Loading…
Exact Modeling of Non-Gaussian Measurement Uncertainty in Distribution System State Estimation
State estimation allows to monitor power networks, exploiting field measurements to derive the most likely grid state. In the literature, measurement errors are usually assumed to follow zero-mean Gaussian distributions; however, it has been shown that this assumption often does not hold. One such e...
Saved in:
Published in: | arXiv.org 2023-03 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | |
---|---|
cites | |
container_end_page | |
container_issue | |
container_start_page | |
container_title | arXiv.org |
container_volume | |
creator | Vanin, Marta Tom Van Acker D'hulst, Reinhilde Dirk Van Hertem |
description | State estimation allows to monitor power networks, exploiting field measurements to derive the most likely grid state. In the literature, measurement errors are usually assumed to follow zero-mean Gaussian distributions; however, it has been shown that this assumption often does not hold. One such example is when considering pseudo-measurements. In distribution networks, a significant amount of pseudo-measurements might be necessary, due to the scarcity of real-time measurements. In this paper, a state estimator is presented which allows to model measurement uncertainty with any continuous distribution, without approximations. This becomes possible by writing state estimation as a general maximum-likelihood estimation-based constrained optimization problem. To realistically describe distribution networks, three-phase unbalanced power flow equations are used. Results are presented that illustrate the differences in accuracy and computational effort between different uncertainty modeling methods, for the IEEE European Low Voltage Test Feeder. |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2784118315</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2784118315</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-proquest_journals_27841183153</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNisEOwUAQQDcSCcE_TOLcpN1ttXeKCxdcyWLINjrLzmzC3yPxAU4vee91VF8bkyVVrnVPjZibNE31pNRFYfpqXz_tSWDlz3hzdAV_gbWnZGEjs7MEK7QcA7ZIAjs6YRDrSF7gCGaOJbhjFOcJNi8WbGEjVhBqFtfarx-q7sXeGEc_DtR4Xm-ny-Qe_CMiy6HxMdAnHXRZ5VlWmaww_11ve1pElQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2784118315</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Exact Modeling of Non-Gaussian Measurement Uncertainty in Distribution System State Estimation</title><source>Publicly Available Content Database</source><creator>Vanin, Marta ; Tom Van Acker ; D'hulst, Reinhilde ; Dirk Van Hertem</creator><creatorcontrib>Vanin, Marta ; Tom Van Acker ; D'hulst, Reinhilde ; Dirk Van Hertem</creatorcontrib><description>State estimation allows to monitor power networks, exploiting field measurements to derive the most likely grid state. In the literature, measurement errors are usually assumed to follow zero-mean Gaussian distributions; however, it has been shown that this assumption often does not hold. One such example is when considering pseudo-measurements. In distribution networks, a significant amount of pseudo-measurements might be necessary, due to the scarcity of real-time measurements. In this paper, a state estimator is presented which allows to model measurement uncertainty with any continuous distribution, without approximations. This becomes possible by writing state estimation as a general maximum-likelihood estimation-based constrained optimization problem. To realistically describe distribution networks, three-phase unbalanced power flow equations are used. Results are presented that illustrate the differences in accuracy and computational effort between different uncertainty modeling methods, for the IEEE European Low Voltage Test Feeder.</description><identifier>EISSN: 2331-8422</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Ithaca: Cornell University Library, arXiv.org</publisher><subject>Flow equations ; Low voltage ; Maximum likelihood estimation ; Networks ; Optimization ; Power flow ; State estimation ; Uncertainty</subject><ispartof>arXiv.org, 2023-03</ispartof><rights>2023. This work is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2784118315?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>780,784,25751,37010,44588</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Vanin, Marta</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tom Van Acker</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>D'hulst, Reinhilde</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dirk Van Hertem</creatorcontrib><title>Exact Modeling of Non-Gaussian Measurement Uncertainty in Distribution System State Estimation</title><title>arXiv.org</title><description>State estimation allows to monitor power networks, exploiting field measurements to derive the most likely grid state. In the literature, measurement errors are usually assumed to follow zero-mean Gaussian distributions; however, it has been shown that this assumption often does not hold. One such example is when considering pseudo-measurements. In distribution networks, a significant amount of pseudo-measurements might be necessary, due to the scarcity of real-time measurements. In this paper, a state estimator is presented which allows to model measurement uncertainty with any continuous distribution, without approximations. This becomes possible by writing state estimation as a general maximum-likelihood estimation-based constrained optimization problem. To realistically describe distribution networks, three-phase unbalanced power flow equations are used. Results are presented that illustrate the differences in accuracy and computational effort between different uncertainty modeling methods, for the IEEE European Low Voltage Test Feeder.