Loading…
A comprehensive Thermo-hydraulic neutronic and safety analysis of a 100MWth pebble bed reactor core
The HTMR100 is a 100MWth High Temperature Gas-cooled Reactor (HTGR), which is helium-cooled and graphite moderated. This reactor is of the Pebble Bed type featuring a Once-Through-Then-Out (OTTO) fuelling scheme, this cycle was chosen for the simplicity of the fuel handling system. The HTMR100 Pebbl...
Saved in:
Published in: | Nuclear engineering and design 2022-11, Vol.398, p.111991, Article 111991 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c273t-29b2b02acd4ec3eea10b08154ca7129f284e7f2bf87fe2390c56c715540265f83 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c273t-29b2b02acd4ec3eea10b08154ca7129f284e7f2bf87fe2390c56c715540265f83 |
container_end_page | |
container_issue | |
container_start_page | 111991 |
container_title | Nuclear engineering and design |
container_volume | 398 |
creator | Boyes, W.A Slabber, J.F.M Boyes, D.W |
description | The HTMR100 is a 100MWth High Temperature Gas-cooled Reactor (HTGR), which is helium-cooled and graphite moderated. This reactor is of the Pebble Bed type featuring a Once-Through-Then-Out (OTTO) fuelling scheme, this cycle was chosen for the simplicity of the fuel handling system.
The HTMR100 Pebble Bed Reactor (PBR) has a core volume of 27.73 m3 (core diameter 2.6 m, core height ∼ 5.2 m) which results in an average core power density of 3.6 MW/m3. This reactor utilizes uranium dioxide fuel (UO2) at a U-235 enrichment of 10 wt% and 10 g of heavy metal (total uranium) per Fuel Sphere (FS). Although there are various types of fuel options that can be utilized in the HTMR100 reactor, ranging from LEU to mixtures of Th/LEU, Th/HEU and Th/Pu, this study will only focus on LEU in the form of UO2 fuel.
This study investigates the neutronic and thermal–hydraulic modelling of the 100MWth HTMR100 at equilibrium (100% power with the control rods situated at the nominal position for a core having an equilibrium fuel burnup profile) and at transient/accident conditions. The purpose of the investigation is to determine if the maximum fuel temperature remains below the set limit of 1600 °C during a design-base accident event that is defined as a Loss of Coolant Accident (LOCA).
The equilibrium core was simulated using the Very Superior Old Programs (VSOP99) suite of codes to obtain burnup results. The transient behaviour of the core was modelled by a code called Multi-group Time Dependent Neutronics and Temperatures (MGT). MGT assesses the dynamic transient results of the accident scenarios such as the Depressurized Loss of Forced Cooling (DLOFC), Pressurized Loss of Forced Cooling (PLOFC), Control Rod Withdrawal (CRW) and a Control Rod Ejection (CRE) as well as normal operating transients of which a Load Following (LF) operation is a typical example.
The HTMR100 reactor utilizing the enrichment and heavy metal loading as specified does indeed produce the targeted 80 000 MWD/THM burnup for the OTTO fuel cycle. The study also proves that the VSOP99 and the MGT codes do in fact yield similar results for the HTMR100 reactor with regards to fuel centreline temperatures, outer sphere surface temperatures as well as moderator temperatures for the postulated accident scenarios that were analysed. The results also indicate that the design-base transient safety analysis simulations prove that the fuel temperatures remain below the set value of 1600 °C for the oxide-based fuel. A |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.nucengdes.2022.111991 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2765099725</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0029549322003429</els_id><sourcerecordid>2765099725</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c273t-29b2b02acd4ec3eea10b08154ca7129f284e7f2bf87fe2390c56c715540265f83</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkM1OwzAQhC0EEqXwDFjinGBv4jo-VhV_UhGXIrhZjrOmido42Emlvj2pgriyl53DzGj3I-SWs5Qzvrhv0naw2H5VGFNgACnnXCl-Rma8kJBIoT7PyYwxUInIVXZJrmJs2GkUzIhdUuv3XcAttrE-IN1sMex9sj1WwQy72tIWhz74dlSmrWg0DvvjKM3uGOtIvaOGcsZeP_ot7bAsd0hLrGhAY3sfxvKA1-TCmV3Em989J--PD5vVc7J-e3pZLdeJBZn1CagSSgbGVjnaDNFwVrKCi9wayUE5KHKUDkpXSIeQKWbFwkouRM5gIVyRzcnd1NsF_z1g7HXjhzBeGjXIhWBKSRCjS04uG3yMAZ3uQr034ag50yeiutF_RPWJqJ6IjsnllMTxiUONQUdbY2uxqgPaXle-_rfjB3VXg1o</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2765099725</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A comprehensive Thermo-hydraulic neutronic and safety analysis of a 100MWth pebble bed reactor core</title><source>ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Boyes, W.A ; Slabber, J.F.M ; Boyes, D.W</creator><creatorcontrib>Boyes, W.A ; Slabber, J.F.M ; Boyes, D.W</creatorcontrib><description>The HTMR100 is a 100MWth High Temperature Gas-cooled Reactor (HTGR), which is helium-cooled and graphite moderated. This reactor is of the Pebble Bed type featuring a Once-Through-Then-Out (OTTO) fuelling scheme, this cycle was chosen for the simplicity of the fuel handling system.
