Prospective primary teachers’ efficacy to teach mathematics: measuring efficacy beliefs and identifying the factors that influence them

Prospective teachers’ mathematics efficacy beliefs affect school placement experiences and influence later teacher behaviour and subsequent student outcomes. These efficacy beliefs are open to change during initial teacher education and become more resistant to change once the teacher enters the wor...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Educational studies in mathematics 2023-03, Vol.112 (3), p.437-460
Main Authors: Leavy, Aisling, Bjerke, Annette Hessen, Hourigan, Mairéad
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Addition & subtraction
Attitude Change
Education
Effectiveness
Elementary School Teachers
Knowledge Level
Mathematical analysis
Mathematics
Mathematics Education
Mathematics Instruction
Mathematics teachers
Methods
Preservice Teachers
Psychological aspects
Rasch model
Self Concept Measures
Self Efficacy
Study and teaching
Teacher centers
Teacher education
Teacher Effectiveness
Teachers
Teaching
Training
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Prospective teachers’ mathematics efficacy beliefs affect school placement experiences and influence later teacher behaviour and subsequent student outcomes. These efficacy beliefs are open to change during initial teacher education and become more resistant to change once the teacher enters the workforce. Therefore, it is important to measure mathematics teacher efficacy early in initial teacher education and identify low efficacy beliefs. This study measured the mathematics teaching efficacy beliefs of 402 prospective primary teachers. Arising from Rasch analysis of the efficacy scores of these teachers, 22 participants who displayed a range of mathematics teaching efficacy beliefs were interviewed to gain insights into factors affecting these beliefs. Participants communicated greater confidence in tasks requiring procedural (tell-items) than conceptual knowledge (explain-items). Both low and high efficacy participants reported traditional experiences of mathematics teaching and learning as students. However, high efficacy participants reported mastery of mathematics within these traditional contexts, whereas their low efficacy peers did not report mastery. Furthermore, all participants reported how memories of their school mathematics experiences informed their level of efficacy when thinking about teaching mathematics, thus revealing the powerful influence of mastery experiences.
ISSN:0013-1954
1573-0816
DOI:10.1007/s10649-022-10181-1