Loading…

Biopolitics in the ‘Psychic Realm’: Han, Foucault and neoliberal psychopolitics

This article explores German Korean philosopher Byung-Chul Han’s notion of psychopolitics and his concept of the neoliberal subject. For Han, mental processes are now the primary target of power. This means that, according to Han, biopower must give way to what he calls psychopower since perspective...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Philosophy & social criticism 2023-05, Vol.49 (4), p.477-491
Main Authors: Alphin, Caroline, Debrix, François
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c312t-113b7e04580857cdd2468d3a2a70df3c40184c00e004d4d794685054127e46873
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c312t-113b7e04580857cdd2468d3a2a70df3c40184c00e004d4d794685054127e46873
container_end_page 491
container_issue 4
container_start_page 477
container_title Philosophy & social criticism
container_volume 49
creator Alphin, Caroline
Debrix, François
description This article explores German Korean philosopher Byung-Chul Han’s notion of psychopolitics and his concept of the neoliberal subject. For Han, mental processes are now the primary target of power. This means that, according to Han, biopower must give way to what he calls psychopower since perspectives that critically seek to understand neoliberalism through a biopolitical lens are no longer adequate to contemporary regimes of neoliberal achievement. This article examines and evaluates Han’s argument that Foucauldian biopolitics is obsolete in today’s neoliberal age because of biopolitics’ primary focus on the body over mental processes. We suggest that, instead of emphasizing the need to move beyond biopolitics, Han’s theorization of psychopolitics could benefit from paying closer attention to some of Foucault’s insights on biopower and from identifying key connections between biopolitics and psychopolitics. By highlighting some important continuities between Foucault’s biopolitics and Han’s psychopolitics (instead of emphasizing the discontinuities between both theorists’ perspectives, as Han tends to privilege), this article seeks to move towards improved theorizations of concepts like achievement, subjectivity, otherness or optimization, concepts that are key to Han’s understanding of contemporary neoliberal practices.
doi_str_mv 10.1177/01914537211033011
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2788111910</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.1177_01914537211033011</sage_id><sourcerecordid>2788111910</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c312t-113b7e04580857cdd2468d3a2a70df3c40184c00e004d4d794685054127e46873</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kE1OwzAQhS0EEqVwAHaW2JIyEztxwg4qSpEqgfiR2EWu7dJUaRLsZNFdjwHX60lwFAQLxGpGet97o3mEnCKMEIW4AEyRR0yEiMAYIO6RAfIYA8H46z4ZdHrQAYfkyLkVAERpLAbk6Tqv6qrIm1w5mpe0WRq62348uI1a5oo-Glmsd9vPSzqV5TmdVK2SbdFQWWpaGu-bGysLWnf4T84xOVjIwpmT7zkkL5Ob5_E0mN3f3o2vZoFiGDYBIpsLAzxKIImE0jrkcaKZDKUAvWCKAyZcARgArrkWqZcjiDiGwvhVsCE563NrW723xjXZqmpt6U9moUgSRP8zeAp7StnKOWsWWW3ztbSbDCHrusv-dOc9o97j5Jv5Tf3f8AXec23Y</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2788111910</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Biopolitics in the ‘Psychic Realm’: Han, Foucault and neoliberal psychopolitics</title><source>SAGE:Jisc Collections:SAGE Journals Read and Publish 2023-2024:2025 extension (reading list)</source><source>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</source><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><creator>Alphin, Caroline ; Debrix, François</creator><creatorcontrib>Alphin, Caroline ; Debrix, François</creatorcontrib><description>This article explores German Korean philosopher Byung-Chul Han’s notion of psychopolitics and his concept of the neoliberal subject. For Han, mental processes are now the primary target of power. This means that, according to Han, biopower must give way to what he calls psychopower since perspectives that critically seek to understand neoliberalism through a biopolitical lens are no longer adequate to contemporary regimes of neoliberal achievement. This article examines and evaluates Han’s argument that Foucauldian biopolitics is obsolete in today’s neoliberal age because of biopolitics’ primary focus on the body over mental processes. We suggest that, instead of emphasizing the need to move beyond biopolitics, Han’s theorization of psychopolitics could benefit from paying closer attention to some of Foucault’s insights on biopower and from identifying key connections between biopolitics and psychopolitics. By highlighting some important continuities between Foucault’s biopolitics and Han’s psychopolitics (instead of emphasizing the discontinuities between both theorists’ perspectives, as Han tends to privilege), this article seeks to move towards improved theorizations of concepts like achievement, subjectivity, otherness or optimization, concepts that are key to Han’s understanding of contemporary neoliberal practices.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0191-4537</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1461-734X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/01914537211033011</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London, England: SAGE Publications</publisher><subject>Biopolitics ; Liberalism ; Neoliberalism ; Otherness ; Subjectivity</subject><ispartof>Philosophy &amp; social criticism, 2023-05, Vol.49 (4), p.477-491</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2021</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c312t-113b7e04580857cdd2468d3a2a70df3c40184c00e004d4d794685054127e46873</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c312t-113b7e04580857cdd2468d3a2a70df3c40184c00e004d4d794685054127e46873</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-4932-3364</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902,33751</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Alphin, Caroline</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Debrix, François</creatorcontrib><title>Biopolitics in the ‘Psychic Realm’: Han, Foucault and neoliberal psychopolitics</title><title>Philosophy &amp; social criticism</title><description>This article explores German Korean philosopher Byung-Chul Han’s notion of psychopolitics and his concept of the neoliberal subject. For Han, mental processes are now the primary target of power. This means that, according to Han, biopower must give way to what he calls psychopower since perspectives that critically seek to understand neoliberalism through a biopolitical lens are no longer adequate to contemporary regimes of neoliberal achievement. This article examines and evaluates Han’s argument that Foucauldian biopolitics is obsolete in today’s neoliberal age because of biopolitics’ primary focus on the body over mental processes. We suggest that, instead of emphasizing the need to move beyond biopolitics, Han’s theorization of psychopolitics could benefit from paying closer attention to some of Foucault’s insights on biopower and from identifying key connections between biopolitics and psychopolitics. By highlighting some important continuities between Foucault’s biopolitics and Han’s psychopolitics (instead of emphasizing the discontinuities between both theorists’ perspectives, as Han tends to privilege), this article seeks to move towards improved theorizations of concepts like achievement, subjectivity, otherness or optimization, concepts that are key to Han’s understanding of contemporary neoliberal practices.</description><subject>Biopolitics</subject><subject>Liberalism</subject><subject>Neoliberalism</subject><subject>Otherness</subject><subject>Subjectivity</subject><issn>0191-4537</issn><issn>1461-734X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7UB</sourceid><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kE1OwzAQhS0EEqVwAHaW2JIyEztxwg4qSpEqgfiR2EWu7dJUaRLsZNFdjwHX60lwFAQLxGpGet97o3mEnCKMEIW4AEyRR0yEiMAYIO6RAfIYA8H46z4ZdHrQAYfkyLkVAERpLAbk6Tqv6qrIm1w5mpe0WRq62348uI1a5oo-Glmsd9vPSzqV5TmdVK2SbdFQWWpaGu-bGysLWnf4T84xOVjIwpmT7zkkL5Ob5_E0mN3f3o2vZoFiGDYBIpsLAzxKIImE0jrkcaKZDKUAvWCKAyZcARgArrkWqZcjiDiGwvhVsCE563NrW723xjXZqmpt6U9moUgSRP8zeAp7StnKOWsWWW3ztbSbDCHrusv-dOc9o97j5Jv5Tf3f8AXec23Y</recordid><startdate>202305</startdate><enddate>202305</enddate><creator>Alphin, Caroline</creator><creator>Debrix, François</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><general>Sage Publications Ltd</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7U4</scope><scope>7UB</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>DWI</scope><scope>WZK</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4932-3364</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202305</creationdate><title>Biopolitics in the ‘Psychic Realm’: Han, Foucault and neoliberal psychopolitics</title><author>Alphin, Caroline ; Debrix, François</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c312t-113b7e04580857cdd2468d3a2a70df3c40184c00e004d4d794685054127e46873</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Biopolitics</topic><topic>Liberalism</topic><topic>Neoliberalism</topic><topic>Otherness</topic><topic>Subjectivity</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Alphin, Caroline</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Debrix, François</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (pre-2017)</collection><collection>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (Ovid)</collection><jtitle>Philosophy &amp; social criticism</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Alphin, Caroline</au><au>Debrix, François</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Biopolitics in the ‘Psychic Realm’: Han, Foucault and neoliberal psychopolitics</atitle><jtitle>Philosophy &amp; social criticism</jtitle><date>2023-05</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>49</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>477</spage><epage>491</epage><pages>477-491</pages><issn>0191-4537</issn><eissn>1461-734X</eissn><abstract>This article explores German Korean philosopher Byung-Chul Han’s notion of psychopolitics and his concept of the neoliberal subject. For Han, mental processes are now the primary target of power. This means that, according to Han, biopower must give way to what he calls psychopower since perspectives that critically seek to understand neoliberalism through a biopolitical lens are no longer adequate to contemporary regimes of neoliberal achievement. This article examines and evaluates Han’s argument that Foucauldian biopolitics is obsolete in today’s neoliberal age because of biopolitics’ primary focus on the body over mental processes. We suggest that, instead of emphasizing the need to move beyond biopolitics, Han’s theorization of psychopolitics could benefit from paying closer attention to some of Foucault’s insights on biopower and from identifying key connections between biopolitics and psychopolitics. By highlighting some important continuities between Foucault’s biopolitics and Han’s psychopolitics (instead of emphasizing the discontinuities between both theorists’ perspectives, as Han tends to privilege), this article seeks to move towards improved theorizations of concepts like achievement, subjectivity, otherness or optimization, concepts that are key to Han’s understanding of contemporary neoliberal practices.</abstract><cop>London, England</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><doi>10.1177/01914537211033011</doi><tpages>15</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4932-3364</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0191-4537
ispartof Philosophy & social criticism, 2023-05, Vol.49 (4), p.477-491
issn 0191-4537
1461-734X
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2788111910
source SAGE:Jisc Collections:SAGE Journals Read and Publish 2023-2024:2025 extension (reading list); Worldwide Political Science Abstracts; Sociological Abstracts
subjects Biopolitics
Liberalism
Neoliberalism
Otherness
Subjectivity
title Biopolitics in the ‘Psychic Realm’: Han, Foucault and neoliberal psychopolitics
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-06T15%3A37%3A20IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Biopolitics%20in%20the%20%E2%80%98Psychic%20Realm%E2%80%99:%20Han,%20Foucault%20and%20neoliberal%20psychopolitics&rft.jtitle=Philosophy%20&%20social%20criticism&rft.au=Alphin,%20Caroline&rft.date=2023-05&rft.volume=49&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=477&rft.epage=491&rft.pages=477-491&rft.issn=0191-4537&rft.eissn=1461-734X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/01914537211033011&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2788111910%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c312t-113b7e04580857cdd2468d3a2a70df3c40184c00e004d4d794685054127e46873%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2788111910&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_sage_id=10.1177_01914537211033011&rfr_iscdi=true