Loading…
Growth, remediation, and yield assessment of Jatropha curcas, Millettia pinnata, and Helianthus annus on fly ash amended soil: a comparative study
The piling up of fly ash (FA) from thermal power plants ends up degrading land and water sources and the problem has even fester with time. An energy plantation on fly ash amended soil appears to be the most attractive integrated approach towards better waste utilization and sustainable remediation....
Saved in:
Published in: | Acta physiologiae plantarum 2023-02, Vol.45 (2), Article 35 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c249t-97c568d9270ce710236fbcfff0d246d4678a194b7de41c6a16645900abef63023 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c249t-97c568d9270ce710236fbcfff0d246d4678a194b7de41c6a16645900abef63023 |
container_end_page | |
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | |
container_title | Acta physiologiae plantarum |
container_volume | 45 |
creator | Jain, Sandeep Tembhurkar, Ajay R. |
description | The piling up of fly ash (FA) from thermal power plants ends up degrading land and water sources and the problem has even fester with time. An energy plantation on fly ash amended soil appears to be the most attractive integrated approach towards better waste utilization and sustainable remediation. Recently the research is focused to figure out the best remediation plant alternative among the energy crops. In the present study a comparative assessment of growth, remediation and yield of energy plant viz.
Jatropha curcas
,
Millettia pinnata
, and
Helianthus annus
were made with the fly ash amended soil with 0, 10, and 15% of FA treatments. It includes morphological growth measurements, estimation of remediation efficiency (RE), bio-concentration factor (BCF), and energy yields. The research outcome confers
J. Curcas
to possess better response altogether in comparison to
M. pinnata
and
H. annus
. The plant obtained greater absolute growth rate (AGR), leaf area (LA) as morphological assessment parameters, and greater yield in terms of biomass and energy. Although,
H. Annus
absorbed maximum metal content but was insusceptible to survive the experimental duration with lesser RE.
J. Curcas
obtained maximum RE for 10% FA treatment and outcomes to be the potential alternative among the three energy plants. The remediation efficiency of
J. curcas
for Al, Fe, Mn, and Zn was 187.79%, 150.36%, 118.67%, and 137.43% greater than the control. Based on Principal Component Analysis (PCA)
J. curcas
at F10 treatment has better association of growth, remediation, and yield parameter values among other plant alternatives. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s11738-023-03516-9 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2765092230</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2765092230</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c249t-97c568d9270ce710236fbcfff0d246d4678a194b7de41c6a16645900abef63023</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kM1KAzEUhYMoWKsv4CrgtqPJ_CQz7kS0VSpudB1uJ4lNmSZjklH6Gj6xqSO4c3MvF875DvcgdE7JJSWEXwVKeVFnJC8yUlSUZc0BmtCa0YwyVh6iCaEFz6q6psfoJIQNIVVRMTZBX3PvPuN6hr3aKmkgGmdnGKzEO6M6iSEEFcJW2Yidxo8QvevXgNvBtxBm-Ml0nYrRAO6NtRBh9C5UZ8DG9RDSadN0Futul2hrDAkmlcTBme4aJ5Tb9uBT8IfCIQ5yd4qONHRBnf3uKXq9v3u5XWTL5_nD7c0ya_OyiVnD24rVssk5aRWn6XWmV63Wmsi8ZLJkvAbalCsuVUlbBvsiqoYQWCnNiiSfoouR23v3PqgQxcYN3qZIkXNWkSbPC5JU-ahqvQvBKy16b7bgd4ISse9ejN2LRBQ_3YsmmYrRFJLYvin_h_7H9Q0p3oiW</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2765092230</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Growth, remediation, and yield assessment of Jatropha curcas, Millettia pinnata, and Helianthus annus on fly ash amended soil: a comparative study</title><source>Springer Nature</source><creator>Jain, Sandeep ; Tembhurkar, Ajay R.</creator><creatorcontrib>Jain, Sandeep ; Tembhurkar, Ajay R.</creatorcontrib><description>The piling up of fly ash (FA) from thermal power plants ends up degrading land and water sources and the problem has even fester with time. An energy plantation on fly ash amended soil appears to be the most attractive integrated approach towards better waste utilization and sustainable remediation. Recently the research is focused to figure out the best remediation plant alternative among the energy crops. In the present study a comparative assessment of growth, remediation and yield of energy plant viz.
