Factorization‐based active contour segmentation and pelican optimization‐based modified bidirectional long short‐term memory for ovarian tumor detection

This paper proposes a novel three‐dimensional convolution neural network‐based modified bidirectional long short‐term memory with pelican optimization (3D CNN based MBiLSTM with PO) algorithm for multiclass ovarian tumor detection. Initially, the International Collaboration on Cancer Reporting endom...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:International journal of imaging systems and technology 2023-01, Vol.33 (1), p.230-245
Main Authors: Jeya Sundari, M., Brintha, N. C.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
3D CNN
Algorithms
Artificial neural networks
Cancer
Contours
Factorization
Feature extraction
Image segmentation
MBiLSTM
multiclass classification
Optimization
ovarian tumor
pelican optimization
Performance measurement
pre‐emphasis filter
Subgroups
Tumors
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:This paper proposes a novel three‐dimensional convolution neural network‐based modified bidirectional long short‐term memory with pelican optimization (3D CNN based MBiLSTM with PO) algorithm for multiclass ovarian tumor detection. Initially, the International Collaboration on Cancer Reporting endometrial cancer dataset images are provided in pre‐processing phase, which uses a pre‐emphasis filter to process the input image. In the segmentation phase, pre‐processed data is then partitioned into diverse subgroups (i.e., pixels), which minimizes the complexity of images. In this paper, a factorization‐based active contour technique is employed in the effective segmentation of images. The segmented features are then extracted and classified using the 3D CNN‐MBiLSTM with PO algorithm. Finally, the experimental results are conducted and compared with various other approaches for various performance metrics. Each metric is evaluated with respect to the different number of iterations. The accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity have reached a higher value of 98.5%, 96%, and 98.25%, respectively.
ISSN:0899-9457
1098-1098
DOI:10.1002/ima.22796