Examining Case Dismissal Outcomes in Prosecutor-Led Diversion Programs

Prosecutors’ offices are a critical site for criminal legal reform and decarceration efforts. Prosecutor-led diversion programs (PLDPs) are a prosecutorial innovation that process cases away from punitive prosecution and, instead, offer various services and supports. Successfully completing a PLDP r...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Criminal justice policy review 2023-04, Vol.34 (3), p.236-260
Main Authors: Epperson, Matthew W., Sawh, Leon, Patel, Sadiq, Pettus, Carrie, Grier, Annie
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Defendants
Dismissal
Diversion programs
Ethnicity
Imprisonment
Legal reform
Legal system
Public prosecutors
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Prosecutors’ offices are a critical site for criminal legal reform and decarceration efforts. Prosecutor-led diversion programs (PLDPs) are a prosecutorial innovation that process cases away from punitive prosecution and, instead, offer various services and supports. Successfully completing a PLDP results in the dismissal of the charge, which helps participants to avoid formal entry into the criminal legal system and a range of collateral consequences. This paper reports findings from over 11,000 participants in six PLDPs in three Midwestern jurisdictions, and examines race/ethnicity and charge characteristics associated with successful program completion and case dismissal. Findings indicate that PLDPs have the capacity to provide alternative processing to a large volume of defendants with high completion rates, although the likelihood of racial/ethnic minorities to successfully complete the program is mixed. PLDPs are discussed as a promising policy and programmatic innovation that can help to move away from an era of mass incarceration.
ISSN:0887-4034
1552-3586
DOI:10.1177/08874034221138738