Loading…

Dry grassland within the urban matrix acts as favourable habitat for different pollinators including endangered species

This study highlights the potential of urban dry grasslands for diverse pollinator communities of wild bees and hoverflies, including rare and endangered species. By using pan trap sampling on 49 study sites distributed across the urban environment, responses of wild bee and hoverfly communities to...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Insect conservation and diversity 2023-01, Vol.16 (1), p.97-109
Main Authors: Grossmann, Anita Judit, Herrmann, Johann, Buchholz, Sascha, Gathof, Anika Kristin
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2677-5727c6a0c71f446a128abc9cb708eb487aee6c4b99f3d8bc6e72b7cbe34494e03
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2677-5727c6a0c71f446a128abc9cb708eb487aee6c4b99f3d8bc6e72b7cbe34494e03
container_end_page 109
container_issue 1
container_start_page 97
container_title Insect conservation and diversity
container_volume 16
creator Grossmann, Anita Judit
Herrmann, Johann
Buchholz, Sascha
Gathof, Anika Kristin
description This study highlights the potential of urban dry grasslands for diverse pollinator communities of wild bees and hoverflies, including rare and endangered species. By using pan trap sampling on 49 study sites distributed across the urban environment, responses of wild bee and hoverfly communities to urban features at two spatial scales (urban matrix and local habitat) were examined. A total of 1246 hoverfly individuals (Syrphidae) from 31 species and 1463 bee individuals (Apoidea) from 107 species were collected. Our analysis showed that hoverflies are impacted by urban matrix features and local floral resources, whereas wild bees only respond to patch size at the local habitat scale and endangered wild bee species additionally to non‐native pollinator‐friendly plants. Given the different responses of wild bees and hoverflies to the urban environment, we recommend multi‐taxon approaches for urban conservation practice. Urban dry grasslands and the diversity of pollinator‐friendly plants, including non‐native species, should be conserved and promoted to support urban pollinator diversity. We demonstrate the potential of urban dry grasslands for diverse pollinator communities of wild bees and hoverflies, including rare and endangered species. The responses of wild bee and hoverfly communities to urban features were assessed on 49 study sites across the city of Berlin using pan trapping. We found different responses from wild bee and hoverfly species, suggesting that multi‐taxon approaches are required in urban pollinator conservation practice.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/icad.12607
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2766277048</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2766277048</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2677-5727c6a0c71f446a128abc9cb708eb487aee6c4b99f3d8bc6e72b7cbe34494e03</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE1PwzAMhisEEmNw4RdE4obUkWZZ0h7RxpeExAUkbpGTOlumLh1Jyti_p6OII77Yh8e23ifLLgs6Kfq6cQbqScEElUfZqJAzlvNZVR7_zeX7aXYW45pSQSvBRtluEfZkGSDGBnxNdi6tnCdphaQLGjzZQArui4BJkUAkFj7bLoBukKxAuwSJ2DaQ2lmLAX0i27ZpnIfUhkicN01XO78k6Gvwy56oSdyicRjPsxMLTcSL3z7O3u7vXueP-fPLw9P89jk3TEiZzySTRgA1srCcCyhYCdpURktaoualBERhuK4qO61LbQRKpqXROOW84kin4-xquLsN7UeHMal1H8D3LxWTQjApKS976nqgTGhjDGjVNrgNhL0qqDqIVQex6kdsDxcDvHMN7v8hVR9kMex8A6Amfbc</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2766277048</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Dry grassland within the urban matrix acts as favourable habitat for different pollinators including endangered species</title><source>Wiley</source><creator>Grossmann, Anita Judit ; Herrmann, Johann ; Buchholz, Sascha ; Gathof, Anika Kristin</creator><creatorcontrib>Grossmann, Anita Judit ; Herrmann, Johann ; Buchholz, Sascha ; Gathof, Anika Kristin</creatorcontrib><description>This study highlights the potential of urban dry grasslands for diverse pollinator communities of wild bees and hoverflies, including rare and endangered species. By using pan trap sampling on 49 study sites distributed across the urban environment, responses of wild bee and hoverfly communities to urban features at two spatial scales (urban matrix and local habitat) were examined. A total of 1246 hoverfly individuals (Syrphidae) from 31 species and 1463 bee individuals (Apoidea) from 107 species were collected. Our analysis showed that hoverflies are impacted by urban matrix features and local floral resources, whereas wild bees only respond to patch size at the local habitat scale and endangered wild bee species additionally to non‐native pollinator‐friendly plants. Given the different responses of wild bees and hoverflies to the urban environment, we recommend multi‐taxon approaches for urban conservation practice. Urban dry grasslands and the diversity of pollinator‐friendly plants, including non‐native species, should be conserved and promoted to support urban pollinator diversity. We demonstrate the potential of urban dry grasslands for diverse pollinator communities of wild bees and hoverflies, including rare and endangered species. The responses of wild bee and hoverfly communities to urban features were assessed on 49 study sites across the city of Berlin using pan trapping. We found different responses from wild bee and hoverfly species, suggesting that multi‐taxon approaches are required in urban pollinator conservation practice.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1752-458X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1752-4598</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/icad.12607</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Chichester, UK: John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd</publisher><subject>Apoidea ; dry grassland ; Endangered &amp; extinct species ; Endangered species ; Grasslands ; Habitats ; hoverflies ; Indigenous species ; multi‐taxon approach ; pollinator diversity ; Pollinators ; Rare species ; Syrphidae ; urban spatial scales ; wild bees</subject><ispartof>Insect conservation and diversity, 2023-01, Vol.16 (1), p.97-109</ispartof><rights>2022 The Authors. published by John Wiley &amp; Sons Ltd on behalf of Royal Entomological Society.</rights><rights>2022. This article is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2677-5727c6a0c71f446a128abc9cb708eb487aee6c4b99f3d8bc6e72b7cbe34494e03</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2677-5727c6a0c71f446a128abc9cb708eb487aee6c4b99f3d8bc6e72b7cbe34494e03</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,27905,27906</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Grossmann, Anita Judit</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Herrmann, Johann</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Buchholz, Sascha</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gathof, Anika Kristin</creatorcontrib><title>Dry grassland within the urban matrix acts as favourable habitat for different pollinators including endangered species</title><title>Insect conservation and diversity</title><description>This study highlights the potential of urban dry grasslands for diverse pollinator communities of wild bees and hoverflies, including rare and endangered species. By using pan trap sampling on 49 study sites distributed across the urban environment, responses of wild bee and hoverfly communities to urban features at two spatial scales (urban matrix and local habitat) were examined. A total of 1246 hoverfly individuals (Syrphidae) from 31 species and 1463 bee individuals (Apoidea) from 107 species were collected. Our analysis showed that hoverflies are impacted by urban matrix features and local floral resources, whereas wild bees only respond to patch size at the local habitat scale and endangered wild bee species additionally to non‐native pollinator‐friendly plants. Given the different responses of wild bees and hoverflies to the urban environment, we recommend multi‐taxon approaches for urban conservation practice. Urban dry grasslands and the diversity of pollinator‐friendly plants, including non‐native species, should be conserved and promoted to support urban pollinator diversity. We demonstrate the potential of urban dry grasslands for diverse pollinator communities of wild bees and hoverflies, including rare and endangered species. The responses of wild bee and hoverfly communities to urban features were assessed on 49 study sites across the city of Berlin using pan trapping. We found different responses from wild bee and hoverfly species, suggesting that multi‐taxon approaches are required in urban pollinator conservation practice.</description><subject>Apoidea</subject><subject>dry grassland</subject><subject>Endangered &amp; extinct species</subject><subject>Endangered species</subject><subject>Grasslands</subject><subject>Habitats</subject><subject>hoverflies</subject><subject>Indigenous species</subject><subject>multi‐taxon approach</subject><subject>pollinator diversity</subject><subject>Pollinators</subject><subject>Rare species</subject><subject>Syrphidae</subject><subject>urban spatial scales</subject><subject>wild bees</subject><issn>1752-458X</issn><issn>1752-4598</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>24P</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kE1PwzAMhisEEmNw4RdE4obUkWZZ0h7RxpeExAUkbpGTOlumLh1Jyti_p6OII77Yh8e23ifLLgs6Kfq6cQbqScEElUfZqJAzlvNZVR7_zeX7aXYW45pSQSvBRtluEfZkGSDGBnxNdi6tnCdphaQLGjzZQArui4BJkUAkFj7bLoBukKxAuwSJ2DaQ2lmLAX0i27ZpnIfUhkicN01XO78k6Gvwy56oSdyicRjPsxMLTcSL3z7O3u7vXueP-fPLw9P89jk3TEiZzySTRgA1srCcCyhYCdpURktaoualBERhuK4qO61LbQRKpqXROOW84kin4-xquLsN7UeHMal1H8D3LxWTQjApKS976nqgTGhjDGjVNrgNhL0qqDqIVQex6kdsDxcDvHMN7v8hVR9kMex8A6Amfbc</recordid><startdate>202301</startdate><enddate>202301</enddate><creator>Grossmann, Anita Judit</creator><creator>Herrmann, Johann</creator><creator>Buchholz, Sascha</creator><creator>Gathof, Anika Kristin</creator><general>John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd</general><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>24P</scope><scope>WIN</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SS</scope></search><sort><creationdate>202301</creationdate><title>Dry grassland within the urban matrix acts as favourable habitat for different pollinators including endangered species</title><author>Grossmann, Anita Judit ; Herrmann, Johann ; Buchholz, Sascha ; Gathof, Anika Kristin</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2677-5727c6a0c71f446a128abc9cb708eb487aee6c4b99f3d8bc6e72b7cbe34494e03</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Apoidea</topic><topic>dry grassland</topic><topic>Endangered &amp; extinct species</topic><topic>Endangered species</topic><topic>Grasslands</topic><topic>Habitats</topic><topic>hoverflies</topic><topic>Indigenous species</topic><topic>multi‐taxon approach</topic><topic>pollinator diversity</topic><topic>Pollinators</topic><topic>Rare species</topic><topic>Syrphidae</topic><topic>urban spatial scales</topic><topic>wild bees</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Grossmann, Anita Judit</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Herrmann, Johann</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Buchholz, Sascha</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gathof, Anika Kristin</creatorcontrib><collection>Wiley-Blackwell Open Access Collection</collection><collection>Wiley Free Archive</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><jtitle>Insect conservation and diversity</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Grossmann, Anita Judit</au><au>Herrmann, Johann</au><au>Buchholz, Sascha</au><au>Gathof, Anika Kristin</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Dry grassland within the urban matrix acts as favourable habitat for different pollinators including endangered species</atitle><jtitle>Insect conservation and diversity</jtitle><date>2023-01</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>16</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>97</spage><epage>109</epage><pages>97-109</pages><issn>1752-458X</issn><eissn>1752-4598</eissn><abstract>This study highlights the potential of urban dry grasslands for diverse pollinator communities of wild bees and hoverflies, including rare and endangered species. By using pan trap sampling on 49 study sites distributed across the urban environment, responses of wild bee and hoverfly communities to urban features at two spatial scales (urban matrix and local habitat) were examined. A total of 1246 hoverfly individuals (Syrphidae) from 31 species and 1463 bee individuals (Apoidea) from 107 species were collected. Our analysis showed that hoverflies are impacted by urban matrix features and local floral resources, whereas wild bees only respond to patch size at the local habitat scale and endangered wild bee species additionally to non‐native pollinator‐friendly plants. Given the different responses of wild bees and hoverflies to the urban environment, we recommend multi‐taxon approaches for urban conservation practice. Urban dry grasslands and the diversity of pollinator‐friendly plants, including non‐native species, should be conserved and promoted to support urban pollinator diversity. We demonstrate the potential of urban dry grasslands for diverse pollinator communities of wild bees and hoverflies, including rare and endangered species. The responses of wild bee and hoverfly communities to urban features were assessed on 49 study sites across the city of Berlin using pan trapping. We found different responses from wild bee and hoverfly species, suggesting that multi‐taxon approaches are required in urban pollinator conservation practice.</abstract><cop>Chichester, UK</cop><pub>John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd</pub><doi>10.1111/icad.12607</doi><tpages>13</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1752-458X
ispartof Insect conservation and diversity, 2023-01, Vol.16 (1), p.97-109
issn 1752-458X
1752-4598
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2766277048
source Wiley
subjects Apoidea
dry grassland
Endangered & extinct species
Endangered species
Grasslands
Habitats
hoverflies
Indigenous species
multi‐taxon approach
pollinator diversity
Pollinators
Rare species
Syrphidae
urban spatial scales
wild bees
title Dry grassland within the urban matrix acts as favourable habitat for different pollinators including endangered species
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-20T14%3A29%3A28IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Dry%20grassland%20within%20the%20urban%20matrix%20acts%20as%20favourable%20habitat%20for%20different%20pollinators%20including%20endangered%20species&rft.jtitle=Insect%20conservation%20and%20diversity&rft.au=Grossmann,%20Anita%20Judit&rft.date=2023-01&rft.volume=16&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=97&rft.epage=109&rft.pages=97-109&rft.issn=1752-458X&rft.eissn=1752-4598&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/icad.12607&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2766277048%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2677-5727c6a0c71f446a128abc9cb708eb487aee6c4b99f3d8bc6e72b7cbe34494e03%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2766277048&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true