Loading…

Rendering quality technical: modern quinoa, modern farmers, and the moral politics of quality standards

The quinoa export boom generated a rapid standardization project that sought to transform a heteroglot local grain into a uniform global commodity that could flow smoothly through global markets. All agricultural commodities come into being through different standardization processes that materializ...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Agriculture and human values 2023-03, Vol.40 (1), p.305-315
Main Author: McDonell, Emma
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c303t-e18d5b6fa4ad2095d1fdddd96fc0bb9c5b0bdb1d724c17deb0626d7b204cc3843
container_end_page 315
container_issue 1
container_start_page 305
container_title Agriculture and human values
container_volume 40
creator McDonell, Emma
description The quinoa export boom generated a rapid standardization project that sought to transform a heteroglot local grain into a uniform global commodity that could flow smoothly through global markets. All agricultural commodities come into being through different standardization processes that materialize specific concepts of quality. Yet the sudden rise in export demand for quinoa, massive price surge, and the biodiverse nature and local orientation of existing quinoa production made quinoa’s standardization particularly dramatic. This article traces the enforcement of quality standards for quinoa export ethnographically, focusing on the interactions between farmers and técnicos, a category of actors tasked with training farmers in “quality” quinoa production and enforcing quality at the moment of sale. I argue that standards moralize agricultural production practices, redefining “good quinoa” and “good farmers.” At the same time, they serve as powerful tools to render technical the reorientation of Andean agricultural systems toward quinoa export. Advocates for more just and ecologically sustainable global commodity chains should pay attention to quality standards as a key site of politics with major ramifications for inclusion/exclusion and resilience.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s10460-022-10358-7
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2784998141</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2784998141</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c303t-e18d5b6fa4ad2095d1fdddd96fc0bb9c5b0bdb1d724c17deb0626d7b204cc3843</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE1Lw0AQhhdRsFb_gKeA167ObjbZjTcpfkFBEAVvy362KWmS7qaH_nu3xo-bcxlm5n3fgQehSwLXBIDfRAKsBAyUYgJ5ITA_QhNScIpFXpbHaAJCVBiY-DhFZzGuAUBwoBO0fHWtdaFul9l2p5p62GeDM6u2Nqq5zTZdurXpUredmv2MXoWNC3GWqdZmw8qlfVBN1nfJXpuYdf43Kw5Jo4KN5-jEqya6i-8-Re8P92_zJ7x4eXye3y2wySEfsCPCFrr0iilLoSos8TZVVXoDWlem0KCtJpZTZgi3TkNJS8s1BWZMLlg-RVdjbh-67c7FQa67XWjTS0m5YFUlCCNJRUeVCV2MwXnZh3qjwl4SkAegcgQqE1D5BVTyZMpHU-wPvFz4i_7H9Qn0AnsH</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2784998141</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Rendering quality technical: modern quinoa, modern farmers, and the moral politics of quality standards</title><source>EconLit s plnými texty</source><source>Social Science Premium Collection</source><source>ABI/INFORM Global</source><source>Sociology Collection</source><source>Springer Link</source><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><source>Art, Design &amp; Architecture Collection</source><creator>McDonell, Emma</creator><creatorcontrib>McDonell, Emma</creatorcontrib><description>The quinoa export boom generated a rapid standardization project that sought to transform a heteroglot local grain into a uniform global commodity that could flow smoothly through global markets. All agricultural commodities come into being through different standardization processes that materialize specific concepts of quality. Yet the sudden rise in export demand for quinoa, massive price surge, and the biodiverse nature and local orientation of existing quinoa production made quinoa’s standardization particularly dramatic. This article traces the enforcement of quality standards for quinoa export ethnographically, focusing on the interactions between farmers and técnicos, a category of actors tasked with training farmers in “quality” quinoa production and enforcing quality at the moment of sale. I argue that standards moralize agricultural production practices, redefining “good quinoa” and “good farmers.” At the same time, they serve as powerful tools to render technical the reorientation of Andean agricultural systems toward quinoa export. Advocates for more just and ecologically sustainable global commodity chains should pay attention to quality standards as a key site of politics with major ramifications for inclusion/exclusion and resilience.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0889-048X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1572-8366</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s10460-022-10358-7</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands</publisher><subject>Agrarian structures ; Agricultural commodities ; Agricultural Economics ; Agricultural Ethics ; Agricultural production ; Commodities ; Development Studies ; Education ; Environmental Sociology ; Exports ; Farmers ; Farming systems ; Global marketing ; Humanities and Social Sciences ; multidisciplinary ; Philosophy ; Politics ; Quality standards ; Quinoa ; Resilience ; Science ; Standardization ; Sustainable Development</subject><ispartof>Agriculture and human values, 2023-03, Vol.40 (1), p.305-315</ispartof><rights>The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature B.V. 2022. Springer Nature or its licensor holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c303t-e18d5b6fa4ad2095d1fdddd96fc0bb9c5b0bdb1d724c17deb0626d7b204cc3843</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-5862-9918</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2784998141/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2784998141?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,11688,12861,21394,21395,27344,27924,27925,33611,33774,34530,34775,36060,43733,44115,44200,44363,74221,74639,74728,74895</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>McDonell, Emma</creatorcontrib><title>Rendering quality technical: modern quinoa, modern farmers, and the moral politics of quality standards</title><title>Agriculture and human values</title><addtitle>Agric Hum Values</addtitle><description>The quinoa export boom generated a rapid standardization project that sought to transform a heteroglot local grain into a uniform global commodity that could flow smoothly through global markets. All agricultural commodities come into being through different standardization processes that materialize specific concepts of quality. Yet the sudden rise in export demand for quinoa, massive price surge, and the biodiverse nature and local orientation of existing quinoa production made quinoa’s standardization particularly dramatic. This article traces the enforcement of quality standards for quinoa export ethnographically, focusing on the interactions between farmers and técnicos, a category of actors tasked with training farmers in “quality” quinoa production and enforcing quality at the moment of sale. I argue that standards moralize agricultural production practices, redefining “good quinoa” and “good farmers.” At the same time, they serve as powerful tools to render technical the reorientation of Andean agricultural systems toward quinoa export. Advocates for more just and ecologically sustainable global commodity chains should pay attention to quality standards as a key site of politics with major ramifications for inclusion/exclusion and resilience.</description><subject>Agrarian structures</subject><subject>Agricultural commodities</subject><subject>Agricultural Economics</subject><subject>Agricultural Ethics</subject><subject>Agricultural production</subject><subject>Commodities</subject><subject>Development Studies</subject><subject>Education</subject><subject>Environmental Sociology</subject><subject>Exports</subject><subject>Farmers</subject><subject>Farming systems</subject><subject>Global marketing</subject><subject>Humanities and Social Sciences</subject><subject>multidisciplinary</subject><subject>Philosophy</subject><subject>Politics</subject><subject>Quality standards</subject><subject>Quinoa</subject><subject>Resilience</subject><subject>Science</subject><subject>Standardization</subject><subject>Sustainable Development</subject><issn>0889-048X</issn><issn>1572-8366</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ALSLI</sourceid><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><sourceid>HEHIP</sourceid><sourceid>K50</sourceid><sourceid>M0C</sourceid><sourceid>M1D</sourceid><sourceid>M2R</sourceid><sourceid>M2S</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kE1Lw0AQhhdRsFb_gKeA167ObjbZjTcpfkFBEAVvy362KWmS7qaH_nu3xo-bcxlm5n3fgQehSwLXBIDfRAKsBAyUYgJ5ITA_QhNScIpFXpbHaAJCVBiY-DhFZzGuAUBwoBO0fHWtdaFul9l2p5p62GeDM6u2Nqq5zTZdurXpUredmv2MXoWNC3GWqdZmw8qlfVBN1nfJXpuYdf43Kw5Jo4KN5-jEqya6i-8-Re8P92_zJ7x4eXye3y2wySEfsCPCFrr0iilLoSos8TZVVXoDWlem0KCtJpZTZgi3TkNJS8s1BWZMLlg-RVdjbh-67c7FQa67XWjTS0m5YFUlCCNJRUeVCV2MwXnZh3qjwl4SkAegcgQqE1D5BVTyZMpHU-wPvFz4i_7H9Qn0AnsH</recordid><startdate>20230301</startdate><enddate>20230301</enddate><creator>McDonell, Emma</creator><general>Springer Netherlands</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RQ</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7U4</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>88J</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>AABKS</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABSDQ</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AVQMV</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWI</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>HEHIP</scope><scope>K50</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M1D</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2R</scope><scope>M2S</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>SOI</scope><scope>U9A</scope><scope>WZK</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5862-9918</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20230301</creationdate><title>Rendering quality technical: modern quinoa, modern farmers, and the moral politics of quality standards</title><author>McDonell, Emma</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c303t-e18d5b6fa4ad2095d1fdddd96fc0bb9c5b0bdb1d724c17deb0626d7b204cc3843</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Agrarian structures</topic><topic>Agricultural commodities</topic><topic>Agricultural Economics</topic><topic>Agricultural Ethics</topic><topic>Agricultural production</topic><topic>Commodities</topic><topic>Development Studies</topic><topic>Education</topic><topic>Environmental Sociology</topic><topic>Exports</topic><topic>Farmers</topic><topic>Farming systems</topic><topic>Global marketing</topic><topic>Humanities and Social Sciences</topic><topic>multidisciplinary</topic><topic>Philosophy</topic><topic>Politics</topic><topic>Quality standards</topic><topic>Quinoa</topic><topic>Resilience</topic><topic>Science</topic><topic>Standardization</topic><topic>Sustainable Development</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>McDonell, Emma</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Career &amp; Technical Education Database</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (pre-2017)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Social Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Philosophy Collection</collection><collection>Materials Science &amp; Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Philosophy Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural &amp; Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>Arts Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Sociology Collection</collection><collection>Art, Design &amp; Architecture Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>Agriculture Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Arts &amp; Humanities Database</collection><collection>ProQuest research library</collection><collection>Social Science Database</collection><collection>Sociology Database</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>One Business (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (Ovid)</collection><jtitle>Agriculture and human values</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>McDonell, Emma</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Rendering quality technical: modern quinoa, modern farmers, and the moral politics of quality standards</atitle><jtitle>Agriculture and human values</jtitle><stitle>Agric Hum Values</stitle><date>2023-03-01</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>40</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>305</spage><epage>315</epage><pages>305-315</pages><issn>0889-048X</issn><eissn>1572-8366</eissn><abstract>The quinoa export boom generated a rapid standardization project that sought to transform a heteroglot local grain into a uniform global commodity that could flow smoothly through global markets. All agricultural commodities come into being through different standardization processes that materialize specific concepts of quality. Yet the sudden rise in export demand for quinoa, massive price surge, and the biodiverse nature and local orientation of existing quinoa production made quinoa’s standardization particularly dramatic. This article traces the enforcement of quality standards for quinoa export ethnographically, focusing on the interactions between farmers and técnicos, a category of actors tasked with training farmers in “quality” quinoa production and enforcing quality at the moment of sale. I argue that standards moralize agricultural production practices, redefining “good quinoa” and “good farmers.” At the same time, they serve as powerful tools to render technical the reorientation of Andean agricultural systems toward quinoa export. Advocates for more just and ecologically sustainable global commodity chains should pay attention to quality standards as a key site of politics with major ramifications for inclusion/exclusion and resilience.</abstract><cop>Dordrecht</cop><pub>Springer Netherlands</pub><doi>10.1007/s10460-022-10358-7</doi><tpages>11</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5862-9918</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0889-048X
ispartof Agriculture and human values, 2023-03, Vol.40 (1), p.305-315
issn 0889-048X
1572-8366
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2784998141
source EconLit s plnými texty; Social Science Premium Collection; ABI/INFORM Global; Sociology Collection; Springer Link; Sociological Abstracts; Art, Design & Architecture Collection
subjects Agrarian structures
Agricultural commodities
Agricultural Economics
Agricultural Ethics
Agricultural production
Commodities
Development Studies
Education
Environmental Sociology
Exports
Farmers
Farming systems
Global marketing
Humanities and Social Sciences
multidisciplinary
Philosophy
Politics
Quality standards
Quinoa
Resilience
Science
Standardization
Sustainable Development
title Rendering quality technical: modern quinoa, modern farmers, and the moral politics of quality standards
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-27T00%3A41%3A00IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Rendering%20quality%20technical:%20modern%20quinoa,%20modern%20farmers,%20and%20the%20moral%20politics%20of%20quality%20standards&rft.jtitle=Agriculture%20and%20human%20values&rft.au=McDonell,%20Emma&rft.date=2023-03-01&rft.volume=40&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=305&rft.epage=315&rft.pages=305-315&rft.issn=0889-048X&rft.eissn=1572-8366&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s10460-022-10358-7&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2784998141%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c303t-e18d5b6fa4ad2095d1fdddd96fc0bb9c5b0bdb1d724c17deb0626d7b204cc3843%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2784998141&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true