Loading…
Social–ecological systems approaches are essential for understanding and responding to the complex impacts of COVID-19 on people and the environment
The Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic is dramatically impacting planetary and human societal systems that are inseparably linked. Zoonotic diseases like COVID-19 expose how human well-being is inextricably interconnected with the environment and to other converging (human driven) social–e...
Saved in:
Published in: | PLOS sustainability and transformation 2022-04, Vol.1 (4), p.e0000006 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c1706-83dba7dc7de3b15b43200336828dc39d2eaedccf69333a632ec938f9a80a8963 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c1706-83dba7dc7de3b15b43200336828dc39d2eaedccf69333a632ec938f9a80a8963 |
container_end_page | |
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | e0000006 |
container_title | PLOS sustainability and transformation |
container_volume | 1 |
creator | Kadykalo, Andrew N. Beaudoin, Christine Hackenburg, Diana M. Young, Nathan Cooke, Steven J. |
description | The Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic is dramatically impacting planetary and human societal systems that are inseparably linked. Zoonotic diseases like COVID-19 expose how human well-being is inextricably interconnected with the environment and to other converging (human driven) social–ecological crises, such as the dramatic losses of biodiversity, land use change, and climate change. We argue that COVID-19 is itself a social–ecological crisis, but responses so far have not been inclusive of ecological resiliency, in part because the “Anthropause” metaphor has created an unrealistic sense of comfort that excuses inaction. Anthropause narratives belie the fact that resource extraction has continued during the pandemic and that business-as-usual continues to cause widespread ecosystem degradation that requires immediate policy attention. In some cases, COVID-19 policy measures further contributed to the problem such as reducing environmental taxes or regulatory enforcement. While some social–ecological systems (SES) are experiencing reduced impacts, others are experiencing what we term an “Anthrocrush,” with more visitors and intensified use. The varied causes and impacts of the pandemic can be better understood with a social–ecological lens. Social–ecological insights are necessary to plan and build the resilience needed to tackle the pandemic and future social–ecological crises. If we as a society are serious about building back better from the pandemic, we must embrace a set of research and policy responses informed by SES thinking. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1371/journal.pstr.0000006 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2762069859</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2762069859</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1706-83dba7dc7de3b15b43200336828dc39d2eaedccf69333a632ec938f9a80a8963</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpNkc1KAzEQx4MoWGrfwEPA89Zk02aTo9SvQqEHi9clTWbbLbvJmqRib76D4AP6JKYfgnOZGeY3M8z8EbqmZEhZQW83buutaoZdiH5IDsbPUC8veJExKovzf_ElGoSwSUQuiJSS9tD3i9O1an4-v0C7xq1qrRocdiFCG7DqOu-UXkMKPWAIAWxMNK6cx1trwIeorKntCieHPYTOHdPocFwD1q7tGvjAddspHQN2FZ7MX6f3GZXYWdyBS-VD754G-157Z9u05ApdVKoJMDj5Plo8Piwmz9ls_jSd3M0yTQvCM8HMUhVGFwbYko6XI5YTwhgXuTCaSZODAqN1xSVjTHGWg5ZMVFIJooTkrI9ujmPTnW9bCLE8fTOU6Wc54VKMZaJGR0p7F4KHqux83Sq_Kykp9xr8dZV7DcqTBuwXZp2BsQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2762069859</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Social–ecological systems approaches are essential for understanding and responding to the complex impacts of COVID-19 on people and the environment</title><source>Publicly Available Content Database</source><source>Coronavirus Research Database</source><creator>Kadykalo, Andrew N. ; Beaudoin, Christine ; Hackenburg, Diana M. ; Young, Nathan ; Cooke, Steven J.</creator><contributor>Martin, Dominic Andreas</contributor><creatorcontrib>Kadykalo, Andrew N. ; Beaudoin, Christine ; Hackenburg, Diana M. ; Young, Nathan ; Cooke, Steven J. ; Martin, Dominic Andreas</creatorcontrib><description>The Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic is dramatically impacting planetary and human societal systems that are inseparably linked. Zoonotic diseases like COVID-19 expose how human well-being is inextricably interconnected with the environment and to other converging (human driven) social–ecological crises, such as the dramatic losses of biodiversity, land use change, and climate change. We argue that COVID-19 is itself a social–ecological crisis, but responses so far have not been inclusive of ecological resiliency, in part because the “Anthropause” metaphor has created an unrealistic sense of comfort that excuses inaction. Anthropause narratives belie the fact that resource extraction has continued during the pandemic and that business-as-usual continues to cause widespread ecosystem degradation that requires immediate policy attention. In some cases, COVID-19 policy measures further contributed to the problem such as reducing environmental taxes or regulatory enforcement. While some social–ecological systems (SES) are experiencing reduced impacts, others are experiencing what we term an “Anthrocrush,” with more visitors and intensified use. The varied causes and impacts of the pandemic can be better understood with a social–ecological lens. Social–ecological insights are necessary to plan and build the resilience needed to tackle the pandemic and future social–ecological crises. If we as a society are serious about building back better from the pandemic, we must embrace a set of research and policy responses informed by SES thinking.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2767-3197</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2767-3197</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1371/journal.pstr.0000006</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>San Francisco: Public Library of Science</publisher><subject>Biodiversity ; Climate change ; Coronaviruses ; COVID-19 ; Crises ; Ecology ; Ecosystem degradation ; Environmental tax ; Infectious diseases ; Land use ; Pandemics ; Resilience ; Social-ecological systems ; Viral diseases ; Zoonoses</subject><ispartof>PLOS sustainability and transformation, 2022-04, Vol.1 (4), p.e0000006</ispartof><rights>2022 Kadykalo et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1706-83dba7dc7de3b15b43200336828dc39d2eaedccf69333a632ec938f9a80a8963</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1706-83dba7dc7de3b15b43200336828dc39d2eaedccf69333a632ec938f9a80a8963</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-7359-0967 ; 0000-0003-4678-8297 ; 0000-0002-2927-7025 ; 0000-0002-7574-4392</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2762069859?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2762069859?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,25753,27924,27925,37012,38516,43895,44590,74412,75126</link.rule.ids></links><search><contributor>Martin, Dominic Andreas</contributor><creatorcontrib>Kadykalo, Andrew N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Beaudoin, Christine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hackenburg, Diana M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Young, Nathan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cooke, Steven J.</creatorcontrib><title>Social–ecological systems approaches are essential for understanding and responding to the complex impacts of COVID-19 on people and the environment</title><title>PLOS sustainability and transformation</title><description>The Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic is dramatically impacting planetary and human societal systems that are inseparably linked. Zoonotic diseases like COVID-19 expose how human well-being is inextricably interconnected with the environment and to other converging (human driven) social–ecological crises, such as the dramatic losses of biodiversity, land use change, and climate change. We argue that COVID-19 is itself a social–ecological crisis, but responses so far have not been inclusive of ecological resiliency, in part because the “Anthropause” metaphor has created an unrealistic sense of comfort that excuses inaction. Anthropause narratives belie the fact that resource extraction has continued during the pandemic and that business-as-usual continues to cause widespread ecosystem degradation that requires immediate policy attention. In some cases, COVID-19 policy measures further contributed to the problem such as reducing environmental taxes or regulatory enforcement. While some social–ecological systems (SES) are experiencing reduced impacts, others are experiencing what we term an “Anthrocrush,” with more visitors and intensified use. The varied causes and impacts of the pandemic can be better understood with a social–ecological lens. Social–ecological insights are necessary to plan and build the resilience needed to tackle the pandemic and future social–ecological crises. If we as a society are serious about building back better from the pandemic, we must embrace a set of research and policy responses informed by SES thinking.</description><subject>Biodiversity</subject><subject>Climate change</subject><subject>Coronaviruses</subject><subject>COVID-19</subject><subject>Crises</subject><subject>Ecology</subject><subject>Ecosystem degradation</subject><subject>Environmental tax</subject><subject>Infectious diseases</subject><subject>Land use</subject><subject>Pandemics</subject><subject>Resilience</subject><subject>Social-ecological systems</subject><subject>Viral diseases</subject><subject>Zoonoses</subject><issn>2767-3197</issn><issn>2767-3197</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>COVID</sourceid><sourceid>PIMPY</sourceid><recordid>eNpNkc1KAzEQx4MoWGrfwEPA89Zk02aTo9SvQqEHi9clTWbbLbvJmqRib76D4AP6JKYfgnOZGeY3M8z8EbqmZEhZQW83buutaoZdiH5IDsbPUC8veJExKovzf_ElGoSwSUQuiJSS9tD3i9O1an4-v0C7xq1qrRocdiFCG7DqOu-UXkMKPWAIAWxMNK6cx1trwIeorKntCieHPYTOHdPocFwD1q7tGvjAddspHQN2FZ7MX6f3GZXYWdyBS-VD754G-157Z9u05ApdVKoJMDj5Plo8Piwmz9ls_jSd3M0yTQvCM8HMUhVGFwbYko6XI5YTwhgXuTCaSZODAqN1xSVjTHGWg5ZMVFIJooTkrI9ujmPTnW9bCLE8fTOU6Wc54VKMZaJGR0p7F4KHqux83Sq_Kykp9xr8dZV7DcqTBuwXZp2BsQ</recordid><startdate>20220418</startdate><enddate>20220418</enddate><creator>Kadykalo, Andrew N.</creator><creator>Beaudoin, Christine</creator><creator>Hackenburg, Diana M.</creator><creator>Young, Nathan</creator><creator>Cooke, Steven J.</creator><general>Public Library of Science</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>BKSAR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>COVID</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PCBAR</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7359-0967</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4678-8297</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2927-7025</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7574-4392</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20220418</creationdate><title>Social–ecological systems approaches are essential for understanding and responding to the complex impacts of COVID-19 on people and the environment</title><author>Kadykalo, Andrew N. ; Beaudoin, Christine ; Hackenburg, Diana M. ; Young, Nathan ; Cooke, Steven J.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c1706-83dba7dc7de3b15b43200336828dc39d2eaedccf69333a632ec938f9a80a8963</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Biodiversity</topic><topic>Climate change</topic><topic>Coronaviruses</topic><topic>COVID-19</topic><topic>Crises</topic><topic>Ecology</topic><topic>Ecosystem degradation</topic><topic>Environmental tax</topic><topic>Infectious diseases</topic><topic>Land use</topic><topic>Pandemics</topic><topic>Resilience</topic><topic>Social-ecological systems</topic><topic>Viral diseases</topic><topic>Zoonoses</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kadykalo, Andrew N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Beaudoin, Christine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hackenburg, Diana M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Young, Nathan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cooke, Steven J.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric & Aquatic Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Coronavirus Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric & Aquatic Science Database</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><jtitle>PLOS sustainability and transformation</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kadykalo, Andrew N.</au><au>Beaudoin, Christine</au><au>Hackenburg, Diana M.</au><au>Young, Nathan</au><au>Cooke, Steven J.</au><au>Martin, Dominic Andreas</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Social–ecological systems approaches are essential for understanding and responding to the complex impacts of COVID-19 on people and the environment</atitle><jtitle>PLOS sustainability and transformation</jtitle><date>2022-04-18</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>1</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>e0000006</spage><pages>e0000006-</pages><issn>2767-3197</issn><eissn>2767-3197</eissn><abstract>The Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic is dramatically impacting planetary and human societal systems that are inseparably linked. Zoonotic diseases like COVID-19 expose how human well-being is inextricably interconnected with the environment and to other converging (human driven) social–ecological crises, such as the dramatic losses of biodiversity, land use change, and climate change. We argue that COVID-19 is itself a social–ecological crisis, but responses so far have not been inclusive of ecological resiliency, in part because the “Anthropause” metaphor has created an unrealistic sense of comfort that excuses inaction. Anthropause narratives belie the fact that resource extraction has continued during the pandemic and that business-as-usual continues to cause widespread ecosystem degradation that requires immediate policy attention. In some cases, COVID-19 policy measures further contributed to the problem such as reducing environmental taxes or regulatory enforcement. While some social–ecological systems (SES) are experiencing reduced impacts, others are experiencing what we term an “Anthrocrush,” with more visitors and intensified use. The varied causes and impacts of the pandemic can be better understood with a social–ecological lens. Social–ecological insights are necessary to plan and build the resilience needed to tackle the pandemic and future social–ecological crises. If we as a society are serious about building back better from the pandemic, we must embrace a set of research and policy responses informed by SES thinking.</abstract><cop>San Francisco</cop><pub>Public Library of Science</pub><doi>10.1371/journal.pstr.0000006</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7359-0967</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4678-8297</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2927-7025</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7574-4392</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 2767-3197 |
ispartof | PLOS sustainability and transformation, 2022-04, Vol.1 (4), p.e0000006 |
issn | 2767-3197 2767-3197 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2762069859 |
source | Publicly Available Content Database; Coronavirus Research Database |
subjects | Biodiversity Climate change Coronaviruses COVID-19 Crises Ecology Ecosystem degradation Environmental tax Infectious diseases Land use Pandemics Resilience Social-ecological systems Viral diseases Zoonoses |
title | Social–ecological systems approaches are essential for understanding and responding to the complex impacts of COVID-19 on people and the environment |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-18T16%3A55%3A57IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Social%E2%80%93ecological%20systems%20approaches%20are%20essential%20for%20understanding%20and%20responding%20to%20the%20complex%20impacts%20of%20COVID-19%20on%20people%20and%20the%20environment&rft.jtitle=PLOS%20sustainability%20and%20transformation&rft.au=Kadykalo,%20Andrew%20N.&rft.date=2022-04-18&rft.volume=1&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=e0000006&rft.pages=e0000006-&rft.issn=2767-3197&rft.eissn=2767-3197&rft_id=info:doi/10.1371/journal.pstr.0000006&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2762069859%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c1706-83dba7dc7de3b15b43200336828dc39d2eaedccf69333a632ec938f9a80a8963%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2762069859&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |