Loading…

Household impacts of interruption to electric power and water services

Critical infrastructure systems derive their importance from the societal needs they help meet. Yet the relationship between infrastructure system functioning and societal functioning is not well-understood, nor are the impacts of infrastructure system disruptions on consumers. We develop two empiri...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Natural hazards (Dordrecht) 2023-02, Vol.115 (3), p.2279-2306
Main Authors: Stock, Alexia, Davidson, Rachel A., Kendra, James, Martins, V. Nuno, Ewing, Bradley, Nozick, Linda K., Starbird, Kate, Leon-Corwin, Maggie
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c319t-10f5c6c99064990495d841be9faf240ab7f5661caa6e4e3e7e81ee42a9129a523
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c319t-10f5c6c99064990495d841be9faf240ab7f5661caa6e4e3e7e81ee42a9129a523
container_end_page 2306
container_issue 3
container_start_page 2279
container_title Natural hazards (Dordrecht)
container_volume 115
creator Stock, Alexia
Davidson, Rachel A.
Kendra, James
Martins, V. Nuno
Ewing, Bradley
Nozick, Linda K.
Starbird, Kate
Leon-Corwin, Maggie
description Critical infrastructure systems derive their importance from the societal needs they help meet. Yet the relationship between infrastructure system functioning and societal functioning is not well-understood, nor are the impacts of infrastructure system disruptions on consumers. We develop two empirical measures of societal impacts—willingness to pay (WTP) to avoid service interruptions and a constructed scale of unhappiness, compare them to each other and others from the literature, and use them to examine household impacts of service interruptions. Focusing on household-level societal impacts of electric power and water service interruptions, we use survey-based data from Los Angeles County, USA, to fit a random effects within-between model of WTP and an ordinal logit with mixed effects to predict unhappiness, both as a function of infrastructure type, outage duration, and household attributes. Results suggest household impact increases nonlinearly with outage duration, and the impact of electric power disruptions is greater than water supply disruptions. Unhappiness is better able to distinguish the effects of shorter-duration outages than WTP is. Some people experience at least some duration of outage without negative impact. Increased household impact was also associated with using electricity for medical devices or water for work or business, perceived likelihood of an emergency, worry about an emergency, past negative experiences with emergencies, lower level of preparation, less connection to the neighborhood, higher income, being married, being younger, having pets, and having someone with a medical condition in the house. Financial, time/effort, health, and stress concerns all substantially influence the stated level of unhappiness.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s11069-022-05638-8
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2784703710</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2784703710</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c319t-10f5c6c99064990495d841be9faf240ab7f5661caa6e4e3e7e81ee42a9129a523</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kEFLAzEQhYMoWKt_wFPAc3QmyWY3RynWCgUvCt5Cms7qlnazJluL_97VFbx5mXf53hv4GLtEuEaA8iYjgrECpBRQGFWJ6ohNsCiVgErDMZuAlShAwcspO8t5A4BopJ2w-SLuM73F7Zo3u86HPvNY86btKaV91zex5X3ktKXQpybwLh4ocd-u-cEPCM-UPppA-Zyd1H6b6eI3p-x5fvc0W4jl4_3D7HYpgkLbC4S6CCZYC0YPR9tiXWlcka19LTX4VVkXxmDw3pAmRSVVSKSltyitL6Sasqtxt0vxfU-5d5u4T-3w0smy0iWoEmGg5EiFFHNOVLsuNTufPh2C-_blRl9u8OV-fLlqKKmxlAe4faX0N_1P6wt59G2-</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2784703710</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Household impacts of interruption to electric power and water services</title><source>Springer Link</source><creator>Stock, Alexia ; Davidson, Rachel A. ; Kendra, James ; Martins, V. Nuno ; Ewing, Bradley ; Nozick, Linda K. ; Starbird, Kate ; Leon-Corwin, Maggie</creator><creatorcontrib>Stock, Alexia ; Davidson, Rachel A. ; Kendra, James ; Martins, V. Nuno ; Ewing, Bradley ; Nozick, Linda K. ; Starbird, Kate ; Leon-Corwin, Maggie</creatorcontrib><description>Critical infrastructure systems derive their importance from the societal needs they help meet. Yet the relationship between infrastructure system functioning and societal functioning is not well-understood, nor are the impacts of infrastructure system disruptions on consumers. We develop two empirical measures of societal impacts—willingness to pay (WTP) to avoid service interruptions and a constructed scale of unhappiness, compare them to each other and others from the literature, and use them to examine household impacts of service interruptions. Focusing on household-level societal impacts of electric power and water service interruptions, we use survey-based data from Los Angeles County, USA, to fit a random effects within-between model of WTP and an ordinal logit with mixed effects to predict unhappiness, both as a function of infrastructure type, outage duration, and household attributes. Results suggest household impact increases nonlinearly with outage duration, and the impact of electric power disruptions is greater than water supply disruptions. Unhappiness is better able to distinguish the effects of shorter-duration outages than WTP is. Some people experience at least some duration of outage without negative impact. Increased household impact was also associated with using electricity for medical devices or water for work or business, perceived likelihood of an emergency, worry about an emergency, past negative experiences with emergencies, lower level of preparation, less connection to the neighborhood, higher income, being married, being younger, having pets, and having someone with a medical condition in the house. Financial, time/effort, health, and stress concerns all substantially influence the stated level of unhappiness.