Interpersonal arguing in Argentina

Orientations toward interpersonal arguing were systematically assessed in Argentina in this article. Several hundred university-connected respondents self-reported their motivations, understandings, and emotional reactions for face-to-face arguing. Comparisons were made to earlier investigations in...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Argumentation and advocacy 2022-10, Vol.58 (3-4), p.214-231
Main Authors: Mamberti, Juan, Hample, Dale
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Argentina
Argument frames
argumentativeness
interpersonal arguing
verbal aggressiveness
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c268t-e59369e3325fe5fc9a7da812d7485ee74681bcc1d26f5a4ccd8558d6d8c4cbb93
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c268t-e59369e3325fe5fc9a7da812d7485ee74681bcc1d26f5a4ccd8558d6d8c4cbb93
container_end_page 231
container_issue 3-4
container_start_page 214
container_title Argumentation and advocacy
container_volume 58
creator Mamberti, Juan
Hample, Dale
description Orientations toward interpersonal arguing were systematically assessed in Argentina in this article. Several hundred university-connected respondents self-reported their motivations, understandings, and emotional reactions for face-to-face arguing. Comparisons were made to earlier investigations in Mexico and Chile. We found that Argentinian, Mexican, and Chilean orientations were identifiably different. Argentinian men and women often had different orientations, as was also the case in Mexico and Chile (but not in all other nations studied in this global project). Older Argentinian respondents were less aggressive and less interested in arguing than younger ones. Arguing motivations generally reproduced the U.S. correlational patterns, which was not as clearly the case in Mexico and Chile. Early reports on the connections between the standard orientation variables and both power distance and workplace arguing are also reported, and show points of interest.
doi_str_mv 10.1080/10511431.2022.2137984
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2758158037</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2758158037</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c268t-e59369e3325fe5fc9a7da812d7485ee74681bcc1d26f5a4ccd8558d6d8c4cbb93</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kM1KAzEYRYMoWKuPIBRdT82X_9lZij-FghtdhzTJlCnTpH6ZIn17O7RuXd3NuZfLIeQe6BSooU9AJYDgMGWUsSkDrmsjLsiISa0qI7S6JKOBqQbomtyUsqGUAtUwIg-L1EfcRSw5uW7icL1v03rSpskM1zH1bXK35KpxXYl35xyTr9eXz_l7tfx4W8xny8ozZfoqypqrOnLOZBNl42ungzPAghZGxqiFMrDyHgJTjXTC-2CkNEEF44VfrWo-Jo-n3R3m730svd3kPR5fFcu0NCAN5fpIyRPlMZeCsbE7bLcODxaoHXTYPx120GHPOo6951OvTU3GrfvJ2AXbu0OXsUGXfFss_3_iF4u4ZUY</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2758158037</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Interpersonal arguing in Argentina</title><source>Taylor and Francis Social Sciences and Humanities Collection</source><creator>Mamberti, Juan ; Hample, Dale</creator><creatorcontrib>Mamberti, Juan ; Hample, Dale</creatorcontrib><description>Orientations toward interpersonal arguing were systematically assessed in Argentina in this article. Several hundred university-connected respondents self-reported their motivations, understandings, and emotional reactions for face-to-face arguing. Comparisons were made to earlier investigations in Mexico and Chile. We found that Argentinian, Mexican, and Chilean orientations were identifiably different. Argentinian men and women often had different orientations, as was also the case in Mexico and Chile (but not in all other nations studied in this global project). Older Argentinian respondents were less aggressive and less interested in arguing than younger ones. Arguing motivations generally reproduced the U.S. correlational patterns, which was not as clearly the case in Mexico and Chile. Early reports on the connections between the standard orientation variables and both power distance and workplace arguing are also reported, and show points of interest.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1051-1431</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2576-8476</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1080/10511431.2022.2137984</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>River Falls: Routledge</publisher><subject>Argentina ; Argument frames ; argumentativeness ; interpersonal arguing ; verbal aggressiveness</subject><ispartof>Argumentation and advocacy, 2022-10, Vol.58 (3-4), p.214-231</ispartof><rights>2022 American Forensic Association 2022</rights><rights>2022 American Forensic Association</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c268t-e59369e3325fe5fc9a7da812d7485ee74681bcc1d26f5a4ccd8558d6d8c4cbb93</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c268t-e59369e3325fe5fc9a7da812d7485ee74681bcc1d26f5a4ccd8558d6d8c4cbb93</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-5822-1701 ; 0000-0001-6458-8470</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Mamberti, Juan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hample, Dale</creatorcontrib><title>Interpersonal arguing in Argentina</title><title>Argumentation and advocacy</title><description>Orientations toward interpersonal arguing were systematically assessed in Argentina in this article. Several hundred university-connected respondents self-reported their motivations, understandings, and emotional reactions for face-to-face arguing. Comparisons were made to earlier investigations in Mexico and Chile. We found that Argentinian, Mexican, and Chilean orientations were identifiably different. Argentinian men and women often had different orientations, as was also the case in Mexico and Chile (but not in all other nations studied in this global project). Older Argentinian respondents were less aggressive and less interested in arguing than younger ones. Arguing motivations generally reproduced the U.S. correlational patterns, which was not as clearly the case in Mexico and Chile. Early reports on the connections between the standard orientation variables and both power distance and workplace arguing are also reported, and show points of interest.</description><subject>Argentina</subject><subject>Argument frames</subject><subject>argumentativeness</subject><subject>interpersonal arguing</subject><subject>verbal aggressiveness</subject><issn>1051-1431</issn><issn>2576-8476</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kM1KAzEYRYMoWKuPIBRdT82X_9lZij-FghtdhzTJlCnTpH6ZIn17O7RuXd3NuZfLIeQe6BSooU9AJYDgMGWUsSkDrmsjLsiISa0qI7S6JKOBqQbomtyUsqGUAtUwIg-L1EfcRSw5uW7icL1v03rSpskM1zH1bXK35KpxXYl35xyTr9eXz_l7tfx4W8xny8ozZfoqypqrOnLOZBNl42ungzPAghZGxqiFMrDyHgJTjXTC-2CkNEEF44VfrWo-Jo-n3R3m730svd3kPR5fFcu0NCAN5fpIyRPlMZeCsbE7bLcODxaoHXTYPx120GHPOo6951OvTU3GrfvJ2AXbu0OXsUGXfFss_3_iF4u4ZUY</recordid><startdate>20221002</startdate><enddate>20221002</enddate><creator>Mamberti, Juan</creator><creator>Hample, Dale</creator><general>Routledge</general><general>Taylor &amp; Francis Ltd</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5822-1701</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6458-8470</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20221002</creationdate><title>Interpersonal arguing in Argentina</title><author>Mamberti, Juan ; Hample, Dale</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c268t-e59369e3325fe5fc9a7da812d7485ee74681bcc1d26f5a4ccd8558d6d8c4cbb93</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Argentina</topic><topic>Argument frames</topic><topic>argumentativeness</topic><topic>interpersonal arguing</topic><topic>verbal aggressiveness</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Mamberti, Juan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hample, Dale</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Argumentation and advocacy</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Mamberti, Juan</au><au>Hample, Dale</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Interpersonal arguing in Argentina</atitle><jtitle>Argumentation and advocacy</jtitle><date>2022-10-02</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>58</volume><issue>3-4</issue><spage>214</spage><epage>231</epage><pages>214-231</pages><issn>1051-1431</issn><eissn>2576-8476</eissn><abstract>Orientations toward interpersonal arguing were systematically assessed in Argentina in this article. Several hundred university-connected respondents self-reported their motivations, understandings, and emotional reactions for face-to-face arguing. Comparisons were made to earlier investigations in Mexico and Chile. We found that Argentinian, Mexican, and Chilean orientations were identifiably different. Argentinian men and women often had different orientations, as was also the case in Mexico and Chile (but not in all other nations studied in this global project). Older Argentinian respondents were less aggressive and less interested in arguing than younger ones. Arguing motivations generally reproduced the U.S. correlational patterns, which was not as clearly the case in Mexico and Chile. Early reports on the connections between the standard orientation variables and both power distance and workplace arguing are also reported, and show points of interest.</abstract><cop>River Falls</cop><pub>Routledge</pub><doi>10.1080/10511431.2022.2137984</doi><tpages>18</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5822-1701</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6458-8470</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1051-1431
ispartof Argumentation and advocacy, 2022-10, Vol.58 (3-4), p.214-231
issn 1051-1431
2576-8476
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2758158037
source Taylor and Francis Social Sciences and Humanities Collection
subjects Argentina
Argument frames
argumentativeness
interpersonal arguing
verbal aggressiveness
title Interpersonal arguing in Argentina
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-25T09%3A27%3A00IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Interpersonal%20arguing%20in%20Argentina&rft.jtitle=Argumentation%20and%20advocacy&rft.au=Mamberti,%20Juan&rft.date=2022-10-02&rft.volume=58&rft.issue=3-4&rft.spage=214&rft.epage=231&rft.pages=214-231&rft.issn=1051-1431&rft.eissn=2576-8476&rft_id=info:doi/10.1080/10511431.2022.2137984&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2758158037%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c268t-e59369e3325fe5fc9a7da812d7485ee74681bcc1d26f5a4ccd8558d6d8c4cbb93%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2758158037&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true