Jatropha curcas
,
Millettia pinnata
, and
Helianthus annus
were made with the fly ash amended soil with 0, 10, and 15% of FA treatments. It includes morphological growth measurements, estimation of remediation efficiency (RE), bio-concentration factor (BCF), and energy yields. The research outcome confers
J. Curcas
to possess better response altogether in comparison to
M. pinnata
and
H. annus
. The plant obtained greater absolute growth rate (AGR), leaf area (LA) as morphological assessment parameters, and greater yield in terms of biomass and energy. Although,
H. Annus
absorbed maximum metal content but was insusceptible to survive the experimental duration with lesser RE.
J. Curcas
obtained maximum RE for 10% FA treatment and outcomes to be the potential alternative among the three energy plants. The remediation efficiency of
J. curcas
for Al, Fe, Mn, and Zn was 187.79%, 150.36%, 118.67%, and 137.43% greater than the control. Based on Principal Component Analysis (PCA)
J. curcas
at F10 treatment has better association of growth, remediation, and yield parameter values among other plant alternatives.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0137-5881</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1861-1664</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s11738-023-03516-9</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg</publisher><subject>Agriculture ; Alternative energy sources ; Aluminum ; Biomass energy production ; Biomedical and Life Sciences ; Comparative studies ; Energy ; Energy crops ; Fly ash ; Growth rate ; Helianthus ; Iron ; Jatropha curcas ; Leaf area ; Life Sciences ; Manganese ; Millettia pinnata ; Morphology ; Original Article ; Parameters ; Plant Anatomy/Development ; Plant Biochemistry ; Plant Genetics and Genomics ; Plant Pathology ; Plant Physiology ; Power plants ; Principal components analysis ; Remediation ; Soil amendment ; Soils ; Sustainable remediation ; Thermal power ; Thermal power plants ; Waste utilization</subject><ispartof>Acta physiologiae plantarum, 2023-02, Vol.45 (2), Article 35</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) under exclusive licence to Franciszek Górski Institute of Plant Physiology, Polish Academy of Sciences, Kraków 2023. Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c249t-97c568d9270ce710236fbcfff0d246d4678a194b7de41c6a16645900abef63023</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c249t-97c568d9270ce710236fbcfff0d246d4678a194b7de41c6a16645900abef63023</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-9377-183X</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27903,27904</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Jain, Sandeep</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tembhurkar, Ajay R.</creatorcontrib><title>Growth, remediation, and yield assessment of Jatropha curcas, Millettia pinnata, and Helianthus annus on fly ash amended soil: a comparative study</title><title>Acta physiologiae plantarum</title><addtitle>Acta Physiol Plant</addtitle><description>The piling up of fly ash (FA) from thermal power plants ends up degrading land and water sources and the problem has even fester with time. An energy plantation on fly ash amended soil appears to be the most attractive integrated approach towards better waste utilization and sustainable remediation. Recently the research is focused to figure out the best remediation plant alternative among the energy crops. In the present study a comparative assessment of growth, remediation and yield of energy plant viz.
Jatropha curcas
,
Millettia pinnata
, and
Helianthus annus
were made with the fly ash amended soil with 0, 10, and 15% of FA treatments. It includes morphological growth measurements, estimation of remediation efficiency (RE), bio-concentration factor (BCF), and energy yields. The research outcome confers
J. Curcas
to possess better response altogether in comparison to
M. pinnata
and
H. annus
. The plant obtained greater absolute growth rate (AGR), leaf area (LA) as morphological assessment parameters, and greater yield in terms of biomass and energy. Although,
H. Annus
absorbed maximum metal content but was insusceptible to survive the experimental duration with lesser RE.
