Loading…
Graph Construction using Principal Axis Trees for Simple Graph Convolution
Graph Neural Networks (GNNs) are increasingly becoming the favorite method for graph learning. They exploit the semi-supervised nature of deep learning, and they bypass computational bottlenecks associated with traditional graph learning methods. In addition to the feature matrix \(X\), GNNs need an...
Saved in:
Published in: | arXiv.org 2023-11 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | |
---|---|
cites | |
container_end_page | |
container_issue | |
container_start_page | |
container_title | arXiv.org |
container_volume | |
creator | Alshammari, Mashaan Stavrakakis, John Ahmed, Adel F Takatsuka, Masahiro |
description | Graph Neural Networks (GNNs) are increasingly becoming the favorite method for graph learning. They exploit the semi-supervised nature of deep learning, and they bypass computational bottlenecks associated with traditional graph learning methods. In addition to the feature matrix \(X\), GNNs need an adjacency matrix \(A\) to perform feature propagation. In many cases, the adjacency matrix \(A\) is missing. We introduce a graph construction scheme that constructs the adjacency matrix \(A\) using unsupervised and supervised information. Unsupervised information characterizes the neighborhood around points. We used Principal Axis trees (PA-trees) as a source for unsupervised information, where we create edges between points falling onto the same leaf node. For supervised information, we used the concept of penalty and intrinsic graphs. A penalty graph connects points with different class labels, whereas an intrinsic graph connects points with the same class labels. We used the penalty and intrinsic graphs to remove or add edges to the graph constructed via PA-tree. We tested this graph construction scheme on two well-known GNNs: 1) Graph Convolutional Network (GCN) and 2) Simple Graph Convolution (SGC). The experiments show that it is better to use SGC because it is faster and delivers better or the same results as GCN. We also test the effect of oversmoothing on both GCN and SGC. We found out that the level of smoothing has to be carefully selected for SGC to avoid oversmoothing. |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2779548865</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2779548865</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-proquest_journals_27795488653</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNiz0LwjAUAIMgWLT_4YFzoSZNW0cpfuAk2L2UkmpKTOJ7jfjzVRBnpxvubsIiLsQqKTPOZywmGtI05XnBpRQRO-6x9VeonKURQzdqZyGQthc4obad9q2BzVMT1KgUQe8QzvrmjYLf-HAmfL4Fm_atIRV_OWfL3bauDolHdw-KxmZwAe1bNbwo1jIry1yK_6oX3Ms9CQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2779548865</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Graph Construction using Principal Axis Trees for Simple Graph Convolution</title><source>Publicly Available Content Database</source><creator>Alshammari, Mashaan ; Stavrakakis, John ; Ahmed, Adel F ; Takatsuka, Masahiro</creator><creatorcontrib>Alshammari, Mashaan ; Stavrakakis, John ; Ahmed, Adel F ; Takatsuka, Masahiro</creatorcontrib><description>Graph Neural Networks (GNNs) are increasingly becoming the favorite method for graph learning. They exploit the semi-supervised nature of deep learning, and they bypass computational bottlenecks associated with traditional graph learning methods. In addition to the feature matrix \(X\), GNNs need an adjacency matrix \(A\) to perform feature propagation. In many cases, the adjacency matrix \(A\) is missing. We introduce a graph construction scheme that constructs the adjacency matrix \(A\) using unsupervised and supervised information. Unsupervised information characterizes the neighborhood around points. We used Principal Axis trees (PA-trees) as a source for unsupervised information, where we create edges between points falling onto the same leaf node. For supervised information, we used the concept of penalty and intrinsic graphs. A penalty graph connects points with different class labels, whereas an intrinsic graph connects points with the same class labels. We used the penalty and intrinsic graphs to remove or add edges to the graph constructed via PA-tree. We tested this graph construction scheme on two well-known GNNs: 1) Graph Convolutional Network (GCN) and 2) Simple Graph Convolution (SGC). The experiments show that it is better to use SGC because it is faster and delivers better or the same results as GCN. We also test the effect of oversmoothing on both GCN and SGC. We found out that the level of smoothing has to be carefully selected for SGC to avoid oversmoothing.</description><identifier>EISSN: 2331-8422</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Ithaca: Cornell University Library, arXiv.org</publisher><subject>Convolution ; Deep learning ; Graph neural networks ; Graph theory ; Graphs</subject><ispartof>arXiv.org, 2023-11</ispartof><rights>2023. This work is published under http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2779548865?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>780,784,25752,37011,44589</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Alshammari, Mashaan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stavrakakis, John</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ahmed, Adel F</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Takatsuka, Masahiro</creatorcontrib><title>Graph Construction using Principal Axis Trees for Simple Graph Convolution</title><title>arXiv.org</title><description>Graph Neural Networks (GNNs) are increasingly becoming the favorite method for graph learning. They exploit the semi-supervised nature of deep learning, and they bypass computational bottlenecks associated with traditional graph learning methods. In addition to the feature matrix \(X\), GNNs need an adjacency matrix \(A\) to perform feature propagation. In many cases, the adjacency matrix \(A\) is missing. We introduce a graph construction scheme that constructs the adjacency matrix \(A\) using unsupervised and supervised information. Unsupervised information characterizes the neighborhood around points. We used Principal Axis trees (PA-trees) as a source for unsupervised information, where we create edges between points falling onto the same leaf node. For supervised information, we used the concept of penalty and intrinsic graphs. A penalty graph connects points with different class labels, whereas an intrinsic graph connects points with the same class labels. We used the penalty and intrinsic graphs to remove or add edges to the graph constructed via PA-tree. We tested this graph construction scheme on two well-known GNNs: 1) Graph Convolutional Network (GCN) and 2) Simple Graph Convolution (SGC). The experiments show that it is better to use SGC because it is faster and delivers better or the same results as GCN. We also test the effect of oversmoothing on both GCN and SGC. We found out that the level of smoothing has to be carefully selected for SGC to avoid oversmoothing.</description><subject>Convolution</subject><subject>Deep learning</subject><subject>Graph neural networks</subject><subject>Graph theory</subject><subject>Graphs</subject><issn>2331-8422</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>PIMPY</sourceid><recordid>eNqNiz0LwjAUAIMgWLT_4YFzoSZNW0cpfuAk2L2UkmpKTOJ7jfjzVRBnpxvubsIiLsQqKTPOZywmGtI05XnBpRQRO-6x9VeonKURQzdqZyGQthc4obad9q2BzVMT1KgUQe8QzvrmjYLf-HAmfL4Fm_atIRV_OWfL3bauDolHdw-KxmZwAe1bNbwo1jIry1yK_6oX3Ms9CQ</recordid><startdate>20231107</startdate><enddate>20231107</enddate><creator>Alshammari, Mashaan</creator><creator>Stavrakakis, John</creator><creator>Ahmed, Adel F</creator><creator>Takatsuka, Masahiro</creator><general>Cornell University Library, arXiv.org</general><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20231107</creationdate><title>Graph Construction using Principal Axis Trees for Simple Graph Convolution</title><author>Alshammari, Mashaan ; Stavrakakis, John ; Ahmed, Adel F ; Takatsuka, Masahiro</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-proquest_journals_27795488653</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Convolution</topic><topic>Deep learning</topic><topic>Graph neural networks</topic><topic>Graph theory</topic><topic>Graphs</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Alshammari, Mashaan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stavrakakis, John</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ahmed, Adel F</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Takatsuka, Masahiro</creatorcontrib><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>Materials Science & Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Alshammari, Mashaan</au><au>Stavrakakis, John</au><au>Ahmed, Adel F</au><au>Takatsuka, Masahiro</au><format>book</format><genre>document</genre><ristype>GEN</ristype><atitle>Graph Construction using Principal Axis Trees for Simple Graph Convolution</atitle><jtitle>arXiv.org</jtitle><date>2023-11-07</date><risdate>2023</risdate><eissn>2331-8422</eissn><abstract>Graph Neural Networks (GNNs) are increasingly becoming the favorite method for graph learning. They exploit the semi-supervised nature of deep learning, and they bypass computational bottlenecks associated with traditional graph learning methods. In addition to the feature matrix \(X\), GNNs need an adjacency matrix \(A\) to perform feature propagation. In many cases, the adjacency matrix \(A\) is missing. We introduce a graph construction scheme that constructs the adjacency matrix \(A\) using unsupervised and supervised information. Unsupervised information characterizes the neighborhood around points. We used Principal Axis trees (PA-trees) as a source for unsupervised information, where we create edges between points falling onto the same leaf node. For supervised information, we used the concept of penalty and intrinsic graphs. A penalty graph connects points with different class labels, whereas an intrinsic graph connects points with the same class labels. We used the penalty and intrinsic graphs to remove or add edges to the graph constructed via PA-tree. We tested this graph construction scheme on two well-known GNNs: 1) Graph Convolutional Network (GCN) and 2) Simple Graph Convolution (SGC). The experiments show that it is better to use SGC because it is faster and delivers better or the same results as GCN. We also test the effect of oversmoothing on both GCN and SGC. We found out that the level of smoothing has to be carefully selected for SGC to avoid oversmoothing.</abstract><cop>Ithaca</cop><pub>Cornell University Library, arXiv.org</pub><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | EISSN: 2331-8422 |
ispartof | arXiv.org, 2023-11 |
issn | 2331-8422 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2779548865 |
source | Publicly Available Content Database |
subjects | Convolution Deep learning Graph neural networks Graph theory Graphs |
title | Graph Construction using Principal Axis Trees for Simple Graph Convolution |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-08T08%3A25%3A43IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:book&rft.genre=document&rft.atitle=Graph%20Construction%20using%20Principal%20Axis%20Trees%20for%20Simple%20Graph%20Convolution&rft.jtitle=arXiv.org&rft.au=Alshammari,%20Mashaan&rft.date=2023-11-07&rft.eissn=2331-8422&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cproquest%3E2779548865%3C/proquest%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-proquest_journals_27795488653%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2779548865&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |