Loading…
SEM-Based Out-of-Sample Predictions
Predictive modeling is becoming more popular in psychological science. Machine learning techniques have been used to develop prediction rules based on items of psychological tests. However, this approach does not take into account that these items are noisy indicators of the constructs they intend t...
Saved in:
Published in: | Structural equation modeling 2023-01, Vol.30 (1), p.132-148 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c385t-1616b308447f717dc6045a1a479e03eb8056c678e47934af9a0a69f80cf0af2f3 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c385t-1616b308447f717dc6045a1a479e03eb8056c678e47934af9a0a69f80cf0af2f3 |
container_end_page | 148 |
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 132 |
container_title | Structural equation modeling |
container_volume | 30 |
creator | de Rooij, Mark Karch, Julian D. Fokkema, Marjolein Bakk, Zsuzsa Pratiwi, Bunga Citra Kelderman, Henk |
description | Predictive modeling is becoming more popular in psychological science. Machine learning techniques have been used to develop prediction rules based on items of psychological tests. However, this approach does not take into account that these items are noisy indicators of the constructs they intend to measure. Structural equation modeling does take this into account. Several authors have concluded that it is impossible to make out-of-sample predictions based on a reflective structural equation model. We show that it is possible to make such predictions and we develop R-code to do so. With two empirical examples, we show that SEM-based prediction can outperform prediction based on linear regression models. With three simulation studies, we further investigate the SEM-based prediction rule and its robustness in comparison with predictions using regularized linear regression. We conclude that the new SEM-based prediction rule is robust against violation of the normality assumption but sensitive to model misspecification. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1080/10705511.2022.2061494 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2760694065</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2760694065</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c385t-1616b308447f717dc6045a1a479e03eb8056c678e47934af9a0a69f80cf0af2f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE1LAzEQhoMoWKs_QSj0nDr5zt7U0qpQqVA9hzSbwJbtpiZbpP_elNarl5lheN4ZeBC6JzAhoOGBgAIhCJlQoLQUSXjFL9CACEaxBlCXZS4MPkLX6CbnDQDRhOoBGq9m7_jZZl-Plvsex4BXdrtr_egj-bpxfRO7fIuugm2zvzv3Ifqazz6nr3ixfHmbPi2wY1r0mEgi1ww05yooomongQtLLFeVB-bXGoR0UmlfFozbUFmwsgoaXAAbaGBDND7d3aX4vfe5N5u4T115aaiSICsOUhRKnCiXYs7JB7NLzdamgyFgjj7Mnw9z9GHOPkru8ZRruhDT1v7E1Namt4c2ppBs55ps2P8nfgHQpmNX</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2760694065</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>SEM-Based Out-of-Sample Predictions</title><source>Taylor and Francis Social Sciences and Humanities Collection</source><creator>de Rooij, Mark ; Karch, Julian D. ; Fokkema, Marjolein ; Bakk, Zsuzsa ; Pratiwi, Bunga Citra ; Kelderman, Henk</creator><creatorcontrib>de Rooij, Mark ; Karch, Julian D. ; Fokkema, Marjolein ; Bakk, Zsuzsa ; Pratiwi, Bunga Citra ; Kelderman, Henk</creatorcontrib><description>Predictive modeling is becoming more popular in psychological science. Machine learning techniques have been used to develop prediction rules based on items of psychological tests. However, this approach does not take into account that these items are noisy indicators of the constructs they intend to measure. Structural equation modeling does take this into account. Several authors have concluded that it is impossible to make out-of-sample predictions based on a reflective structural equation model. We show that it is possible to make such predictions and we develop R-code to do so. With two empirical examples, we show that SEM-based prediction can outperform prediction based on linear regression models. With three simulation studies, we further investigate the SEM-based prediction rule and its robustness in comparison with predictions using regularized linear regression. We conclude that the new SEM-based prediction rule is robust against violation of the normality assumption but sensitive to model misspecification.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1070-5511</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1532-8007</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1080/10705511.2022.2061494</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Hove: Routledge</publisher><subject>Cross-validation ; machine learning ; prediction rule ; regression ; Structural equation modeling</subject><ispartof>Structural equation modeling, 2023-01, Vol.30 (1), p.132-148</ispartof><rights>2022 The Author(s). Published with license by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC. 2022</rights><rights>2022 The Author(s). Published with license by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC. This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution – Non-Commercial – No Derivatives License http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c385t-1616b308447f717dc6045a1a479e03eb8056c678e47934af9a0a69f80cf0af2f3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c385t-1616b308447f717dc6045a1a479e03eb8056c678e47934af9a0a69f80cf0af2f3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-9431-4208 ; 0000-0001-9352-4812 ; 0000-0001-9074-0229 ; 0000-0001-7308-6210 ; 0000-0002-9252-8325 ; 0000-0002-1625-2822</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>de Rooij, Mark</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Karch, Julian D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fokkema, Marjolein</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bakk, Zsuzsa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pratiwi, Bunga Citra</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kelderman, Henk</creatorcontrib><title>SEM-Based Out-of-Sample Predictions</title><title>Structural equation modeling</title><description>Predictive modeling is becoming more popular in psychological science. Machine learning techniques have been used to develop prediction rules based on items of psychological tests. However, this approach does not take into account that these items are noisy indicators of the constructs they intend to measure. Structural equation modeling does take this into account. Several authors have concluded that it is impossible to make out-of-sample predictions based on a reflective structural equation model. We show that it is possible to make such predictions and we develop R-code to do so. With two empirical examples, we show that SEM-based prediction can outperform prediction based on linear regression models. With three simulation studies, we further investigate the SEM-based prediction rule and its robustness in comparison with predictions using regularized linear regression. We conclude that the new SEM-based prediction rule is robust against violation of the normality assumption but sensitive to model misspecification.</description><subject>Cross-validation</subject><subject>machine learning</subject><subject>prediction rule</subject><subject>regression</subject><subject>Structural equation modeling</subject><issn>1070-5511</issn><issn>1532-8007</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>0YH</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kE1LAzEQhoMoWKs_QSj0nDr5zt7U0qpQqVA9hzSbwJbtpiZbpP_elNarl5lheN4ZeBC6JzAhoOGBgAIhCJlQoLQUSXjFL9CACEaxBlCXZS4MPkLX6CbnDQDRhOoBGq9m7_jZZl-Plvsex4BXdrtr_egj-bpxfRO7fIuugm2zvzv3Ifqazz6nr3ixfHmbPi2wY1r0mEgi1ww05yooomongQtLLFeVB-bXGoR0UmlfFozbUFmwsgoaXAAbaGBDND7d3aX4vfe5N5u4T115aaiSICsOUhRKnCiXYs7JB7NLzdamgyFgjj7Mnw9z9GHOPkru8ZRruhDT1v7E1Namt4c2ppBs55ps2P8nfgHQpmNX</recordid><startdate>20230102</startdate><enddate>20230102</enddate><creator>de Rooij, Mark</creator><creator>Karch, Julian D.</creator><creator>Fokkema, Marjolein</creator><creator>Bakk, Zsuzsa</creator><creator>Pratiwi, Bunga Citra</creator><creator>Kelderman, Henk</creator><general>Routledge</general><general>Psychology Press</general><scope>0YH</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9431-4208</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9352-4812</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9074-0229</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7308-6210</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9252-8325</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1625-2822</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20230102</creationdate><title>SEM-Based Out-of-Sample Predictions</title><author>de Rooij, Mark ; Karch, Julian D. ; Fokkema, Marjolein ; Bakk, Zsuzsa ; Pratiwi, Bunga Citra ; Kelderman, Henk</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c385t-1616b308447f717dc6045a1a479e03eb8056c678e47934af9a0a69f80cf0af2f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Cross-validation</topic><topic>machine learning</topic><topic>prediction rule</topic><topic>regression</topic><topic>Structural equation modeling</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>de Rooij, Mark</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Karch, Julian D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fokkema, Marjolein</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bakk, Zsuzsa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pratiwi, Bunga Citra</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kelderman, Henk</creatorcontrib><collection>Taylor & Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Structural equation modeling</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>de Rooij, Mark</au><au>Karch, Julian D.</au><au>Fokkema, Marjolein</au><au>Bakk, Zsuzsa</au><au>Pratiwi, Bunga Citra</au><au>Kelderman, Henk</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>SEM-Based Out-of-Sample Predictions</atitle><jtitle>Structural equation modeling</jtitle><date>2023-01-02</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>30</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>132</spage><epage>148</epage><pages>132-148</pages><issn>1070-5511</issn><eissn>1532-8007</eissn><abstract>Predictive modeling is becoming more popular in psychological science. Machine learning techniques have been used to develop prediction rules based on items of psychological tests. However, this approach does not take into account that these items are noisy indicators of the constructs they intend to measure. Structural equation modeling does take this into account. Several authors have concluded that it is impossible to make out-of-sample predictions based on a reflective structural equation model. We show that it is possible to make such predictions and we develop R-code to do so. With two empirical examples, we show that SEM-based prediction can outperform prediction based on linear regression models. With three simulation studies, we further investigate the SEM-based prediction rule and its robustness in comparison with predictions using regularized linear regression. We conclude that the new SEM-based prediction rule is robust against violation of the normality assumption but sensitive to model misspecification.</abstract><cop>Hove</cop><pub>Routledge</pub><doi>10.1080/10705511.2022.2061494</doi><tpages>17</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9431-4208</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9352-4812</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9074-0229</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7308-6210</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9252-8325</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1625-2822</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1070-5511 |
ispartof | Structural equation modeling, 2023-01, Vol.30 (1), p.132-148 |
issn | 1070-5511 1532-8007 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2760694065 |
source | Taylor and Francis Social Sciences and Humanities Collection |
subjects | Cross-validation machine learning prediction rule regression Structural equation modeling |
title | SEM-Based Out-of-Sample Predictions |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-28T02%3A17%3A22IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=SEM-Based%20Out-of-Sample%20Predictions&rft.jtitle=Structural%20equation%20modeling&rft.au=de%20Rooij,%20Mark&rft.date=2023-01-02&rft.volume=30&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=132&rft.epage=148&rft.pages=132-148&rft.issn=1070-5511&rft.eissn=1532-8007&rft_id=info:doi/10.1080/10705511.2022.2061494&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2760694065%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c385t-1616b308447f717dc6045a1a479e03eb8056c678e47934af9a0a69f80cf0af2f3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2760694065&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |