Loading…

Roll on that day: A dialectical poetry

Phil O’ Keefe’s Roll on that day is not just poetry, but a dialectical materialist rendition of reality. In this tribute, I refer to his poetry as “rendition,” rather than, interpretation. O’ Keefe renders nature, time, and space not as separate and discrete, but as a complete assemblage of hope and...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Human geography 2023-03, Vol.16 (1), p.109-112
Main Author: Chatterjee, Ipsita
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c1426-f7e28c22c6d6b00121bda91381c2031a2c4097b42285730528b5a04b5df803603
container_end_page 112
container_issue 1
container_start_page 109
container_title Human geography
container_volume 16
creator Chatterjee, Ipsita
description Phil O’ Keefe’s Roll on that day is not just poetry, but a dialectical materialist rendition of reality. In this tribute, I refer to his poetry as “rendition,” rather than, interpretation. O’ Keefe renders nature, time, and space not as separate and discrete, but as a complete assemblage of hope and fear; second, he renders resources, labor, and landscape as simultaneously “nature(al)” and produced. “Rendering” as opposed to “interpreting” is O’Keefe’s Marxist poetic justice because “rendition” is reality communicated, expressed, viewed, and revealed in the richness of its relationality. Rendition is poetic and dialectical. Interpretation, on the other hand, involves the treatment of data collected through externalization and segmentation, a prosaic analysis that externalizes nature as an environment to be prodded, tabulated, experimented, and fixed. Inspired by O’ Keefe’s poetry, I trace Marxist concepts of alienation and commodification of nature, arguing that O’Keefe’s poetry provides a dialectical ebb and flow which disrupts teleology and provides a conceptual lens to understand modes of production not as discrete or ahistorical, but instead, as containing seeds of the previous modes of production. This tribute concludes by emphasizing O’Keefe’s contention that development has to be decolonized, that uneven development is the death of dialectical poetry and the victory of analytical prose, that theorists must begin with an honest acceptance that development theory is simultaneously a response to the effects of capital and are conditioned by it.
doi_str_mv 10.1177/19427786221102886
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2787274684</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.1177_19427786221102886</sage_id><sourcerecordid>2787274684</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1426-f7e28c22c6d6b00121bda91381c2031a2c4097b42285730528b5a04b5df803603</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kMFKxDAQhoMoWNZ9AG8FwVvXzCTNpN6WRVdhQRAFbyVNU-1StzXpHvr2tlTwIM5lDvN9_8DP2CXwFQDRDWQSibRCBOCotTphESohEkXy7ZRF0z2ZgHO2DGHPx5EKM6KIXT-3TRO3h7j_MH1cmuE2XsdlbRpn-9qaJu5a1_vhgp1Vpglu-bMX7PX-7mXzkOyeto-b9S6xIFElFTnUFtGqUhWcA0JRmgyEBotcgEEreUaFRNQpCZ6iLlLDZZGWleZCcbFgV3Nu59uvowt9vm-P_jC-zJE0IUml5UjBTFnfhuBdlXe-_jR-yIHnUyP5n0ZGZzU7wby739T_hW-BlVwA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2787274684</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Roll on that day: A dialectical poetry</title><source>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</source><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><source>SAGE</source><creator>Chatterjee, Ipsita</creator><creatorcontrib>Chatterjee, Ipsita</creatorcontrib><description>Phil O’ Keefe’s Roll on that day is not just poetry, but a dialectical materialist rendition of reality. In this tribute, I refer to his poetry as “rendition,” rather than, interpretation. O’ Keefe renders nature, time, and space not as separate and discrete, but as a complete assemblage of hope and fear; second, he renders resources, labor, and landscape as simultaneously “nature(al)” and produced. “Rendering” as opposed to “interpreting” is O’Keefe’s Marxist poetic justice because “rendition” is reality communicated, expressed, viewed, and revealed in the richness of its relationality. Rendition is poetic and dialectical. Interpretation, on the other hand, involves the treatment of data collected through externalization and segmentation, a prosaic analysis that externalizes nature as an environment to be prodded, tabulated, experimented, and fixed. Inspired by O’ Keefe’s poetry, I trace Marxist concepts of alienation and commodification of nature, arguing that O’Keefe’s poetry provides a dialectical ebb and flow which disrupts teleology and provides a conceptual lens to understand modes of production not as discrete or ahistorical, but instead, as containing seeds of the previous modes of production. This tribute concludes by emphasizing O’Keefe’s contention that development has to be decolonized, that uneven development is the death of dialectical poetry and the victory of analytical prose, that theorists must begin with an honest acceptance that development theory is simultaneously a response to the effects of capital and are conditioned by it.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1942-7786</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2633-674X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/19427786221102886</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London, England: SAGE Publications</publisher><subject>Alienation ; Commodification ; Dialectics ; Economic development ; Marxist analysis ; Modes of production ; Poetry ; Prose ; Segmentation ; Theorists</subject><ispartof>Human geography, 2023-03, Vol.16 (1), p.109-112</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2022</rights><rights>Copyright Institute for Human Geography Mar 2023</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1426-f7e28c22c6d6b00121bda91381c2031a2c4097b42285730528b5a04b5df803603</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,33223,33774,79364</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Chatterjee, Ipsita</creatorcontrib><title>Roll on that day: A dialectical poetry</title><title>Human geography</title><description>Phil O’ Keefe’s Roll on that day is not just poetry, but a dialectical materialist rendition of reality. In this tribute, I refer to his poetry as “rendition,” rather than, interpretation. O’ Keefe renders nature, time, and space not as separate and discrete, but as a complete assemblage of hope and fear; second, he renders resources, labor, and landscape as simultaneously “nature(al)” and produced. “Rendering” as opposed to “interpreting” is O’Keefe’s Marxist poetic justice because “rendition” is reality communicated, expressed, viewed, and revealed in the richness of its relationality. Rendition is poetic and dialectical. Interpretation, on the other hand, involves the treatment of data collected through externalization and segmentation, a prosaic analysis that externalizes nature as an environment to be prodded, tabulated, experimented, and fixed. Inspired by O’ Keefe’s poetry, I trace Marxist concepts of alienation and commodification of nature, arguing that O’Keefe’s poetry provides a dialectical ebb and flow which disrupts teleology and provides a conceptual lens to understand modes of production not as discrete or ahistorical, but instead, as containing seeds of the previous modes of production. This tribute concludes by emphasizing O’Keefe’s contention that development has to be decolonized, that uneven development is the death of dialectical poetry and the victory of analytical prose, that theorists must begin with an honest acceptance that development theory is simultaneously a response to the effects of capital and are conditioned by it.</description><subject>Alienation</subject><subject>Commodification</subject><subject>Dialectics</subject><subject>Economic development</subject><subject>Marxist analysis</subject><subject>Modes of production</subject><subject>Poetry</subject><subject>Prose</subject><subject>Segmentation</subject><subject>Theorists</subject><issn>1942-7786</issn><issn>2633-674X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8BJ</sourceid><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kMFKxDAQhoMoWNZ9AG8FwVvXzCTNpN6WRVdhQRAFbyVNU-1StzXpHvr2tlTwIM5lDvN9_8DP2CXwFQDRDWQSibRCBOCotTphESohEkXy7ZRF0z2ZgHO2DGHPx5EKM6KIXT-3TRO3h7j_MH1cmuE2XsdlbRpn-9qaJu5a1_vhgp1Vpglu-bMX7PX-7mXzkOyeto-b9S6xIFElFTnUFtGqUhWcA0JRmgyEBotcgEEreUaFRNQpCZ6iLlLDZZGWleZCcbFgV3Nu59uvowt9vm-P_jC-zJE0IUml5UjBTFnfhuBdlXe-_jR-yIHnUyP5n0ZGZzU7wby739T_hW-BlVwA</recordid><startdate>202303</startdate><enddate>202303</enddate><creator>Chatterjee, Ipsita</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><general>Institute for Human Geography</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7U4</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>DWI</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>WZK</scope></search><sort><creationdate>202303</creationdate><title>Roll on that day: A dialectical poetry</title><author>Chatterjee, Ipsita</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c1426-f7e28c22c6d6b00121bda91381c2031a2c4097b42285730528b5a04b5df803603</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Alienation</topic><topic>Commodification</topic><topic>Dialectics</topic><topic>Economic development</topic><topic>Marxist analysis</topic><topic>Modes of production</topic><topic>Poetry</topic><topic>Prose</topic><topic>Segmentation</topic><topic>Theorists</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Chatterjee, Ipsita</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (pre-2017)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (Ovid)</collection><jtitle>Human geography</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Chatterjee, Ipsita</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Roll on that day: A dialectical poetry</atitle><jtitle>Human geography</jtitle><date>2023-03</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>16</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>109</spage><epage>112</epage><pages>109-112</pages><issn>1942-7786</issn><eissn>2633-674X</eissn><abstract>Phil O’ Keefe’s Roll on that day is not just poetry, but a dialectical materialist rendition of reality. In this tribute, I refer to his poetry as “rendition,” rather than, interpretation. O’ Keefe renders nature, time, and space not as separate and discrete, but as a complete assemblage of hope and fear; second, he renders resources, labor, and landscape as simultaneously “nature(al)” and produced. “Rendering” as opposed to “interpreting” is O’Keefe’s Marxist poetic justice because “rendition” is reality communicated, expressed, viewed, and revealed in the richness of its relationality. Rendition is poetic and dialectical. Interpretation, on the other hand, involves the treatment of data collected through externalization and segmentation, a prosaic analysis that externalizes nature as an environment to be prodded, tabulated, experimented, and fixed. Inspired by O’ Keefe’s poetry, I trace Marxist concepts of alienation and commodification of nature, arguing that O’Keefe’s poetry provides a dialectical ebb and flow which disrupts teleology and provides a conceptual lens to understand modes of production not as discrete or ahistorical, but instead, as containing seeds of the previous modes of production. This tribute concludes by emphasizing O’Keefe’s contention that development has to be decolonized, that uneven development is the death of dialectical poetry and the victory of analytical prose, that theorists must begin with an honest acceptance that development theory is simultaneously a response to the effects of capital and are conditioned by it.</abstract><cop>London, England</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><doi>10.1177/19427786221102886</doi><tpages>4</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1942-7786
ispartof Human geography, 2023-03, Vol.16 (1), p.109-112
issn 1942-7786
2633-674X
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2787274684
source International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS); Sociological Abstracts; SAGE
subjects Alienation
Commodification
Dialectics
Economic development
Marxist analysis
Modes of production
Poetry
Prose
Segmentation
Theorists
title Roll on that day: A dialectical poetry
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-26T11%3A28%3A38IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Roll%20on%20that%20day:%20A%20dialectical%20poetry&rft.jtitle=Human%20geography&rft.au=Chatterjee,%20Ipsita&rft.date=2023-03&rft.volume=16&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=109&rft.epage=112&rft.pages=109-112&rft.issn=1942-7786&rft.eissn=2633-674X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/19427786221102886&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2787274684%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c1426-f7e28c22c6d6b00121bda91381c2031a2c4097b42285730528b5a04b5df803603%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2787274684&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_sage_id=10.1177_19427786221102886&rfr_iscdi=true