Loading…
Life cycle assessment of different municipal solid waste management options: a case study of Algiers (Algeria)
This paper examines four strategies of municipal solid waste management (MSWM) for Algiers city using life cycle assessment methodology. Analyzed options include the current WM landfilling system (SC1), landfilling with biogas recovery (SC2), anaerobic digestion (SC3), and anaerobic digestion with e...
Saved in:
| Published in: | Journal of material cycles and waste management 2023-03, Vol.25 (2), p.954-969 |
|---|---|
| Main Authors: | , , |
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Subjects: | |
| Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
| Online Access: | Get full text |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c249t-3c8264b1a2f5e27fc3eeed36a9850e5bf80a2f3f5bb26a8b245948a698a1baad3 |
|---|---|
| cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c249t-3c8264b1a2f5e27fc3eeed36a9850e5bf80a2f3f5bb26a8b245948a698a1baad3 |
| container_end_page | 969 |
| container_issue | 2 |
| container_start_page | 954 |
| container_title | Journal of material cycles and waste management |
| container_volume | 25 |
| creator | Zibouche, Sadia Amouri, Mohammed Bouarab, Rabah |
| description | This paper examines four strategies of municipal solid waste management (MSWM) for Algiers city using life cycle assessment methodology. Analyzed options include the current WM landfilling system (SC1), landfilling with biogas recovery (SC2), anaerobic digestion (SC3), and anaerobic digestion with energy recovery (SC4). Real facilities in the city provided data for the inventory and background process data were taken from Ecoinvent V3.1 of SimaPro 8.1. Scenarios were compared using ReCiPe evaluation method. Results indicate that baseline scenario produces the greatest impact due diesel emissions for transportation and biogas emitted. Meanwhile, steel used for industrial installations and engines emissions contribute negatively in anaerobic digestion scenarios. Furthermore, AD scenarios shows significant improvement in all impact categories except eutrophication, toxicity and human health, which is due to high NO
x
and CO emissions from the biogas engine. The SC4 scenario achieved the least environmental impact where it eliminates 403.06 kg CO
2
eq/t waste, saves fossil fuels with a net avoidance of 18.2 PJ/t waste, and electricity generation of 280 GWh
el
/year, covering 6% of the city electricity needs. The sensitivity analysis revealed that the variation of parameters do not alter the ranking order of scenarios affirming the reliability of results.
Graphical abstract |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s10163-022-01576-6 |
| format | article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2784997108</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2784997108</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c249t-3c8264b1a2f5e27fc3eeed36a9850e5bf80a2f3f5bb26a8b245948a698a1baad3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kMtKxEAQRYMoOI7-gKsGN7qI9iPpdNwN4gsG3Oi6qSTVQw95jF0JMn9vjxHcuaoq6t5b1EmSS8FvBefFHQkutEq5lCkXeaFTfZQshBYiNVIWx7HPlEmzMi9OkzOiLeey5KpYJP3aO2T1vm6RARESddiPbHCs8c5hOAzd1Pva76BlNLS-YV9AI7IOetjgrN6NfujpngGrgZDRODX7Q8aq3XgMxK5jg8HDzXly4qAlvPity-Tj6fH94SVdvz2_PqzWaS2zckxVbaTOKgHS5SgLVytEbJSG0uQc88oZHlfK5VUlNZhKZnmZGdClAVEBNGqZXM25uzB8Tkij3Q5T6ONJKwuTlWUhuIkqOavqMBAFdHYXfAdhbwW3B6525mojV_vD1epoUrOJoriPb_1F_-P6BpoDfFA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2784997108</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Life cycle assessment of different municipal solid waste management options: a case study of Algiers (Algeria)</title><source>ABI/INFORM Global</source><source>Springer Nature</source><creator>Zibouche, Sadia ; Amouri, Mohammed ; Bouarab, Rabah</creator><creatorcontrib>Zibouche, Sadia ; Amouri, Mohammed ; Bouarab, Rabah</creatorcontrib><description>This paper examines four strategies of municipal solid waste management (MSWM) for Algiers city using life cycle assessment methodology. Analyzed options include the current WM landfilling system (SC1), landfilling with biogas recovery (SC2), anaerobic digestion (SC3), and anaerobic digestion with energy recovery (SC4). Real facilities in the city provided data for the inventory and background process data were taken from Ecoinvent V3.1 of SimaPro 8.1. Scenarios were compared using ReCiPe evaluation method. Results indicate that baseline scenario produces the greatest impact due diesel emissions for transportation and biogas emitted. Meanwhile, steel used for industrial installations and engines emissions contribute negatively in anaerobic digestion scenarios. Furthermore, AD scenarios shows significant improvement in all impact categories except eutrophication, toxicity and human health, which is due to high NO
x
and CO emissions from the biogas engine. The SC4 scenario achieved the least environmental impact where it eliminates 403.06 kg CO
2
eq/t waste, saves fossil fuels with a net avoidance of 18.2 PJ/t waste, and electricity generation of 280 GWh
el
/year, covering 6% of the city electricity needs. The sensitivity analysis revealed that the variation of parameters do not alter the ranking order of scenarios affirming the reliability of results.