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0921-030X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-0840</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s11069-022-05638-8</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands</publisher><subject>Civil Engineering ; Critical infrastructure ; Duration ; Earth and Environmental Science ; Earth Sciences ; Electric power ; Electric power generation ; Electric power sources ; Electricity distribution ; Emergencies ; Environmental Management ; Geophysics/Geodesy ; Geotechnical Engineering &amp; Applied Earth Sciences ; Households ; Hydrogeology ; Infrastructure ; Medical devices ; Medical equipment ; Natural Hazards ; Original Paper ; Outages ; Pets ; Water supply ; Willingness to pay</subject><ispartof>Natural hazards (Dordrecht), 2023-02, Vol.115 (3), p.2279-2306</ispartof><rights>The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature B.V. 2022. Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c319t-10f5c6c99064990495d841be9faf240ab7f5661caa6e4e3e7e81ee42a9129a523</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c319t-10f5c6c99064990495d841be9faf240ab7f5661caa6e4e3e7e81ee42a9129a523</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-0128-2516 ; 0000-0002-6061-5985</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Stock, Alexia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Davidson, Rachel A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kendra, James</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Martins, V. Nuno</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ewing, Bradley</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nozick, Linda K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Starbird, Kate</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Leon-Corwin, Maggie</creatorcontrib><title>Household impacts of interruption to electric power and water services</title><title>Natural hazards (Dordrecht)</title><addtitle>Nat Hazards</addtitle><description>Critical infrastructure systems derive their importance from the societal needs they help meet. Yet the relationship between infrastructure system functioning and societal functioning is not well-understood, nor are the impacts of infrastructure system disruptions on consumers. We develop two empirical measures of societal impacts—willingness to pay (WTP) to avoid service interruptions and a constructed scale of unhappiness, compare them to each other and others from the literature, and use them to examine household impacts of service interruptions. Focusing on household-level societal impacts of electric power and water service interruptions, we use survey-based data from Los Angeles County, USA, to fit a random effects within-between model of WTP and an ordinal logit with mixed effects to predict unhappiness, both as a function of infrastructure type, outage duration, and household attributes. Results suggest household impact increases nonlinearly with outage duration, and the impact of electric power disruptions is greater than water supply disruptions. Unhappiness is better able to distinguish the effects of shorter-duration outages than WTP is. Some people experience at least some duration of outage without negative impact. Increased household impact was also associated with using electricity for medical devices or water for work or business, perceived likelihood of an emergency, worry about an emergency, past negative experiences with emergencies, lower level of preparation, less connection to the neighborhood, higher income, being married, being younger, having pets, and having someone with a medical condition in the house. Financial, time/effort, health, and stress concerns all substantially influence the stated level of unhappiness.</description><subject>Civil Engineering</subject><subject>Critical infrastructure</subject><subject>Duration</subject><subject>Earth and Environmental Science</subject><subject>Earth Sciences</subject><subject>Electric power</subject><subject>Electric power generation</subject><subject>Electric power sources</subject><subject>Electricity distribution</subject><subject>Emergencies</subject><subject>Environmental Management</subject><subject>Geophysics/Geodesy</subject><subject>Geotechnical Engineering &amp; Applied Earth Sciences</subject><subject>Households</subject><subject>Hydrogeology</subject><subject>Infrastructure</subject><subject>Medical devices</subject><subject>Medical equipment</subject><subject>Natural Hazards</subject><subject>Original Paper</subject><subject>Outages</subject><subject>Pets</subject><subject>Water supply</subject><subject>Willingness to pay</subject><issn>0921-030X</issn><issn>1573-0840</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kEFLAzEQhYMoWKt_wFPAc3QmyWY3RynWCgUvCt5Cms7qlnazJluL_97VFbx5mXf53hv4GLtEuEaA8iYjgrECpBRQGFWJ6ohNsCiVgErDMZuAlShAwcspO8t5A4BopJ2w-SLuM73F7Zo3u86HPvNY86btKaV91zex5X3ktKXQpybwLh4ocd-u-cEPCM-UPppA-Zyd1H6b6eI3p-x5fvc0W4jl4_3D7HYpgkLbC4S6CCZYC0YPR9tiXWlcka19LTX4VVkXxmDw3pAmRSVVSKSltyitL6Sasqtxt0vxfU-5d5u4T-3w0smy0iWoEmGg5EiFFHNOVLsuNTufPh2C-_blRl9u8OV-fLlqKKmxlAe4faX0N_1P6wt59G2-</recordid><startdate>20230201</startdate><enddate>20230201</enddate><creator>Stock, Alexia</creator><creator>Davidson, Rachel A.</creator><creator>Kendra, James</creator><creator>Martins, V. Nuno</creator><creator>Ewing, Bradley</creator><creator>Nozick, Linda K.</creator><creator>Starbird, Kate</creator><creator>Leon-Corwin, Maggie</creator><general>Springer Netherlands</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>BKSAR</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H96</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PCBAR</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>SOI</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0128-2516</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6061-5985</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20230201</creationdate><title>Household impacts of interruption to electric power and water services</title><author>Stock, Alexia ; Davidson, Rachel A. ; Kendra, James ; Martins, V. Nuno ; Ewing, Bradley ; Nozick, Linda K. ; Starbird, Kate ; Leon-Corwin, Maggie</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c319t-10f5c6c99064990495d841be9faf240ab7f5661caa6e4e3e7e81ee42a9129a523</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Civil Engineering</topic><topic>Critical infrastructure</topic><topic>Duration</topic><topic>Earth and Environmental Science</topic><topic>Earth Sciences</topic><topic>Electric power</topic><topic>Electric power generation</topic><topic>Electric power sources</topic><topic>Electricity distribution</topic><topic>Emergencies</topic><topic>Environmental Management</topic><topic>Geophysics/Geodesy</topic><topic>Geotechnical Engineering &amp; Applied Earth Sciences</topic><topic>Households</topic><topic>Hydrogeology</topic><topic>Infrastructure</topic><topic>Medical devices</topic><topic>Medical equipment</topic><topic>Natural Hazards</topic><topic>Original Paper</topic><topic>Outages</topic><topic>Pets</topic><topic>Water supply</topic><topic>Willingness to pay</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Stock, Alexia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Davidson, Rachel A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kendra, James</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Martins, V. Nuno</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ewing, Bradley</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nozick, Linda K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Starbird, Kate</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Leon-Corwin, Maggie</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Materials Science &amp; Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Agricultural &amp; Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric &amp; Aquatic Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 2: Ocean Technology, Policy &amp; Non-Living Resources</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric &amp; Aquatic Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Engineering collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Natural hazards (Dordrecht)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Stock, Alexia</au><au>Davidson, Rachel A.</au><au>Kendra, James</au><au>Martins, V. Nuno</au><au>Ewing, Bradley</au><au>Nozick, Linda K.</au><au>Starbird, Kate</au><au>Leon-Corwin, Maggie</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Household impacts of interruption to electric power and water services</atitle><jtitle>Natural hazards (Dordrecht)</jtitle><stitle>Nat Hazards</stitle><date>2023-02-01</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>115</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>2279</spage><epage>2306</epage><pages>2279-2306</pages><issn>0921-030X</issn><eissn>1573-0840</eissn><abstract>Critical infrastructure systems derive their importance from the societal needs they help meet. Yet the relationship between infrastructure system functioning and societal functioning is not well-understood, nor are the impacts of infrastructure system disruptions on consumers. We develop two empirical measures of societal impacts—willingness to pay (WTP) to avoid service interruptions and a constructed scale of unhappiness, compare them to each other and others from the literature, and use them to examine household impacts of service interruptions. Focusing on household-level societal impacts of electric power and water service interruptions, we use survey-based data from Los Angeles County, USA, to fit a random effects within-between model of WTP and an ordinal logit with mixed effects to predict unhappiness, both as a function of infrastructure type, outage duration, and household attributes. Results suggest household impact increases nonlinearly with outage duration, and the impact of electric power disruptions is greater than water supply disruptions. Unhappiness is better able to distinguish the effects of shorter-duration outages than WTP is. Some people experience at least some duration of outage without negative impact. Increased household impact was also associated with using electricity for medical devices or water for work or business, perceived likelihood of an emergency, worry about an emergency, past negative experiences with emergencies, lower level of preparation, less connection to the neighborhood, higher income, being married, being younger, having pets, and having someone with a medical condition in the house. Financial, time/effort, health, and stress concerns all substantially influence the stated level of unhappiness.</abstract><cop>Dordrecht</cop><pub>Springer Netherlands</pub><doi>10.1007/s11069-022-05638-8</doi><tpages>28</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0128-2516</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6061-5985</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0921-030X
ispartof Natural hazards (Dordrecht), 2023-02, Vol.115 (3), p.2279-2306
issn 0921-030X
1573-0840
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2784703710
source Springer Link
subjects Civil Engineering
Critical infrastructure
Duration
Earth and Environmental Science
Earth Sciences
Electric power
Electric power generation
Electric power sources
Electricity distribution
Emergencies
Environmental Management
Geophysics/Geodesy
Geotechnical Engineering & Applied Earth Sciences
Households
Hydrogeology
Infrastructure
Medical devices
Medical equipment
Natural Hazards
Original Paper
Outages
Pets
Water supply
Willingness to pay
title Household impacts of interruption to electric power and water services
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-28T16%3A13%3A24IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Household%20impacts%20of%20interruption%20to%20electric%20power%20and%20water%20services&rft.jtitle=Natural%20hazards%20(Dordrecht)&rft.au=Stock,%20Alexia&rft.date=2023-02-01&rft.volume=115&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=2279&rft.epage=2306&rft.pages=2279-2306&rft.issn=0921-030X&rft.eissn=1573-0840&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s11069-022-05638-8&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2784703710%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c319t-10f5c6c99064990495d841be9faf240ab7f5661caa6e4e3e7e81ee42a9129a523%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2784703710&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true