Loading…

Comparison of transversal versus torsional mode phacoemulsification for removal of hard cataracts

Aim: To compare the efficacy and safety profiles of phacoemulsification machines using transversal and torsional ultrasonic power in hard cataract surgery. Methods: The medical records of patients having NO4-6 grade hard cataract based on the Lens Opacification Classification System III, and thereby...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Experimental biomedical research 2022-07, Vol.5 (3), p.336
Main Authors: Ucgul, Ahmet Yucel, Ucgul, Rukiye Kilic
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by
cites
container_end_page
container_issue 3
container_start_page 336
container_title Experimental biomedical research
container_volume 5
creator Ucgul, Ahmet Yucel
Ucgul, Rukiye Kilic
description Aim: To compare the efficacy and safety profiles of phacoemulsification machines using transversal and torsional ultrasonic power in hard cataract surgery. Methods: The medical records of patients having NO4-6 grade hard cataract based on the Lens Opacification Classification System III, and thereby, operated by using Whitestar Signature (with transversal ultrasonic power) or Infiniti Ozil IP (with torsional ultrasonic power) phacoemulsification machines were retrospectively reviewed. At baseline, best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), cataract grade, intraocular pressure (IOP), central corneal thickness (CCT), and biometric parameters such as lens thickness or anterior chamber depth were noted. Intraoperatively, total phaco needle time and total surgery time were recorded. Postoperatively, corneal edema severity, BCVA, IOP, and CCT was examined at first, 7th and 30th days. Results: Ninety-eight eyes of 98 patients with an average age of 69.5±10.9 (47-88) years and an average follow-up time of 3.0±1.4 (1-6) months were included into the study. Total phaco needle time and surgery time were significantly shorter in the torsional US group compared to the transversal US group (112±46 vs 171±42 seconds and 9.2±3.5 vs 13.4±3.3 minutes, respectively, both p
doi_str_mv 10.30714/j-ebr.2022.152
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2771058552</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2771058552</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1352-e3fcd2f0f5ed6bf8f5416acdbb06014e7acaeeacb5740cccb44ca61ccbe84ea73</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpNkEtrwzAQhEVpoSHNuVdBz04kWbJ9LaYvCPTSnsVaXhGb2HJXdqD_vkrTQ0877AzD8DF2L8U2F6XUuz7DhrZKKLWVRl2xlSpklRXa6Ot_-pZtYuyFEKoqtZBixaAOwwTUxTDy4PlMMMYTUoQjP58l8jlQ7MKYHkNokU8HcAGH5Rg73zmYk8V9IE44hFMKpZIDUMuTBQRujnfsxsMx4ubvrtnn89NH_Zrt31_e6sd95mRuVIa5d63ywhtsi8ZX3mhZgGubRhRCaizBASK4xqTlzrlGaweFTAIrjVDma_Zw6Z0ofC0YZ9uHhdLuaFVZSmEqY1RK7S4pRyFGQm8n6gagbyuF_UVpe5tQ2jNKm1DmP2kOazI</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2771058552</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparison of transversal versus torsional mode phacoemulsification for removal of hard cataracts</title><source>Publicly Available Content Database</source><creator>Ucgul, Ahmet Yucel ; Ucgul, Rukiye Kilic</creator><creatorcontrib>Ucgul, Ahmet Yucel ; Ucgul, Rukiye Kilic</creatorcontrib><description>Aim: To compare the efficacy and safety profiles of phacoemulsification machines using transversal and torsional ultrasonic power in hard cataract surgery. Methods: The medical records of patients having NO4-6 grade hard cataract based on the Lens Opacification Classification System III, and thereby, operated by using Whitestar Signature (with transversal ultrasonic power) or Infiniti Ozil IP (with torsional ultrasonic power) phacoemulsification machines were retrospectively reviewed. At baseline, best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), cataract grade, intraocular pressure (IOP), central corneal thickness (CCT), and biometric parameters such as lens thickness or anterior chamber depth were noted. Intraoperatively, total phaco needle time and total surgery time were recorded. Postoperatively, corneal edema severity, BCVA, IOP, and CCT was examined at first, 7th and 30th days. Results: Ninety-eight eyes of 98 patients with an average age of 69.5±10.9 (47-88) years and an average follow-up time of 3.0±1.4 (1-6) months were included into the study. Total phaco needle time and surgery time were significantly shorter in the torsional US group compared to the transversal US group (112±46 vs 171±42 seconds and 9.2±3.5 vs 13.4±3.3 minutes, respectively, both p&lt;0.001). Severe postoperative corneal edema was more common in patients in the transversal US group compared to the torsional US group. Conclusion: Transversal ultrasonic power is more likely to cause corneal edema in patients with hard cataract possibly due to increased phaco needle time and surgery time, compared to torsional ultrasonic power. Therefore, torsional ultrasonic power-based phacoemulsification machines should be the first option, in patients whose corneas at risk of decompensation.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2618-6454</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2618-6454</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.30714/j-ebr.2022.152</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Bolu: Experimental Biomedical Research</publisher><subject>Acuity ; Anterior chamber ; Cataracts ; Cornea ; Edema ; Medical records ; Patients ; Surgery</subject><ispartof>Experimental biomedical research, 2022-07, Vol.5 (3), p.336</ispartof><rights>2022. This work is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><orcidid>0000-0001-9945-793X ; 0000-0002-7356-9826</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2771058552?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,25753,27924,27925,37012,44590</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Ucgul, Ahmet Yucel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ucgul, Rukiye Kilic</creatorcontrib><title>Comparison of transversal versus torsional mode phacoemulsification for removal of hard cataracts</title><title>Experimental biomedical research</title><description>Aim: To compare the efficacy and safety profiles of phacoemulsification machines using transversal and torsional ultrasonic power in hard cataract surgery. Methods: The medical records of patients having NO4-6 grade hard cataract based on the Lens Opacification Classification System III, and thereby, operated by using Whitestar Signature (with transversal ultrasonic power) or Infiniti Ozil IP (with torsional ultrasonic power) phacoemulsification machines were retrospectively reviewed. At baseline, best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), cataract grade, intraocular pressure (IOP), central corneal thickness (CCT), and biometric parameters such as lens thickness or anterior chamber depth were noted. Intraoperatively, total phaco needle time and total surgery time were recorded. Postoperatively, corneal edema severity, BCVA, IOP, and CCT was examined at first, 7th and 30th days. Results: Ninety-eight eyes of 98 patients with an average age of 69.5±10.9 (47-88) years and an average follow-up time of 3.0±1.4 (1-6) months were included into the study. Total phaco needle time and surgery time were significantly shorter in the torsional US group compared to the transversal US group (112±46 vs 171±42 seconds and 9.2±3.5 vs 13.4±3.3 minutes, respectively, both p&lt;0.001). Severe postoperative corneal edema was more common in patients in the transversal US group compared to the torsional US group. Conclusion: Transversal ultrasonic power is more likely to cause corneal edema in patients with hard cataract possibly due to increased phaco needle time and surgery time, compared to torsional ultrasonic power. Therefore, torsional ultrasonic power-based phacoemulsification machines should be the first option, in patients whose corneas at risk of decompensation.</description><subject>Acuity</subject><subject>Anterior chamber</subject><subject>Cataracts</subject><subject>Cornea</subject><subject>Edema</subject><subject>Medical records</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Surgery</subject><issn>2618-6454</issn><issn>2618-6454</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>PIMPY</sourceid><recordid>eNpNkEtrwzAQhEVpoSHNuVdBz04kWbJ9LaYvCPTSnsVaXhGb2HJXdqD_vkrTQ0877AzD8DF2L8U2F6XUuz7DhrZKKLWVRl2xlSpklRXa6Ot_-pZtYuyFEKoqtZBixaAOwwTUxTDy4PlMMMYTUoQjP58l8jlQ7MKYHkNokU8HcAGH5Rg73zmYk8V9IE44hFMKpZIDUMuTBQRujnfsxsMx4ubvrtnn89NH_Zrt31_e6sd95mRuVIa5d63ywhtsi8ZX3mhZgGubRhRCaizBASK4xqTlzrlGaweFTAIrjVDma_Zw6Z0ofC0YZ9uHhdLuaFVZSmEqY1RK7S4pRyFGQm8n6gagbyuF_UVpe5tQ2jNKm1DmP2kOazI</recordid><startdate>20220701</startdate><enddate>20220701</enddate><creator>Ucgul, Ahmet Yucel</creator><creator>Ucgul, Rukiye Kilic</creator><general>Experimental Biomedical Research</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9945-793X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7356-9826</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20220701</creationdate><title>Comparison of transversal versus torsional mode phacoemulsification for removal of hard cataracts</title><author>Ucgul, Ahmet Yucel ; Ucgul, Rukiye Kilic</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c1352-e3fcd2f0f5ed6bf8f5416acdbb06014e7acaeeacb5740cccb44ca61ccbe84ea73</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Acuity</topic><topic>Anterior chamber</topic><topic>Cataracts</topic><topic>Cornea</topic><topic>Edema</topic><topic>Medical records</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Surgery</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Ucgul, Ahmet Yucel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ucgul, Rukiye Kilic</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Biological Sciences</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Journals</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><jtitle>Experimental biomedical research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Ucgul, Ahmet Yucel</au><au>Ucgul, Rukiye Kilic</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparison of transversal versus torsional mode phacoemulsification for removal of hard cataracts</atitle><jtitle>Experimental biomedical research</jtitle><date>2022-07-01</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>5</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>336</spage><pages>336-</pages><issn>2618-6454</issn><eissn>2618-6454</eissn><abstract>Aim: To compare the efficacy and safety profiles of phacoemulsification machines using transversal and torsional ultrasonic power in hard cataract surgery. Methods: The medical records of patients having NO4-6 grade hard cataract based on the Lens Opacification Classification System III, and thereby, operated by using Whitestar Signature (with transversal ultrasonic power) or Infiniti Ozil IP (with torsional ultrasonic power) phacoemulsification machines were retrospectively reviewed. At baseline, best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), cataract grade, intraocular pressure (IOP), central corneal thickness (CCT), and biometric parameters such as lens thickness or anterior chamber depth were noted. Intraoperatively, total phaco needle time and total surgery time were recorded. Postoperatively, corneal edema severity, BCVA, IOP, and CCT was examined at first, 7th and 30th days. Results: Ninety-eight eyes of 98 patients with an average age of 69.5±10.9 (47-88) years and an average follow-up time of 3.0±1.4 (1-6) months were included into the study. Total phaco needle time and surgery time were significantly shorter in the torsional US group compared to the transversal US group (112±46 vs 171±42 seconds and 9.2±3.5 vs 13.4±3.3 minutes, respectively, both p&lt;0.001). Severe postoperative corneal edema was more common in patients in the transversal US group compared to the torsional US group. Conclusion: Transversal ultrasonic power is more likely to cause corneal edema in patients with hard cataract possibly due to increased phaco needle time and surgery time, compared to torsional ultrasonic power. Therefore, torsional ultrasonic power-based phacoemulsification machines should be the first option, in patients whose corneas at risk of decompensation.</abstract><cop>Bolu</cop><pub>Experimental Biomedical Research</pub><doi>10.30714/j-ebr.2022.152</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9945-793X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7356-9826</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2618-6454
ispartof Experimental biomedical research, 2022-07, Vol.5 (3), p.336
issn 2618-6454
2618-6454
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2771058552
source Publicly Available Content Database
subjects Acuity
Anterior chamber
Cataracts
Cornea
Edema
Medical records
Patients
Surgery
title Comparison of transversal versus torsional mode phacoemulsification for removal of hard cataracts
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-20T14%3A11%3A10IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparison%20of%20transversal%20versus%20torsional%20mode%20phacoemulsification%20for%20removal%20of%20hard%20cataracts&rft.jtitle=Experimental%20biomedical%20research&rft.au=Ucgul,%20Ahmet%20Yucel&rft.date=2022-07-01&rft.volume=5&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=336&rft.pages=336-&rft.issn=2618-6454&rft.eissn=2618-6454&rft_id=info:doi/10.30714/j-ebr.2022.152&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2771058552%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c1352-e3fcd2f0f5ed6bf8f5416acdbb06014e7acaeeacb5740cccb44ca61ccbe84ea73%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2771058552&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true