Loading…
A meta-analysis of the adoption of agricultural technology in Sub-Saharan Africa
Both global poverty and hunger have increased in recent years, endangering progress towards accomplishing Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) 1 and 2. The regression has been most pronounced in Sub-Saharan Africa (SSA). Meeting the SDG targets requires achieving resilient farm productivity. Althoug...
Saved in:
Published in: | PLOS sustainability and transformation 2022-07, Vol.1 (7), p.e0000018 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c1708-ab8cf54e2bb5f156ae06813e0faef916166049bd40621b1711c678742f1a03ef3 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c1708-ab8cf54e2bb5f156ae06813e0faef916166049bd40621b1711c678742f1a03ef3 |
container_end_page | |
container_issue | 7 |
container_start_page | e0000018 |
container_title | PLOS sustainability and transformation |
container_volume | 1 |
creator | Arslan, Aslihan Floress, Kristin Lamanna, Christine Lipper, Leslie Rosenstock, Todd S. |
description | Both global poverty and hunger have increased in recent years, endangering progress towards accomplishing Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) 1 and 2. The regression has been most pronounced in Sub-Saharan Africa (SSA). Meeting the SDG targets requires achieving resilient farm productivity. Although many farm management technologies exist to improve yields, farmers in SSA largely have not adopted these approaches. A long-standing literature about technology adoption identifies multiple hypotheses as to why farmers may or may not adopt new agricultural technologies, culminating in numerous micro-econometric studies. We analyse a metadata set capturing the findings of 164 published studies specifically focusing on SSA and show that 20 out of 38, or 53%, of the determinants commonly believed to influence technology adoption lack empirical support. Eighteen determinants—primarily related to information access, wealth, group membership and social capital, and land tenure—consistently influence adoption across studies. Wealth remains a significant determinant of fertilizer adoption, despite long-running subsidies in most countries, although it is decoupled from the adoption of improved seeds and alternative crop and nutrient management technologies. We highlight the foundational determinants of adoption and offer guidance to design effective interventions that can decrease poverty and hunger towards 2030. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1371/journal.pstr.0000018 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2762070986</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2762070986</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1708-ab8cf54e2bb5f156ae06813e0faef916166049bd40621b1711c678742f1a03ef3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpNkE1rwzAMhs3YYKXrP9jBsHMyK0n9cSxlH4XCBt3ORkntNiWNM9s59N8voRlMF0nw6AU9hDwCSyEX8HxyvW-xSbsQfcrGAnlDZpngIslBidt_8z1ZhHAakEwypRTMyOeKnk3EBIeIS6gDdZbGo6G4d12sXTvuePB11Tex99jQaKpj6xp3uNC6pbu-THZ4RI8tXdkBwwdyZ7EJZjH1Ofl-fflavyfbj7fNerVNKhBMJljKyi4Lk5Xl0sKSo2FcQm6YRWMVcOCcFarcF4xnUIIAqLiQosgsIMuNzefk6ZrbeffTmxD1JCLo4d2MCaYkH6jiSlXeheCN1Z2vz-gvGpge9f1d6VGfnvTlv4rLZgQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2762070986</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A meta-analysis of the adoption of agricultural technology in Sub-Saharan Africa</title><source>Publicly Available Content Database</source><source>Coronavirus Research Database</source><creator>Arslan, Aslihan ; Floress, Kristin ; Lamanna, Christine ; Lipper, Leslie ; Rosenstock, Todd S.</creator><contributor>Uribe Toril, Juan</contributor><creatorcontrib>Arslan, Aslihan ; Floress, Kristin ; Lamanna, Christine ; Lipper, Leslie ; Rosenstock, Todd S. ; Uribe Toril, Juan</creatorcontrib><description>Both global poverty and hunger have increased in recent years, endangering progress towards accomplishing Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) 1 and 2. The regression has been most pronounced in Sub-Saharan Africa (SSA). Meeting the SDG targets requires achieving resilient farm productivity. Although many farm management technologies exist to improve yields, farmers in SSA largely have not adopted these approaches. A long-standing literature about technology adoption identifies multiple hypotheses as to why farmers may or may not adopt new agricultural technologies, culminating in numerous micro-econometric studies. We analyse a metadata set capturing the findings of 164 published studies specifically focusing on SSA and show that 20 out of 38, or 53%, of the determinants commonly believed to influence technology adoption lack empirical support. Eighteen determinants—primarily related to information access, wealth, group membership and social capital, and land tenure—consistently influence adoption across studies. Wealth remains a significant determinant of fertilizer adoption, despite long-running subsidies in most countries, although it is decoupled from the adoption of improved seeds and alternative crop and nutrient management technologies. We highlight the foundational determinants of adoption and offer guidance to design effective interventions that can decrease poverty and hunger towards 2030.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2767-3197</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2767-3197</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1371/journal.pstr.0000018</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>San Francisco: Public Library of Science</publisher><subject>Access to information ; Agricultural production ; Agricultural technology ; Agroforestry ; Alternative crops ; Econometrics ; Empirical analysis ; Farm management ; Farmers ; Farms ; Fertilizers ; Hunger ; Information dissemination ; Land tenure ; Livestock ; Meta-analysis ; Pandemics ; Poverty ; Productivity ; Seeds ; Subsidies ; Sustainable development ; Taxonomy ; Technology ; Technology adoption ; Technology utilization ; Variables</subject><ispartof>PLOS sustainability and transformation, 2022-07, Vol.1 (7), p.e0000018</ispartof><rights>This is an open access article, free of all copyright, and may be freely reproduced, distributed, transmitted, modified, built upon, or otherwise used by anyone for any lawful purpose. The work is made available under the Creative Commons CC0 public domain dedication: https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1708-ab8cf54e2bb5f156ae06813e0faef916166049bd40621b1711c678742f1a03ef3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1708-ab8cf54e2bb5f156ae06813e0faef916166049bd40621b1711c678742f1a03ef3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-4655-6501 ; 0000-0002-9918-8116 ; 0000-0002-6773-7352</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2762070986?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2762070986?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,25753,27924,27925,37012,38516,43895,44590,74412,75126</link.rule.ids></links><search><contributor>Uribe Toril, Juan</contributor><creatorcontrib>Arslan, Aslihan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Floress, Kristin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lamanna, Christine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lipper, Leslie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rosenstock, Todd S.</creatorcontrib><title>A meta-analysis of the adoption of agricultural technology in Sub-Saharan Africa</title><title>PLOS sustainability and transformation</title><description>Both global poverty and hunger have increased in recent years, endangering progress towards accomplishing Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) 1 and 2. The regression has been most pronounced in Sub-Saharan Africa (SSA). Meeting the SDG targets requires achieving resilient farm productivity. Although many farm management technologies exist to improve yields, farmers in SSA largely have not adopted these approaches. A long-standing literature about technology adoption identifies multiple hypotheses as to why farmers may or may not adopt new agricultural technologies, culminating in numerous micro-econometric studies. We analyse a metadata set capturing the findings of 164 published studies specifically focusing on SSA and show that 20 out of 38, or 53%, of the determinants commonly believed to influence technology adoption lack empirical support. Eighteen determinants—primarily related to information access, wealth, group membership and social capital, and land tenure—consistently influence adoption across studies. Wealth remains a significant determinant of fertilizer adoption, despite long-running subsidies in most countries, although it is decoupled from the adoption of improved seeds and alternative crop and nutrient management technologies. We highlight the foundational determinants of adoption and offer guidance to design effective interventions that can decrease poverty and hunger towards 2030.</description><subject>Access to information</subject><subject>Agricultural production</subject><subject>Agricultural technology</subject><subject>Agroforestry</subject><subject>Alternative crops</subject><subject>Econometrics</subject><subject>Empirical analysis</subject><subject>Farm management</subject><subject>Farmers</subject><subject>Farms</subject><subject>Fertilizers</subject><subject>Hunger</subject><subject>Information dissemination</subject><subject>Land tenure</subject><subject>Livestock</subject><subject>Meta-analysis</subject><subject>Pandemics</subject><subject>Poverty</subject><subject>Productivity</subject><subject>Seeds</subject><subject>Subsidies</subject><subject>Sustainable development</subject><subject>Taxonomy</subject><subject>Technology</subject><subject>Technology adoption</subject><subject>Technology utilization</subject><subject>Variables</subject><issn>2767-3197</issn><issn>2767-3197</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>COVID</sourceid><sourceid>PIMPY</sourceid><recordid>eNpNkE1rwzAMhs3YYKXrP9jBsHMyK0n9cSxlH4XCBt3ORkntNiWNM9s59N8voRlMF0nw6AU9hDwCSyEX8HxyvW-xSbsQfcrGAnlDZpngIslBidt_8z1ZhHAakEwypRTMyOeKnk3EBIeIS6gDdZbGo6G4d12sXTvuePB11Tex99jQaKpj6xp3uNC6pbu-THZ4RI8tXdkBwwdyZ7EJZjH1Ofl-fflavyfbj7fNerVNKhBMJljKyi4Lk5Xl0sKSo2FcQm6YRWMVcOCcFarcF4xnUIIAqLiQosgsIMuNzefk6ZrbeffTmxD1JCLo4d2MCaYkH6jiSlXeheCN1Z2vz-gvGpge9f1d6VGfnvTlv4rLZgQ</recordid><startdate>20220701</startdate><enddate>20220701</enddate><creator>Arslan, Aslihan</creator><creator>Floress, Kristin</creator><creator>Lamanna, Christine</creator><creator>Lipper, Leslie</creator><creator>Rosenstock, Todd S.</creator><general>Public Library of Science</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>BKSAR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>COVID</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PCBAR</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4655-6501</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9918-8116</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6773-7352</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20220701</creationdate><title>A meta-analysis of the adoption of agricultural technology in Sub-Saharan Africa</title><author>Arslan, Aslihan ; Floress, Kristin ; Lamanna, Christine ; Lipper, Leslie ; Rosenstock, Todd S.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c1708-ab8cf54e2bb5f156ae06813e0faef916166049bd40621b1711c678742f1a03ef3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Access to information</topic><topic>Agricultural production</topic><topic>Agricultural technology</topic><topic>Agroforestry</topic><topic>Alternative crops</topic><topic>Econometrics</topic><topic>Empirical analysis</topic><topic>Farm management</topic><topic>Farmers</topic><topic>Farms</topic><topic>Fertilizers</topic><topic>Hunger</topic><topic>Information dissemination</topic><topic>Land tenure</topic><topic>Livestock</topic><topic>Meta-analysis</topic><topic>Pandemics</topic><topic>Poverty</topic><topic>Productivity</topic><topic>Seeds</topic><topic>Subsidies</topic><topic>Sustainable development</topic><topic>Taxonomy</topic><topic>Technology</topic><topic>Technology adoption</topic><topic>Technology utilization</topic><topic>Variables</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Arslan, Aslihan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Floress, Kristin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lamanna, Christine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lipper, Leslie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rosenstock, Todd S.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric & Aquatic Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Coronavirus Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric & Aquatic Science Database</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><jtitle>PLOS sustainability and transformation</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Arslan, Aslihan</au><au>Floress, Kristin</au><au>Lamanna, Christine</au><au>Lipper, Leslie</au><au>Rosenstock, Todd S.</au><au>Uribe Toril, Juan</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A meta-analysis of the adoption of agricultural technology in Sub-Saharan Africa</atitle><jtitle>PLOS sustainability and transformation</jtitle><date>2022-07-01</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>1</volume><issue>7</issue><spage>e0000018</spage><pages>e0000018-</pages><issn>2767-3197</issn><eissn>2767-3197</eissn><abstract>Both global poverty and hunger have increased in recent years, endangering progress towards accomplishing Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) 1 and 2. The regression has been most pronounced in Sub-Saharan Africa (SSA). Meeting the SDG targets requires achieving resilient farm productivity. Although many farm management technologies exist to improve yields, farmers in SSA largely have not adopted these approaches. A long-standing literature about technology adoption identifies multiple hypotheses as to why farmers may or may not adopt new agricultural technologies, culminating in numerous micro-econometric studies. We analyse a metadata set capturing the findings of 164 published studies specifically focusing on SSA and show that 20 out of 38, or 53%, of the determinants commonly believed to influence technology adoption lack empirical support. Eighteen determinants—primarily related to information access, wealth, group membership and social capital, and land tenure—consistently influence adoption across studies. Wealth remains a significant determinant of fertilizer adoption, despite long-running subsidies in most countries, although it is decoupled from the adoption of improved seeds and alternative crop and nutrient management technologies. We highlight the foundational determinants of adoption and offer guidance to design effective interventions that can decrease poverty and hunger towards 2030.</abstract><cop>San Francisco</cop><pub>Public Library of Science</pub><doi>10.1371/journal.pstr.0000018</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4655-6501</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9918-8116</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6773-7352</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 2767-3197 |
ispartof | PLOS sustainability and transformation, 2022-07, Vol.1 (7), p.e0000018 |
issn | 2767-3197 2767-3197 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2762070986 |
source | Publicly Available Content Database; Coronavirus Research Database |
subjects | Access to information Agricultural production Agricultural technology Agroforestry Alternative crops Econometrics Empirical analysis Farm management Farmers Farms Fertilizers Hunger Information dissemination Land tenure Livestock Meta-analysis Pandemics Poverty Productivity Seeds Subsidies Sustainable development Taxonomy Technology Technology adoption Technology utilization Variables |
title | A meta-analysis of the adoption of agricultural technology in Sub-Saharan Africa |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-25T12%3A07%3A28IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20meta-analysis%20of%20the%20adoption%20of%20agricultural%20technology%20in%20Sub-Saharan%20Africa&rft.jtitle=PLOS%20sustainability%20and%20transformation&rft.au=Arslan,%20Aslihan&rft.date=2022-07-01&rft.volume=1&rft.issue=7&rft.spage=e0000018&rft.pages=e0000018-&rft.issn=2767-3197&rft.eissn=2767-3197&rft_id=info:doi/10.1371/journal.pstr.0000018&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2762070986%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c1708-ab8cf54e2bb5f156ae06813e0faef916166049bd40621b1711c678742f1a03ef3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2762070986&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |