The predictive value of201Tl rest-redistribution and18F-fluorodeoxyglucose SPECT for wall motion recovery after recent reperfused myocardial infarction

Sensitivity [Confidence Interval] for^sup 201^Tl R-R was 74.6% [60.5-84.5], for FDG it was 82.1% [70.8-90.4]; specificities were 73% [64.3-80.5] and 54.8% [45.6-63.7], respectively.^sup 18^F-FDG tended to be more sensitive than 201Tl R-R, but the latter was more specific (p < 0.0004). Both^sup 20...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Annals of nuclear medicine 2004-04, Vol.18 (2), p.97-103
Main Authors: González, Patricio, Massardo, Teresa, Coll, Claudia, Humeres, Pamela, Sierralta, Paulina, Jofré, M. Josefina, Yovanovich, Jorge, Aramburu, Ivonne, Brugère, Solange, Chamorro, Hernán
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Angioplasty
Echocardiography
Heart attacks
Myocardial infarction
Recovery
Thrombolysis
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c1313-b404afe7be3e1c9ecbb517b0e6005003b17e061badcbaeb8d28b835010775f393
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c1313-b404afe7be3e1c9ecbb517b0e6005003b17e061badcbaeb8d28b835010775f393
container_end_page 103
container_issue 2
container_start_page 97
container_title Annals of nuclear medicine
container_volume 18
creator González, Patricio
Massardo, Teresa
Coll, Claudia
Humeres, Pamela
Sierralta, Paulina
Jofré, M. Josefina
Yovanovich, Jorge
Aramburu, Ivonne
Brugère, Solange
Chamorro, Hernán
description Sensitivity [Confidence Interval] for^sup 201^Tl R-R was 74.6% [60.5-84.5], for FDG it was 82.1% [70.8-90.4]; specificities were 73% [64.3-80.5] and 54.8% [45.6-63.7], respectively.^sup 18^F-FDG tended to be more sensitive than 201Tl R-R, but the latter was more specific (p < 0.0004). Both^sup 201^T1 R-R and^sup 18^F-FDG presented high negative predictive value (p: ns).Conclusion: In recent MI, SPECT^sup 201^Tl R-R is a valuable and widely available technique for viability detection, with similar sensitivity and significant better specificity than SPECT^sup 18^F-FDG.[PUBLICATION ABSTRACT]
doi_str_mv 10.1007/BF02985099
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2787241623</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2787241623</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1313-b404afe7be3e1c9ecbb517b0e6005003b17e061badcbaeb8d28b835010775f393</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kU9r3DAQxUVJIJs_l34C0d4CbmYs25KP7ZJtA4EEsjkbSR61Dl5rO7I33U_SrxtvU8gpp8djfvOG4QnxEeELAuirbyvIa1NCXX8QCzRVkVWFUkdiATUWmUajT8RpSk8AuSlNvhB_179Ibpnazo_djuTO9hPJGHLAdS-Z0pgdhmnkzk1jFwdphxbNKgv9FDm2FP_sf_aTj4nkw_31ci1DZPls-15u4j-eyccd8V7aMBIfLA3jLFviMCVq5WYfveW2s73shmDZH9bOxXGwfaKL_3omHlfX6-WP7Pbu-83y623mUaHKXAGFDaQdKUJfk3euRO2AKoASQDnUBBU623pnyZk2N86oEhC0LoOq1Zn4_Jq75fh7mt9tnuLEw3yyybXReYFVrmbq07sUllCYWlczdPkKeY4pMYVmy93G8r5BaA7tNG_tqBfhG4Ph</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>215048976</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The predictive value of201Tl rest-redistribution and18F-fluorodeoxyglucose SPECT for wall motion recovery after recent reperfused myocardial infarction</title><source>Springer Nature</source><creator>González, Patricio ; Massardo, Teresa ; Coll, Claudia ; Humeres, Pamela ; Sierralta, Paulina ; Jofré, M. Josefina ; Yovanovich, Jorge ; Aramburu, Ivonne ; Brugère, Solange ; Chamorro, Hernán</creator><creatorcontrib>González, Patricio ; Massardo, Teresa ; Coll, Claudia ; Humeres, Pamela ; Sierralta, Paulina ; Jofré, M. Josefina ; Yovanovich, Jorge ; Aramburu, Ivonne ; Brugère, Solange ; Chamorro, Hernán</creatorcontrib><description>Sensitivity [Confidence Interval] for^sup 201^Tl R-R was 74.6% [60.5-84.5], for FDG it was 82.1% [70.8-90.4]; specificities were 73% [64.3-80.5] and 54.8% [45.6-63.7], respectively.^sup 18^F-FDG tended to be more sensitive than 201Tl R-R, but the latter was more specific (p &lt; 0.0004). Both^sup 201^T1 R-R and^sup 18^F-FDG presented high negative predictive value (p: ns).Conclusion: In recent MI, SPECT^sup 201^Tl R-R is a valuable and widely available technique for viability detection, with similar sensitivity and significant better specificity than SPECT^sup 18^F-FDG.[PUBLICATION ABSTRACT]</description><identifier>ISSN: 0914-7187</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1864-6433</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/BF02985099</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Tokyo: Springer Nature B.V</publisher><subject>Angioplasty ; Echocardiography ; Heart attacks ; Myocardial infarction ; Recovery ; Thrombolysis</subject><ispartof>Annals of nuclear medicine, 2004-04, Vol.18 (2), p.97-103</ispartof><rights>Springer 2004</rights><rights>Springer 2004.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1313-b404afe7be3e1c9ecbb517b0e6005003b17e061badcbaeb8d28b835010775f393</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1313-b404afe7be3e1c9ecbb517b0e6005003b17e061badcbaeb8d28b835010775f393</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>González, Patricio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Massardo, Teresa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Coll, Claudia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Humeres, Pamela</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sierralta, Paulina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jofré, M. Josefina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yovanovich, Jorge</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Aramburu, Ivonne</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brugère, Solange</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chamorro, Hernán</creatorcontrib><title>The predictive value of201Tl rest-redistribution and18F-fluorodeoxyglucose SPECT for wall motion recovery after recent reperfused myocardial infarction</title><title>Annals of nuclear medicine</title><description>Sensitivity [Confidence Interval] for^sup 201^Tl R-R was 74.6% [60.5-84.5], for FDG it was 82.1% [70.8-90.4]; specificities were 73% [64.3-80.5] and 54.8% [45.6-63.7], respectively.^sup 18^F-FDG tended to be more sensitive than 201Tl R-R, but the latter was more specific (p &lt; 0.0004). Both^sup 201^T1 R-R and^sup 18^F-FDG presented high negative predictive value (p: ns).Conclusion: In recent MI, SPECT^sup 201^Tl R-R is a valuable and widely available technique for viability detection, with similar sensitivity and significant better specificity than SPECT^sup 18^F-FDG.[PUBLICATION ABSTRACT]</description><subject>Angioplasty</subject><subject>Echocardiography</subject><subject>Heart attacks</subject><subject>Myocardial infarction</subject><subject>Recovery</subject><subject>Thrombolysis</subject><issn>0914-7187</issn><issn>1864-6433</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2004</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kU9r3DAQxUVJIJs_l34C0d4CbmYs25KP7ZJtA4EEsjkbSR61Dl5rO7I33U_SrxtvU8gpp8djfvOG4QnxEeELAuirbyvIa1NCXX8QCzRVkVWFUkdiATUWmUajT8RpSk8AuSlNvhB_179Ibpnazo_djuTO9hPJGHLAdS-Z0pgdhmnkzk1jFwdphxbNKgv9FDm2FP_sf_aTj4nkw_31ci1DZPls-15u4j-eyccd8V7aMBIfLA3jLFviMCVq5WYfveW2s73shmDZH9bOxXGwfaKL_3omHlfX6-WP7Pbu-83y623mUaHKXAGFDaQdKUJfk3euRO2AKoASQDnUBBU623pnyZk2N86oEhC0LoOq1Zn4_Jq75fh7mt9tnuLEw3yyybXReYFVrmbq07sUllCYWlczdPkKeY4pMYVmy93G8r5BaA7tNG_tqBfhG4Ph</recordid><startdate>20040401</startdate><enddate>20040401</enddate><creator>González, Patricio</creator><creator>Massardo, Teresa</creator><creator>Coll, Claudia</creator><creator>Humeres, Pamela</creator><creator>Sierralta, Paulina</creator><creator>Jofré, M. Josefina</creator><creator>Yovanovich, Jorge</creator><creator>Aramburu, Ivonne</creator><creator>Brugère, Solange</creator><creator>Chamorro, Hernán</creator><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QP</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20040401</creationdate><title>The predictive value of201Tl rest-redistribution and18F-fluorodeoxyglucose SPECT for wall motion recovery after recent reperfused myocardial infarction</title><author>González, Patricio ; Massardo, Teresa ; Coll, Claudia ; Humeres, Pamela ; Sierralta, Paulina ; Jofré, M. Josefina ; Yovanovich, Jorge ; Aramburu, Ivonne ; Brugère, Solange ; Chamorro, Hernán</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c1313-b404afe7be3e1c9ecbb517b0e6005003b17e061badcbaeb8d28b835010775f393</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2004</creationdate><topic>Angioplasty</topic><topic>Echocardiography</topic><topic>Heart attacks</topic><topic>Myocardial infarction</topic><topic>Recovery</topic><topic>Thrombolysis</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>González, Patricio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Massardo, Teresa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Coll, Claudia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Humeres, Pamela</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sierralta, Paulina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jofré, M. Josefina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yovanovich, Jorge</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Aramburu, Ivonne</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brugère, Solange</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chamorro, Hernán</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Calcium &amp; Calcified Tissue Abstracts</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>Health Medical collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep (ProQuest)</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Research Library</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Journals</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest advanced technologies &amp; aerospace journals</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Annals of nuclear medicine</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>González, Patricio</au><au>Massardo, Teresa</au><au>Coll, Claudia</au><au>Humeres, Pamela</au><au>Sierralta, Paulina</au><au>Jofré, M. Josefina</au><au>Yovanovich, Jorge</au><au>Aramburu, Ivonne</au><au>Brugère, Solange</au><au>Chamorro, Hernán</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The predictive value of201Tl rest-redistribution and18F-fluorodeoxyglucose SPECT for wall motion recovery after recent reperfused myocardial infarction</atitle><jtitle>Annals of nuclear medicine</jtitle><date>2004-04-01</date><risdate>2004</risdate><volume>18</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>97</spage><epage>103</epage><pages>97-103</pages><issn>0914-7187</issn><eissn>1864-6433</eissn><abstract>Sensitivity [Confidence Interval] for^sup 201^Tl R-R was 74.6% [60.5-84.5], for FDG it was 82.1% [70.8-90.4]; specificities were 73% [64.3-80.5] and 54.8% [45.6-63.7], respectively.^sup 18^F-FDG tended to be more sensitive than 201Tl R-R, but the latter was more specific (p &lt; 0.0004). Both^sup 201^T1 R-R and^sup 18^F-FDG presented high negative predictive value (p: ns).Conclusion: In recent MI, SPECT^sup 201^Tl R-R is a valuable and widely available technique for viability detection, with similar sensitivity and significant better specificity than SPECT^sup 18^F-FDG.[PUBLICATION ABSTRACT]</abstract><cop>Tokyo</cop><pub>Springer Nature B.V</pub><doi>10.1007/BF02985099</doi><tpages>7</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0914-7187
ispartof Annals of nuclear medicine, 2004-04, Vol.18 (2), p.97-103
issn 0914-7187
1864-6433
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2787241623
source Springer Nature
subjects Angioplasty
Echocardiography
Heart attacks
Myocardial infarction
Recovery
Thrombolysis
title The predictive value of201Tl rest-redistribution and18F-fluorodeoxyglucose SPECT for wall motion recovery after recent reperfused myocardial infarction
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-02T19%3A00%3A48IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20predictive%20value%20of201Tl%20rest-redistribution%20and18F-fluorodeoxyglucose%20SPECT%20for%20wall%20motion%20recovery%20after%20recent%20reperfused%20myocardial%20infarction&rft.jtitle=Annals%20of%20nuclear%20medicine&rft.au=Gonz%C3%A1lez,%20Patricio&rft.date=2004-04-01&rft.volume=18&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=97&rft.epage=103&rft.pages=97-103&rft.issn=0914-7187&rft.eissn=1864-6433&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/BF02985099&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2787241623%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c1313-b404afe7be3e1c9ecbb517b0e6005003b17e061badcbaeb8d28b835010775f393%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=215048976&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true