Loading…

SEM-Based Out-of-Sample Predictions

Predictive modeling is becoming more popular in psychological science. Machine learning techniques have been used to develop prediction rules based on items of psychological tests. However, this approach does not take into account that these items are noisy indicators of the constructs they intend t...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Structural equation modeling 2023-01, Vol.30 (1), p.132-148
Main Authors: de Rooij, Mark, Karch, Julian D., Fokkema, Marjolein, Bakk, Zsuzsa, Pratiwi, Bunga Citra, Kelderman, Henk
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c385t-1616b308447f717dc6045a1a479e03eb8056c678e47934af9a0a69f80cf0af2f3
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c385t-1616b308447f717dc6045a1a479e03eb8056c678e47934af9a0a69f80cf0af2f3
container_end_page 148
container_issue 1
container_start_page 132
container_title Structural equation modeling
container_volume 30
creator de Rooij, Mark
Karch, Julian D.
Fokkema, Marjolein
Bakk, Zsuzsa
Pratiwi, Bunga Citra
Kelderman, Henk
description Predictive modeling is becoming more popular in psychological science. Machine learning techniques have been used to develop prediction rules based on items of psychological tests. However, this approach does not take into account that these items are noisy indicators of the constructs they intend to measure. Structural equation modeling does take this into account. Several authors have concluded that it is impossible to make out-of-sample predictions based on a reflective structural equation model. We show that it is possible to make such predictions and we develop R-code to do so. With two empirical examples, we show that SEM-based prediction can outperform prediction based on linear regression models. With three simulation studies, we further investigate the SEM-based prediction rule and its robustness in comparison with predictions using regularized linear regression. We conclude that the new SEM-based prediction rule is robust against violation of the normality assumption but sensitive to model misspecification.
doi_str_mv 10.1080/10705511.2022.2061494
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2760694065</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2760694065</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c385t-1616b308447f717dc6045a1a479e03eb8056c678e47934af9a0a69f80cf0af2f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE1LAzEQhoMoWKs_QSj0nDr5zt7U0qpQqVA9hzSbwJbtpiZbpP_elNarl5lheN4ZeBC6JzAhoOGBgAIhCJlQoLQUSXjFL9CACEaxBlCXZS4MPkLX6CbnDQDRhOoBGq9m7_jZZl-Plvsex4BXdrtr_egj-bpxfRO7fIuugm2zvzv3Ifqazz6nr3ixfHmbPi2wY1r0mEgi1ww05yooomongQtLLFeVB-bXGoR0UmlfFozbUFmwsgoaXAAbaGBDND7d3aX4vfe5N5u4T115aaiSICsOUhRKnCiXYs7JB7NLzdamgyFgjj7Mnw9z9GHOPkru8ZRruhDT1v7E1Namt4c2ppBs55ps2P8nfgHQpmNX</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2760694065</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>SEM-Based Out-of-Sample Predictions</title><source>Taylor and Francis Social Sciences and Humanities Collection</source><creator>de Rooij, Mark ; Karch, Julian D. ; Fokkema, Marjolein ; Bakk, Zsuzsa ; Pratiwi, Bunga Citra ; Kelderman, Henk</creator><creatorcontrib>de Rooij, Mark ; Karch, Julian D. ; Fokkema, Marjolein ; Bakk, Zsuzsa ; Pratiwi, Bunga Citra ; Kelderman, Henk</creatorcontrib><description>Predictive modeling is becoming more popular in psychological science. Machine learning techniques have been used to develop prediction rules based on items of psychological tests. However, this approach does not take into account that these items are noisy indicators of the constructs they intend to measure. Structural equation modeling does take this into account. Several authors have concluded that it is impossible to make out-of-sample predictions based on a reflective structural equation model. We show that it is possible to make such predictions and we develop R-code to do so. With two empirical examples, we show that SEM-based prediction can outperform prediction based on linear regression models. With three simulation studies, we further investigate the SEM-based prediction rule and its robustness in comparison with predictions using regularized linear regression. We conclude that the new SEM-based prediction rule is robust against violation of the normality assumption but sensitive to model misspecification.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1070-5511</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1532-8007</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1080/10705511.2022.2061494</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Hove: Routledge</publisher><subject>Cross-validation ; machine learning ; prediction rule ; regression ; Structural equation modeling</subject><ispartof>Structural equation modeling, 2023-01, Vol.30 (1), p.132-148</ispartof><rights>2022 The Author(s). Published with license by Taylor &amp; Francis Group, LLC. 2022</rights><rights>2022 The Author(s). Published with license by Taylor &amp; Francis Group, LLC. This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution – Non-Commercial – No Derivatives License http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c385t-1616b308447f717dc6045a1a479e03eb8056c678e47934af9a0a69f80cf0af2f3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c385t-1616b308447f717dc6045a1a479e03eb8056c678e47934af9a0a69f80cf0af2f3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-9431-4208 ; 0000-0001-9352-4812 ; 0000-0001-9074-0229 ; 0000-0001-7308-6210 ; 0000-0002-9252-8325 ; 0000-0002-1625-2822</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>de Rooij, Mark</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Karch, Julian D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fokkema, Marjolein</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bakk, Zsuzsa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pratiwi, Bunga Citra</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kelderman, Henk</creatorcontrib><title>SEM-Based Out-of-Sample Predictions</title><title>Structural equation modeling</title><description>Predictive modeling is becoming more popular in psychological science. Machine learning techniques have been used to develop prediction rules based on items of psychological tests. However, this approach does not take into account that these items are noisy indicators of the constructs they intend to measure. Structural equation modeling does take this into account. Several authors have concluded that it is impossible to make out-of-sample predictions based on a reflective structural equation model. We show that it is possible to make such predictions and we develop R-code to do so. With two empirical examples, we show that SEM-based prediction can outperform prediction based on linear regression models. With three simulation studies, we further investigate the SEM-based prediction rule and its robustness in comparison with predictions using regularized linear regression. We conclude that the new SEM-based prediction rule is robust against violation of the normality assumption but sensitive to model misspecification.</description><subject>Cross-validation</subject><subject>machine learning</subject><subject>prediction rule</subject><subject>regression</subject><subject>Structural equation modeling</subject><issn>1070-5511</issn><issn>1532-8007</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>0YH</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kE1LAzEQhoMoWKs_QSj0nDr5zt7U0qpQqVA9hzSbwJbtpiZbpP_elNarl5lheN4ZeBC6JzAhoOGBgAIhCJlQoLQUSXjFL9CACEaxBlCXZS4MPkLX6CbnDQDRhOoBGq9m7_jZZl-Plvsex4BXdrtr_egj-bpxfRO7fIuugm2zvzv3Ifqazz6nr3ixfHmbPi2wY1r0mEgi1ww05yooomongQtLLFeVB-bXGoR0UmlfFozbUFmwsgoaXAAbaGBDND7d3aX4vfe5N5u4T115aaiSICsOUhRKnCiXYs7JB7NLzdamgyFgjj7Mnw9z9GHOPkru8ZRruhDT1v7E1Namt4c2ppBs55ps2P8nfgHQpmNX</recordid><startdate>20230102</startdate><enddate>20230102</enddate><creator>de Rooij, Mark</creator><creator>Karch, Julian D.</creator><creator>Fokkema, Marjolein</creator><creator>Bakk, Zsuzsa</creator><creator>Pratiwi, Bunga Citra</creator><creator>Kelderman, Henk</creator><general>Routledge</general><general>Psychology Press</general><scope>0YH</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9431-4208</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9352-4812</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9074-0229</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7308-6210</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9252-8325</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1625-2822</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20230102</creationdate><title>SEM-Based Out-of-Sample Predictions</title><author>de Rooij, Mark ; Karch, Julian D. ; Fokkema, Marjolein ; Bakk, Zsuzsa ; Pratiwi, Bunga Citra ; Kelderman, Henk</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c385t-1616b308447f717dc6045a1a479e03eb8056c678e47934af9a0a69f80cf0af2f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Cross-validation</topic><topic>machine learning</topic><topic>prediction rule</topic><topic>regression</topic><topic>Structural equation modeling</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>de Rooij, Mark</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Karch, Julian D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fokkema, Marjolein</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bakk, Zsuzsa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pratiwi, Bunga Citra</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kelderman, Henk</creatorcontrib><collection>Taylor &amp; Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Structural equation modeling</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>de Rooij, Mark</au><au>Karch, Julian D.</au><au>Fokkema, Marjolein</au><au>Bakk, Zsuzsa</au><au>Pratiwi, Bunga Citra</au><au>Kelderman, Henk</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>SEM-Based Out-of-Sample Predictions</atitle><jtitle>Structural equation modeling</jtitle><date>2023-01-02</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>30</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>132</spage><epage>148</epage><pages>132-148</pages><issn>1070-5511</issn><eissn>1532-8007</eissn><abstract>Predictive modeling is becoming more popular in psychological science. Machine learning techniques have been used to develop prediction rules based on items of psychological tests. However, this approach does not take into account that these items are noisy indicators of the constructs they intend to measure. Structural equation modeling does take this into account. Several authors have concluded that it is impossible to make out-of-sample predictions based on a reflective structural equation model. We show that it is possible to make such predictions and we develop R-code to do so. With two empirical examples, we show that SEM-based prediction can outperform prediction based on linear regression models. With three simulation studies, we further investigate the SEM-based prediction rule and its robustness in comparison with predictions using regularized linear regression. We conclude that the new SEM-based prediction rule is robust against violation of the normality assumption but sensitive to model misspecification.</abstract><cop>Hove</cop><pub>Routledge</pub><doi>10.1080/10705511.2022.2061494</doi><tpages>17</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9431-4208</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9352-4812</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9074-0229</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7308-6210</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9252-8325</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1625-2822</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1070-5511
ispartof Structural equation modeling, 2023-01, Vol.30 (1), p.132-148
issn 1070-5511
1532-8007
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2760694065
source Taylor and Francis Social Sciences and Humanities Collection
subjects Cross-validation
machine learning
prediction rule
regression
Structural equation modeling
title SEM-Based Out-of-Sample Predictions
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-28T02%3A17%3A22IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=SEM-Based%20Out-of-Sample%20Predictions&rft.jtitle=Structural%20equation%20modeling&rft.au=de%20Rooij,%20Mark&rft.date=2023-01-02&rft.volume=30&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=132&rft.epage=148&rft.pages=132-148&rft.issn=1070-5511&rft.eissn=1532-8007&rft_id=info:doi/10.1080/10705511.2022.2061494&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2760694065%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c385t-1616b308447f717dc6045a1a479e03eb8056c678e47934af9a0a69f80cf0af2f3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2760694065&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true