Loading…

Comparative evaluation of freeze and thaw effect on strength of BEICP-stabilized silty sands and cement- and fly ash-stabilized soils

This paper addresses a soil bio-stabilization technique using bacterial enzyme-induced calcium carbonate precipitation (BEICP) as an alternative to previous conventional methods including microbial-induced carbonate precipitation and plant-derived enzyme-induced carbonate precipitation. The extracte...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Acta geotechnica 2023-02, Vol.18 (2), p.1073-1092
Main Authors: Hoang, Tung, Do, Huyen, Alleman, James, Cetin, Bora, Dayioglu, Asli Y.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:This paper addresses a soil bio-stabilization technique using bacterial enzyme-induced calcium carbonate precipitation (BEICP) as an alternative to previous conventional methods including microbial-induced carbonate precipitation and plant-derived enzyme-induced carbonate precipitation. The extracted urease enzyme of viable S. pasteurii was used as a biological source along with calcium chloride and urea to solidify sandy soil and silty sand soil. The bio-treated soil columns were subjected to freeze and thaw ( F – T ) cycling for a durability evaluation. Engineering properties of bio-cemented soil including unconfined compressive strength, calcium carbonate contents, moisture contents, porosity, permeability, and microstructure were examined before and after the F – T durations. It was found that although bio-stabilizer was able to increase a frost duration of soil, the F – T cycling significantly impacted on the compressive strength of bio-treated soil, due to a formation of microcracks. This investigation has revealed that the BEICP method provided a similar capacity in F – T resistance of soil as using the traditional Portland cement stabilizer, whereas the class F fly ash did not improve F – T durability of medium dense soil.
ISSN:1861-1125
1861-1133
DOI:10.1007/s11440-022-01612-7