The HTMR100 Pebble Bed Reactor (PBR) has a core volume of 27.73 m3 (core diameter 2.6 m, core height ∼ 5.2 m) which results in an average core power density of 3.6 MW/m3. This reactor utilizes uranium dioxide fuel (UO2) at a U-235 enrichment of 10 wt% and 10 g of heavy metal (total uranium) per Fuel Sphere (FS). Although there are various types of fuel options that can be utilized in the HTMR100 reactor, ranging from LEU to mixtures of Th/LEU, Th/HEU and Th/Pu, this study will only focus on LEU in the form of UO2 fuel.
This study investigates the neutronic and thermal–hydraulic modelling of the 100MWth HTMR100 at equilibrium (100% power with the control rods situated at the nominal position for a core having an equilibrium fuel burnup profile) and at transient/accident conditions. The purpose of the investigation is to determine if the maximum fuel temperature remains below the set limit of 1600 °C during a design-base accident event that is defined as a Loss of Coolant Accident (LOCA).
The equilibrium core was simulated using the Very Superior Old Programs (VSOP99) suite of codes to obtain burnup results. The transient behaviour of the core was modelled by a code called Multi-group Time Dependent Neutronics and Temperatures (MGT). MGT assesses the dynamic transient results of the accident scenarios such as the Depressurized Loss of Forced Cooling (DLOFC), Pressurized Loss of Forced Cooling (PLOFC), Control Rod Withdrawal (CRW) and a Control Rod Ejection (CRE) as well as normal operating transients of which a Load Following (LF) operation is a typical example.
The HTMR100 reactor utilizing the enrichment and heavy metal loading as specified does indeed produce the targeted 80 000 MWD/THM burnup for the OTTO fuel cycle. The study also proves that the VSOP99 and the MGT codes do in fact yield similar results for the HTMR100 reactor with regards to fuel centreline temperatures, outer sphere surface temperatures as well as moderator temperatures for the postulated accident scenarios that were analysed. The results also indicate that the design-base transient safety analysis simulations prove that the fuel temperatures remain below the set value of 1600 °C for the oxide-based fuel. A temperature-volume analysis of a DLOFC design-base event shows that only ∼ 2 % of the fuel reaches the higher temperatures of 1500 °C to 1600 °C in a DLOFC event.
The beyond-design base events with a very low probability of occurrence do however exceed the set value of 1600 °C but the fuel only exceeds this set limit for short periods of time while the transient occurs. The probability that this will lead to fuel damage should be very small since the time at these high temperatures is short and the volume fraction of the core exposed to these high temperatures is small.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0029-5493</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1872-759X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.nucengdes.2022.111991</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Amsterdam: Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>Accident conditions ; Control rods ; Cooling ; Design ; Design analysis ; Equilibrium ; Fuel cycles ; Fuel Spheres (FS) ; Fuels ; Heavy metals ; Helium ; High temperature ; High temperature gas cooled reactors ; High Temperature Gas Reactor (HTGR) ; Loss of coolant accidents ; Low Enriched Uranium (LEU) ; Multi-Group Time Dependent Neutronics and Temperatures (MGT) ; Nuclear fuels ; Nuclear safety ; Once-Through-Then-Out (OTTO) ; Pebble Bed Reactor (PBR) ; Pebble bed reactors ; Reactor cores ; Reactor Pressure Vessel (RPV) ; Reactors ; Safety engineering ; Surface temperature ; Temperature ; Thorium ; Time dependence ; Uranium ; Uranium dioxide ; Very Superior Old Program (VSOP)</subject><ispartof>Nuclear engineering and design, 2022-11, Vol.398, p.111991, Article 111991</ispartof><rights>2022 Elsevier B.V.</rights><rights>Copyright Elsevier BV Nov 2022</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c273t-29b2b02acd4ec3eea10b08154ca7129f284e7f2bf87fe2390c56c715540265f83</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c273t-29b2b02acd4ec3eea10b08154ca7129f284e7f2bf87fe2390c56c715540265f83</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Boyes, W.A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Slabber, J.F.M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Boyes, D.W</creatorcontrib><title>A comprehensive Thermo-hydraulic neutronic and safety analysis of a 100MWth pebble bed reactor core</title><title>Nuclear engineering and design</title><description>The HTMR100 is a 100MWth High Temperature Gas-cooled Reactor (HTGR), which is helium-cooled and graphite moderated. This reactor is of the Pebble Bed type featuring a Once-Through-Then-Out (OTTO) fuelling scheme, this cycle was chosen for the simplicity of the fuel handling system.
The HTMR100 Pebble Bed Reactor (PBR) has a core volume of 27.73 m3 (core diameter 2.6 m, core height ∼ 5.2 m) which results in an average core power density of 3.6 MW/m3. This reactor utilizes uranium dioxide fuel (UO2) at a U-235 enrichment of 10 wt% and 10 g of heavy metal (total uranium) per Fuel Sphere (FS). Although there are various types of fuel options that can be utilized in the HTMR100 reactor, ranging from LEU to mixtures of Th/LEU, Th/HEU and Th/Pu, this study will only focus on LEU in the form of UO2 fuel.
This study investigates the neutronic and thermal–hydraulic modelling of the 100MWth HTMR100 at equilibrium (100% power with the control rods situated at the nominal position for a core having an equilibrium fuel burnup profile) and at transient/accident conditions. The purpose of the investigation is to determine if the maximum fuel temperature remains below the set limit of 1600 °C during a design-base accident event that is defined as a Loss of Coolant Accident (LOCA).
The equilibrium core was simulated using the Very Superior Old Programs (VSOP99) suite of codes to obtain burnup results. The transient behaviour of the core was modelled by a code called Multi-group Time Dependent Neutronics and Temperatures (MGT). MGT assesses the dynamic transient results of the accident scenarios such as the Depressurized Loss of Forced Cooling (DLOFC), Pressurized Loss of Forced Cooling (PLOFC), Control Rod Withdrawal (CRW) and a Control Rod Ejection (CRE) as well as normal operating transients of which a Load Following (LF) operation is a typical example.
The HTMR100 reactor utilizing the enrichment and heavy metal loading as specified does indeed produce the targeted 80 000 MWD/THM burnup for the OTTO fuel cycle. The study also proves that the VSOP99 and the MGT codes do in fact yield similar results for the HTMR100 reactor with regards to fuel centreline temperatures, outer sphere surface temperatures as well as moderator temperatures for the postulated accident scenarios that were analysed. The results also indicate that the design-base transient safety analysis simulations prove that the fuel temperatures remain below the set value of 1600 °C for the oxide-based fuel. A temperature-volume analysis of a DLOFC design-base event shows that only ∼ 2 % of the fuel reaches the higher temperatures of 1500 °C to 1600 °C in a DLOFC event.
The beyond-design base events with a very low probability of occurrence do however exceed the set value of 1600 °C but the fuel only exceeds this set limit for short periods of time while the transient occurs. The probability that this will lead to fuel damage should be very small since the time at these high temperatures is short and the volume fraction of the core exposed to these high temperatures is small.</description><subject>Accident conditions</subject><subject>Control rods</subject><subject>Cooling</subject><subject>Design</subject><subject>Design analysis</subject><subject>Equilibrium</subject><subject>Fuel cycles</subject><subject>Fuel Spheres (FS)</subject><subject>Fuels</subject><subject>Heavy metals</subject><subject>Helium</subject><subject>High temperature</subject><subject>High temperature gas cooled reactors</subject><subject>High Temperature Gas Reactor (HTGR)</subject><subject>Loss of coolant accidents</subject><subject>Low Enriched Uranium (LEU)</subject><subject>Multi-Group Time Dependent Neutronics and Temperatures (MGT)</subject><subject>Nuclear fuels</subject><subject>Nuclear safety</subject><subject>Once-Through-Then-Out (OTTO)</subject><subject>Pebble Bed Reactor (PBR)</subject><subject>Pebble bed reactors</subject><subject>Reactor cores</subject><subject>Reactor Pressure Vessel (RPV)</subject><subject>Reactors</subject><subject>Safety engineering</subject><subject>Surface temperature</subject><subject>Temperature</subject><subject>Thorium</subject><subject>Time dependence</subject><subject>Uranium</subject><subject>Uranium dioxide</subject><subject>Very Superior Old Program (VSOP)</subject><issn>0029-5493</issn><issn>1872-759X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkM1OwzAQhC0EEqXwDFjinGBv4jo-VhV_UhGXIrhZjrOmido42Emlvj2pgriyl53DzGj3I-SWs5Qzvrhv0naw2H5VGFNgACnnXCl-Rma8kJBIoT7PyYwxUInIVXZJrmJs2GkUzIhdUuv3XcAttrE-IN1sMex9sj1WwQy72tIWhz74dlSmrWg0DvvjKM3uGOtIvaOGcsZeP_ot7bAsd0hLrGhAY3sfxvKA1-TCmV3Em989J--PD5vVc7J-e3pZLdeJBZn1CagSSgbGVjnaDNFwVrKCi9wayUE5KHKUDkpXSIeQKWbFwkouRM5gIVyRzcnd1NsF_z1g7HXjhzBeGjXIhWBKSRCjS04uG3yMAZ3uQr034ag50yeiutF_RPWJqJ6IjsnllMTxiUONQUdbY2uxqgPaXle-_rfjB3VXg1o</recordid><startdate>202211</startdate><enddate>202211</enddate><creator>Boyes, W.A</creator><creator>Slabber, J.F.M</creator><creator>Boyes, D.W</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><general>Elsevier BV</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SP</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7TB</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>SOI</scope></search><sort><creationdate>202211</creationdate><title>A comprehensive Thermo-hydraulic neutronic and safety analysis of a 100MWth pebble bed reactor core</title><author>Boyes, W.A ; Slabber, J.F.M ; Boyes, D.W</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c273t-29b2b02acd4ec3eea10b08154ca7129f284e7f2bf87fe2390c56c715540265f83</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Accident conditions</topic><topic>Control rods</topic><topic>Cooling</topic><topic>Design</topic><topic>Design analysis</topic><topic>Equilibrium</topic><topic>Fuel cycles</topic><topic>Fuel Spheres (FS)</topic><topic>Fuels</topic><topic>Heavy metals</topic><topic>Helium</topic><topic>High temperature</topic><topic>High temperature gas cooled reactors</topic><topic>High Temperature Gas Reactor (HTGR)</topic><topic>Loss of coolant accidents</topic><topic>Low Enriched Uranium (LEU)</topic><topic>Multi-Group Time Dependent Neutronics and Temperatures (MGT)</topic><topic>Nuclear fuels</topic><topic>Nuclear safety</topic><topic>Once-Through-Then-Out (OTTO)</topic><topic>Pebble Bed Reactor (PBR)</topic><topic>Pebble bed reactors</topic><topic>Reactor cores</topic><topic>Reactor Pressure Vessel (RPV)</topic><topic>Reactors</topic><topic>Safety engineering</topic><topic>Surface temperature</topic><topic>Temperature</topic><topic>Thorium</topic><topic>Time dependence</topic><topic>Uranium</topic><topic>Uranium dioxide</topic><topic>Very Superior Old Program (VSOP)</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Boyes, W.A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Slabber, J.F.M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Boyes, D.W</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Electronics & Communications Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Mechanical & Transportation Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Nuclear engineering and design</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Boyes, W.A</au><au>Slabber, J.F.M</au><au>Boyes, D.W</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A comprehensive Thermo-hydraulic neutronic and safety analysis of a 100MWth pebble bed reactor core</atitle><jtitle>Nuclear engineering and design</jtitle><date>2022-11</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>398</volume><spage>111991</spage><pages>111991-</pages><artnum>111991</artnum><issn>0029-5493</issn><eissn>1872-759X</eissn><abstract>The HTMR100 is a 100MWth High Temperature Gas-cooled Reactor (HTGR), which is helium-cooled and graphite moderated. This reactor is of the Pebble Bed type featuring a Once-Through-Then-Out (OTTO) fuelling scheme, this cycle was chosen for the simplicity of the fuel handling system.
The HTMR100 Pebble Bed Reactor (PBR) has a core volume of 27.73 m3 (core diameter 2.6 m, core height ∼ 5.2 m) which results in an average core power density of 3.6 MW/m3. This reactor utilizes uranium dioxide fuel (UO2) at a U-235 enrichment of 10 wt% and 10 g of heavy metal (total uranium) per Fuel Sphere (FS). Although there are various types of fuel options that can be utilized in the HTMR100 reactor, ranging from LEU to mixtures of Th/LEU, Th/HEU and Th/Pu, this study will only focus on LEU in the form of UO2 fuel.
This study investigates the neutronic and thermal–hydraulic modelling of the 100MWth HTMR100 at equilibrium (100% power with the control rods situated at the nominal position for a core having an equilibrium fuel burnup profile) and at transient/accident conditions. The purpose of the investigation is to determine if the maximum fuel temperature remains below the set limit of 1600 °C during a design-base accident event that is defined as a Loss of Coolant Accident (LOCA).
The equilibrium core was simulated using the Very Superior Old Programs (VSOP99) suite of codes to obtain burnup results. The transient behaviour of the core was modelled by a code called Multi-group Time Dependent Neutronics and Temperatures (MGT). MGT assesses the dynamic transient results of the accident scenarios such as the Depressurized Loss of Forced Cooling (DLOFC), Pressurized Loss of Forced Cooling (PLOFC), Control Rod Withdrawal (CRW) and a Control Rod Ejection (CRE) as well as normal operating transients of which a Load Following (LF) operation is a typical example.
The HTMR100 reactor utilizing the enrichment and heavy metal loading as specified does indeed produce the targeted 80 000 MWD/THM burnup for the OTTO fuel cycle. The study also proves that the VSOP99 and the MGT codes do in fact yield similar results for the HTMR100 reactor with regards to fuel centreline temperatures, outer sphere surface temperatures as well as moderator temperatures for the postulated accident scenarios that were analysed. The results also indicate that the design-base transient safety analysis simulations prove that the fuel temperatures remain below the set value of 1600 °C for the oxide-based fuel. A temperature-volume analysis of a DLOFC design-base event shows that only ∼ 2 % of the fuel reaches the higher temperatures of 1500 °C to 1600 °C in a DLOFC event.
The beyond-design base events with a very low probability of occurrence do however exceed the set value of 1600 °C but the fuel only exceeds this set limit for short periods of time while the transient occurs. The probability that this will lead to fuel damage should be very small since the time at these high temperatures is short and the volume fraction of the core exposed to these high temperatures is small.</abstract><cop>Amsterdam</cop><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><doi>10.1016/j.nucengdes.2022.111991</doi></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0029-5493 |
ispartof | Nuclear engineering and design, 2022-11, Vol.398, p.111991, Article 111991 |
issn | 0029-5493 1872-759X |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2765099725 |
source | ScienceDirect Journals |
subjects | Accident conditions Control rods Cooling Design Design analysis Equilibrium Fuel cycles Fuel Spheres (FS) Fuels Heavy metals Helium High temperature High temperature gas cooled reactors High Temperature Gas Reactor (HTGR) Loss of coolant accidents Low Enriched Uranium (LEU) Multi-Group Time Dependent Neutronics and Temperatures (MGT) Nuclear fuels Nuclear safety Once-Through-Then-Out (OTTO) Pebble Bed Reactor (PBR) Pebble bed reactors Reactor cores Reactor Pressure Vessel (RPV) Reactors Safety engineering Surface temperature Temperature Thorium Time dependence Uranium Uranium dioxide Very Superior Old Program (VSOP) |
title | A comprehensive Thermo-hydraulic neutronic and safety analysis of a 100MWth pebble bed reactor core |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-05T06%3A49%3A06IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20comprehensive%20Thermo-hydraulic%20neutronic%20and%20safety%20analysis%20of%20a%20100MWth%20pebble%20bed%20reactor%20core&rft.jtitle=Nuclear%20engineering%20and%20design&rft.au=Boyes,%20W.A&rft.date=2022-11&rft.volume=398&rft.spage=111991&rft.pages=111991-&rft.artnum=111991&rft.issn=0029-5493&rft.eissn=1872-759X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.nucengdes.2022.111991&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2765099725%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c273t-29b2b02acd4ec3eea10b08154ca7129f284e7f2bf87fe2390c56c715540265f83%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2765099725&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |