Loading…

On the Within-Group Fairness of Screening Classifiers

Screening classifiers are increasingly used to identify qualified candidates in a variety of selection processes. In this context, it has been recently shown that, if a classifier is calibrated, one can identify the smallest set of candidates which contains, in expectation, a desired number of quali...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:arXiv.org 2023-08
Main Authors: Okati, Nastaran, Stratis Tsirtsis, Manuel Gomez Rodriguez
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by
cites
container_end_page
container_issue
container_start_page
container_title arXiv.org
container_volume
creator Okati, Nastaran
Stratis Tsirtsis
Manuel Gomez Rodriguez
description Screening classifiers are increasingly used to identify qualified candidates in a variety of selection processes. In this context, it has been recently shown that, if a classifier is calibrated, one can identify the smallest set of candidates which contains, in expectation, a desired number of qualified candidates using a threshold decision rule. This lends support to focusing on calibration as the only requirement for screening classifiers. In this paper, we argue that screening policies that use calibrated classifiers may suffer from an understudied type of within-group unfairness -- they may unfairly treat qualified members within demographic groups of interest. Further, we argue that this type of unfairness can be avoided if classifiers satisfy within-group monotonicity, a natural monotonicity property within each of the groups. Then, we introduce an efficient post-processing algorithm based on dynamic programming to minimally modify a given calibrated classifier so that its probability estimates satisfy within-group monotonicity. We validate our algorithm using US Census survey data and show that within-group monotonicity can be often achieved at a small cost in terms of prediction granularity and shortlist size.
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2771816915</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2771816915</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-proquest_journals_27718169153</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNyr0KwjAUQOEgCBbtOwScA_kxTZ2L1c1BwbEEubEpJam5yfvr4AM4neE7K1JJpQRrD1JuSI04cc5lY6TWqiL6GmgegT58Hn1g5xTLQnvrUwBEGh29PRNA8OFFu9kieuch4Y6snZ0R6l-3ZN-f7t2FLSm-C2AeplhS-NIgjRGtaI5Cq_-uD1xaNKk</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2771816915</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>On the Within-Group Fairness of Screening Classifiers</title><source>Publicly Available Content Database</source><creator>Okati, Nastaran ; Stratis Tsirtsis ; Manuel Gomez Rodriguez</creator><creatorcontrib>Okati, Nastaran ; Stratis Tsirtsis ; Manuel Gomez Rodriguez</creatorcontrib><description>Screening classifiers are increasingly used to identify qualified candidates in a variety of selection processes. In this context, it has been recently shown that, if a classifier is calibrated, one can identify the smallest set of candidates which contains, in expectation, a desired number of qualified candidates using a threshold decision rule. This lends support to focusing on calibration as the only requirement for screening classifiers. In this paper, we argue that screening policies that use calibrated classifiers may suffer from an understudied type of within-group unfairness -- they may unfairly treat qualified members within demographic groups of interest. Further, we argue that this type of unfairness can be avoided if classifiers satisfy within-group monotonicity, a natural monotonicity property within each of the groups. Then, we introduce an efficient post-processing algorithm based on dynamic programming to minimally modify a given calibrated classifier so that its probability estimates satisfy within-group monotonicity. We validate our algorithm using US Census survey data and show that within-group monotonicity can be often achieved at a small cost in terms of prediction granularity and shortlist size.</description><identifier>EISSN: 2331-8422</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Ithaca: Cornell University Library, arXiv.org</publisher><subject>Algorithms ; Calibration ; Classifiers ; Dynamic programming ; Screening</subject><ispartof>arXiv.org, 2023-08</ispartof><rights>2023. This work is published under http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2771816915?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>780,784,25753,37012,44590</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Okati, Nastaran</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stratis Tsirtsis</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Manuel Gomez Rodriguez</creatorcontrib><title>On the Within-Group Fairness of Screening Classifiers</title><title>arXiv.org</title><description>Screening classifiers are increasingly used to identify qualified candidates in a variety of selection processes. In this context, it has been recently shown that, if a classifier is calibrated, one can identify the smallest set of candidates which contains, in expectation, a desired number of qualified candidates using a threshold decision rule. This lends support to focusing on calibration as the only requirement for screening classifiers. In this paper, we argue that screening policies that use calibrated classifiers may suffer from an understudied type of within-group unfairness -- they may unfairly treat qualified members within demographic groups of interest. Further, we argue that this type of unfairness can be avoided if classifiers satisfy within-group monotonicity, a natural monotonicity property within each of the groups. Then, we introduce an efficient post-processing algorithm based on dynamic programming to minimally modify a given calibrated classifier so that its probability estimates satisfy within-group monotonicity. We validate our algorithm using US Census survey data and show that within-group monotonicity can be often achieved at a small cost in terms of prediction granularity and shortlist size.</description><subject>Algorithms</subject><subject>Calibration</subject><subject>Classifiers</subject><subject>Dynamic programming</subject><subject>Screening</subject><issn>2331-8422</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>PIMPY</sourceid><recordid>eNqNyr0KwjAUQOEgCBbtOwScA_kxTZ2L1c1BwbEEubEpJam5yfvr4AM4neE7K1JJpQRrD1JuSI04cc5lY6TWqiL6GmgegT58Hn1g5xTLQnvrUwBEGh29PRNA8OFFu9kieuch4Y6snZ0R6l-3ZN-f7t2FLSm-C2AeplhS-NIgjRGtaI5Cq_-uD1xaNKk</recordid><startdate>20230807</startdate><enddate>20230807</enddate><creator>Okati, Nastaran</creator><creator>Stratis Tsirtsis</creator><creator>Manuel Gomez Rodriguez</creator><general>Cornell University Library, arXiv.org</general><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20230807</creationdate><title>On the Within-Group Fairness of Screening Classifiers</title><author>Okati, Nastaran ; Stratis Tsirtsis ; Manuel Gomez Rodriguez</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-proquest_journals_27718169153</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Algorithms</topic><topic>Calibration</topic><topic>Classifiers</topic><topic>Dynamic programming</topic><topic>Screening</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Okati, Nastaran</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stratis Tsirtsis</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Manuel Gomez Rodriguez</creatorcontrib><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>Materials Science &amp; Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Okati, Nastaran</au><au>Stratis Tsirtsis</au><au>Manuel Gomez Rodriguez</au><format>book</format><genre>document</genre><ristype>GEN</ristype><atitle>On the Within-Group Fairness of Screening Classifiers</atitle><jtitle>arXiv.org</jtitle><date>2023-08-07</date><risdate>2023</risdate><eissn>2331-8422</eissn><abstract>Screening classifiers are increasingly used to identify qualified candidates in a variety of selection processes. In this context, it has been recently shown that, if a classifier is calibrated, one can identify the smallest set of candidates which contains, in expectation, a desired number of qualified candidates using a threshold decision rule. This lends support to focusing on calibration as the only requirement for screening classifiers. In this paper, we argue that screening policies that use calibrated classifiers may suffer from an understudied type of within-group unfairness -- they may unfairly treat qualified members within demographic groups of interest. Further, we argue that this type of unfairness can be avoided if classifiers satisfy within-group monotonicity, a natural monotonicity property within each of the groups. Then, we introduce an efficient post-processing algorithm based on dynamic programming to minimally modify a given calibrated classifier so that its probability estimates satisfy within-group monotonicity. We validate our algorithm using US Census survey data and show that within-group monotonicity can be often achieved at a small cost in terms of prediction granularity and shortlist size.</abstract><cop>Ithaca</cop><pub>Cornell University Library, arXiv.org</pub><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier EISSN: 2331-8422
ispartof arXiv.org, 2023-08
issn 2331-8422
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2771816915
source Publicly Available Content Database
subjects Algorithms
Calibration
Classifiers
Dynamic programming
Screening
title On the Within-Group Fairness of Screening Classifiers
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-07T06%3A06%3A45IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:book&rft.genre=document&rft.atitle=On%20the%20Within-Group%20Fairness%20of%20Screening%20Classifiers&rft.jtitle=arXiv.org&rft.au=Okati,%20Nastaran&rft.date=2023-08-07&rft.eissn=2331-8422&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cproquest%3E2771816915%3C/proquest%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-proquest_journals_27718169153%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2771816915&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true