A back‐arc transtensional origin for the Nanpanjiang basin in the pre‐Norian Triassic, with implications for the broader intracontinental development of South China

• Published in: Basin research 2023-04, Vol.35 (2), p.551-571
• Main Authors: Duan, Liang, Christie‐Blick, Nicholas, Meng, Qing‐Ren, Wu, Guo‐Li, Yang, Zhao, Wang, Bin
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Basins; Crustal shortening; Decoupling; Deformation; Fault lines; Geological faults; intracontinental tectonics; Magma; Outcrops; Palaeomagnetism; Paleomagnetism; Permian; Radiometric dating; South China; stratigraphic architecture; Stratigraphy; tectonic subsidence; Tectonics; Triassic; Triassic Nanpanjiang basin; Turbidites; Volcanic activity; Volcanism; Zircon
• ISSN: 0950-091X; 1365-2117
• DOI: 10.1111/bre.12722

The generally accepted foreland interpretation of the Nanpanjiang basin has been regarded as providing support for the hypothesized Indosinian collision between the South China and Indochina blocks, and it has led to the long‐standing view that crustal shortening dominated the Triassic intracontinental development of South China. Here, we examine the stratigraphic architecture, magmatism and gross structural features of the Nanpanjiang basin. Outcrop studies indicate that a north‐stepping axial turbidite system was confined by intrabasinal faults, the active development of which is indicated by mass‐transport complexes. Field mapping combined with U–Pb dating of baddeleyite and zircon reveals that magmatism in the southern part of the basin coincides with a distinct episode of bimodal volcanism from ca. 244 to 242 Ma, and is unrelated to the middle Permian Emeishan plume. Differences in tectonic subsidence between hanging‐wall and footwall blocks, as that has been quantified by the backstripping of composite sections, show that synsedimentary dip slip along intrabasinal faults was of normal sense. Meanwhile, a role for strike‐slip deformation is registered by the left‐lateral offset of middle Permian and Middle Triassic piercing points and the exceptional preservation in outcrop of syndepositional negative flower structures. For these reasons, therefore, the pre‐Norian Triassic Nanpanjiang basin is thought to represent a transtensional back‐arc setting, a result that leads to an unresolved paradox: in adjacent parts of South China to the east, coeval development involves crustal thickening, nonmarine sedimentation and granitic plutonism. A new lateral decoupling model consistent with palaeomagnetic evidence for large‐scale block rotation is tentatively proposed here as a working hypothesis to explain the observed intracontinental evolution of South China during the Triassic assembly of eastern Asia. We propose that such decoupling may relate in part to the configuration of inherited crustal weaknesses. A field‐based basin analysis reveals that the pre‐Norian Triassic Nanpanjiang basin developed a transtensional back‐arc setting, a result that contrasts with evidence for transpressional development in adjacent parts of South China to the east. Lateral decoupling of composite continent along inherited weak zone is tentatively proposed to explain observed differential development.