Loading…
On the Within-Group Fairness of Screening Classifiers
Screening classifiers are increasingly used to identify qualified candidates in a variety of selection processes. In this context, it has been recently shown that, if a classifier is calibrated, one can identify the smallest set of candidates which contains, in expectation, a desired number of quali...
Saved in:
Published in: | arXiv.org 2023-08 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | |
---|---|
cites | |
container_end_page | |
container_issue | |
container_start_page | |
container_title | arXiv.org |
container_volume | |
creator | Okati, Nastaran Stratis Tsirtsis Manuel Gomez Rodriguez |
description | Screening classifiers are increasingly used to identify qualified candidates in a variety of selection processes. In this context, it has been recently shown that, if a classifier is calibrated, one can identify the smallest set of candidates which contains, in expectation, a desired number of qualified candidates using a threshold decision rule. This lends support to focusing on calibration as the only requirement for screening classifiers. In this paper, we argue that screening policies that use calibrated classifiers may suffer from an understudied type of within-group unfairness -- they may unfairly treat qualified members within demographic groups of interest. Further, we argue that this type of unfairness can be avoided if classifiers satisfy within-group monotonicity, a natural monotonicity property within each of the groups. Then, we introduce an efficient post-processing algorithm based on dynamic programming to minimally modify a given calibrated classifier so that its probability estimates satisfy within-group monotonicity. We validate our algorithm using US Census survey data and show that within-group monotonicity can be often achieved at a small cost in terms of prediction granularity and shortlist size. |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2771816915</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2771816915</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-proquest_journals_27718169153</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNyr0KwjAUQOEgCBbtOwScA_kxTZ2L1c1BwbEEubEpJam5yfvr4AM4neE7K1JJpQRrD1JuSI04cc5lY6TWqiL6GmgegT58Hn1g5xTLQnvrUwBEGh29PRNA8OFFu9kieuch4Y6snZ0R6l-3ZN-f7t2FLSm-C2AeplhS-NIgjRGtaI5Cq_-uD1xaNKk</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2771816915</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>On the Within-Group Fairness of Screening Classifiers</title><source>Publicly Available Content Database</source><creator>Okati, Nastaran ; Stratis Tsirtsis ; Manuel Gomez Rodriguez</creator><creatorcontrib>Okati, Nastaran ; Stratis Tsirtsis ; Manuel Gomez Rodriguez</creatorcontrib><description>Screening classifiers are increasingly used to identify qualified candidates in a variety of selection processes. In this context, it has been recently shown that, if a classifier is calibrated, one can identify the smallest set of candidates which contains, in expectation, a desired number of qualified candidates using a threshold decision rule. This lends support to focusing on calibration as the only requirement for screening classifiers. In this paper, we argue that screening policies that use calibrated classifiers may suffer from an understudied type of within-group unfairness -- they may unfairly treat qualified members within demographic groups of interest. Further, we argue that this type of unfairness can be avoided if classifiers satisfy within-group monotonicity, a natural monotonicity property within each of the groups. Then, we introduce an efficient post-processing algorithm based on dynamic programming to minimally modify a given calibrated classifier so that its probability estimates satisfy within-group monotonicity. We validate our algorithm using US Census survey data and show that within-group monotonicity can be often achieved at a small cost in terms of prediction granularity and shortlist size.</description><identifier>EISSN: 2331-8422</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Ithaca: Cornell University Library, arXiv.org</publisher><subject>Algorithms ; Calibration ; Classifiers ; Dynamic programming ; Screening</subject><ispartof>arXiv.org, 2023-08</ispartof><rights>2023. This work is published under http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2771816915?