Loading…
Translating pathogen knowledge to practice for sanitation decision-making
Sanitation planners make complex decisions in the delivery of sanitation services to achieve health outcomes. We present findings from a stakeholder engagement workshop held in Kampala, Uganda, to educate, interact with, and solicit feedback from participants on how the relevant scientific literatur...
Saved in:
Published in: | Journal of water and health 2019-12, Vol.17 (6), p.896-909 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c354t-fe33c4c10693aa3552974bba89968daecf0a5208ecaa5cf5f11c3e9e755024433 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c354t-fe33c4c10693aa3552974bba89968daecf0a5208ecaa5cf5f11c3e9e755024433 |
container_end_page | 909 |
container_issue | 6 |
container_start_page | 896 |
container_title | Journal of water and health |
container_volume | 17 |
creator | Tumwebaze, Innocent K Rose, Joan B Hofstra, Nynke Verbyla, Matthew E Musaazi, Isaac Okaali, Daniel A Kaggwa, Rose C Nansubuga, Irene Murphy, Heather M |
description | Sanitation planners make complex decisions in the delivery of sanitation services to achieve health outcomes. We present findings from a stakeholder engagement workshop held in Kampala, Uganda, to educate, interact with, and solicit feedback from participants on how the relevant scientific literature on pathogens can be made more accessible to practitioners to support decision-making. We targeted Water, Sanitation and Hygiene (WASH) practitioners involved in different levels of service delivery. Practitioners revealed that different sanitation planning tools are used to inform decision-making; however, most of these tools are not user-friendly or adapted to meet their needs. Most stakeholders (68%) expressed familiarity with pathogens, yet less than half (46%) understood that fecal coliforms were bacteria and used as indicators for fecal pollution. A number of stakeholders were unaware that fecal indicator bacteria do not behave and persist the same as helminths, protozoa, or viruses, making fecal indicator bacteria inadequate for assessing pathogen reductions for all pathogen groups. This suggests a need for awareness and capacity development around pathogens found in excreta. The findings underscore the importance to engage stakeholders in the development of support tools for sanitation planning and highlighted broader opportunities to bridge science with practice in the WASH sector. |
doi_str_mv | 10.2166/wh.2019.151 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2777408707</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2777408707</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c354t-fe33c4c10693aa3552974bba89968daecf0a5208ecaa5cf5f11c3e9e755024433</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo9kEtLAzEURoMotlZX7mXApUzNYzJJllJ8FApu6jrcZpJ2-kjGZErx35vS6up-i3O_ezkI3RM8pqSunw-rMcVEjQknF2hIlKpLIam6zLkSopSK4gG6SWmNMa0pp9dowIjkWCoxRNN5BJ-20Ld-WXTQr8LS-mLjw2Frm6Ut-lB0EUzfGlu4EIsEvu0zHXzRWNOmHModbPL2LbpysE327jxH6OvtdT75KGef79PJy6w0jFd96SxjpjIE14oBMM6pEtViATL_LRuwxmHgFEtrALhx3BFimFVWcI5pVTE2Qo-n3i6G771NvV6HffT5pKZCiApLgUWmnk6UiSGlaJ3uYruD-KMJ1kdt-rDSR206a8v0w7lzv9jZ5p_988R-AZsCaHk</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2777408707</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Translating pathogen knowledge to practice for sanitation decision-making</title><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Tumwebaze, Innocent K ; Rose, Joan B ; Hofstra, Nynke ; Verbyla, Matthew E ; Musaazi, Isaac ; Okaali, Daniel A ; Kaggwa, Rose C ; Nansubuga, Irene ; Murphy, Heather M</creator><creatorcontrib>Tumwebaze, Innocent K ; Rose, Joan B ; Hofstra, Nynke ; Verbyla, Matthew E ; Musaazi, Isaac ; Okaali, Daniel A ; Kaggwa, Rose C ; Nansubuga, Irene ; Murphy, Heather M</creatorcontrib><description>Sanitation planners make complex decisions in the delivery of sanitation services to achieve health outcomes. We present findings from a stakeholder engagement workshop held in Kampala, Uganda, to educate, interact with, and solicit feedback from participants on how the relevant scientific literature on pathogens can be made more accessible to practitioners to support decision-making. We targeted Water, Sanitation and Hygiene (WASH) practitioners involved in different levels of service delivery. Practitioners revealed that different sanitation planning tools are used to inform decision-making; however, most of these tools are not user-friendly or adapted to meet their needs. Most stakeholders (68%) expressed familiarity with pathogens, yet less than half (46%) understood that fecal coliforms were bacteria and used as indicators for fecal pollution. A number of stakeholders were unaware that fecal indicator bacteria do not behave and persist the same as helminths, protozoa, or viruses, making fecal indicator bacteria inadequate for assessing pathogen reductions for all pathogen groups. This suggests a need for awareness and capacity development around pathogens found in excreta. The findings underscore the importance to engage stakeholders in the development of support tools for sanitation planning and highlighted broader opportunities to bridge science with practice in the WASH sector.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1477-8920</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1996-7829</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.2166/wh.2019.151</identifier><identifier>PMID: 31850897</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: IWA Publishing</publisher><subject>Animals ; Bacteria ; Bridges ; Capacity development ; Coliforms ; Decision Making ; Excreta ; Faecal coliforms ; Familiarity ; Fecal coliforms ; Feces ; Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice ; Hygiene ; Knowledge ; Pathogens ; Planning ; Pollution ; Protozoa ; Public health ; Sanitation ; Sanitation - standards ; Sanitation services ; Stakeholders ; Uganda ; Viruses ; Water ; Water Microbiology ; Water Quality - standards ; Water Supply - standards ; Water treatment ; Workshops</subject><ispartof>Journal of water and health, 2019-12, Vol.17 (6), p.896-909</ispartof><rights>Copyright IWA Publishing Dec 2019</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c354t-fe33c4c10693aa3552974bba89968daecf0a5208ecaa5cf5f11c3e9e755024433</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c354t-fe33c4c10693aa3552974bba89968daecf0a5208ecaa5cf5f11c3e9e755024433</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31850897$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Tumwebaze, Innocent K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rose, Joan B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hofstra, Nynke</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Verbyla, Matthew E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Musaazi, Isaac</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Okaali, Daniel A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kaggwa, Rose C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nansubuga, Irene</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Murphy, Heather M</creatorcontrib><title>Translating pathogen knowledge to practice for sanitation decision-making</title><title>Journal of water and health</title><addtitle>J Water Health</addtitle><description>Sanitation planners make complex decisions in the delivery of sanitation services to achieve health outcomes. We present findings from a stakeholder engagement workshop held in Kampala, Uganda, to educate, interact with, and solicit feedback from participants on how the relevant scientific literature on pathogens can be made more accessible to practitioners to support decision-making. We targeted Water, Sanitation and Hygiene (WASH) practitioners involved in different levels of service delivery. Practitioners revealed that different sanitation planning tools are used to inform decision-making; however, most of these tools are not user-friendly or adapted to meet their needs. Most stakeholders (68%) expressed familiarity with pathogens, yet less than half (46%) understood that fecal coliforms were bacteria and used as indicators for fecal pollution. A number of stakeholders were unaware that fecal indicator bacteria do not behave and persist the same as helminths, protozoa, or viruses, making fecal indicator bacteria inadequate for assessing pathogen reductions for all pathogen groups. This suggests a need for awareness and capacity development around pathogens found in excreta. The findings underscore the importance to engage stakeholders in the development of support tools for sanitation planning and highlighted broader opportunities to bridge science with practice in the WASH sector.</description><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Bacteria</subject><subject>Bridges</subject><subject>Capacity development</subject><subject>Coliforms</subject><subject>Decision Making</subject><subject>Excreta</subject><subject>Faecal coliforms</subject><subject>Familiarity</subject><subject>Fecal coliforms</subject><subject>Feces</subject><subject>Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice</subject><subject>Hygiene</subject><subject>Knowledge</subject><subject>Pathogens</subject><subject>Planning</subject><subject>Pollution</subject><subject>Protozoa</subject><subject>Public health</subject><subject>Sanitation</subject><subject>Sanitation - standards</subject><subject>Sanitation services</subject><subject>Stakeholders</subject><subject>Uganda</subject><subject>Viruses</subject><subject>Water</subject><subject>Water Microbiology</subject><subject>Water Quality - standards</subject><subject>Water Supply - standards</subject><subject>Water treatment</subject><subject>Workshops</subject><issn>1477-8920</issn><issn>1996-7829</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNo9kEtLAzEURoMotlZX7mXApUzNYzJJllJ8FApu6jrcZpJ2-kjGZErx35vS6up-i3O_ezkI3RM8pqSunw-rMcVEjQknF2hIlKpLIam6zLkSopSK4gG6SWmNMa0pp9dowIjkWCoxRNN5BJ-20Ld-WXTQr8LS-mLjw2Frm6Ut-lB0EUzfGlu4EIsEvu0zHXzRWNOmHModbPL2LbpysE327jxH6OvtdT75KGef79PJy6w0jFd96SxjpjIE14oBMM6pEtViATL_LRuwxmHgFEtrALhx3BFimFVWcI5pVTE2Qo-n3i6G771NvV6HffT5pKZCiApLgUWmnk6UiSGlaJ3uYruD-KMJ1kdt-rDSR206a8v0w7lzv9jZ5p_988R-AZsCaHk</recordid><startdate>201912</startdate><enddate>201912</enddate><creator>Tumwebaze, Innocent K</creator><creator>Rose, Joan B</creator><creator>Hofstra, Nynke</creator><creator>Verbyla, Matthew E</creator><creator>Musaazi, Isaac</creator><creator>Okaali, Daniel A</creator><creator>Kaggwa, Rose C</creator><creator>Nansubuga, Irene</creator><creator>Murphy, Heather M</creator><general>IWA Publishing</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QH</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>BKSAR</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H97</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PCBAR</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201912</creationdate><title>Translating pathogen knowledge to practice for sanitation decision-making</title><author>Tumwebaze, Innocent K ; Rose, Joan B ; Hofstra, Nynke ; Verbyla, Matthew E ; Musaazi, Isaac ; Okaali, Daniel A ; Kaggwa, Rose C ; Nansubuga, Irene ; Murphy, Heather M</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c354t-fe33c4c10693aa3552974bba89968daecf0a5208ecaa5cf5f11c3e9e755024433</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Bacteria</topic><topic>Bridges</topic><topic>Capacity development</topic><topic>Coliforms</topic><topic>Decision Making</topic><topic>Excreta</topic><topic>Faecal coliforms</topic><topic>Familiarity</topic><topic>Fecal coliforms</topic><topic>Feces</topic><topic>Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice</topic><topic>Hygiene</topic><topic>Knowledge</topic><topic>Pathogens</topic><topic>Planning</topic><topic>Pollution</topic><topic>Protozoa</topic><topic>Public health</topic><topic>Sanitation</topic><topic>Sanitation - standards</topic><topic>Sanitation services</topic><topic>Stakeholders</topic><topic>Uganda</topic><topic>Viruses</topic><topic>Water</topic><topic>Water Microbiology</topic><topic>Water Quality - standards</topic><topic>Water Supply - standards</topic><topic>Water treatment</topic><topic>Workshops</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Tumwebaze, Innocent K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rose, Joan B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hofstra, Nynke</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Verbyla, Matthew E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Musaazi, Isaac</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Okaali, Daniel A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kaggwa, Rose C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nansubuga, Irene</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Murphy, Heather M</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Aqualine</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Health and Medical</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric & Aquatic Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 3: Aquatic Pollution & Environmental Quality</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric & Aquatic Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><jtitle>Journal of water and health</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Tumwebaze, Innocent K</au><au>Rose, Joan B</au><au>Hofstra, Nynke</au><au>Verbyla, Matthew E</au><au>Musaazi, Isaac</au><au>Okaali, Daniel A</au><au>Kaggwa, Rose C</au><au>Nansubuga, Irene</au><au>Murphy, Heather M</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Translating pathogen knowledge to practice for sanitation decision-making</atitle><jtitle>Journal of water and health</jtitle><addtitle>J Water Health</addtitle><date>2019-12</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>17</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>896</spage><epage>909</epage><pages>896-909</pages><issn>1477-8920</issn><eissn>1996-7829</eissn><abstract>Sanitation planners make complex decisions in the delivery of sanitation services to achieve health outcomes. We present findings from a stakeholder engagement workshop held in Kampala, Uganda, to educate, interact with, and solicit feedback from participants on how the relevant scientific literature on pathogens can be made more accessible to practitioners to support decision-making. We targeted Water, Sanitation and Hygiene (WASH) practitioners involved in different levels of service delivery. Practitioners revealed that different sanitation planning tools are used to inform decision-making; however, most of these tools are not user-friendly or adapted to meet their needs. Most stakeholders (68%) expressed familiarity with pathogens, yet less than half (46%) understood that fecal coliforms were bacteria and used as indicators for fecal pollution. A number of stakeholders were unaware that fecal indicator bacteria do not behave and persist the same as helminths, protozoa, or viruses, making fecal indicator bacteria inadequate for assessing pathogen reductions for all pathogen groups. This suggests a need for awareness and capacity development around pathogens found in excreta. The findings underscore the importance to engage stakeholders in the development of support tools for sanitation planning and highlighted broader opportunities to bridge science with practice in the WASH sector.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>IWA Publishing</pub><pmid>31850897</pmid><doi>10.2166/wh.2019.151</doi><tpages>14</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1477-8920 |
ispartof | Journal of water and health, 2019-12, Vol.17 (6), p.896-909 |
issn | 1477-8920 1996-7829 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2777408707 |
source | Alma/SFX Local Collection |
subjects | Animals Bacteria Bridges Capacity development Coliforms Decision Making Excreta Faecal coliforms Familiarity Fecal coliforms Feces Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice Hygiene Knowledge Pathogens Planning Pollution Protozoa Public health Sanitation Sanitation - standards Sanitation services Stakeholders Uganda Viruses Water Water Microbiology Water Quality - standards Water Supply - standards Water treatment Workshops |
title | Translating pathogen knowledge to practice for sanitation decision-making |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-28T04%3A33%3A20IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Translating%20pathogen%20knowledge%20to%20practice%20for%20sanitation%20decision-making&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20water%20and%20health&rft.au=Tumwebaze,%20Innocent%20K&rft.date=2019-12&rft.volume=17&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=896&rft.epage=909&rft.pages=896-909&rft.issn=1477-8920&rft.eissn=1996-7829&rft_id=info:doi/10.2166/wh.2019.151&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2777408707%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c354t-fe33c4c10693aa3552974bba89968daecf0a5208ecaa5cf5f11c3e9e755024433%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2777408707&rft_id=info:pmid/31850897&rfr_iscdi=true |