Loading…

Social–ecological systems approaches are essential for understanding and responding to the complex impacts of COVID-19 on people and the environment

The Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic is dramatically impacting planetary and human societal systems that are inseparably linked. Zoonotic diseases like COVID-19 expose how human well-being is inextricably interconnected with the environment and to other converging (human driven) social–e...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:PLOS sustainability and transformation 2022-04, Vol.1 (4), p.e0000006
Main Authors: Kadykalo, Andrew N., Beaudoin, Christine, Hackenburg, Diana M., Young, Nathan, Cooke, Steven J.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c1706-83dba7dc7de3b15b43200336828dc39d2eaedccf69333a632ec938f9a80a8963
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c1706-83dba7dc7de3b15b43200336828dc39d2eaedccf69333a632ec938f9a80a8963
container_end_page
container_issue 4
container_start_page e0000006
container_title PLOS sustainability and transformation
container_volume 1
creator Kadykalo, Andrew N.
Beaudoin, Christine
Hackenburg, Diana M.
Young, Nathan
Cooke, Steven J.
description The Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic is dramatically impacting planetary and human societal systems that are inseparably linked. Zoonotic diseases like COVID-19 expose how human well-being is inextricably interconnected with the environment and to other converging (human driven) social–ecological crises, such as the dramatic losses of biodiversity, land use change, and climate change. We argue that COVID-19 is itself a social–ecological crisis, but responses so far have not been inclusive of ecological resiliency, in part because the “Anthropause” metaphor has created an unrealistic sense of comfort that excuses inaction. Anthropause narratives belie the fact that resource extraction has continued during the pandemic and that business-as-usual continues to cause widespread ecosystem degradation that requires immediate policy attention. In some cases, COVID-19 policy measures further contributed to the problem such as reducing environmental taxes or regulatory enforcement. While some social–ecological systems (SES) are experiencing reduced impacts, others are experiencing what we term an “Anthrocrush,” with more visitors and intensified use. The varied causes and impacts of the pandemic can be better understood with a social–ecological lens. Social–ecological insights are necessary to plan and build the resilience needed to tackle the pandemic and future social–ecological crises. If we as a society are serious about building back better from the pandemic, we must embrace a set of research and policy responses informed by SES thinking.
doi_str_mv 10.1371/journal.pstr.0000006
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2762069859</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2762069859</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1706-83dba7dc7de3b15b43200336828dc39d2eaedccf69333a632ec938f9a80a8963</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpNkc1KAzEQx4MoWGrfwEPA89Zk02aTo9SvQqEHi9clTWbbLbvJmqRib76D4AP6JKYfgnOZGeY3M8z8EbqmZEhZQW83buutaoZdiH5IDsbPUC8veJExKovzf_ElGoSwSUQuiJSS9tD3i9O1an4-v0C7xq1qrRocdiFCG7DqOu-UXkMKPWAIAWxMNK6cx1trwIeorKntCieHPYTOHdPocFwD1q7tGvjAddspHQN2FZ7MX6f3GZXYWdyBS-VD754G-157Z9u05ApdVKoJMDj5Plo8Piwmz9ls_jSd3M0yTQvCM8HMUhVGFwbYko6XI5YTwhgXuTCaSZODAqN1xSVjTHGWg5ZMVFIJooTkrI9ujmPTnW9bCLE8fTOU6Wc54VKMZaJGR0p7F4KHqux83Sq_Kykp9xr8dZV7DcqTBuwXZp2BsQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2762069859</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Social–ecological systems approaches are essential for understanding and responding to the complex impacts of COVID-19 on people and the environment</title><source>Publicly Available Content Database</source><source>Coronavirus Research Database</source><creator>Kadykalo, Andrew N. ; Beaudoin, Christine ; Hackenburg, Diana M. ; Young, Nathan ; Cooke, Steven J.</creator><contributor>Martin, Dominic Andreas</contributor><creatorcontrib>Kadykalo, Andrew N. ; Beaudoin, Christine ; Hackenburg, Diana M. ; Young, Nathan ; Cooke, Steven J. ; Martin, Dominic Andreas</creatorcontrib><description>The Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic is dramatically impacting planetary and human societal systems that are inseparably linked. Zoonotic diseases like COVID-19 expose how human well-being is inextricably interconnected with the environment and to other converging (human driven) social–ecological crises, such as the dramatic losses of biodiversity, land use change, and climate change. We argue that COVID-19 is itself a social–ecological crisis, but responses so far have not been inclusive of ecological resiliency, in part because the “Anthropause” metaphor has created an unrealistic sense of comfort that excuses inaction. Anthropause narratives belie the fact that resource extraction has continued during the pandemic and that business-as-usual continues to cause widespread ecosystem degradation that requires immediate policy attention. In some cases, COVID-19 policy measures further contributed to the problem such as reducing environmental taxes or regulatory enforcement. While some social–ecological systems (SES) are experiencing reduced impacts, others are experiencing what we term an “Anthrocrush,” with more visitors and intensified use. The varied causes and impacts of the pandemic can be better understood with a social–ecological lens. Social–ecological insights are necessary to plan and build the resilience needed to tackle the pandemic and future social–ecological crises. If we as a society are serious about building back better from the pandemic, we must embrace a set of research and policy responses informed by SES thinking.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2767-3197</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2767-3197</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1371/journal.pstr.0000006</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>San Francisco: Public Library of Science</publisher><subject>Biodiversity ; Climate change ; Coronaviruses ; COVID-19 ; Crises ; Ecology ; Ecosystem degradation ; Environmental tax ; Infectious diseases ; Land use ; Pandemics ; Resilience ; Social-ecological systems ; Viral diseases ; Zoonoses</subject><ispartof>PLOS sustainability and transformation, 2022-04, Vol.1 (4), p.e0000006</ispartof><rights>2022 Kadykalo et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1706-83dba7dc7de3b15b43200336828dc39d2eaedccf69333a632ec938f9a80a8963</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1706-83dba7dc7de3b15b43200336828dc39d2eaedccf69333a632ec938f9a80a8963</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-7359-0967 ; 0000-0003-4678-8297 ; 0000-0002-2927-7025 ; 0000-0002-7574-4392</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2762069859?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2762069859?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,25753,27924,27925,37012,38516,43895,44590,74412,75126</link.rule.ids></links><search><contributor>Martin, Dominic Andreas</contributor><creatorcontrib>Kadykalo, Andrew N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Beaudoin, Christine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hackenburg, Diana M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Young, Nathan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cooke, Steven J.</creatorcontrib><title>Social–ecological systems approaches are essential for understanding and responding to the complex impacts of COVID-19 on people and the environment</title><title>PLOS sustainability and transformation</title><description>The Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic is dramatically impacting planetary and human societal systems that are inseparably linked. Zoonotic diseases like COVID-19 expose how human well-being is inextricably interconnected with the environment and to other converging (human driven) social–ecological crises, such as the dramatic losses of biodiversity, land use change, and climate change. We argue that COVID-19 is itself a social–ecological crisis, but responses so far have not been inclusive of ecological resiliency, in part because the “Anthropause” metaphor has created an unrealistic sense of comfort that excuses inaction. Anthropause narratives belie the fact that resource extraction has continued during the pandemic and that business-as-usual continues to cause widespread ecosystem degradation that requires immediate policy attention. In some cases, COVID-19 policy measures further contributed to the problem such as reducing environmental taxes or regulatory enforcement. While some social–ecological systems (SES) are experiencing reduced impacts, others are experiencing what we term an “Anthrocrush,” with more visitors and intensified use. The varied causes and impacts of the pandemic can be better understood with a social–ecological lens. Social–ecological insights are necessary to plan and build the resilience needed to tackle the pandemic and future social–ecological crises. If we as a society are serious about building back better from the pandemic, we must embrace a set of research and policy responses informed by SES thinking.</description><subject>Biodiversity</subject><subject>Climate change</subject><subject>Coronaviruses</subject><subject>COVID-19</subject><subject>Crises</subject><subject>Ecology</subject><subject>Ecosystem degradation</subject><subject>Environmental tax</subject><subject>Infectious diseases</subject><subject>Land use</subject><subject>Pandemics</subject><subject>Resilience</subject><subject>Social-ecological systems</subject><subject>Viral diseases</subject><subject>Zoonoses</subject><issn>2767-3197</issn><issn>2767-3197</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>COVID</sourceid><sourceid>PIMPY</sourceid><recordid>eNpNkc1KAzEQx4MoWGrfwEPA89Zk02aTo9SvQqEHi9clTWbbLbvJmqRib76D4AP6JKYfgnOZGeY3M8z8EbqmZEhZQW83buutaoZdiH5IDsbPUC8veJExKovzf_ElGoSwSUQuiJSS9tD3i9O1an4-v0C7xq1qrRocdiFCG7DqOu-UXkMKPWAIAWxMNK6cx1trwIeorKntCieHPYTOHdPocFwD1q7tGvjAddspHQN2FZ7MX6f3GZXYWdyBS-VD754G-157Z9u05ApdVKoJMDj5Plo8Piwmz9ls_jSd3M0yTQvCM8HMUhVGFwbYko6XI5YTwhgXuTCaSZODAqN1xSVjTHGWg5ZMVFIJooTkrI9ujmPTnW9bCLE8fTOU6Wc54VKMZaJGR0p7F4KHqux83Sq_Kykp9xr8dZV7DcqTBuwXZp2BsQ</recordid><startdate>20220418</startdate><enddate>20220418</enddate><creator>Kadykalo, Andrew N.</creator><creator>Beaudoin, Christine</creator><creator>Hackenburg, Diana M.</creator><creator>Young, Nathan</creator><creator>Cooke, Steven J.</creator><general>Public Library of Science</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>BKSAR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>COVID</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PCBAR</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7359-0967</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4678-8297</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2927-7025</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7574-4392</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20220418</creationdate><title>Social–ecological systems approaches are essential for understanding and responding to the complex impacts of COVID-19 on people and the environment</title><author>Kadykalo, Andrew N. ; Beaudoin, Christine ; Hackenburg, Diana M. ; Young, Nathan ; Cooke, Steven J.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c1706-83dba7dc7de3b15b43200336828dc39d2eaedccf69333a632ec938f9a80a8963</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Biodiversity</topic><topic>Climate change</topic><topic>Coronaviruses</topic><topic>COVID-19</topic><topic>Crises</topic><topic>Ecology</topic><topic>Ecosystem degradation</topic><topic>Environmental tax</topic><topic>Infectious diseases</topic><topic>Land use</topic><topic>Pandemics</topic><topic>Resilience</topic><topic>Social-ecological systems</topic><topic>Viral diseases</topic><topic>Zoonoses</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kadykalo, Andrew N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Beaudoin, Christine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hackenburg, Diana M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Young, Nathan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cooke, Steven J.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Agricultural &amp; Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric &amp; Aquatic Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Coronavirus Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric &amp; Aquatic Science Database</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><jtitle>PLOS sustainability and transformation</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kadykalo, Andrew N.</au><au>Beaudoin, Christine</au><au>Hackenburg, Diana M.</au><au>Young, Nathan</au><au>Cooke, Steven J.</au><au>Martin, Dominic Andreas</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Social–ecological systems approaches are essential for understanding and responding to the complex impacts of COVID-19 on people and the environment</atitle><jtitle>PLOS sustainability and transformation</jtitle><date>2022-04-18</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>1</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>e0000006</spage><pages>e0000006-</pages><issn>2767-3197</issn><eissn>2767-3197</eissn><abstract>The Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic is dramatically impacting planetary and human societal systems that are inseparably linked. Zoonotic diseases like COVID-19 expose how human well-being is inextricably interconnected with the environment and to other converging (human driven) social–ecological crises, such as the dramatic losses of biodiversity, land use change, and climate change. We argue that COVID-19 is itself a social–ecological crisis, but responses so far have not been inclusive of ecological resiliency, in part because the “Anthropause” metaphor has created an unrealistic sense of comfort that excuses inaction. Anthropause narratives belie the fact that resource extraction has continued during the pandemic and that business-as-usual continues to cause widespread ecosystem degradation that requires immediate policy attention. In some cases, COVID-19 policy measures further contributed to the problem such as reducing environmental taxes or regulatory enforcement. While some social–ecological systems (SES) are experiencing reduced impacts, others are experiencing what we term an “Anthrocrush,” with more visitors and intensified use. The varied causes and impacts of the pandemic can be better understood with a social–ecological lens. Social–ecological insights are necessary to plan and build the resilience needed to tackle the pandemic and future social–ecological crises. If we as a society are serious about building back better from the pandemic, we must embrace a set of research and policy responses informed by SES thinking.</abstract><cop>San Francisco</cop><pub>Public Library of Science</pub><doi>10.1371/journal.pstr.0000006</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7359-0967</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4678-8297</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2927-7025</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7574-4392</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2767-3197
ispartof PLOS sustainability and transformation, 2022-04, Vol.1 (4), p.e0000006
issn 2767-3197
2767-3197
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2762069859
source Publicly Available Content Database; Coronavirus Research Database
subjects Biodiversity
Climate change
Coronaviruses
COVID-19
Crises
Ecology
Ecosystem degradation
Environmental tax
Infectious diseases
Land use
Pandemics
Resilience
Social-ecological systems
Viral diseases
Zoonoses
title Social–ecological systems approaches are essential for understanding and responding to the complex impacts of COVID-19 on people and the environment
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-18T16%3A55%3A57IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Social%E2%80%93ecological%20systems%20approaches%20are%20essential%20for%20understanding%20and%20responding%20to%20the%20complex%20impacts%20of%20COVID-19%20on%20people%20and%20the%20environment&rft.jtitle=PLOS%20sustainability%20and%20transformation&rft.au=Kadykalo,%20Andrew%20N.&rft.date=2022-04-18&rft.volume=1&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=e0000006&rft.pages=e0000006-&rft.issn=2767-3197&rft.eissn=2767-3197&rft_id=info:doi/10.1371/journal.pstr.0000006&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2762069859%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c1706-83dba7dc7de3b15b43200336828dc39d2eaedccf69333a632ec938f9a80a8963%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2762069859&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true