Risk allocation and financial intermediation

The classic Arrow–Debreu framework requires a very large number of specific securities to reach Pareto optimality. The present paper shows that financial intermediation can play an important role in maintaining a more parsimonious market framework while still obtaining Pareto optimality. In the fram...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Mathematical social sciences 2022-11, Vol.120, p.78-84
Main Author: Goussebaïle, Arnaud
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Derivatives
Financial intermediation
General equilibrium
Insurance
Market completeness
Pareto optimum
Risk allocation
Risk factors
Securities
Securities markets
Securities trading
Citations: Items that this one cites
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c304t-ae5ca352d72804a9cb950b290e7ad2c740b82a0b1308e716f189b6cd03ad7e573
container_end_page 84
container_issue
container_start_page 78
container_title Mathematical social sciences
container_volume 120
creator Goussebaïle, Arnaud
description The classic Arrow–Debreu framework requires a very large number of specific securities to reach Pareto optimality. The present paper shows that financial intermediation can play an important role in maintaining a more parsimonious market framework while still obtaining Pareto optimality. In the framework developed, the aggregate risk components of individual risks are exchanged through a highly reduced set of nonspecific securities, while the idiosyncratic risk components are insured through financial intermediation. Reaching Pareto optimality does not rest on a Law of Large Numbers approximation. The role of financial intermediation is complementary to the role of security derivatives and dynamic trading. •The present paper shows that financial intermediation can play an important role in maintaining a more parsimonious market framework than the classic Arrow–Debreu framework while still obtaining Pareto optimality.•In the framework developed, the aggregate risk components of individual risks are exchanged through a highly reduced set of nonspecific securities, while the idiosyncratic risk components are insured through financial intermediation.•Reaching Pareto optimality does not rest on a Law of Large Numbers approximation.•The role of financial intermediation is complementary to the role of security derivatives and dynamic trading.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.mathsocsci.2022.09.004
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2774940344</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0165489622000749</els_id><sourcerecordid>2774940344</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c304t-ae5ca352d72804a9cb950b290e7ad2c740b82a0b1308e716f189b6cd03ad7e573</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkMtKxDAUhoMoOF7eoeDW1pNLm2SpgzcYEETXIU1STO0kY9IRfHszjuDS1Vmc7_8P50OowtBgwN3V2Kz1_JajycY3BAhpQDYA7AAtsOCyphiLQ7QoaFszIbtjdJLzCACcAF6gy2ef3ys9TdHo2cdQ6WCrwQcdjNdT5cPs0tpZ_7M8Q0eDnrI7_52n6PXu9mX5UK-e7h-X16vaUGBzrV1rNG2J5UQA09L0soWeSHBcW2I4g14QDT2mIBzH3YCF7DtjgWrLXcvpKbrY925S_Ni6PKsxblMoJxXhnEkGlLFCiT1lUsw5uUFtkl_r9KUwqJ0bNao_N2rnRoFUxU2J3uyjrnzx6V1ShXDBlEeTM7Oy0f9f8g14w3F-</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2774940344</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Risk allocation and financial intermediation</title><source>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</source><source>ScienceDirect Freedom Collection</source><creator>Goussebaïle, Arnaud</creator><creatorcontrib>Goussebaïle, Arnaud</creatorcontrib><description>The classic Arrow–Debreu framework requires a very large number of specific securities to reach Pareto optimality. The present paper shows that financial intermediation can play an important role in maintaining a more parsimonious market framework while still obtaining Pareto optimality. In the framework developed, the aggregate risk components of individual risks are exchanged through a highly reduced set of nonspecific securities, while the idiosyncratic risk components are insured through financial intermediation. Reaching Pareto optimality does not rest on a Law of Large Numbers approximation. The role of financial intermediation is complementary to the role of security derivatives and dynamic trading. •The present paper shows that financial intermediation can play an important role in maintaining a more parsimonious market framework than the classic Arrow–Debreu framework while still obtaining Pareto optimality.•In the framework developed, the aggregate risk components of individual risks are exchanged through a highly reduced set of nonspecific securities, while the idiosyncratic risk components are insured through financial intermediation.•Reaching Pareto optimality does not rest on a Law of Large Numbers approximation.•The role of financial intermediation is complementary to the role of security derivatives and dynamic trading.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0165-4896</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1879-3118</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.mathsocsci.2022.09.004</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Amsterdam: Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>Derivatives ; Financial intermediation ; General equilibrium ; Insurance ; Market completeness ; Pareto optimum ; Risk allocation ; Risk factors ; Securities ; Securities markets ; Securities trading</subject><ispartof>Mathematical social sciences, 2022-11, Vol.120, p.78-84</ispartof><rights>2022 The Author(s)</rights><rights>Copyright Elsevier Science Ltd. Nov 2022</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c304t-ae5ca352d72804a9cb950b290e7ad2c740b82a0b1308e716f189b6cd03ad7e573</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902,33200</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Goussebaïle, Arnaud</creatorcontrib><title>Risk allocation and financial intermediation</title><title>Mathematical social sciences</title><description>The classic Arrow–Debreu framework requires a very large number of specific securities to reach Pareto optimality. The present paper shows that financial intermediation can play an important role in maintaining a more parsimonious market framework while still obtaining Pareto optimality. In the framework developed, the aggregate risk components of individual risks are exchanged through a highly reduced set of nonspecific securities, while the idiosyncratic risk components are insured through financial intermediation. Reaching Pareto optimality does not rest on a Law of Large Numbers approximation. The role of financial intermediation is complementary to the role of security derivatives and dynamic trading. •The present paper shows that financial intermediation can play an important role in maintaining a more parsimonious market framework than the classic Arrow–Debreu framework while still obtaining Pareto optimality.•In the framework developed, the aggregate risk components of individual risks are exchanged through a highly reduced set of nonspecific securities, while the idiosyncratic risk components are insured through financial intermediation.•Reaching Pareto optimality does not rest on a Law of Large Numbers approximation.•The role of financial intermediation is complementary to the role of security derivatives and dynamic trading.</description><subject>Derivatives</subject><subject>Financial intermediation</subject><subject>General equilibrium</subject><subject>Insurance</subject><subject>Market completeness</subject><subject>Pareto optimum</subject><subject>Risk allocation</subject><subject>Risk factors</subject><subject>Securities</subject><subject>Securities markets</subject><subject>Securities trading</subject><issn>0165-4896</issn><issn>1879-3118</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8BJ</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkMtKxDAUhoMoOF7eoeDW1pNLm2SpgzcYEETXIU1STO0kY9IRfHszjuDS1Vmc7_8P50OowtBgwN3V2Kz1_JajycY3BAhpQDYA7AAtsOCyphiLQ7QoaFszIbtjdJLzCACcAF6gy2ef3ys9TdHo2cdQ6WCrwQcdjNdT5cPs0tpZ_7M8Q0eDnrI7_52n6PXu9mX5UK-e7h-X16vaUGBzrV1rNG2J5UQA09L0soWeSHBcW2I4g14QDT2mIBzH3YCF7DtjgWrLXcvpKbrY925S_Ni6PKsxblMoJxXhnEkGlLFCiT1lUsw5uUFtkl_r9KUwqJ0bNao_N2rnRoFUxU2J3uyjrnzx6V1ShXDBlEeTM7Oy0f9f8g14w3F-</recordid><startdate>202211</startdate><enddate>202211</enddate><creator>Goussebaïle, Arnaud</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><general>Elsevier Science Ltd</general><scope>6I.</scope><scope>AAFTH</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope></search><sort><creationdate>202211</creationdate><title>Risk allocation and financial intermediation</title><author>Goussebaïle, Arnaud</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c304t-ae5ca352d72804a9cb950b290e7ad2c740b82a0b1308e716f189b6cd03ad7e573</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Derivatives</topic><topic>Financial intermediation</topic><topic>General equilibrium</topic><topic>Insurance</topic><topic>Market completeness</topic><topic>Pareto optimum</topic><topic>Risk allocation</topic><topic>Risk factors</topic><topic>Securities</topic><topic>Securities markets</topic><topic>Securities trading</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Goussebaïle, Arnaud</creatorcontrib><collection>ScienceDirect Open Access Titles</collection><collection>Elsevier:ScienceDirect:Open Access</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><jtitle>Mathematical social sciences</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Goussebaïle, Arnaud</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Risk allocation and financial intermediation</atitle><jtitle>Mathematical social sciences</jtitle><date>2022-11</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>120</volume><spage>78</spage><epage>84</epage><pages>78-84</pages><issn>0165-4896</issn><eissn>1879-3118</eissn><abstract>The classic Arrow–Debreu framework requires a very large number of specific securities to reach Pareto optimality. The present paper shows that financial intermediation can play an important role in maintaining a more parsimonious market framework while still obtaining Pareto optimality. In the framework developed, the aggregate risk components of individual risks are exchanged through a highly reduced set of nonspecific securities, while the idiosyncratic risk components are insured through financial intermediation. Reaching Pareto optimality does not rest on a Law of Large Numbers approximation. The role of financial intermediation is complementary to the role of security derivatives and dynamic trading. •The present paper shows that financial intermediation can play an important role in maintaining a more parsimonious market framework than the classic Arrow–Debreu framework while still obtaining Pareto optimality.•In the framework developed, the aggregate risk components of individual risks are exchanged through a highly reduced set of nonspecific securities, while the idiosyncratic risk components are insured through financial intermediation.•Reaching Pareto optimality does not rest on a Law of Large Numbers approximation.•The role of financial intermediation is complementary to the role of security derivatives and dynamic trading.</abstract><cop>Amsterdam</cop><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><doi>10.1016/j.mathsocsci.2022.09.004</doi><tpages>7</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0165-4896
ispartof Mathematical social sciences, 2022-11, Vol.120, p.78-84
issn 0165-4896
1879-3118
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2774940344
source International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS); ScienceDirect Freedom Collection
subjects Derivatives
Financial intermediation
General equilibrium
Insurance
Market completeness
Pareto optimum
Risk allocation
Risk factors
Securities
Securities markets
Securities trading
title Risk allocation and financial intermediation
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-12T17%3A01%3A43IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Risk%20allocation%20and%20financial%20intermediation&rft.jtitle=Mathematical%20social%20sciences&rft.au=Gousseba%C3%AFle,%20Arnaud&rft.date=2022-11&rft.volume=120&rft.spage=78&rft.epage=84&rft.pages=78-84&rft.issn=0165-4896&rft.eissn=1879-3118&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.mathsocsci.2022.09.004&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2774940344%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c304t-ae5ca352d72804a9cb950b290e7ad2c740b82a0b1308e716f189b6cd03ad7e573%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2774940344&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true