Graphical abstract</description><identifier>ISSN: 1438-4957</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1611-8227</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s10163-022-01576-6</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Tokyo: Springer Japan</publisher><subject>Anaerobic digestion ; Biogas ; Carbon dioxide ; Civil Engineering ; Diesel engines ; Diesel fuels ; Electricity ; Emissions ; Energy recovery ; Engineering ; Environmental impact ; Environmental Management ; Eutrophication ; Fossil fuels ; Landfills ; Life cycle analysis ; Life cycle assessment ; Life cycles ; Municipal solid waste ; Municipal waste management ; Original Article ; Parameter sensitivity ; Refuse as fuel ; Sensitivity analysis ; Solid waste management ; Solid wastes ; Toxicity ; Waste management ; Waste Management/Waste Technology</subject><ispartof>Journal of material cycles and waste management, 2023-03, Vol.25 (2), p.954-969</ispartof><rights>Springer Japan KK, part of Springer Nature 2022. Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c249t-3c8264b1a2f5e27fc3eeed36a9850e5bf80a2f3f5bb26a8b245948a698a1baad3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c249t-3c8264b1a2f5e27fc3eeed36a9850e5bf80a2f3f5bb26a8b245948a698a1baad3</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-7350-0450</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2784997108/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2784997108?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,11687,27923,27924,36059,44362,74666</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Zibouche, Sadia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Amouri, Mohammed</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bouarab, Rabah</creatorcontrib><title>Life cycle assessment of different municipal solid waste management options: a case study of Algiers (Algeria)</title><title>Journal of material cycles and waste management</title><addtitle>J Mater Cycles Waste Manag</addtitle><description>This paper examines four strategies of municipal solid waste management (MSWM) for Algiers city using life cycle assessment methodology. Analyzed options include the current WM landfilling system (SC1), landfilling with biogas recovery (SC2), anaerobic digestion (SC3), and anaerobic digestion with energy recovery (SC4). Real facilities in the city provided data for the inventory and background process data were taken from Ecoinvent V3.1 of SimaPro 8.1. Scenarios were compared using ReCiPe evaluation method. Results indicate that baseline scenario produces the greatest impact due diesel emissions for transportation and biogas emitted. Meanwhile, steel used for industrial installations and engines emissions contribute negatively in anaerobic digestion scenarios. Furthermore, AD scenarios shows significant improvement in all impact categories except eutrophication, toxicity and human health, which is due to high NO
x
and CO emissions from the biogas engine. The SC4 scenario achieved the least environmental impact where it eliminates 403.06 kg CO
2
eq/t waste, saves fossil fuels with a net avoidance of 18.2 PJ/t waste, and electricity generation of 280 GWh
el
/year, covering 6% of the city electricity needs. The sensitivity analysis revealed that the variation of parameters do not alter the ranking order of scenarios affirming the reliability of results.
Graphical abstract</description><subject>Anaerobic digestion</subject><subject>Biogas</subject><subject>Carbon dioxide</subject><subject>Civil Engineering</subject><subject>Diesel engines</subject><subject>Diesel fuels</subject><subject>Electricity</subject><subject>Emissions</subject><subject>Energy recovery</subject><subject>Engineering</subject><subject>Environmental impact</subject><subject>Environmental Management</subject><subject>Eutrophication</subject><subject>Fossil fuels</subject><subject>Landfills</subject><subject>Life cycle analysis</subject><subject>Life cycle assessment</subject><subject>Life cycles</subject><subject>Municipal solid waste</subject><subject>Municipal waste management</subject><subject>Original Article</subject><subject>Parameter sensitivity</subject><subject>Refuse as fuel</subject><subject>Sensitivity analysis</subject><subject>Solid waste management</subject><subject>Solid wastes</subject><subject>Toxicity</subject><subject>Waste management</subject><subject>Waste Management/Waste Technology</subject><issn>1438-4957</issn><issn>1611-8227</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>M0C</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kMtKxEAQRYMoOI7-gKsGN7qI9iPpdNwN4gsG3Oi6qSTVQw95jF0JMn9vjxHcuaoq6t5b1EmSS8FvBefFHQkutEq5lCkXeaFTfZQshBYiNVIWx7HPlEmzMi9OkzOiLeey5KpYJP3aO2T1vm6RARESddiPbHCs8c5hOAzd1Pva76BlNLS-YV9AI7IOetjgrN6NfujpngGrgZDRODX7Q8aq3XgMxK5jg8HDzXly4qAlvPity-Tj6fH94SVdvz2_PqzWaS2zckxVbaTOKgHS5SgLVytEbJSG0uQc88oZHlfK5VUlNZhKZnmZGdClAVEBNGqZXM25uzB8Tkij3Q5T6ONJKwuTlWUhuIkqOavqMBAFdHYXfAdhbwW3B6525mojV_vD1epoUrOJoriPb_1F_-P6BpoDfFA</recordid><startdate>20230301</startdate><enddate>20230301</enddate><creator>Zibouche, Sadia</creator><creator>Amouri, Mohammed</creator><creator>Bouarab, Rabah</creator><general>Springer Japan</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7SR</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8BQ</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>D1I</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>JG9</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>KB.</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PDBOC</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>SOI</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7350-0450</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20230301</creationdate><title>Life cycle assessment of different municipal solid waste management options: a case study of Algiers (Algeria)</title><author>Zibouche, Sadia ; Amouri, Mohammed ; Bouarab, Rabah</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c249t-3c8264b1a2f5e27fc3eeed36a9850e5bf80a2f3f5bb26a8b245948a698a1baad3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Anaerobic digestion</topic><topic>Biogas</topic><topic>Carbon dioxide</topic><topic>Civil Engineering</topic><topic>Diesel engines</topic><topic>Diesel fuels</topic><topic>Electricity</topic><topic>Emissions</topic><topic>Energy recovery</topic><topic>Engineering</topic><topic>Environmental impact</topic><topic>Environmental Management</topic><topic>Eutrophication</topic><topic>Fossil fuels</topic><topic>Landfills</topic><topic>Life cycle analysis</topic><topic>Life cycle assessment</topic><topic>Life cycles</topic><topic>Municipal solid waste</topic><topic>Municipal waste management</topic><topic>Original Article</topic><topic>Parameter sensitivity</topic><topic>Refuse as fuel</topic><topic>Sensitivity analysis</topic><topic>Solid waste management</topic><topic>Solid wastes</topic><topic>Toxicity</topic><topic>Waste management</topic><topic>Waste Management/Waste Technology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Zibouche, Sadia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Amouri, Mohammed</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bouarab, Rabah</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Engineered Materials Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Complete database</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>METADEX</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Materials Science & Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Materials Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>Materials Science Database</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>One Business (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Journal of material cycles and waste management</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Zibouche, Sadia</au><au>Amouri, Mohammed</au><au>Bouarab, Rabah</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Life cycle assessment of different municipal solid waste management options: a case study of Algiers (Algeria)</atitle><jtitle>Journal of material cycles and waste management</jtitle><stitle>J Mater Cycles Waste Manag</stitle><date>2023-03-01</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>25</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>954</spage><epage>969</epage><pages>954-969</pages><issn>1438-4957</issn><eissn>1611-8227</eissn><abstract>This paper examines four strategies of municipal solid waste management (MSWM) for Algiers city using life cycle assessment methodology. Analyzed options include the current WM landfilling system (SC1), landfilling with biogas recovery (SC2), anaerobic digestion (SC3), and anaerobic digestion with energy recovery (SC4). Real facilities in the city provided data for the inventory and background process data were taken from Ecoinvent V3.1 of SimaPro 8.1. Scenarios were compared using ReCiPe evaluation method. Results indicate that baseline scenario produces the greatest impact due diesel emissions for transportation and biogas emitted. Meanwhile, steel used for industrial installations and engines emissions contribute negatively in anaerobic digestion scenarios. Furthermore, AD scenarios shows significant improvement in all impact categories except eutrophication, toxicity and human health, which is due to high NO
x
and CO emissions from the biogas engine. The SC4 scenario achieved the least environmental impact where it eliminates 403.06 kg CO
2
eq/t waste, saves fossil fuels with a net avoidance of 18.2 PJ/t waste, and electricity generation of 280 GWh
el
/year, covering 6% of the city electricity needs. The sensitivity analysis revealed that the variation of parameters do not alter the ranking order of scenarios affirming the reliability of results.
Graphical abstract</abstract><cop>Tokyo</cop><pub>Springer Japan</pub><doi>10.1007/s10163-022-01576-6</doi><tpages>16</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7350-0450</orcidid></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 1438-4957 |
| ispartof | Journal of material cycles and waste management, 2023-03, Vol.25 (2), p.954-969 |
| issn | 1438-4957 1611-8227 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2784997108 |
| source | ABI/INFORM Global; Springer Nature |
| subjects | Anaerobic digestion Biogas Carbon dioxide Civil Engineering Diesel engines Diesel fuels Electricity Emissions Energy recovery Engineering Environmental impact Environmental Management Eutrophication Fossil fuels Landfills Life cycle analysis Life cycle assessment Life cycles Municipal solid waste Municipal waste management Original Article Parameter sensitivity Refuse as fuel Sensitivity analysis Solid waste management Solid wastes Toxicity Waste management Waste Management/Waste Technology |
| title | Life cycle assessment of different municipal solid waste management options: a case study of Algiers (Algeria) |
| url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-10T13%3A02%3A56IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Life%20cycle%20assessment%20of%20different%20municipal%20solid%20waste%20management%20options:%20a%20case%20study%20of%20Algiers%20(Algeria)&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20material%20cycles%20and%20waste%20management&rft.au=Zibouche,%20Sadia&rft.date=2023-03-01&rft.volume=25&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=954&rft.epage=969&rft.pages=954-969&rft.issn=1438-4957&rft.eissn=1611-8227&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s10163-022-01576-6&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2784997108%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c249t-3c8264b1a2f5e27fc3eeed36a9850e5bf80a2f3f5bb26a8b245948a698a1baad3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2784997108&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |