Loading…

Presidents, Prime Ministers and Legislative Behaviour: The Conditional Effect of Presidential Legislative Powers on Party Unity

This article proposes a novel theoretical framework to account for the combined effects of regime type and patterns of executive authority on legislative party unity. We argue that broad presidential legislative powers favour coordination between the president and legislative parties under pure pres...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Government and opposition (London) 2023-04, Vol.58 (2), p.227-248
Main Authors: Borges, André, Ribeiro, Pedro Floriano
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c299t-35d9cd5c7bbb532381b449358e7e111c2745653267203a18aa419cdc30a742ea3
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c299t-35d9cd5c7bbb532381b449358e7e111c2745653267203a18aa419cdc30a742ea3
container_end_page 248
container_issue 2
container_start_page 227
container_title Government and opposition (London)
container_volume 58
creator Borges, André
Ribeiro, Pedro Floriano
description This article proposes a novel theoretical framework to account for the combined effects of regime type and patterns of executive authority on legislative party unity. We argue that broad presidential legislative powers favour coordination between the president and legislative parties under pure presidentialism, whereas under semi-presidentialism, strong presidents increase the potential for intra-executive conflict, submitting parties to cross-cutting pressures. We expect higher levels of legislative authority to increase party unity under presidentialism but decrease under semi-presidentialism. Moreover, when presidents are endowed with limited legislative authority, semi-presidentialism produces higher levels of party unity than presidentialism, but for sufficiently high levels of legislative authority there should be no difference across regime types. Our analyses of 1,586 pooled observations for 72 democracies from all regions of the world using the V-Dem measure of party cohesion demonstrate that presidential legislative authority, in combination with regime type, is indeed a key predictor of party unity.
doi_str_mv 10.1017/gov.2021.45
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2784157697</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><cupid>10_1017_gov_2021_45</cupid><sourcerecordid>2784157697</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c299t-35d9cd5c7bbb532381b449358e7e111c2745653267203a18aa419cdc30a742ea3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptkE1PAjEQhhujiYie_ANNPOpiP7esNyX4kWDcAyTeNt3dWSiBLbYFw8m_bglEPXiazLzPvJl5EbqkpEcJVbdTu-kxwmhPyCPUoUKpRBHJj1GHRDlhUr2fojPv57HlIs066Ct34E0NbfA3OHdmCfjVtMYHcB7rtsYjmBq_0MFsAD_ATG-MXbs7PJ4BHti2NsHYVi_wsGmgCtg2-MfQxPHf7dx-7kxti3PtwhZPWhO25-ik0QsPF4faRZPH4XjwnIzenl4G96OkYlkWEi7rrKplpcqylJzxPi2FyLjsgwJKacWUkGkUUsUI17SvtaBxoeJEK8FA8y662vuunP1Ygw_FPP4RL_cFU31BpUozFanrPVU5672DpljFSLTbFpQUu4SLmHCxS7gQMtLJgdbL0pl6Cr-m__Hf6RV-eA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2784157697</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Presidents, Prime Ministers and Legislative Behaviour: The Conditional Effect of Presidential Legislative Powers on Party Unity</title><source>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</source><source>Social Science Premium Collection</source><source>ABI/INFORM Global</source><source>Politics Collection</source><source>Sociology Collection</source><source>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</source><source>Cambridge University Press</source><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><creator>Borges, André ; Ribeiro, Pedro Floriano</creator><creatorcontrib>Borges, André ; Ribeiro, Pedro Floriano</creatorcontrib><description>This article proposes a novel theoretical framework to account for the combined effects of regime type and patterns of executive authority on legislative party unity. We argue that broad presidential legislative powers favour coordination between the president and legislative parties under pure presidentialism, whereas under semi-presidentialism, strong presidents increase the potential for intra-executive conflict, submitting parties to cross-cutting pressures. We expect higher levels of legislative authority to increase party unity under presidentialism but decrease under semi-presidentialism. Moreover, when presidents are endowed with limited legislative authority, semi-presidentialism produces higher levels of party unity than presidentialism, but for sufficiently high levels of legislative authority there should be no difference across regime types. Our analyses of 1,586 pooled observations for 72 democracies from all regions of the world using the V-Dem measure of party cohesion demonstrate that presidential legislative authority, in combination with regime type, is indeed a key predictor of party unity.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0017-257X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1477-7053</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1017/gov.2021.45</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press</publisher><subject>Authority ; Cooperation ; Coordination ; Democracy ; Hypotheses ; Incentives ; Legislators ; Legislatures ; Power ; Presidential systems ; Presidents ; Prime ministers</subject><ispartof>Government and opposition (London), 2023-04, Vol.58 (2), p.227-248</ispartof><rights>Copyright © The Author(s), 2021. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of Government and Opposition Limited</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c299t-35d9cd5c7bbb532381b449358e7e111c2745653267203a18aa419cdc30a742ea3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c299t-35d9cd5c7bbb532381b449358e7e111c2745653267203a18aa419cdc30a742ea3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-2129-8091</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2784157697/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2784157697?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,11688,12845,12847,21387,21394,21395,27344,27924,27925,33223,33611,33774,33985,34530,36060,43733,43948,44115,44363,72960,74221,74468,74639,74895</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Borges, André</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ribeiro, Pedro Floriano</creatorcontrib><title>Presidents, Prime Ministers and Legislative Behaviour: The Conditional Effect of Presidential Legislative Powers on Party Unity</title><title>Government and opposition (London)</title><addtitle>Gov. &amp; oppos</addtitle><description>This article proposes a novel theoretical framework to account for the combined effects of regime type and patterns of executive authority on legislative party unity. We argue that broad presidential legislative powers favour coordination between the president and legislative parties under pure presidentialism, whereas under semi-presidentialism, strong presidents increase the potential for intra-executive conflict, submitting parties to cross-cutting pressures. We expect higher levels of legislative authority to increase party unity under presidentialism but decrease under semi-presidentialism. Moreover, when presidents are endowed with limited legislative authority, semi-presidentialism produces higher levels of party unity than presidentialism, but for sufficiently high levels of legislative authority there should be no difference across regime types. Our analyses of 1,586 pooled observations for 72 democracies from all regions of the world using the V-Dem measure of party cohesion demonstrate that presidential legislative authority, in combination with regime type, is indeed a key predictor of party unity.</description><subject>Authority</subject><subject>Cooperation</subject><subject>Coordination</subject><subject>Democracy</subject><subject>Hypotheses</subject><subject>Incentives</subject><subject>Legislators</subject><subject>Legislatures</subject><subject>Power</subject><subject>Presidential systems</subject><subject>Presidents</subject><subject>Prime ministers</subject><issn>0017-257X</issn><issn>1477-7053</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7UB</sourceid><sourceid>8BJ</sourceid><sourceid>ALSLI</sourceid><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><sourceid>DPSOV</sourceid><sourceid>HEHIP</sourceid><sourceid>M0C</sourceid><sourceid>M2L</sourceid><sourceid>M2R</sourceid><sourceid>M2S</sourceid><recordid>eNptkE1PAjEQhhujiYie_ANNPOpiP7esNyX4kWDcAyTeNt3dWSiBLbYFw8m_bglEPXiazLzPvJl5EbqkpEcJVbdTu-kxwmhPyCPUoUKpRBHJj1GHRDlhUr2fojPv57HlIs066Ct34E0NbfA3OHdmCfjVtMYHcB7rtsYjmBq_0MFsAD_ATG-MXbs7PJ4BHti2NsHYVi_wsGmgCtg2-MfQxPHf7dx-7kxti3PtwhZPWhO25-ik0QsPF4faRZPH4XjwnIzenl4G96OkYlkWEi7rrKplpcqylJzxPi2FyLjsgwJKacWUkGkUUsUI17SvtaBxoeJEK8FA8y662vuunP1Ygw_FPP4RL_cFU31BpUozFanrPVU5672DpljFSLTbFpQUu4SLmHCxS7gQMtLJgdbL0pl6Cr-m__Hf6RV-eA</recordid><startdate>20230401</startdate><enddate>20230401</enddate><creator>Borges, André</creator><creator>Ribeiro, Pedro Floriano</creator><general>Cambridge University Press</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7U4</scope><scope>7UB</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>884</scope><scope>88F</scope><scope>88J</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DPSOV</scope><scope>DWI</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HEHIP</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>KC-</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M0I</scope><scope>M1Q</scope><scope>M2L</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2R</scope><scope>M2S</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>QXPDG</scope><scope>WZK</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2129-8091</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20230401</creationdate><title>Presidents, Prime Ministers and Legislative Behaviour: The Conditional Effect of Presidential Legislative Powers on Party Unity</title><author>Borges, André ; Ribeiro, Pedro Floriano</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c299t-35d9cd5c7bbb532381b449358e7e111c2745653267203a18aa419cdc30a742ea3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Authority</topic><topic>Cooperation</topic><topic>Coordination</topic><topic>Democracy</topic><topic>Hypotheses</topic><topic>Incentives</topic><topic>Legislators</topic><topic>Legislatures</topic><topic>Power</topic><topic>Presidential systems</topic><topic>Presidents</topic><topic>Prime ministers</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Borges, André</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ribeiro, Pedro Floriano</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (pre-2017)</collection><collection>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>Alt-PressWatch (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Military Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Social Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Politics Collection</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>Sociology Collection</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Politics Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>Alt-PressWatch</collection><collection>Military Database</collection><collection>Political Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest research library</collection><collection>Social Science Database</collection><collection>Sociology Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Diversity Collection</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (Ovid)</collection><jtitle>Government and opposition (London)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Borges, André</au><au>Ribeiro, Pedro Floriano</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Presidents, Prime Ministers and Legislative Behaviour: The Conditional Effect of Presidential Legislative Powers on Party Unity</atitle><jtitle>Government and opposition (London)</jtitle><addtitle>Gov. &amp; oppos</addtitle><date>2023-04-01</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>58</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>227</spage><epage>248</epage><pages>227-248</pages><issn>0017-257X</issn><eissn>1477-7053</eissn><abstract>This article proposes a novel theoretical framework to account for the combined effects of regime type and patterns of executive authority on legislative party unity. We argue that broad presidential legislative powers favour coordination between the president and legislative parties under pure presidentialism, whereas under semi-presidentialism, strong presidents increase the potential for intra-executive conflict, submitting parties to cross-cutting pressures. We expect higher levels of legislative authority to increase party unity under presidentialism but decrease under semi-presidentialism. Moreover, when presidents are endowed with limited legislative authority, semi-presidentialism produces higher levels of party unity than presidentialism, but for sufficiently high levels of legislative authority there should be no difference across regime types. Our analyses of 1,586 pooled observations for 72 democracies from all regions of the world using the V-Dem measure of party cohesion demonstrate that presidential legislative authority, in combination with regime type, is indeed a key predictor of party unity.</abstract><cop>Cambridge, UK</cop><pub>Cambridge University Press</pub><doi>10.1017/gov.2021.45</doi><tpages>22</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2129-8091</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0017-257X
ispartof Government and opposition (London), 2023-04, Vol.58 (2), p.227-248
issn 0017-257X
1477-7053
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2784157697
source International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS); Social Science Premium Collection; ABI/INFORM Global; Politics Collection; Sociology Collection; Worldwide Political Science Abstracts; Cambridge University Press; Sociological Abstracts
subjects Authority
Cooperation
Coordination
Democracy
Hypotheses
Incentives
Legislators
Legislatures
Power
Presidential systems
Presidents
Prime ministers
title Presidents, Prime Ministers and Legislative Behaviour: The Conditional Effect of Presidential Legislative Powers on Party Unity
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-05T00%3A04%3A43IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Presidents,%20Prime%20Ministers%20and%20Legislative%20Behaviour:%20The%20Conditional%20Effect%20of%20Presidential%20Legislative%20Powers%20on%20Party%20Unity&rft.jtitle=Government%20and%20opposition%20(London)&rft.au=Borges,%20Andr%C3%A9&rft.date=2023-04-01&rft.volume=58&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=227&rft.epage=248&rft.pages=227-248&rft.issn=0017-257X&rft.eissn=1477-7053&rft_id=info:doi/10.1017/gov.2021.45&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2784157697%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c299t-35d9cd5c7bbb532381b449358e7e111c2745653267203a18aa419cdc30a742ea3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2784157697&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_cupid=10_1017_gov_2021_45&rfr_iscdi=true