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>780,784,25753,37012,44590</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Okati, Nastaran</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stratis Tsirtsis</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Manuel Gomez Rodriguez</creatorcontrib><title>On the Within-Group Fairness of Screening Classifiers</title><title>arXiv.org</title><description>Screening classifiers are increasingly used to identify qualified candidates in a variety of selection processes. In this context, it has been recently shown that, if a classifier is calibrated, one can identify the smallest set of candidates which contains, in expectation, a desired number of qualified candidates using a threshold decision rule. This lends support to focusing on calibration as the only requirement for screening classifiers. In this paper, we argue that screening policies that use calibrated classifiers may suffer from an understudied type of within-group unfairness -- they may unfairly treat qualified members within demographic groups of interest. Further, we argue that this type of unfairness can be avoided if classifiers satisfy within-group monotonicity, a natural monotonicity property within each of the groups. Then, we introduce an efficient post-processing algorithm based on dynamic programming to minimally modify a given calibrated classifier so that its probability estimates satisfy within-group monotonicity. We validate our algorithm using US Census survey data and show that within-group monotonicity can be often achieved at a small cost in terms of prediction granularity and shortlist size.</description><subject>Algorithms</subject><subject>Calibration</subject><subject>Classifiers</subject><subject>Dynamic programming</subject><subject>Screening</subject><issn>2331-8422</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>PIMPY</sourceid><recordid>eNqNyr0KwjAUQOEgCBbtOwScA_kxTZ2L1c1BwbEEubEpJam5yfvr4AM4neE7K1JJpQRrD1JuSI04cc5lY6TWqiL6GmgegT58Hn1g5xTLQnvrUwBEGh29PRNA8OFFu9kieuch4Y6snZ0R6l-3ZN-f7t2FLSm-C2AeplhS-NIgjRGtaI5Cq_-uD1xaNKk</recordid><startdate>20230807</startdate><enddate>20230807</enddate><creator>Okati, Nastaran</creator><creator>Stratis Tsirtsis</creator><creator>Manuel Gomez Rodriguez</creator><general>Cornell University Library, arXiv.org</general><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20230807</creationdate><title>On the Within-Group Fairness of Screening Classifiers</title><author>Okati, Nastaran ; Stratis Tsirtsis ; Manuel Gomez Rodriguez</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-proquest_journals_27718169153</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Algorithms</topic><topic>Calibration</topic><topic>Classifiers</topic><topic>Dynamic programming</topic><topic>Screening</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Okati, Nastaran</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stratis Tsirtsis</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Manuel Gomez Rodriguez</creatorcontrib><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>Materials Science & Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Okati, Nastaran</au><au>Stratis Tsirtsis</au><au>Manuel Gomez Rodriguez</au><format>book</format><genre>document</genre><ristype>GEN</ristype><atitle>On the Within-Group Fairness of Screening Classifiers</atitle><jtitle>arXiv.org</jtitle><date>2023-08-07</date><risdate>2023</risdate><eissn>2331-8422</eissn><abstract>Screening classifiers are increasingly used to identify qualified candidates in a variety of selection processes. In this context, it has been recently shown that, if a classifier is calibrated, one can identify the smallest set of candidates which contains, in expectation, a desired number of qualified candidates using a threshold decision rule. This lends support to focusing on calibration as the only requirement for screening classifiers. In this paper, we argue that screening policies that use calibrated classifiers may suffer from an understudied type of within-group unfairness -- they may unfairly treat qualified members within demographic groups of interest. Further, we argue that this type of unfairness can be avoided if classifiers satisfy within-group monotonicity, a natural monotonicity property within each of the groups. Then, we introduce an efficient post-processing algorithm based on dynamic programming to minimally modify a given calibrated classifier so that its probability estimates satisfy within-group monotonicity. We validate our algorithm using US Census survey data and show that within-group monotonicity can be often achieved at a small cost in terms of prediction granularity and shortlist size.</abstract><cop>Ithaca</cop><pub>Cornell University Library, arXiv.org</pub><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | EISSN: 2331-8422 |
ispartof | arXiv.org, 2023-08 |
issn | 2331-8422 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2771816915 |
source | Publicly Available Content Database |
subjects | Algorithms Calibration Classifiers Dynamic programming Screening |
title | On the Within-Group Fairness of Screening Classifiers |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-07T06%3A06%3A45IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:book&rft.genre=document&rft.atitle=On%20the%20Within-Group%20Fairness%20of%20Screening%20Classifiers&rft.jtitle=arXiv.org&rft.au=Okati,%20Nastaran&rft.date=2023-08-07&rft.eissn=2331-8422&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cproquest%3E2771816915%3C/proquest%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-proquest_journals_27718169153%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2771816915&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |