The Contested Adriatic Sea: The Adriatic Guard and Identity Politics in Interwar Yugoslavia1

Throughout history, Mediterranean cultures have tried to appropriate, with words or weapons, the sea that surrounds them. Sometimes called the “Inner Sea,” “Superior Sea,” or “Great Sea,” the Mediterranean was designated by the Greeks—as the Odyssey testifies—as theirs, “Our Sea.” In the 1920s, Muss...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Austrian history yearbook 2011-04, Vol.42, p.33-51
Main Author: Tchoukarine, Igor
Format: Article
Language:eng ; ger
Subjects:
Associations
Consciousness
Identity politics
Ideology
Interwar period
National identity
Political parties
Scholarly publishing
Tourism
World War I
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Throughout history, Mediterranean cultures have tried to appropriate, with words or weapons, the sea that surrounds them. Sometimes called the “Inner Sea,” “Superior Sea,” or “Great Sea,” the Mediterranean was designated by the Greeks—as the Odyssey testifies—as theirs, “Our Sea.” In the 1920s, Mussolini revived the Latin mare nostrum to justify the “Italian-ness” of the Mediterranean (and, by extension, of the Adriatic Sea and its immediate eastern coastline, Dalmatia), an act that marked a new step in a long-term process that placed the Mediterranean and Adriatic seas at the core of national identity politics. Yugoslav ascriptions of the adjective “Yugoslav,” or even “Slavic,” to the Adriatic Sea during the interwar period proceeded from the same desire: to appropriate a space in order to articulate a national discourse.
ISSN:0067-2378
1558-5255
DOI:10.1017/S0067237811000038