Loading…

Growth, remediation, and yield assessment of Jatropha curcas, Millettia pinnata, and Helianthus annus on fly ash amended soil: a comparative study

The piling up of fly ash (FA) from thermal power plants ends up degrading land and water sources and the problem has even fester with time. An energy plantation on fly ash amended soil appears to be the most attractive integrated approach towards better waste utilization and sustainable remediation....

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Acta physiologiae plantarum 2023-02, Vol.45 (2), Article 35
Main Authors: Jain, Sandeep, Tembhurkar, Ajay R.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c249t-97c568d9270ce710236fbcfff0d246d4678a194b7de41c6a16645900abef63023
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c249t-97c568d9270ce710236fbcfff0d246d4678a194b7de41c6a16645900abef63023
container_end_page
container_issue 2
container_start_page
container_title Acta physiologiae plantarum
container_volume 45
creator Jain, Sandeep
Tembhurkar, Ajay R.
description The piling up of fly ash (FA) from thermal power plants ends up degrading land and water sources and the problem has even fester with time. An energy plantation on fly ash amended soil appears to be the most attractive integrated approach towards better waste utilization and sustainable remediation. Recently the research is focused to figure out the best remediation plant alternative among the energy crops. In the present study a comparative assessment of growth, remediation and yield of energy plant viz. Jatropha curcas , Millettia pinnata , and Helianthus annus were made with the fly ash amended soil with 0, 10, and 15% of FA treatments. It includes morphological growth measurements, estimation of remediation efficiency (RE), bio-concentration factor (BCF), and energy yields. The research outcome confers J. Curcas to possess better response altogether in comparison to M. pinnata and H. annus . The plant obtained greater absolute growth rate (AGR), leaf area (LA) as morphological assessment parameters, and greater yield in terms of biomass and energy. Although, H. Annus absorbed maximum metal content but was insusceptible to survive the experimental duration with lesser RE. J. Curcas obtained maximum RE for 10% FA treatment and outcomes to be the potential alternative among the three energy plants. The remediation efficiency of J. curcas for Al, Fe, Mn, and Zn was 187.79%, 150.36%, 118.67%, and 137.43% greater than the control. Based on Principal Component Analysis (PCA) J. curcas at F10 treatment has better association of growth, remediation, and yield parameter values among other plant alternatives.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s11738-023-03516-9
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2765092230</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2765092230</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c249t-97c568d9270ce710236fbcfff0d246d4678a194b7de41c6a16645900abef63023</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kM1KAzEUhYMoWKsv4CrgtqPJ_CQz7kS0VSpudB1uJ4lNmSZjklH6Gj6xqSO4c3MvF875DvcgdE7JJSWEXwVKeVFnJC8yUlSUZc0BmtCa0YwyVh6iCaEFz6q6psfoJIQNIVVRMTZBX3PvPuN6hr3aKmkgGmdnGKzEO6M6iSEEFcJW2Yidxo8QvevXgNvBtxBm-Ml0nYrRAO6NtRBh9C5UZ8DG9RDSadN0Futul2hrDAkmlcTBme4aJ5Tb9uBT8IfCIQ5yd4qONHRBnf3uKXq9v3u5XWTL5_nD7c0ya_OyiVnD24rVssk5aRWn6XWmV63Wmsi8ZLJkvAbalCsuVUlbBvsiqoYQWCnNiiSfoouR23v3PqgQxcYN3qZIkXNWkSbPC5JU-ahqvQvBKy16b7bgd4ISse9ejN2LRBQ_3YsmmYrRFJLYvin_h_7H9Q0p3oiW</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2765092230</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Growth, remediation, and yield assessment of Jatropha curcas, Millettia pinnata, and Helianthus annus on fly ash amended soil: a comparative study</title><source>Springer Nature</source><creator>Jain, Sandeep ; Tembhurkar, Ajay R.</creator><creatorcontrib>Jain, Sandeep ; Tembhurkar, Ajay R.</creatorcontrib><description>The piling up of fly ash (FA) from thermal power plants ends up degrading land and water sources and the problem has even fester with time. An energy plantation on fly ash amended soil appears to be the most attractive integrated approach towards better waste utilization and sustainable remediation. Recently the research is focused to figure out the best remediation plant alternative among the energy crops. In the present study a comparative assessment of growth, remediation and yield of energy plant viz. Jatropha curcas , Millettia pinnata , and Helianthus annus were made with the fly ash amended soil with 0, 10, and 15% of FA treatments. It includes morphological growth measurements, estimation of remediation efficiency (RE), bio-concentration factor (BCF), and energy yields. The research outcome confers J. Curcas to possess better response altogether in comparison to M. pinnata and H. annus . The plant obtained greater absolute growth rate (AGR), leaf area (LA) as morphological assessment parameters, and greater yield in terms of biomass and energy. Although, H. Annus absorbed maximum metal content but was insusceptible to survive the experimental duration with lesser RE. J. Curcas obtained maximum RE for 10% FA treatment and outcomes to be the potential alternative among the three energy plants. The remediation efficiency of J. curcas for Al, Fe, Mn, and Zn was 187.79%, 150.36%, 118.67%, and 137.43% greater than the control. Based on Principal Component Analysis (PCA) J. curcas at F10 treatment has better association of growth, remediation, and yield parameter values among other plant alternatives.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0137-5881</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1861-1664</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s11738-023-03516-9</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg</publisher><subject>Agriculture ; Alternative energy sources ; Aluminum ; Biomass energy production ; Biomedical and Life Sciences ; Comparative studies ; Energy ; Energy crops ; Fly ash ; Growth rate ; Helianthus ; Iron ; Jatropha curcas ; Leaf area ; Life Sciences ; Manganese ; Millettia pinnata ; Morphology ; Original Article ; Parameters ; Plant Anatomy/Development ; Plant Biochemistry ; Plant Genetics and Genomics ; Plant Pathology ; Plant Physiology ; Power plants ; Principal components analysis ; Remediation ; Soil amendment ; Soils ; Sustainable remediation ; Thermal power ; Thermal power plants ; Waste utilization</subject><ispartof>Acta physiologiae plantarum, 2023-02, Vol.45 (2), Article 35</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) under exclusive licence to Franciszek Górski Institute of Plant Physiology, Polish Academy of Sciences, Kraków 2023. Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c249t-97c568d9270ce710236fbcfff0d246d4678a194b7de41c6a16645900abef63023</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c249t-97c568d9270ce710236fbcfff0d246d4678a194b7de41c6a16645900abef63023</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-9377-183X</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27903,27904</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Jain, Sandeep</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tembhurkar, Ajay R.</creatorcontrib><title>Growth, remediation, and yield assessment of Jatropha curcas, Millettia pinnata, and Helianthus annus on fly ash amended soil: a comparative study</title><title>Acta physiologiae plantarum</title><addtitle>Acta Physiol Plant</addtitle><description>The piling up of fly ash (FA) from thermal power plants ends up degrading land and water sources and the problem has even fester with time. An energy plantation on fly ash amended soil appears to be the most attractive integrated approach towards better waste utilization and sustainable remediation. Recently the research is focused to figure out the best remediation plant alternative among the energy crops. In the present study a comparative assessment of growth, remediation and yield of energy plant viz. Jatropha curcas , Millettia pinnata , and Helianthus annus were made with the fly ash amended soil with 0, 10, and 15% of FA treatments. It includes morphological growth measurements, estimation of remediation efficiency (RE), bio-concentration factor (BCF), and energy yields. The research outcome confers J. Curcas to possess better response altogether in comparison to M. pinnata and H. annus . The plant obtained greater absolute growth rate (AGR), leaf area (LA) as morphological assessment parameters, and greater yield in terms of biomass and energy. Although, H. Annus absorbed maximum metal content but was insusceptible to survive the experimental duration with lesser RE. J. Curcas obtained maximum RE for 10% FA treatment and outcomes to be the potential alternative among the three energy plants. The remediation efficiency of J. curcas for Al, Fe, Mn, and Zn was 187.79%, 150.36%, 118.67%, and 137.43% greater than the control. Based on Principal Component Analysis (PCA) J. curcas at F10 treatment has better association of growth, remediation, and yield parameter values among other plant alternatives.</description><subject>Agriculture</subject><subject>Alternative energy sources</subject><subject>Aluminum</subject><subject>Biomass energy production</subject><subject>Biomedical and Life Sciences</subject><subject>Comparative studies</subject><subject>Energy</subject><subject>Energy crops</subject><subject>Fly ash</subject><subject>Growth rate</subject><subject>Helianthus</subject><subject>Iron</subject><subject>Jatropha curcas</subject><subject>Leaf area</subject><subject>Life Sciences</subject><subject>Manganese</subject><subject>Millettia pinnata</subject><subject>Morphology</subject><subject>Original Article</subject><subject>Parameters</subject><subject>Plant Anatomy/Development</subject><subject>Plant Biochemistry</subject><subject>Plant Genetics and Genomics</subject><subject>Plant Pathology</subject><subject>Plant Physiology</subject><subject>Power plants</subject><subject>Principal components analysis</subject><subject>Remediation</subject><subject>Soil amendment</subject><subject>Soils</subject><subject>Sustainable remediation</subject><subject>Thermal power</subject><subject>Thermal power plants</subject><subject>Waste utilization</subject><issn>0137-5881</issn><issn>1861-1664</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kM1KAzEUhYMoWKsv4CrgtqPJ_CQz7kS0VSpudB1uJ4lNmSZjklH6Gj6xqSO4c3MvF875DvcgdE7JJSWEXwVKeVFnJC8yUlSUZc0BmtCa0YwyVh6iCaEFz6q6psfoJIQNIVVRMTZBX3PvPuN6hr3aKmkgGmdnGKzEO6M6iSEEFcJW2Yidxo8QvevXgNvBtxBm-Ml0nYrRAO6NtRBh9C5UZ8DG9RDSadN0Futul2hrDAkmlcTBme4aJ5Tb9uBT8IfCIQ5yd4qONHRBnf3uKXq9v3u5XWTL5_nD7c0ya_OyiVnD24rVssk5aRWn6XWmV63Wmsi8ZLJkvAbalCsuVUlbBvsiqoYQWCnNiiSfoouR23v3PqgQxcYN3qZIkXNWkSbPC5JU-ahqvQvBKy16b7bgd4ISse9ejN2LRBQ_3YsmmYrRFJLYvin_h_7H9Q0p3oiW</recordid><startdate>20230201</startdate><enddate>20230201</enddate><creator>Jain, Sandeep</creator><creator>Tembhurkar, Ajay R.</creator><general>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9377-183X</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20230201</creationdate><title>Growth, remediation, and yield assessment of Jatropha curcas, Millettia pinnata, and Helianthus annus on fly ash amended soil: a comparative study</title><author>Jain, Sandeep ; Tembhurkar, Ajay R.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c249t-97c568d9270ce710236fbcfff0d246d4678a194b7de41c6a16645900abef63023</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Agriculture</topic><topic>Alternative energy sources</topic><topic>Aluminum</topic><topic>Biomass energy production</topic><topic>Biomedical and Life Sciences</topic><topic>Comparative studies</topic><topic>Energy</topic><topic>Energy crops</topic><topic>Fly ash</topic><topic>Growth rate</topic><topic>Helianthus</topic><topic>Iron</topic><topic>Jatropha curcas</topic><topic>Leaf area</topic><topic>Life Sciences</topic><topic>Manganese</topic><topic>Millettia pinnata</topic><topic>Morphology</topic><topic>Original Article</topic><topic>Parameters</topic><topic>Plant Anatomy/Development</topic><topic>Plant Biochemistry</topic><topic>Plant Genetics and Genomics</topic><topic>Plant Pathology</topic><topic>Plant Physiology</topic><topic>Power plants</topic><topic>Principal components analysis</topic><topic>Remediation</topic><topic>Soil amendment</topic><topic>Soils</topic><topic>Sustainable remediation</topic><topic>Thermal power</topic><topic>Thermal power plants</topic><topic>Waste utilization</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Jain, Sandeep</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tembhurkar, Ajay R.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Acta physiologiae plantarum</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Jain, Sandeep</au><au>Tembhurkar, Ajay R.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Growth, remediation, and yield assessment of Jatropha curcas, Millettia pinnata, and Helianthus annus on fly ash amended soil: a comparative study</atitle><jtitle>Acta physiologiae plantarum</jtitle><stitle>Acta Physiol Plant</stitle><date>2023-02-01</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>45</volume><issue>2</issue><artnum>35</artnum><issn>0137-5881</issn><eissn>1861-1664</eissn><abstract>The piling up of fly ash (FA) from thermal power plants ends up degrading land and water sources and the problem has even fester with time. An energy plantation on fly ash amended soil appears to be the most attractive integrated approach towards better waste utilization and sustainable remediation. Recently the research is focused to figure out the best remediation plant alternative among the energy crops. In the present study a comparative assessment of growth, remediation and yield of energy plant viz. Jatropha curcas , Millettia pinnata , and Helianthus annus were made with the fly ash amended soil with 0, 10, and 15% of FA treatments. It includes morphological growth measurements, estimation of remediation efficiency (RE), bio-concentration factor (BCF), and energy yields. The research outcome confers J. Curcas to possess better response altogether in comparison to M. pinnata and H. annus . The plant obtained greater absolute growth rate (AGR), leaf area (LA) as morphological assessment parameters, and greater yield in terms of biomass and energy. Although, H. Annus absorbed maximum metal content but was insusceptible to survive the experimental duration with lesser RE. J. Curcas obtained maximum RE for 10% FA treatment and outcomes to be the potential alternative among the three energy plants. The remediation efficiency of J. curcas for Al, Fe, Mn, and Zn was 187.79%, 150.36%, 118.67%, and 137.43% greater than the control. Based on Principal Component Analysis (PCA) J. curcas at F10 treatment has better association of growth, remediation, and yield parameter values among other plant alternatives.</abstract><cop>Berlin/Heidelberg</cop><pub>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</pub><doi>10.1007/s11738-023-03516-9</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9377-183X</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0137-5881
ispartof Acta physiologiae plantarum, 2023-02, Vol.45 (2), Article 35
issn 0137-5881
1861-1664
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2765092230
source Springer Nature
subjects Agriculture
Alternative energy sources
Aluminum
Biomass energy production
Biomedical and Life Sciences
Comparative studies
Energy
Energy crops
Fly ash
Growth rate
Helianthus
Iron
Jatropha curcas
Leaf area
Life Sciences
Manganese
Millettia pinnata
Morphology
Original Article
Parameters
Plant Anatomy/Development
Plant Biochemistry
Plant Genetics and Genomics
Plant Pathology
Plant Physiology
Power plants
Principal components analysis
Remediation
Soil amendment
Soils
Sustainable remediation
Thermal power
Thermal power plants
Waste utilization
title Growth, remediation, and yield assessment of Jatropha curcas, Millettia pinnata, and Helianthus annus on fly ash amended soil: a comparative study
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-26T00%3A33%3A37IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Growth,%20remediation,%20and%20yield%20assessment%20of%20Jatropha%20curcas,%20Millettia%20pinnata,%20and%20Helianthus%20annus%20on%20fly%20ash%20amended%20soil:%20a%20comparative%20study&rft.jtitle=Acta%20physiologiae%20plantarum&rft.au=Jain,%20Sandeep&rft.date=2023-02-01&rft.volume=45&rft.issue=2&rft.artnum=35&rft.issn=0137-5881&rft.eissn=1861-1664&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s11738-023-03516-9&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2765092230%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c249t-97c568d9270ce710236fbcfff0d246d4678a194b7de41c6a16645900abef63023%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2765092230&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true