</description><subject>Flow equations</subject><subject>Low voltage</subject><subject>Maximum likelihood estimation</subject><subject>Networks</subject><subject>Optimization</subject><subject>Power flow</subject><subject>State estimation</subject><subject>Uncertainty</subject><issn>2331-8422</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>PIMPY</sourceid><recordid>eNqNisEOwUAQQDcSCcE_TOLcpN1ttXeKCxdcyWLINjrLzmzC3yPxAU4vee91VF8bkyVVrnVPjZibNE31pNRFYfpqXz_tSWDlz3hzdAV_gbWnZGEjs7MEK7QcA7ZIAjs6YRDrSF7gCGaOJbhjFOcJNi8WbGEjVhBqFtfarx-q7sXeGEc_DtR4Xm-ny-Qe_CMiy6HxMdAnHXRZ5VlWmaww_11ve1pElQ</recordid><startdate>20230306</startdate><enddate>20230306</enddate><creator>Vanin, Marta</creator><creator>Tom Van Acker</creator><creator>D'hulst, Reinhilde</creator><creator>Dirk Van Hertem</creator><general>Cornell University Library, arXiv.org</general><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20230306</creationdate><title>Exact Modeling of Non-Gaussian Measurement Uncertainty in Distribution System State Estimation</title><author>Vanin, Marta ; Tom Van Acker ; D'hulst, Reinhilde ; Dirk Van Hertem</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-proquest_journals_27841183153</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Flow equations</topic><topic>Low voltage</topic><topic>Maximum likelihood estimation</topic><topic>Networks</topic><topic>Optimization</topic><topic>Power flow</topic><topic>State estimation</topic><topic>Uncertainty</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Vanin, Marta</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tom Van Acker</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>D'hulst, Reinhilde</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dirk Van Hertem</creatorcontrib><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>Materials Science & Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Vanin, Marta</au><au>Tom Van Acker</au><au>D'hulst, Reinhilde</au><au>Dirk Van Hertem</au><format>book</format><genre>document</genre><ristype>GEN</ristype><atitle>Exact Modeling of Non-Gaussian Measurement Uncertainty in Distribution System State Estimation</atitle><jtitle>arXiv.org</jtitle><date>2023-03-06</date><risdate>2023</risdate><eissn>2331-8422</eissn><abstract>State estimation allows to monitor power networks, exploiting field measurements to derive the most likely grid state. In the literature, measurement errors are usually assumed to follow zero-mean Gaussian distributions; however, it has been shown that this assumption often does not hold. One such example is when considering pseudo-measurements. In distribution networks, a significant amount of pseudo-measurements might be necessary, due to the scarcity of real-time measurements. In this paper, a state estimator is presented which allows to model measurement uncertainty with any continuous distribution, without approximations. This becomes possible by writing state estimation as a general maximum-likelihood estimation-based constrained optimization problem. To realistically describe distribution networks, three-phase unbalanced power flow equations are used. Results are presented that illustrate the differences in accuracy and computational effort between different uncertainty modeling methods, for the IEEE European Low Voltage Test Feeder.</abstract><cop>Ithaca</cop><pub>Cornell University Library, arXiv.org</pub><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | EISSN: 2331-8422 |
ispartof | arXiv.org, 2023-03 |
issn | 2331-8422 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2784118315 |
source | Publicly Available Content Database |
subjects | Flow equations Low voltage Maximum likelihood estimation Networks Optimization Power flow State estimation Uncertainty |
title | Exact Modeling of Non-Gaussian Measurement Uncertainty in Distribution System State Estimation |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-14T00%3A05%3A58IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:book&rft.genre=document&rft.atitle=Exact%20Modeling%20of%20Non-Gaussian%20Measurement%20Uncertainty%20in%20Distribution%20System%20State%20Estimation&rft.jtitle=arXiv.org&rft.au=Vanin,%20Marta&rft.date=2023-03-06&rft.eissn=2331-8422&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cproquest%3E2784118315%3C/proquest%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-proquest_journals_27841183153%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2784118315&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |