Loading…
Demographic trends in late‐slavery Jamaica, 1817–32
Early nineteenth‐century demographic trends on sugar estates in Jamaica, the most important British Caribbean colony, are examined through the 1817–32 public slave registers. We seek evidence regarding the background to the island's 1831–2 popular insurrection, the immediate cause of the London...
Saved in:
Published in: | The Economic history review 2023-02, Vol.76 (1), p.60-86 |
---|---|
Main Author: | |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3878-88beb79fc709c1a7f9c703000cf5322a423477049738fb834bc86dcc78f72d1e3 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3878-88beb79fc709c1a7f9c703000cf5322a423477049738fb834bc86dcc78f72d1e3 |
container_end_page | 86 |
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 60 |
container_title | The Economic history review |
container_volume | 76 |
creator | Ward, J. R. |
description | Early nineteenth‐century demographic trends on sugar estates in Jamaica, the most important British Caribbean colony, are examined through the 1817–32 public slave registers. We seek evidence regarding the background to the island's 1831–2 popular insurrection, the immediate cause of the London parliament's vote in 1833 to abolish colonial slavery. Some historians argue that the revolt occurred as ‘political’ effect from a sudden upsurge of metropolitan anti‐slavery activism in 1830–1. They believe the uprising broke out despite improvement in enslaved people's material welfare, favoured by many slaveholders to secure population increase after the closure of the British transatlantic slave trade in 1808. Alternative ‘economic’ assessments judge that increasing workloads had been aggravating popular unrest before the revolt. Commercial pressures, and the imminent likelihood of emancipation, allegedly outweighed welfare concerns. The excess of slave deaths over births widened between 1817 and 1832. However, the registers show that demographic deficits resulted mainly from the ageing of the last Africa‐born cohorts. Jamaica‐born enslaved people became self‐reproducing. There was no general pre‐1831 regime deterioration. Most slaveholders sought to maintain their Jamaican assets for the long term through pro‐natalist measures, and did not expect emancipation. The revolt's causes were thus more ‘political’ than ‘economic’. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1111/ehr.13168 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2761871107</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2761871107</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3878-88beb79fc709c1a7f9c703000cf5322a423477049738fb834bc86dcc78f72d1e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kMFKAzEQhoMoWKsH32DBk-C2mWS7M3uUWq1SEETPIZsmdsu2W5NW6a2PIPiGfRKj69W5zMB8Mz98jJ0D70Gsvp35HkjI6YB1IMsp5YKKQ9bhHGTKAfCYnYQw55wP4qLD8MYumlevV7PKJGtvl9OQVMuk1mu7332GWr9bv00e9EJXRl8lQID73ZcUp-zI6TrYs7_eZS-3o-fhOJ083t0PryepkYSUEpW2xMIZ5IUBja6Ik4zpxg2kEDoTMkPkWYGSXEkyKw3lU2OQHIopWNllF-3flW_eNjas1bzZ-GWMVAJzIATgGKnLljK-CcFbp1a-Wmi_VcDVjxcVvahfL5Htt-xHVdvt_6AajZ_ai286R2Ly</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2761871107</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Demographic trends in late‐slavery Jamaica, 1817–32</title><source>EconLit s plnými texty</source><source>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</source><source>Business Source Ultimate</source><source>Wiley-Blackwell Read & Publish Collection</source><source>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</source><source>Humanities Index</source><creator>Ward, J. R.</creator><creatorcontrib>Ward, J. R.</creatorcontrib><description>Early nineteenth‐century demographic trends on sugar estates in Jamaica, the most important British Caribbean colony, are examined through the 1817–32 public slave registers. We seek evidence regarding the background to the island's 1831–2 popular insurrection, the immediate cause of the London parliament's vote in 1833 to abolish colonial slavery. Some historians argue that the revolt occurred as ‘political’ effect from a sudden upsurge of metropolitan anti‐slavery activism in 1830–1. They believe the uprising broke out despite improvement in enslaved people's material welfare, favoured by many slaveholders to secure population increase after the closure of the British transatlantic slave trade in 1808. Alternative ‘economic’ assessments judge that increasing workloads had been aggravating popular unrest before the revolt. Commercial pressures, and the imminent likelihood of emancipation, allegedly outweighed welfare concerns. The excess of slave deaths over births widened between 1817 and 1832. However, the registers show that demographic deficits resulted mainly from the ageing of the last Africa‐born cohorts. Jamaica‐born enslaved people became self‐reproducing. There was no general pre‐1831 regime deterioration. Most slaveholders sought to maintain their Jamaican assets for the long term through pro‐natalist measures, and did not expect emancipation. The revolt's causes were thus more ‘political’ than ‘economic’.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0013-0117</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1468-0289</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/ehr.13168</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>19th century ; Aging ; Births ; Closure ; Deterioration ; Emancipation ; Emancipation of slaves ; Estates ; Historians ; late‐slavery Jamaica ; Legislatures ; Population aging ; Population growth ; slave demography ; slave insurrection ; Slave trade ; Slavery ; Sugar ; Trends ; Welfare ; Workloads</subject><ispartof>The Economic history review, 2023-02, Vol.76 (1), p.60-86</ispartof><rights>2022 Economic History Society.</rights><rights>2023 Economic History Society.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3878-88beb79fc709c1a7f9c703000cf5322a423477049738fb834bc86dcc78f72d1e3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3878-88beb79fc709c1a7f9c703000cf5322a423477049738fb834bc86dcc78f72d1e3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,33223,33849</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Ward, J. R.</creatorcontrib><title>Demographic trends in late‐slavery Jamaica, 1817–32</title><title>The Economic history review</title><description>Early nineteenth‐century demographic trends on sugar estates in Jamaica, the most important British Caribbean colony, are examined through the 1817–32 public slave registers. We seek evidence regarding the background to the island's 1831–2 popular insurrection, the immediate cause of the London parliament's vote in 1833 to abolish colonial slavery. Some historians argue that the revolt occurred as ‘political’ effect from a sudden upsurge of metropolitan anti‐slavery activism in 1830–1. They believe the uprising broke out despite improvement in enslaved people's material welfare, favoured by many slaveholders to secure population increase after the closure of the British transatlantic slave trade in 1808. Alternative ‘economic’ assessments judge that increasing workloads had been aggravating popular unrest before the revolt. Commercial pressures, and the imminent likelihood of emancipation, allegedly outweighed welfare concerns. The excess of slave deaths over births widened between 1817 and 1832. However, the registers show that demographic deficits resulted mainly from the ageing of the last Africa‐born cohorts. Jamaica‐born enslaved people became self‐reproducing. There was no general pre‐1831 regime deterioration. Most slaveholders sought to maintain their Jamaican assets for the long term through pro‐natalist measures, and did not expect emancipation. The revolt's causes were thus more ‘political’ than ‘economic’.</description><subject>19th century</subject><subject>Aging</subject><subject>Births</subject><subject>Closure</subject><subject>Deterioration</subject><subject>Emancipation</subject><subject>Emancipation of slaves</subject><subject>Estates</subject><subject>Historians</subject><subject>late‐slavery Jamaica</subject><subject>Legislatures</subject><subject>Population aging</subject><subject>Population growth</subject><subject>slave demography</subject><subject>slave insurrection</subject><subject>Slave trade</subject><subject>Slavery</subject><subject>Sugar</subject><subject>Trends</subject><subject>Welfare</subject><subject>Workloads</subject><issn>0013-0117</issn><issn>1468-0289</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7UB</sourceid><sourceid>8BJ</sourceid><sourceid>C18</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kMFKAzEQhoMoWKsH32DBk-C2mWS7M3uUWq1SEETPIZsmdsu2W5NW6a2PIPiGfRKj69W5zMB8Mz98jJ0D70Gsvp35HkjI6YB1IMsp5YKKQ9bhHGTKAfCYnYQw55wP4qLD8MYumlevV7PKJGtvl9OQVMuk1mu7332GWr9bv00e9EJXRl8lQID73ZcUp-zI6TrYs7_eZS-3o-fhOJ083t0PryepkYSUEpW2xMIZ5IUBja6Ik4zpxg2kEDoTMkPkWYGSXEkyKw3lU2OQHIopWNllF-3flW_eNjas1bzZ-GWMVAJzIATgGKnLljK-CcFbp1a-Wmi_VcDVjxcVvahfL5Htt-xHVdvt_6AajZ_ai286R2Ly</recordid><startdate>202302</startdate><enddate>202302</enddate><creator>Ward, J. R.</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7UB</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>C18</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope></search><sort><creationdate>202302</creationdate><title>Demographic trends in late‐slavery Jamaica, 1817–32</title><author>Ward, J. R.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3878-88beb79fc709c1a7f9c703000cf5322a423477049738fb834bc86dcc78f72d1e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>19th century</topic><topic>Aging</topic><topic>Births</topic><topic>Closure</topic><topic>Deterioration</topic><topic>Emancipation</topic><topic>Emancipation of slaves</topic><topic>Estates</topic><topic>Historians</topic><topic>late‐slavery Jamaica</topic><topic>Legislatures</topic><topic>Population aging</topic><topic>Population growth</topic><topic>slave demography</topic><topic>slave insurrection</topic><topic>Slave trade</topic><topic>Slavery</topic><topic>Sugar</topic><topic>Trends</topic><topic>Welfare</topic><topic>Workloads</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Ward, J. R.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>Humanities Index</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><jtitle>The Economic history review</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Ward, J. R.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Demographic trends in late‐slavery Jamaica, 1817–32</atitle><jtitle>The Economic history review</jtitle><date>2023-02</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>76</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>60</spage><epage>86</epage><pages>60-86</pages><issn>0013-0117</issn><eissn>1468-0289</eissn><abstract>Early nineteenth‐century demographic trends on sugar estates in Jamaica, the most important British Caribbean colony, are examined through the 1817–32 public slave registers. We seek evidence regarding the background to the island's 1831–2 popular insurrection, the immediate cause of the London parliament's vote in 1833 to abolish colonial slavery. Some historians argue that the revolt occurred as ‘political’ effect from a sudden upsurge of metropolitan anti‐slavery activism in 1830–1. They believe the uprising broke out despite improvement in enslaved people's material welfare, favoured by many slaveholders to secure population increase after the closure of the British transatlantic slave trade in 1808. Alternative ‘economic’ assessments judge that increasing workloads had been aggravating popular unrest before the revolt. Commercial pressures, and the imminent likelihood of emancipation, allegedly outweighed welfare concerns. The excess of slave deaths over births widened between 1817 and 1832. However, the registers show that demographic deficits resulted mainly from the ageing of the last Africa‐born cohorts. Jamaica‐born enslaved people became self‐reproducing. There was no general pre‐1831 regime deterioration. Most slaveholders sought to maintain their Jamaican assets for the long term through pro‐natalist measures, and did not expect emancipation. The revolt's causes were thus more ‘political’ than ‘economic’.</abstract><cop>Oxford</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><doi>10.1111/ehr.13168</doi><tpages>27</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0013-0117 |
ispartof | The Economic history review, 2023-02, Vol.76 (1), p.60-86 |
issn | 0013-0117 1468-0289 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2761871107 |
source | EconLit s plnými texty; International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS); Business Source Ultimate; Wiley-Blackwell Read & Publish Collection; Worldwide Political Science Abstracts; Humanities Index |
subjects | 19th century Aging Births Closure Deterioration Emancipation Emancipation of slaves Estates Historians late‐slavery Jamaica Legislatures Population aging Population growth slave demography slave insurrection Slave trade Slavery Sugar Trends Welfare Workloads |
title | Demographic trends in late‐slavery Jamaica, 1817–32 |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-27T01%3A18%3A52IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Demographic%20trends%20in%20late%E2%80%90slavery%20Jamaica,%201817%E2%80%9332&rft.jtitle=The%20Economic%20history%20review&rft.au=Ward,%20J.%20R.&rft.date=2023-02&rft.volume=76&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=60&rft.epage=86&rft.pages=60-86&rft.issn=0013-0117&rft.eissn=1468-0289&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/ehr.13168&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2761871107%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3878-88beb79fc709c1a7f9c703000cf5322a423477049738fb834bc86dcc78f72d1e3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2761871107&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |