Nor shadow of turning: Anthropological reflections on theological critiques of doctrinal change

• Published in: The Australian journal of anthropology 2022-12, Vol.33 (3), p.360-382
• Main Author: Webster, Joseph
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Answers; Anthropology; Anthropology of religion; exceptionalism; Monopolies; protestant fundamentalism; Religion; Religious beliefs; Scotland; Social life & customs; Theology; Truth
• ISSN: 1035-8811; 1757-6547
• DOI: 10.1111/taja.12448

To all intents and purposes, the Free Presbyterian Church of Scotland, the Brethren of Gamrie, and the Orange Order each claim a monopoly over theological truth, believing that they are right and that everyone else is wrong. Such a position is hardly exceptional – strong versions of pluralism take precisely this same monopolistic stance, calling, in effect, for a rejection of anything that rejects anything. Through an examination of such exceptionalist logics, this article seeks to provoke the anthropology of religion to ask certain questions about the social life of theological truth claims. Importantly, by asking anthropological questions (what makes a truth claim ‘stick’; what difference does it make in the world?), the anthropologist of religion is likely to encounter theological questions posed in response. Where does truth come from? What makes it true? What does such truth demand? While answering a question with another question is not always very revealing, this article suggests that in this case it might be, especially if some genuine attempt is made to answer the latter theological questions as a route to answering the former anthropological ones. More specifically, this article argues that anthropology might learn something about the nature of religious change, and changes to religious beliefs, if it first attempts to makes sense of (in this case, Protestant Fundamentalist) theological critiques of doctrinal change.