J. Curcas
obtained maximum RE for 10% FA treatment and outcomes to be the potential alternative among the three energy plants. The remediation efficiency of
J. curcas
for Al, Fe, Mn, and Zn was 187.79%, 150.36%, 118.67%, and 137.43% greater than the control. Based on Principal Component Analysis (PCA)
J. curcas
at F10 treatment has better association of growth, remediation, and yield parameter values among other plant alternatives.</description><subject>Agriculture</subject><subject>Alternative energy sources</subject><subject>Aluminum</subject><subject>Biomass energy production</subject><subject>Biomedical and Life Sciences</subject><subject>Comparative studies</subject><subject>Energy</subject><subject>Energy crops</subject><subject>Fly ash</subject><subject>Growth rate</subject><subject>Helianthus</subject><subject>Iron</subject><subject>Jatropha curcas</subject><subject>Leaf area</subject><subject>Life Sciences</subject><subject>Manganese</subject><subject>Millettia pinnata</subject><subject>Morphology</subject><subject>Original Article</subject><subject>Parameters</subject><subject>Plant Anatomy/Development</subject><subject>Plant Biochemistry</subject><subject>Plant Genetics and Genomics</subject><subject>Plant Pathology</subject><subject>Plant Physiology</subject><subject>Power plants</subject><subject>Principal components analysis</subject><subject>Remediation</subject><subject>Soil amendment</subject><subject>Soils</subject><subject>Sustainable remediation</subject><subject>Thermal power</subject><subject>Thermal power plants</subject><subject>Waste utilization</subject><issn>0137-5881</issn><issn>1861-1664</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kM1KAzEUhYMoWKsv4CrgtqPJ_CQz7kS0VSpudB1uJ4lNmSZjklH6Gj6xqSO4c3MvF875DvcgdE7JJSWEXwVKeVFnJC8yUlSUZc0BmtCa0YwyVh6iCaEFz6q6psfoJIQNIVVRMTZBX3PvPuN6hr3aKmkgGmdnGKzEO6M6iSEEFcJW2Yidxo8QvevXgNvBtxBm-Ml0nYrRAO6NtRBh9C5UZ8DG9RDSadN0Futul2hrDAkmlcTBme4aJ5Tb9uBT8IfCIQ5yd4qONHRBnf3uKXq9v3u5XWTL5_nD7c0ya_OyiVnD24rVssk5aRWn6XWmV63Wmsi8ZLJkvAbalCsuVUlbBvsiqoYQWCnNiiSfoouR23v3PqgQxcYN3qZIkXNWkSbPC5JU-ahqvQvBKy16b7bgd4ISse9ejN2LRBQ_3YsmmYrRFJLYvin_h_7H9Q0p3oiW</recordid><startdate>20230201</startdate><enddate>20230201</enddate><creator>Jain, Sandeep</creator><creator>Tembhurkar, Ajay R.</creator><general>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9377-183X</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20230201</creationdate><title>Growth, remediation, and yield assessment of Jatropha curcas, Millettia pinnata, and Helianthus annus on fly ash amended soil: a comparative study</title><author>Jain, Sandeep ; Tembhurkar, Ajay R.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c249t-97c568d9270ce710236fbcfff0d246d4678a194b7de41c6a16645900abef63023</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Agriculture</topic><topic>Alternative energy sources</topic><topic>Aluminum</topic><topic>Biomass energy production</topic><topic>Biomedical and Life Sciences</topic><topic>Comparative studies</topic><topic>Energy</topic><topic>Energy crops</topic><topic>Fly ash</topic><topic>Growth rate</topic><topic>Helianthus</topic><topic>Iron</topic><topic>Jatropha curcas</topic><topic>Leaf area</topic><topic>Life Sciences</topic><topic>Manganese</topic><topic>Millettia pinnata</topic><topic>Morphology</topic><topic>Original Article</topic><topic>Parameters</topic><topic>Plant Anatomy/Development</topic><topic>Plant Biochemistry</topic><topic>Plant Genetics and Genomics</topic><topic>Plant Pathology</topic><topic>Plant Physiology</topic><topic>Power plants</topic><topic>Principal components analysis</topic><topic>Remediation</topic><topic>Soil amendment</topic><topic>Soils</topic><topic>Sustainable remediation</topic><topic>Thermal power</topic><topic>Thermal power plants</topic><topic>Waste utilization</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Jain, Sandeep</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tembhurkar, Ajay R.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Acta physiologiae plantarum</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Jain, Sandeep</au><au>Tembhurkar, Ajay R.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Growth, remediation, and yield assessment of Jatropha curcas, Millettia pinnata, and Helianthus annus on fly ash amended soil: a comparative study</atitle><jtitle>Acta physiologiae plantarum</jtitle><stitle>Acta Physiol Plant</stitle><date>2023-02-01</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>45</volume><issue>2</issue><artnum>35</artnum><issn>0137-5881</issn><eissn>1861-1664</eissn><abstract>The piling up of fly ash (FA) from thermal power plants ends up degrading land and water sources and the problem has even fester with time. An energy plantation on fly ash amended soil appears to be the most attractive integrated approach towards better waste utilization and sustainable remediation. Recently the research is focused to figure out the best remediation plant alternative among the energy crops. In the present study a comparative assessment of growth, remediation and yield of energy plant viz.
Jatropha curcas
,
Millettia pinnata
, and
Helianthus annus
were made with the fly ash amended soil with 0, 10, and 15% of FA treatments. It includes morphological growth measurements, estimation of remediation efficiency (RE), bio-concentration factor (BCF), and energy yields. The research outcome confers
J. Curcas
to possess better response altogether in comparison to
M. pinnata
and
H. annus
. The plant obtained greater absolute growth rate (AGR), leaf area (LA) as morphological assessment parameters, and greater yield in terms of biomass and energy. Although,
H. Annus
absorbed maximum metal content but was insusceptible to survive the experimental duration with lesser RE.
J. Curcas
obtained maximum RE for 10% FA treatment and outcomes to be the potential alternative among the three energy plants. The remediation efficiency of
J. curcas
for Al, Fe, Mn, and Zn was 187.79%, 150.36%, 118.67%, and 137.43% greater than the control. Based on Principal Component Analysis (PCA)
J. curcas
at F10 treatment has better association of growth, remediation, and yield parameter values among other plant alternatives.</abstract><cop>Berlin/Heidelberg</cop><pub>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</pub><doi>10.1007/s11738-023-03516-9</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9377-183X</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0137-5881 |
ispartof | Acta physiologiae plantarum, 2023-02, Vol.45 (2), Article 35 |
issn | 0137-5881 1861-1664 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2765092230 |
source | Springer Nature |
subjects | Agriculture Alternative energy sources Aluminum Biomass energy production Biomedical and Life Sciences Comparative studies Energy Energy crops Fly ash Growth rate Helianthus Iron Jatropha curcas Leaf area Life Sciences Manganese Millettia pinnata Morphology Original Article Parameters Plant Anatomy/Development Plant Biochemistry Plant Genetics and Genomics Plant Pathology Plant Physiology Power plants Principal components analysis Remediation Soil amendment Soils Sustainable remediation Thermal power Thermal power plants Waste utilization |
title | Growth, remediation, and yield assessment of Jatropha curcas, Millettia pinnata, and Helianthus annus on fly ash amended soil: a comparative study |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-26T00%3A33%3A37IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Growth,%20remediation,%20and%20yield%20assessment%20of%20Jatropha%20curcas,%20Millettia%20pinnata,%20and%20Helianthus%20annus%20on%20fly%20ash%20amended%20soil:%20a%20comparative%20study&rft.jtitle=Acta%20physiologiae%20plantarum&rft.au=Jain,%20Sandeep&rft.date=2023-02-01&rft.volume=45&rft.issue=2&rft.artnum=35&rft.issn=0137-5881&rft.eissn=1861-1664&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s11738-023-03516-9&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2765092230%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c249t-97c568d9270ce710236fbcfff0d246d4678a194b7de41c6a16645900abef63023%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2765092230&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |