Loading…

Enhanced Performance of Series Microexploding Bridge Planar Discharge Switch Integrated with Exploding Foil

To achieve the low energy, miniaturization, and low cost of the exploding bridge foil initiator, single and series microexploding bridge planar discharge switch (MEB-PDS) co-planar and co-cathode integrated with exploding bridge foil is fabricated by magnetron sputtering and photolithography forming...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:IEEE transactions on power electronics 2023-03, Vol.38 (3), p.1-10
Main Authors: Han, Ke-hua, Zhao, Wan-jun, Zeng, Xin, Chu, En-yi, Jiao, Qing-jie
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c293t-3e384b33a5f55db30a95d23eb024c065f8f8fb8c8b9255ae91f6857887143d373
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c293t-3e384b33a5f55db30a95d23eb024c065f8f8fb8c8b9255ae91f6857887143d373
container_end_page 10
container_issue 3
container_start_page 1
container_title IEEE transactions on power electronics
container_volume 38
creator Han, Ke-hua
Zhao, Wan-jun
Zeng, Xin
Chu, En-yi
Jiao, Qing-jie
description To achieve the low energy, miniaturization, and low cost of the exploding bridge foil initiator, single and series microexploding bridge planar discharge switch (MEB-PDS) co-planar and co-cathode integrated with exploding bridge foil is fabricated by magnetron sputtering and photolithography forming etching in this work. The maximum electrostatic field strength and breakdown voltage of the MEB-PDS are calculated by multi-physics field theory. The breakdown voltage, conduction performance, MEB electrical explosion performance, and integrated exploding foil initiator (EFI) of the MEB-PDS have been tested. The relationship between breakdown voltages and design parameters, variation law between conduction time and design parameters, operating voltages and trigger voltages, and the matching between operating voltages and trigger voltages of MEB-PDS are analyzed. The results show that the breakdown voltages of single-bridge and three-series MEB-PDS can meet the insulation requirements at the operating voltage. The plasma clouds generated by the three-series MEB-PDS converge and superimpose, which results in its better conduction performance and operating reliability than single MEB-PDS. Based on the optimization of MEB structure parameters, the breakdown voltage of the three-series MEB-PDS is 2.848 kV at a trigger voltage of 0.600 kV. The 50% ignition voltage sensitivity U (50%) of the corresponding integrated Exploding Foil Initiator (EFI) is 1.191 kV, and the 99.9% ignition voltage sensitivity U (99.9%) is 1.269 kV. Compared with other types of spark gap discharge switches, U (99.9%) is reduced by 11.07%. The trigger voltage of the switch is reduced from ∼1.5 kV to 0.6 kV.
doi_str_mv 10.1109/TPEL.2022.3225148
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2758714593</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ieee_id>9964415</ieee_id><sourcerecordid>2758714593</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c293t-3e384b33a5f55db30a95d23eb024c065f8f8fb8c8b9255ae91f6857887143d373</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo9kFtLw0AQhRdRsFZ_gPiy4HPqXpvdRy-pFioWWp-XTTJptrZJ3U1R_70bWso8DHP4zgxzELqlZEQp0Q_LeTYbMcLYiDMmqVBnaEC1oAmhJD1HA6KUTJTW_BJdhbAmhApJ6AB9ZU1tmwJKPAdftX7bD7it8AK8g4DfXeFb-N1t2tI1K_zkXbkCPN_Yxnr84kJRWx-FxY_rihpPmw5W3nZxXRRqnJ2Mk9ZtrtFFZTcBbo59iD4n2fL5LZl9vE6fH2dJwTTvEg5ciZxzKyspy5wTq2XJOOSEiYKMZaVi5apQuWZSWtC0GiuZKpVSwUue8iG6P-zd-fZ7D6Ez63bvm3jSsFT2mNQ8UvRAxQdD8FCZnXdb6_8MJabP1PSZmj5Tc8w0eu4OHgcAJ17rsRBU8n-MnHLn</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2758714593</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Enhanced Performance of Series Microexploding Bridge Planar Discharge Switch Integrated with Exploding Foil</title><source>IEEE Xplore (Online service)</source><creator>Han, Ke-hua ; Zhao, Wan-jun ; Zeng, Xin ; Chu, En-yi ; Jiao, Qing-jie</creator><creatorcontrib>Han, Ke-hua ; Zhao, Wan-jun ; Zeng, Xin ; Chu, En-yi ; Jiao, Qing-jie</creatorcontrib><description>To achieve the low energy, miniaturization, and low cost of the exploding bridge foil initiator, single and series microexploding bridge planar discharge switch (MEB-PDS) co-planar and co-cathode integrated with exploding bridge foil is fabricated by magnetron sputtering and photolithography forming etching in this work. The maximum electrostatic field strength and breakdown voltage of the MEB-PDS are calculated by multi-physics field theory. The breakdown voltage, conduction performance, MEB electrical explosion performance, and integrated exploding foil initiator (EFI) of the MEB-PDS have been tested. The relationship between breakdown voltages and design parameters, variation law between conduction time and design parameters, operating voltages and trigger voltages, and the matching between operating voltages and trigger voltages of MEB-PDS are analyzed. The results show that the breakdown voltages of single-bridge and three-series MEB-PDS can meet the insulation requirements at the operating voltage. The plasma clouds generated by the three-series MEB-PDS converge and superimpose, which results in its better conduction performance and operating reliability than single MEB-PDS. Based on the optimization of MEB structure parameters, the breakdown voltage of the three-series MEB-PDS is 2.848 kV at a trigger voltage of 0.600 kV. The 50% ignition voltage sensitivity U (50%) of the corresponding integrated Exploding Foil Initiator (EFI) is 1.191 kV, and the 99.9% ignition voltage sensitivity U (99.9%) is 1.269 kV. Compared with other types of spark gap discharge switches, U (99.9%) is reduced by 11.07%. The trigger voltage of the switch is reduced from ∼1.5 kV to 0.6 kV.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0885-8993</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1941-0107</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1109/TPEL.2022.3225148</identifier><identifier>CODEN: ITPEE8</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: IEEE</publisher><subject>Breakdown ; Breakdown Voltage ; Conduction Characteristics ; Design parameters ; Discharge ; Electric fields ; Electric potential ; Exploding Foil Initiator ; Field strength ; Field theory ; Foils ; Ignition ; Initiators ; Insulation ; Magnetron sputtering ; Mathematical analysis ; Microexploding Bridge (MEB) ; Miniaturization ; Optimization ; Performance enhancement ; Photolithography ; Planar Discharge Switch (PDS) ; Plasma clouds ; Sensitivity ; Spark gaps ; Switches ; Voltage</subject><ispartof>IEEE transactions on power electronics, 2023-03, Vol.38 (3), p.1-10</ispartof><rights>Copyright The Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Inc. (IEEE) 2023</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c293t-3e384b33a5f55db30a95d23eb024c065f8f8fb8c8b9255ae91f6857887143d373</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c293t-3e384b33a5f55db30a95d23eb024c065f8f8fb8c8b9255ae91f6857887143d373</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-2739-6610 ; 0000-0001-7615-993X ; 0000-0003-4194-4334</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/9964415$$EHTML$$P50$$Gieee$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,54796</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Han, Ke-hua</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhao, Wan-jun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zeng, Xin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chu, En-yi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jiao, Qing-jie</creatorcontrib><title>Enhanced Performance of Series Microexploding Bridge Planar Discharge Switch Integrated with Exploding Foil</title><title>IEEE transactions on power electronics</title><addtitle>TPEL</addtitle><description>To achieve the low energy, miniaturization, and low cost of the exploding bridge foil initiator, single and series microexploding bridge planar discharge switch (MEB-PDS) co-planar and co-cathode integrated with exploding bridge foil is fabricated by magnetron sputtering and photolithography forming etching in this work. The maximum electrostatic field strength and breakdown voltage of the MEB-PDS are calculated by multi-physics field theory. The breakdown voltage, conduction performance, MEB electrical explosion performance, and integrated exploding foil initiator (EFI) of the MEB-PDS have been tested. The relationship between breakdown voltages and design parameters, variation law between conduction time and design parameters, operating voltages and trigger voltages, and the matching between operating voltages and trigger voltages of MEB-PDS are analyzed. The results show that the breakdown voltages of single-bridge and three-series MEB-PDS can meet the insulation requirements at the operating voltage. The plasma clouds generated by the three-series MEB-PDS converge and superimpose, which results in its better conduction performance and operating reliability than single MEB-PDS. Based on the optimization of MEB structure parameters, the breakdown voltage of the three-series MEB-PDS is 2.848 kV at a trigger voltage of 0.600 kV. The 50% ignition voltage sensitivity U (50%) of the corresponding integrated Exploding Foil Initiator (EFI) is 1.191 kV, and the 99.9% ignition voltage sensitivity U (99.9%) is 1.269 kV. Compared with other types of spark gap discharge switches, U (99.9%) is reduced by 11.07%. The trigger voltage of the switch is reduced from ∼1.5 kV to 0.6 kV.</description><subject>Breakdown</subject><subject>Breakdown Voltage</subject><subject>Conduction Characteristics</subject><subject>Design parameters</subject><subject>Discharge</subject><subject>Electric fields</subject><subject>Electric potential</subject><subject>Exploding Foil Initiator</subject><subject>Field strength</subject><subject>Field theory</subject><subject>Foils</subject><subject>Ignition</subject><subject>Initiators</subject><subject>Insulation</subject><subject>Magnetron sputtering</subject><subject>Mathematical analysis</subject><subject>Microexploding Bridge (MEB)</subject><subject>Miniaturization</subject><subject>Optimization</subject><subject>Performance enhancement</subject><subject>Photolithography</subject><subject>Planar Discharge Switch (PDS)</subject><subject>Plasma clouds</subject><subject>Sensitivity</subject><subject>Spark gaps</subject><subject>Switches</subject><subject>Voltage</subject><issn>0885-8993</issn><issn>1941-0107</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNo9kFtLw0AQhRdRsFZ_gPiy4HPqXpvdRy-pFioWWp-XTTJptrZJ3U1R_70bWso8DHP4zgxzELqlZEQp0Q_LeTYbMcLYiDMmqVBnaEC1oAmhJD1HA6KUTJTW_BJdhbAmhApJ6AB9ZU1tmwJKPAdftX7bD7it8AK8g4DfXeFb-N1t2tI1K_zkXbkCPN_Yxnr84kJRWx-FxY_rihpPmw5W3nZxXRRqnJ2Mk9ZtrtFFZTcBbo59iD4n2fL5LZl9vE6fH2dJwTTvEg5ciZxzKyspy5wTq2XJOOSEiYKMZaVi5apQuWZSWtC0GiuZKpVSwUue8iG6P-zd-fZ7D6Ez63bvm3jSsFT2mNQ8UvRAxQdD8FCZnXdb6_8MJabP1PSZmj5Tc8w0eu4OHgcAJ17rsRBU8n-MnHLn</recordid><startdate>20230301</startdate><enddate>20230301</enddate><creator>Han, Ke-hua</creator><creator>Zhao, Wan-jun</creator><creator>Zeng, Xin</creator><creator>Chu, En-yi</creator><creator>Jiao, Qing-jie</creator><general>IEEE</general><general>The Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Inc. (IEEE)</general><scope>97E</scope><scope>RIA</scope><scope>RIE</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SP</scope><scope>7TB</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>JQ2</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>L7M</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2739-6610</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7615-993X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4194-4334</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20230301</creationdate><title>Enhanced Performance of Series Microexploding Bridge Planar Discharge Switch Integrated with Exploding Foil</title><author>Han, Ke-hua ; Zhao, Wan-jun ; Zeng, Xin ; Chu, En-yi ; Jiao, Qing-jie</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c293t-3e384b33a5f55db30a95d23eb024c065f8f8fb8c8b9255ae91f6857887143d373</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Breakdown</topic><topic>Breakdown Voltage</topic><topic>Conduction Characteristics</topic><topic>Design parameters</topic><topic>Discharge</topic><topic>Electric fields</topic><topic>Electric potential</topic><topic>Exploding Foil Initiator</topic><topic>Field strength</topic><topic>Field theory</topic><topic>Foils</topic><topic>Ignition</topic><topic>Initiators</topic><topic>Insulation</topic><topic>Magnetron sputtering</topic><topic>Mathematical analysis</topic><topic>Microexploding Bridge (MEB)</topic><topic>Miniaturization</topic><topic>Optimization</topic><topic>Performance enhancement</topic><topic>Photolithography</topic><topic>Planar Discharge Switch (PDS)</topic><topic>Plasma clouds</topic><topic>Sensitivity</topic><topic>Spark gaps</topic><topic>Switches</topic><topic>Voltage</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Han, Ke-hua</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhao, Wan-jun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zeng, Xin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chu, En-yi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jiao, Qing-jie</creatorcontrib><collection>IEEE All-Society Periodicals Package (ASPP) 2005–Present</collection><collection>IEEE All-Society Periodicals Package (ASPP) 1998–Present</collection><collection>IEEE Explore</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Electronics &amp; Communications Abstracts</collection><collection>Mechanical &amp; Transportation Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Computer Science Collection</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><jtitle>IEEE transactions on power electronics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Han, Ke-hua</au><au>Zhao, Wan-jun</au><au>Zeng, Xin</au><au>Chu, En-yi</au><au>Jiao, Qing-jie</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Enhanced Performance of Series Microexploding Bridge Planar Discharge Switch Integrated with Exploding Foil</atitle><jtitle>IEEE transactions on power electronics</jtitle><stitle>TPEL</stitle><date>2023-03-01</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>38</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>1</spage><epage>10</epage><pages>1-10</pages><issn>0885-8993</issn><eissn>1941-0107</eissn><coden>ITPEE8</coden><abstract>To achieve the low energy, miniaturization, and low cost of the exploding bridge foil initiator, single and series microexploding bridge planar discharge switch (MEB-PDS) co-planar and co-cathode integrated with exploding bridge foil is fabricated by magnetron sputtering and photolithography forming etching in this work. The maximum electrostatic field strength and breakdown voltage of the MEB-PDS are calculated by multi-physics field theory. The breakdown voltage, conduction performance, MEB electrical explosion performance, and integrated exploding foil initiator (EFI) of the MEB-PDS have been tested. The relationship between breakdown voltages and design parameters, variation law between conduction time and design parameters, operating voltages and trigger voltages, and the matching between operating voltages and trigger voltages of MEB-PDS are analyzed. The results show that the breakdown voltages of single-bridge and three-series MEB-PDS can meet the insulation requirements at the operating voltage. The plasma clouds generated by the three-series MEB-PDS converge and superimpose, which results in its better conduction performance and operating reliability than single MEB-PDS. Based on the optimization of MEB structure parameters, the breakdown voltage of the three-series MEB-PDS is 2.848 kV at a trigger voltage of 0.600 kV. The 50% ignition voltage sensitivity U (50%) of the corresponding integrated Exploding Foil Initiator (EFI) is 1.191 kV, and the 99.9% ignition voltage sensitivity U (99.9%) is 1.269 kV. Compared with other types of spark gap discharge switches, U (99.9%) is reduced by 11.07%. The trigger voltage of the switch is reduced from ∼1.5 kV to 0.6 kV.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>IEEE</pub><doi>10.1109/TPEL.2022.3225148</doi><tpages>10</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2739-6610</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7615-993X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4194-4334</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0885-8993
ispartof IEEE transactions on power electronics, 2023-03, Vol.38 (3), p.1-10
issn 0885-8993
1941-0107
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2758714593
source IEEE Xplore (Online service)
subjects Breakdown
Breakdown Voltage
Conduction Characteristics
Design parameters
Discharge
Electric fields
Electric potential
Exploding Foil Initiator
Field strength
Field theory
Foils
Ignition
Initiators
Insulation
Magnetron sputtering
Mathematical analysis
Microexploding Bridge (MEB)
Miniaturization
Optimization
Performance enhancement
Photolithography
Planar Discharge Switch (PDS)
Plasma clouds
Sensitivity
Spark gaps
Switches
Voltage
title Enhanced Performance of Series Microexploding Bridge Planar Discharge Switch Integrated with Exploding Foil
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-26T18%3A39%3A40IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Enhanced%20Performance%20of%20Series%20Microexploding%20Bridge%20Planar%20Discharge%20Switch%20Integrated%20with%20Exploding%20Foil&rft.jtitle=IEEE%20transactions%20on%20power%20electronics&rft.au=Han,%20Ke-hua&rft.date=2023-03-01&rft.volume=38&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=1&rft.epage=10&rft.pages=1-10&rft.issn=0885-8993&rft.eissn=1941-0107&rft.coden=ITPEE8&rft_id=info:doi/10.1109/TPEL.2022.3225148&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2758714593%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c293t-3e384b33a5f55db30a95d23eb024c065f8f8fb8c8b9255ae91f6857887143d373%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2758714593&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ieee_id=9964415&rfr_iscdi=true