Loading…
Roll on that day: A dialectical poetry
Phil O’ Keefe’s Roll on that day is not just poetry, but a dialectical materialist rendition of reality. In this tribute, I refer to his poetry as “rendition,” rather than, interpretation. O’ Keefe renders nature, time, and space not as separate and discrete, but as a complete assemblage of hope and...
Saved in:
Published in: | Human geography 2023-03, Vol.16 (1), p.109-112 |
---|---|
Main Author: | |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c1426-f7e28c22c6d6b00121bda91381c2031a2c4097b42285730528b5a04b5df803603 |
container_end_page | 112 |
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 109 |
container_title | Human geography |
container_volume | 16 |
creator | Chatterjee, Ipsita |
description | Phil O’ Keefe’s Roll on that day is not just poetry, but a dialectical materialist rendition of reality. In this tribute, I refer to his poetry as “rendition,” rather than, interpretation. O’ Keefe renders nature, time, and space not as separate and discrete, but as a complete assemblage of hope and fear; second, he renders resources, labor, and landscape as simultaneously “nature(al)” and produced. “Rendering” as opposed to “interpreting” is O’Keefe’s Marxist poetic justice because “rendition” is reality communicated, expressed, viewed, and revealed in the richness of its relationality. Rendition is poetic and dialectical. Interpretation, on the other hand, involves the treatment of data collected through externalization and segmentation, a prosaic analysis that externalizes nature as an environment to be prodded, tabulated, experimented, and fixed. Inspired by O’ Keefe’s poetry, I trace Marxist concepts of alienation and commodification of nature, arguing that O’Keefe’s poetry provides a dialectical ebb and flow which disrupts teleology and provides a conceptual lens to understand modes of production not as discrete or ahistorical, but instead, as containing seeds of the previous modes of production. This tribute concludes by emphasizing O’Keefe’s contention that development has to be decolonized, that uneven development is the death of dialectical poetry and the victory of analytical prose, that theorists must begin with an honest acceptance that development theory is simultaneously a response to the effects of capital and are conditioned by it. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1177/19427786221102886 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2787274684</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.1177_19427786221102886</sage_id><sourcerecordid>2787274684</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1426-f7e28c22c6d6b00121bda91381c2031a2c4097b42285730528b5a04b5df803603</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kMFKxDAQhoMoWNZ9AG8FwVvXzCTNpN6WRVdhQRAFbyVNU-1StzXpHvr2tlTwIM5lDvN9_8DP2CXwFQDRDWQSibRCBOCotTphESohEkXy7ZRF0z2ZgHO2DGHPx5EKM6KIXT-3TRO3h7j_MH1cmuE2XsdlbRpn-9qaJu5a1_vhgp1Vpglu-bMX7PX-7mXzkOyeto-b9S6xIFElFTnUFtGqUhWcA0JRmgyEBotcgEEreUaFRNQpCZ6iLlLDZZGWleZCcbFgV3Nu59uvowt9vm-P_jC-zJE0IUml5UjBTFnfhuBdlXe-_jR-yIHnUyP5n0ZGZzU7wby739T_hW-BlVwA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2787274684</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Roll on that day: A dialectical poetry</title><source>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</source><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><source>SAGE</source><creator>Chatterjee, Ipsita</creator><creatorcontrib>Chatterjee, Ipsita</creatorcontrib><description>Phil O’ Keefe’s Roll on that day is not just poetry, but a dialectical materialist rendition of reality. In this tribute, I refer to his poetry as “rendition,” rather than, interpretation. O’ Keefe renders nature, time, and space not as separate and discrete, but as a complete assemblage of hope and fear; second, he renders resources, labor, and landscape as simultaneously “nature(al)” and produced. “Rendering” as opposed to “interpreting” is O’Keefe’s Marxist poetic justice because “rendition” is reality communicated, expressed, viewed, and revealed in the richness of its relationality. Rendition is poetic and dialectical. Interpretation, on the other hand, involves the treatment of data collected through externalization and segmentation, a prosaic analysis that externalizes nature as an environment to be prodded, tabulated, experimented, and fixed. Inspired by O’ Keefe’s poetry, I trace Marxist concepts of alienation and commodification of nature, arguing that O’Keefe’s poetry provides a dialectical ebb and flow which disrupts teleology and provides a conceptual lens to understand modes of production not as discrete or ahistorical, but instead, as containing seeds of the previous modes of production. This tribute concludes by emphasizing O’Keefe’s contention that development has to be decolonized, that uneven development is the death of dialectical poetry and the victory of analytical prose, that theorists must begin with an honest acceptance that development theory is simultaneously a response to the effects of capital and are conditioned by it.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1942-7786</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2633-674X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/19427786221102886</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London, England: SAGE Publications</publisher><subject>Alienation ; Commodification ; Dialectics ; Economic development ; Marxist analysis ; Modes of production ; Poetry ; Prose ; Segmentation ; Theorists</subject><ispartof>Human geography, 2023-03, Vol.16 (1), p.109-112</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2022</rights><rights>Copyright Institute for Human Geography Mar 2023</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1426-f7e28c22c6d6b00121bda91381c2031a2c4097b42285730528b5a04b5df803603</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,33223,33774,79364</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Chatterjee, Ipsita</creatorcontrib><title>Roll on that day: A dialectical poetry</title><title>Human geography</title><description>Phil O’ Keefe’s Roll on that day is not just poetry, but a dialectical materialist rendition of reality. In this tribute, I refer to his poetry as “rendition,” rather than, interpretation. O’ Keefe renders nature, time, and space not as separate and discrete, but as a complete assemblage of hope and fear; second, he renders resources, labor, and landscape as simultaneously “nature(al)” and produced. “Rendering” as opposed to “interpreting” is O’Keefe’s Marxist poetic justice because “rendition” is reality communicated, expressed, viewed, and revealed in the richness of its relationality. Rendition is poetic and dialectical. Interpretation, on the other hand, involves the treatment of data collected through externalization and segmentation, a prosaic analysis that externalizes nature as an environment to be prodded, tabulated, experimented, and fixed. Inspired by O’ Keefe’s poetry, I trace Marxist concepts of alienation and commodification of nature, arguing that O’Keefe’s poetry provides a dialectical ebb and flow which disrupts teleology and provides a conceptual lens to understand modes of production not as discrete or ahistorical, but instead, as containing seeds of the previous modes of production. This tribute concludes by emphasizing O’Keefe’s contention that development has to be decolonized, that uneven development is the death of dialectical poetry and the victory of analytical prose, that theorists must begin with an honest acceptance that development theory is simultaneously a response to the effects of capital and are conditioned by it.</description><subject>Alienation</subject><subject>Commodification</subject><subject>Dialectics</subject><subject>Economic development</subject><subject>Marxist analysis</subject><subject>Modes of production</subject><subject>Poetry</subject><subject>Prose</subject><subject>Segmentation</subject><subject>Theorists</subject><issn>1942-7786</issn><issn>2633-674X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8BJ</sourceid><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kMFKxDAQhoMoWNZ9AG8FwVvXzCTNpN6WRVdhQRAFbyVNU-1StzXpHvr2tlTwIM5lDvN9_8DP2CXwFQDRDWQSibRCBOCotTphESohEkXy7ZRF0z2ZgHO2DGHPx5EKM6KIXT-3TRO3h7j_MH1cmuE2XsdlbRpn-9qaJu5a1_vhgp1Vpglu-bMX7PX-7mXzkOyeto-b9S6xIFElFTnUFtGqUhWcA0JRmgyEBotcgEEreUaFRNQpCZ6iLlLDZZGWleZCcbFgV3Nu59uvowt9vm-P_jC-zJE0IUml5UjBTFnfhuBdlXe-_jR-yIHnUyP5n0ZGZzU7wby739T_hW-BlVwA</recordid><startdate>202303</startdate><enddate>202303</enddate><creator>Chatterjee, Ipsita</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><general>Institute for Human Geography</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7U4</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>DWI</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>WZK</scope></search><sort><creationdate>202303</creationdate><title>Roll on that day: A dialectical poetry</title><author>Chatterjee, Ipsita</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c1426-f7e28c22c6d6b00121bda91381c2031a2c4097b42285730528b5a04b5df803603</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Alienation</topic><topic>Commodification</topic><topic>Dialectics</topic><topic>Economic development</topic><topic>Marxist analysis</topic><topic>Modes of production</topic><topic>Poetry</topic><topic>Prose</topic><topic>Segmentation</topic><topic>Theorists</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Chatterjee, Ipsita</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (pre-2017)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (Ovid)</collection><jtitle>Human geography</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Chatterjee, Ipsita</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Roll on that day: A dialectical poetry</atitle><jtitle>Human geography</jtitle><date>2023-03</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>16</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>109</spage><epage>112</epage><pages>109-112</pages><issn>1942-7786</issn><eissn>2633-674X</eissn><abstract>Phil O’ Keefe’s Roll on that day is not just poetry, but a dialectical materialist rendition of reality. In this tribute, I refer to his poetry as “rendition,” rather than, interpretation. O’ Keefe renders nature, time, and space not as separate and discrete, but as a complete assemblage of hope and fear; second, he renders resources, labor, and landscape as simultaneously “nature(al)” and produced. “Rendering” as opposed to “interpreting” is O’Keefe’s Marxist poetic justice because “rendition” is reality communicated, expressed, viewed, and revealed in the richness of its relationality. Rendition is poetic and dialectical. Interpretation, on the other hand, involves the treatment of data collected through externalization and segmentation, a prosaic analysis that externalizes nature as an environment to be prodded, tabulated, experimented, and fixed. Inspired by O’ Keefe’s poetry, I trace Marxist concepts of alienation and commodification of nature, arguing that O’Keefe’s poetry provides a dialectical ebb and flow which disrupts teleology and provides a conceptual lens to understand modes of production not as discrete or ahistorical, but instead, as containing seeds of the previous modes of production. This tribute concludes by emphasizing O’Keefe’s contention that development has to be decolonized, that uneven development is the death of dialectical poetry and the victory of analytical prose, that theorists must begin with an honest acceptance that development theory is simultaneously a response to the effects of capital and are conditioned by it.</abstract><cop>London, England</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><doi>10.1177/19427786221102886</doi><tpages>4</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1942-7786 |
ispartof | Human geography, 2023-03, Vol.16 (1), p.109-112 |
issn | 1942-7786 2633-674X |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2787274684 |
source | International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS); Sociological Abstracts; SAGE |
subjects | Alienation Commodification Dialectics Economic development Marxist analysis Modes of production Poetry Prose Segmentation Theorists |
title | Roll on that day: A dialectical poetry |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-26T11%3A28%3A38IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Roll%20on%20that%20day:%20A%20dialectical%20poetry&rft.jtitle=Human%20geography&rft.au=Chatterjee,%20Ipsita&rft.date=2023-03&rft.volume=16&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=109&rft.epage=112&rft.pages=109-112&rft.issn=1942-7786&rft.eissn=2633-674X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/19427786221102886&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2787274684%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c1426-f7e28c22c6d6b00121bda91381c2031a2c4097b42285730528b5a04b5df803603%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2787274684&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_sage_id=10.1177_19427786221102886&rfr_iscdi=true |