Uptake of Team Care Arrangements for adults newly diagnosed with cancer

• Published in: Australian journal of primary health 2023-02, Vol.29 (1), p.20-29
• Main Authors: Perez-Concha, Oscar, Goldstein, David, Harris, Mark F., Laaksonen, Maarit A., Hanly, Mark, Suchy, Sue, Vajdic, Claire M.
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Adults; Age; Allied health professionals; Cancer; Chronic illnesses; Continuity of care; Data collection; Educational attainment; Emergency medical care; Ethics; Family physicians; Health care industry; Health care policy; Health insurance; Health services; Health services utilization; Health status; Medical conditions; Medical diagnosis; Medical personnel; Medicare; Mental health care; Native peoples; Newly diagnosed; Patient-centered care; Patients; Prioritizing; Self evaluation; Shared care; Sociodemographics; Socioeconomic factors; Socioeconomic status; Teams; Uptake; Variables
• ISSN: 1448-7527; 1836-7399
• DOI: 10.1071/PY22078

Background Medicare-subsidised Team Care Arrangements (TCAs) support Australian general practitioners to implement shared care between collaborating health professionals for patients with chronic medical conditions and complex needs. We assessed the prevalence of TCAs, factors associated with TCA uptake and visits to TCA-subsidised allied health practitioners, for adults newly diagnosed with cancer in New South Wales, Australia. Methods We carried out a retrospective individual patient data linkage study with 13 951 45 and Up Study participants diagnosed with incident cancer during 2006–16. We used a proportional hazards model to estimate the factors associated with receipt of a TCA after cancer diagnosis. Results In total, 6630 patients had a TCA plan initiated (47.5%). A TCA was more likely for patients aged ≥65 years, those with higher service utilisation 4–15 months prior to cancer diagnosis, a higher number of comorbidities, lower self-rated overall health status, living in areas of greater socio-economic disadvantage, lower educational attainment and those with no private health insurance. A total of 4084 (61.6%) patients with a TCA had at least one TCA-subsidised allied health visit within 24 months of the TCA. Conclusions TCAs appear to be well targeted at cancer patients with chronic health conditions and lower socioeconomic status. Nevertheless, not all patients with a TCA subsequently attended a TCA-subsidised allied healthcare professional. This suggests either a misunderstanding of the plan, the receipt of allied health via other public schemes, a low prioritisation of the plan compared to other health care, or suboptimal availability of these services.