Loading…
Pharmacoepidemiology in Safety Evaluations of Newly Approved Medications
In the recent extension of the Prescription Drug User Fee Act, the risk management programs that are to be funded by additional user fees combine ascertainment of risks in the initial postapproval phase with activities to confront these risks. Better recognition of risks, a prerequisite for success...
Saved in:
Published in: | Drug information journal 2004-01, Vol.38 (1), p.61-67 |
---|---|
Main Author: | |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c511t-9bf854c3108c0396087c5887ff0142508ed4a540353d993e09a9586912c4586d3 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c511t-9bf854c3108c0396087c5887ff0142508ed4a540353d993e09a9586912c4586d3 |
container_end_page | 67 |
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 61 |
container_title | Drug information journal |
container_volume | 38 |
creator | Gutterman, Elane M. |
description | In the recent extension of the Prescription Drug User Fee Act, the risk management programs that are to be funded by additional user fees combine ascertainment of risks in the initial postapproval phase with activities to confront these risks. Better recognition of risks, a prerequisite for success in managing risks, will require strategies to supplement the present system of spontaneous event reporting. This overview considers the merits of pharmacoepidemiology studies in examining gaps in drug safety resulting from the inherent limitations of clinical trials. After drugs become widely used following regulatory approval, many health outcomes potentially related to drug exposures can be studied in large health insurance claims databases using pharmacoepidemiology designs tailored to this venue. We clarify types of safety investigations particularly suited to examination in a large claims database, as well as the benefits and caveats of expanding postapproval follow-up through Prescription Drug User Fee Act funding. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1177/009286150403800109 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_275126217</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.1177_009286150403800109</sage_id><sourcerecordid>2450778473</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c511t-9bf854c3108c0396087c5887ff0142508ed4a540353d993e09a9586912c4586d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kV9LwzAUxYMoOOa-gE9Fwbe5mzRpkscxphPmH1CfS0yT2dE2tWkn_fZmVBEUvS_3wv2dw7lchE4xXGLM-QxAEpFgBhRiAYBBHqARwYmYUgH08GvmEo7RxPsthJKCcSJGaPXwqppSaWfqPDNl7gq36aO8ih6VNW0fLXeq6FSbu8pHzkZ35r3oo3ldN25nsujWZLketifoyKrCm8lnH6Pnq-XTYjVd31_fLObrqWYYt1P5YgWjOsYgNMQyAcE1E4JbC5gSBsJkVLFwCIszKWMDUkkmEomJpqFn8RhdDL4hwltnfJuWudemKFRlXOdTxpnkDMcBPPsBbl3XVCFbSgJAEoJ5gM7_hCgDzgXleysyULpx3jfGpnWTl6rpUwzp_gXp7xcE0WwQebUx37b_KD4Ay4KC2g</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>275126217</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Pharmacoepidemiology in Safety Evaluations of Newly Approved Medications</title><source>Library & Information Science Abstracts (LISA)</source><source>Springer Nature</source><creator>Gutterman, Elane M.</creator><creatorcontrib>Gutterman, Elane M.</creatorcontrib><description>In the recent extension of the Prescription Drug User Fee Act, the risk management programs that are to be funded by additional user fees combine ascertainment of risks in the initial postapproval phase with activities to confront these risks. Better recognition of risks, a prerequisite for success in managing risks, will require strategies to supplement the present system of spontaneous event reporting. This overview considers the merits of pharmacoepidemiology studies in examining gaps in drug safety resulting from the inherent limitations of clinical trials. After drugs become widely used following regulatory approval, many health outcomes potentially related to drug exposures can be studied in large health insurance claims databases using pharmacoepidemiology designs tailored to this venue. We clarify types of safety investigations particularly suited to examination in a large claims database, as well as the benefits and caveats of expanding postapproval follow-up through Prescription Drug User Fee Act funding.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2168-4790</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 0092-8615</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2168-4804</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2164-9200</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/009286150403800109</identifier><identifier>CODEN: DGIJB9</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Los Angeles, CA: SAGE Publications</publisher><subject>Clinical trials ; Pharmaceutics ; Pharmacoepidemiology ; Pharmacology ; Pharmacovigilance ; Prescription drugs ; Regulatory approval ; Risk management ; Safety ; User fees</subject><ispartof>Drug information journal, 2004-01, Vol.38 (1), p.61-67</ispartof><rights>2004 Drug Information Association</rights><rights>Drug Information Association, Inc 2004.</rights><rights>Copyright Drug Information Association 2004</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c511t-9bf854c3108c0396087c5887ff0142508ed4a540353d993e09a9586912c4586d3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c511t-9bf854c3108c0396087c5887ff0142508ed4a540353d993e09a9586912c4586d3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,34136</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Gutterman, Elane M.</creatorcontrib><title>Pharmacoepidemiology in Safety Evaluations of Newly Approved Medications</title><title>Drug information journal</title><description>In the recent extension of the Prescription Drug User Fee Act, the risk management programs that are to be funded by additional user fees combine ascertainment of risks in the initial postapproval phase with activities to confront these risks. Better recognition of risks, a prerequisite for success in managing risks, will require strategies to supplement the present system of spontaneous event reporting. This overview considers the merits of pharmacoepidemiology studies in examining gaps in drug safety resulting from the inherent limitations of clinical trials. After drugs become widely used following regulatory approval, many health outcomes potentially related to drug exposures can be studied in large health insurance claims databases using pharmacoepidemiology designs tailored to this venue. We clarify types of safety investigations particularly suited to examination in a large claims database, as well as the benefits and caveats of expanding postapproval follow-up through Prescription Drug User Fee Act funding.</description><subject>Clinical trials</subject><subject>Pharmaceutics</subject><subject>Pharmacoepidemiology</subject><subject>Pharmacology</subject><subject>Pharmacovigilance</subject><subject>Prescription drugs</subject><subject>Regulatory approval</subject><subject>Risk management</subject><subject>Safety</subject><subject>User fees</subject><issn>2168-4790</issn><issn>0092-8615</issn><issn>2168-4804</issn><issn>2164-9200</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2004</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>F2A</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kV9LwzAUxYMoOOa-gE9Fwbe5mzRpkscxphPmH1CfS0yT2dE2tWkn_fZmVBEUvS_3wv2dw7lchE4xXGLM-QxAEpFgBhRiAYBBHqARwYmYUgH08GvmEo7RxPsthJKCcSJGaPXwqppSaWfqPDNl7gq36aO8ih6VNW0fLXeq6FSbu8pHzkZ35r3oo3ldN25nsujWZLketifoyKrCm8lnH6Pnq-XTYjVd31_fLObrqWYYt1P5YgWjOsYgNMQyAcE1E4JbC5gSBsJkVLFwCIszKWMDUkkmEomJpqFn8RhdDL4hwltnfJuWudemKFRlXOdTxpnkDMcBPPsBbl3XVCFbSgJAEoJ5gM7_hCgDzgXleysyULpx3jfGpnWTl6rpUwzp_gXp7xcE0WwQebUx37b_KD4Ay4KC2g</recordid><startdate>200401</startdate><enddate>200401</enddate><creator>Gutterman, Elane M.</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7U7</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8AF</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>S0X</scope><scope>E3H</scope><scope>F2A</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200401</creationdate><title>Pharmacoepidemiology in Safety Evaluations of Newly Approved Medications</title><author>Gutterman, Elane M.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c511t-9bf854c3108c0396087c5887ff0142508ed4a540353d993e09a9586912c4586d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2004</creationdate><topic>Clinical trials</topic><topic>Pharmaceutics</topic><topic>Pharmacoepidemiology</topic><topic>Pharmacology</topic><topic>Pharmacovigilance</topic><topic>Prescription drugs</topic><topic>Regulatory approval</topic><topic>Risk management</topic><topic>Safety</topic><topic>User fees</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Gutterman, Elane M.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Toxicology Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Nursing and Allied Health Journals</collection><collection>Proquest Health & Medical Complete</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>STEM Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>eLibrary</collection><collection>AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Research Library</collection><collection>ProQuest Science Journals</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><collection>Library & Information Sciences Abstracts (LISA)</collection><collection>Library & Information Science Abstracts (LISA)</collection><jtitle>Drug information journal</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Gutterman, Elane M.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Pharmacoepidemiology in Safety Evaluations of Newly Approved Medications</atitle><jtitle>Drug information journal</jtitle><date>2004-01</date><risdate>2004</risdate><volume>38</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>61</spage><epage>67</epage><pages>61-67</pages><issn>2168-4790</issn><issn>0092-8615</issn><eissn>2168-4804</eissn><eissn>2164-9200</eissn><coden>DGIJB9</coden><abstract>In the recent extension of the Prescription Drug User Fee Act, the risk management programs that are to be funded by additional user fees combine ascertainment of risks in the initial postapproval phase with activities to confront these risks. Better recognition of risks, a prerequisite for success in managing risks, will require strategies to supplement the present system of spontaneous event reporting. This overview considers the merits of pharmacoepidemiology studies in examining gaps in drug safety resulting from the inherent limitations of clinical trials. After drugs become widely used following regulatory approval, many health outcomes potentially related to drug exposures can be studied in large health insurance claims databases using pharmacoepidemiology designs tailored to this venue. We clarify types of safety investigations particularly suited to examination in a large claims database, as well as the benefits and caveats of expanding postapproval follow-up through Prescription Drug User Fee Act funding.</abstract><cop>Los Angeles, CA</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><doi>10.1177/009286150403800109</doi><tpages>7</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 2168-4790 |
ispartof | Drug information journal, 2004-01, Vol.38 (1), p.61-67 |
issn | 2168-4790 0092-8615 2168-4804 2164-9200 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_275126217 |
source | Library & Information Science Abstracts (LISA); Springer Nature |
subjects | Clinical trials Pharmaceutics Pharmacoepidemiology Pharmacology Pharmacovigilance Prescription drugs Regulatory approval Risk management Safety User fees |
title | Pharmacoepidemiology in Safety Evaluations of Newly Approved Medications |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-03T22%3A41%3A38IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Pharmacoepidemiology%20in%20Safety%20Evaluations%20of%20Newly%20Approved%20Medications&rft.jtitle=Drug%20information%20journal&rft.au=Gutterman,%20Elane%20M.&rft.date=2004-01&rft.volume=38&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=61&rft.epage=67&rft.pages=61-67&rft.issn=2168-4790&rft.eissn=2168-4804&rft.coden=DGIJB9&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/009286150403800109&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2450778473%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c511t-9bf854c3108c0396087c5887ff0142508ed4a540353d993e09a9586912c4586d3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=275126217&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_sage_id=10.1177_009286150403800109&rfr_iscdi=true |