Loading…
An evaluation of ecosystem services as a result of land use changes in inland and coastal areas: a comparative study of Beijing and Freetown
Ecosystems provide a number of functions that are essential to human existence and well-being. However, anthropogenic activities and climate change are severely pressuring these ecosystem services. Changes in land use/cover (LU/LC) induced by human activities affect the environment's ecosystem...
Saved in:
Published in: | Journal of coastal conservation 2022-12, Vol.26 (6), p.76, Article 76 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c249t-9cbe1bdc75174006f3b71841e3001552603120af6f8415df2e87fc827da841233 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c249t-9cbe1bdc75174006f3b71841e3001552603120af6f8415df2e87fc827da841233 |
container_end_page | |
container_issue | 6 |
container_start_page | 76 |
container_title | Journal of coastal conservation |
container_volume | 26 |
creator | Abd El-Hamid, Hazem T. Mustafa, Elhadi K. Osman, Hanan E. |
description | Ecosystems provide a number of functions that are essential to human existence and well-being. However, anthropogenic activities and climate change are severely pressuring these ecosystem services. Changes in land use/cover (LU/LC) induced by human activities affect the environment's ecosystem and alter the ecosystem services value (ESV). Decision-making on development based on ecosystem services value (ESV) assessment is significant for the sustainable utilization of resources. In the current study, Beijing in China from 1995 to 2015 and Freetown in Sierra Leone from 2000 to 2018 were used for monitoring the change in (LU/LC) and ecosystem services. To investigate the changes in ESV utilizing an ESV model, cross-sectional field research, GIS technology and economic valuation of natural capital were all combined. In Beijing, land use and land cover (LU/LC) were as follows: forest > farm > urban > water in all periods of the investigated sites. Furthermore, LULC in Freetown was as follows: dense vegetation > spare vegetation > urban > bare > water in 2018. Changes in LU/LC in two areas reflect the trend toward the agriculture sector. Prediction of LU/LC showed a significant decrease in the agriculture areas in Beijing and Freetown that negatively affected the ecosystem. Results showed a lower ESV after prediction than before prediction in Beijing and Freetown, with loss and decrease in ESV caused by excessive economic benefits. Results showed that dense vegetation contributed the most to ecosystem services overall. The finding from this work indicated that for better sustainable ecosystem services, effective land-use regulations should be taken to control vegetation deterioration and protect water bodies. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s11852-022-00927-7 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2758193761</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2758193761</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c249t-9cbe1bdc75174006f3b71841e3001552603120af6f8415df2e87fc827da841233</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9UE1Lw0AQDaJgrf4BTwueo_uR7SbearEqFLzoedluJjUlzdadpNL_4I922gjehBl2ePveG-YlybXgt4Jzc4dC5FqmXFLzQprUnCQjkZssNXkmTmnOOE-50vw8uUBccy51rtUo-Z62DHau6V1Xh5aFioEPuMcONgwh7moPyBwVi4B90x0YjWtL1iMw_-HaFf3XLdURPbQPDjvXMBfB4T0pfdhsXaQFO2DY9eX-YPIA9bpuV0fFPAJ04au9TM4q1yBc_b7j5H3--DZ7ThevTy-z6SL1Miu6tPBLEMvSGy0MnTWp1NIIOhMU50JrOeFKSO6qSUWgLisJual8Lk3pCJBKjZObwXcbw2cP2Nl16GNLK600OheFMhNBLDmwfAyIESq7jfXGxb0V3B5St0PqllK3x9StIZEaREhkCif-Wf-j-gGhPIVk</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2758193761</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>An evaluation of ecosystem services as a result of land use changes in inland and coastal areas: a comparative study of Beijing and Freetown</title><source>Springer Nature</source><creator>Abd El-Hamid, Hazem T. ; Mustafa, Elhadi K. ; Osman, Hanan E.</creator><creatorcontrib>Abd El-Hamid, Hazem T. ; Mustafa, Elhadi K. ; Osman, Hanan E.</creatorcontrib><description>Ecosystems provide a number of functions that are essential to human existence and well-being. However, anthropogenic activities and climate change are severely pressuring these ecosystem services. Changes in land use/cover (LU/LC) induced by human activities affect the environment's ecosystem and alter the ecosystem services value (ESV). Decision-making on development based on ecosystem services value (ESV) assessment is significant for the sustainable utilization of resources. In the current study, Beijing in China from 1995 to 2015 and Freetown in Sierra Leone from 2000 to 2018 were used for monitoring the change in (LU/LC) and ecosystem services. To investigate the changes in ESV utilizing an ESV model, cross-sectional field research, GIS technology and economic valuation of natural capital were all combined. In Beijing, land use and land cover (LU/LC) were as follows: forest > farm > urban > water in all periods of the investigated sites. Furthermore, LULC in Freetown was as follows: dense vegetation > spare vegetation > urban > bare > water in 2018. Changes in LU/LC in two areas reflect the trend toward the agriculture sector. Prediction of LU/LC showed a significant decrease in the agriculture areas in Beijing and Freetown that negatively affected the ecosystem. Results showed a lower ESV after prediction than before prediction in Beijing and Freetown, with loss and decrease in ESV caused by excessive economic benefits. Results showed that dense vegetation contributed the most to ecosystem services overall. The finding from this work indicated that for better sustainable ecosystem services, effective land-use regulations should be taken to control vegetation deterioration and protect water bodies.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1400-0350</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1874-7841</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s11852-022-00927-7</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands</publisher><subject>Agriculture ; Anthropogenic factors ; Climate change ; Coastal Sciences ; Coastal zone ; Comparative analysis ; Comparative studies ; Decision making ; Earth and Environmental Science ; Economic benefits ; Economic models ; Economics ; Ecosystem services ; Ecosystems ; Farms ; Geographical information systems ; Geography ; Human influences ; Land cover ; Land use ; Nature Conservation ; Oceanography ; Predictions ; Remote Sensing/Photogrammetry ; Resource utilization ; Sustainability ; Sustainable ecosystems ; Urban agriculture ; Vegetation</subject><ispartof>Journal of coastal conservation, 2022-12, Vol.26 (6), p.76, Article 76</ispartof><rights>The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature B.V. 2022. Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c249t-9cbe1bdc75174006f3b71841e3001552603120af6f8415df2e87fc827da841233</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c249t-9cbe1bdc75174006f3b71841e3001552603120af6f8415df2e87fc827da841233</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Abd El-Hamid, Hazem T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mustafa, Elhadi K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Osman, Hanan E.</creatorcontrib><title>An evaluation of ecosystem services as a result of land use changes in inland and coastal areas: a comparative study of Beijing and Freetown</title><title>Journal of coastal conservation</title><addtitle>J Coast Conserv</addtitle><description>Ecosystems provide a number of functions that are essential to human existence and well-being. However, anthropogenic activities and climate change are severely pressuring these ecosystem services. Changes in land use/cover (LU/LC) induced by human activities affect the environment's ecosystem and alter the ecosystem services value (ESV). Decision-making on development based on ecosystem services value (ESV) assessment is significant for the sustainable utilization of resources. In the current study, Beijing in China from 1995 to 2015 and Freetown in Sierra Leone from 2000 to 2018 were used for monitoring the change in (LU/LC) and ecosystem services. To investigate the changes in ESV utilizing an ESV model, cross-sectional field research, GIS technology and economic valuation of natural capital were all combined. In Beijing, land use and land cover (LU/LC) were as follows: forest > farm > urban > water in all periods of the investigated sites. Furthermore, LULC in Freetown was as follows: dense vegetation > spare vegetation > urban > bare > water in 2018. Changes in LU/LC in two areas reflect the trend toward the agriculture sector. Prediction of LU/LC showed a significant decrease in the agriculture areas in Beijing and Freetown that negatively affected the ecosystem. Results showed a lower ESV after prediction than before prediction in Beijing and Freetown, with loss and decrease in ESV caused by excessive economic benefits. Results showed that dense vegetation contributed the most to ecosystem services overall. The finding from this work indicated that for better sustainable ecosystem services, effective land-use regulations should be taken to control vegetation deterioration and protect water bodies.</description><subject>Agriculture</subject><subject>Anthropogenic factors</subject><subject>Climate change</subject><subject>Coastal Sciences</subject><subject>Coastal zone</subject><subject>Comparative analysis</subject><subject>Comparative studies</subject><subject>Decision making</subject><subject>Earth and Environmental Science</subject><subject>Economic benefits</subject><subject>Economic models</subject><subject>Economics</subject><subject>Ecosystem services</subject><subject>Ecosystems</subject><subject>Farms</subject><subject>Geographical information systems</subject><subject>Geography</subject><subject>Human influences</subject><subject>Land cover</subject><subject>Land use</subject><subject>Nature Conservation</subject><subject>Oceanography</subject><subject>Predictions</subject><subject>Remote Sensing/Photogrammetry</subject><subject>Resource utilization</subject><subject>Sustainability</subject><subject>Sustainable ecosystems</subject><subject>Urban agriculture</subject><subject>Vegetation</subject><issn>1400-0350</issn><issn>1874-7841</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9UE1Lw0AQDaJgrf4BTwueo_uR7SbearEqFLzoedluJjUlzdadpNL_4I922gjehBl2ePveG-YlybXgt4Jzc4dC5FqmXFLzQprUnCQjkZssNXkmTmnOOE-50vw8uUBccy51rtUo-Z62DHau6V1Xh5aFioEPuMcONgwh7moPyBwVi4B90x0YjWtL1iMw_-HaFf3XLdURPbQPDjvXMBfB4T0pfdhsXaQFO2DY9eX-YPIA9bpuV0fFPAJ04au9TM4q1yBc_b7j5H3--DZ7ThevTy-z6SL1Miu6tPBLEMvSGy0MnTWp1NIIOhMU50JrOeFKSO6qSUWgLisJual8Lk3pCJBKjZObwXcbw2cP2Nl16GNLK600OheFMhNBLDmwfAyIESq7jfXGxb0V3B5St0PqllK3x9StIZEaREhkCif-Wf-j-gGhPIVk</recordid><startdate>20221201</startdate><enddate>20221201</enddate><creator>Abd El-Hamid, Hazem T.</creator><creator>Mustafa, Elhadi K.</creator><creator>Osman, Hanan E.</creator><general>Springer Netherlands</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7TN</scope><scope>7U6</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>BKSAR</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H97</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PCBAR</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>SOI</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20221201</creationdate><title>An evaluation of ecosystem services as a result of land use changes in inland and coastal areas: a comparative study of Beijing and Freetown</title><author>Abd El-Hamid, Hazem T. ; Mustafa, Elhadi K. ; Osman, Hanan E.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c249t-9cbe1bdc75174006f3b71841e3001552603120af6f8415df2e87fc827da841233</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Agriculture</topic><topic>Anthropogenic factors</topic><topic>Climate change</topic><topic>Coastal Sciences</topic><topic>Coastal zone</topic><topic>Comparative analysis</topic><topic>Comparative studies</topic><topic>Decision making</topic><topic>Earth and Environmental Science</topic><topic>Economic benefits</topic><topic>Economic models</topic><topic>Economics</topic><topic>Ecosystem services</topic><topic>Ecosystems</topic><topic>Farms</topic><topic>Geographical information systems</topic><topic>Geography</topic><topic>Human influences</topic><topic>Land cover</topic><topic>Land use</topic><topic>Nature Conservation</topic><topic>Oceanography</topic><topic>Predictions</topic><topic>Remote Sensing/Photogrammetry</topic><topic>Resource utilization</topic><topic>Sustainability</topic><topic>Sustainable ecosystems</topic><topic>Urban agriculture</topic><topic>Vegetation</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Abd El-Hamid, Hazem T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mustafa, Elhadi K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Osman, Hanan E.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Oceanic Abstracts</collection><collection>Sustainability Science Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric & Aquatic Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 3: Aquatic Pollution & Environmental Quality</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric & Aquatic Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Journal of coastal conservation</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Abd El-Hamid, Hazem T.</au><au>Mustafa, Elhadi K.</au><au>Osman, Hanan E.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>An evaluation of ecosystem services as a result of land use changes in inland and coastal areas: a comparative study of Beijing and Freetown</atitle><jtitle>Journal of coastal conservation</jtitle><stitle>J Coast Conserv</stitle><date>2022-12-01</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>26</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>76</spage><pages>76-</pages><artnum>76</artnum><issn>1400-0350</issn><eissn>1874-7841</eissn><abstract>Ecosystems provide a number of functions that are essential to human existence and well-being. However, anthropogenic activities and climate change are severely pressuring these ecosystem services. Changes in land use/cover (LU/LC) induced by human activities affect the environment's ecosystem and alter the ecosystem services value (ESV). Decision-making on development based on ecosystem services value (ESV) assessment is significant for the sustainable utilization of resources. In the current study, Beijing in China from 1995 to 2015 and Freetown in Sierra Leone from 2000 to 2018 were used for monitoring the change in (LU/LC) and ecosystem services. To investigate the changes in ESV utilizing an ESV model, cross-sectional field research, GIS technology and economic valuation of natural capital were all combined. In Beijing, land use and land cover (LU/LC) were as follows: forest > farm > urban > water in all periods of the investigated sites. Furthermore, LULC in Freetown was as follows: dense vegetation > spare vegetation > urban > bare > water in 2018. Changes in LU/LC in two areas reflect the trend toward the agriculture sector. Prediction of LU/LC showed a significant decrease in the agriculture areas in Beijing and Freetown that negatively affected the ecosystem. Results showed a lower ESV after prediction than before prediction in Beijing and Freetown, with loss and decrease in ESV caused by excessive economic benefits. Results showed that dense vegetation contributed the most to ecosystem services overall. The finding from this work indicated that for better sustainable ecosystem services, effective land-use regulations should be taken to control vegetation deterioration and protect water bodies.</abstract><cop>Dordrecht</cop><pub>Springer Netherlands</pub><doi>10.1007/s11852-022-00927-7</doi></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1400-0350 |
ispartof | Journal of coastal conservation, 2022-12, Vol.26 (6), p.76, Article 76 |
issn | 1400-0350 1874-7841 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2758193761 |
source | Springer Nature |
subjects | Agriculture Anthropogenic factors Climate change Coastal Sciences Coastal zone Comparative analysis Comparative studies Decision making Earth and Environmental Science Economic benefits Economic models Economics Ecosystem services Ecosystems Farms Geographical information systems Geography Human influences Land cover Land use Nature Conservation Oceanography Predictions Remote Sensing/Photogrammetry Resource utilization Sustainability Sustainable ecosystems Urban agriculture Vegetation |
title | An evaluation of ecosystem services as a result of land use changes in inland and coastal areas: a comparative study of Beijing and Freetown |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-04T22%3A22%3A58IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=An%20evaluation%20of%20ecosystem%20services%20as%20a%20result%20of%20land%20use%20changes%20in%20inland%20and%20coastal%20areas:%20a%20comparative%20study%20of%20Beijing%20and%20Freetown&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20coastal%20conservation&rft.au=Abd%20El-Hamid,%20Hazem%20T.&rft.date=2022-12-01&rft.volume=26&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=76&rft.pages=76-&rft.artnum=76&rft.issn=1400-0350&rft.eissn=1874-7841&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s11852-022-00927-7&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2758193761%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c249t-9cbe1bdc75174006f3b71841e3001552603120af6f8415df2e87fc827da841233%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2758193761&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |