Brett, Bakshi, Bhavik R
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Beef
Biodiversity
Biomass
Climate change
Commercialization
Cultivation
Cultured meat
Emissions
Energy consumption
Energy demand
Environmental aspects
Eutrophication
Feeds
Greenhouse effect
Greenhouse gases
Information processing
Land use
Life cycle assessment
Livestock
Manufacturing industry
Meat
Meat industry
Meat processing industry
Meat production
Methods
Plant-based foods
Product life cycle
Production management
Proteins
Sustainability
Water use
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:The meat industry has a substantial negative impact on the environment. As a result, this industry is in a period of change to alternative meat to mitigate the environmental issues caused by conventional meat production. Cultivated meat is highlighted as an alternative to conventional meat-based diets. SCiFi Foods has developed such a novel cultivated meat burger as a potential successor to the currently available burgers. Based on the process information provided by SCiFi Foods, this work performed a life cycle analysis on the novel cultivated meat burger and compared it with alternatives. The life cycle impacts of the novel burger were evaluated using four indicators: greenhouse gas emissions (CML-IA); energy use (cumulative energy demand); land use (ReCiPe midpoint); and water use (ReCiPe midpoint). The study found that the cultivated meat burger generated 87% less greenhouse gas emissions, required 39% less energy, had 90% less influence on land use, and 96% less water use than the comparable beef patty. The effects of uncertainty in the data, sensitivity to major assumptions, and the effect of the manufacturing plant location were analyzed. The studied burger was also found to have a life cycle environmental impact that is comparable with plant-based commercialized burgers that are currently available.
ISSN:2071-1050
2071-1050
DOI:10.3390/su142316133