Loading…

Biases and information gaps in the study of habitat connectivity in the Carnivora in the Americas

Habitat connectivity is essential to mitigate the effects of fragmentation by maintaining ecological processes, exchange of individuals, and gene flow among isolated populations. In the last two decades, the importance of habitat connectivity has been highlighted and the number of studies that addre...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Mammal review 2023-04, Vol.53 (2), p.99-115
Main Authors: Balbuena‐Serrano, Ángel, Zarco‐González, Martha Mariela, Monroy‐Vilchis, Octavio
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c1722-6019d16ec9ca956df6bece12b457586ee319a9734fc70ea17c6ca888afa9adc73
container_end_page 115
container_issue 2
container_start_page 99
container_title Mammal review
container_volume 53
creator Balbuena‐Serrano, Ángel
Zarco‐González, Martha Mariela
Monroy‐Vilchis, Octavio
description Habitat connectivity is essential to mitigate the effects of fragmentation by maintaining ecological processes, exchange of individuals, and gene flow among isolated populations. In the last two decades, the importance of habitat connectivity has been highlighted and the number of studies that address this issue has increased. We review and describe the habitat‐connectivity studies for the Carnivora in the Americas to identify taxonomic, geographic, and methodological biases, and we examine the number of publications on habitat connectivity and their relationship with country‐level parameters. We reviewed habitat‐connectivity studies published between 2000 and 2020. We quantified studies by region, country, family, and species. We identified information gaps and analysed each country based on the proportion of land modified by humans, species richness, percentage of carnivoran species that are at risk of extinction, and the percentage of territory that is within Protected Areas. G‐tests were performed to verify if the number of published connectivity studies differed based on these variables. There is an increasing trend in the number of studies; however, this increasing is not proportional among countries, among families, or among carnivoran species. We identified that there is a regional bias, since more than 75% of the studies were carried out in North America, in addition, taxonomic bias indicates that the studies focused on large carnivorans. Regarding the methodological bias, the least‐cost path was the most used approach. There are fewer studies on habitat connectivity in countries with higher fragmentation rates, higher percentages of species that are at risk of extinction and less percentage of land in Protected Areas. The capability of countries to invest in research, the study focused on large charismatic species and the difficulty to obtaining dispersion data are factors that have influenced in the study of habitat connectivity. Resumen en Español La conectividad del hábitat es esencial para mitigar los efectos de la fragmentación al mantener los procesos ecológicos, el intercambio de individuos y el flujo de genes entre poblaciones aisladas. En las últimas dos décadas se ha destacado la importancia de la conectividad del hábitat y se ha incrementado el número de estudios que abordan este tema. Revisamos y describimos los estudios de conectividad de hábitat del orden Carnívora en América, para identificar sesgos taxonómicos, geográficos y metod
doi_str_mv 10.1111/mam.12312
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2789863121</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2789863121</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1722-6019d16ec9ca956df6bece12b457586ee319a9734fc70ea17c6ca888afa9adc73</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kE1LAzEQhoMoWKsH_0HAk4etSbabj2MtfkGLFz2HaTZrU7qbmqSV_fdG1x6dy8DL887Ag9A1JROa566FdkJZSdkJGtGSVwVTRJyiESlJVVBZynN0EeOGEMLElI0Q3DuINmLoauy6xocWkvMd_oBdzAFOa4tj2tc99g1ew8olSNj4rrMmuYNL_RGaQ-jcwQc4BrPWBmcgXqKzBrbRXv3tMXp_fHibPxeL16eX-WxRGCoYKzihqqbcGmVAVbxu-MoaS9lqWolKcmtLqkCJctoYQSxQYbgBKSU0oKA2ohyjm-HuLvjPvY1Jb_w-dPmlZkIqybMUmqnbgTLBxxhso3fBtRB6TYn-MaizQf1rMLN3A_vltrb_H9TL2XJofAPzOHLX</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2789863121</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Biases and information gaps in the study of habitat connectivity in the Carnivora in the Americas</title><source>Wiley-Blackwell Read &amp; Publish Collection</source><creator>Balbuena‐Serrano, Ángel ; Zarco‐González, Martha Mariela ; Monroy‐Vilchis, Octavio</creator><creatorcontrib>Balbuena‐Serrano, Ángel ; Zarco‐González, Martha Mariela ; Monroy‐Vilchis, Octavio</creatorcontrib><description>Habitat connectivity is essential to mitigate the effects of fragmentation by maintaining ecological processes, exchange of individuals, and gene flow among isolated populations. In the last two decades, the importance of habitat connectivity has been highlighted and the number of studies that address this issue has increased. We review and describe the habitat‐connectivity studies for the Carnivora in the Americas to identify taxonomic, geographic, and methodological biases, and we examine the number of publications on habitat connectivity and their relationship with country‐level parameters. We reviewed habitat‐connectivity studies published between 2000 and 2020. We quantified studies by region, country, family, and species. We identified information gaps and analysed each country based on the proportion of land modified by humans, species richness, percentage of carnivoran species that are at risk of extinction, and the percentage of territory that is within Protected Areas. G‐tests were performed to verify if the number of published connectivity studies differed based on these variables. There is an increasing trend in the number of studies; however, this increasing is not proportional among countries, among families, or among carnivoran species. We identified that there is a regional bias, since more than 75% of the studies were carried out in North America, in addition, taxonomic bias indicates that the studies focused on large carnivorans. Regarding the methodological bias, the least‐cost path was the most used approach. There are fewer studies on habitat connectivity in countries with higher fragmentation rates, higher percentages of species that are at risk of extinction and less percentage of land in Protected Areas. The capability of countries to invest in research, the study focused on large charismatic species and the difficulty to obtaining dispersion data are factors that have influenced in the study of habitat connectivity. Resumen en Español La conectividad del hábitat es esencial para mitigar los efectos de la fragmentación al mantener los procesos ecológicos, el intercambio de individuos y el flujo de genes entre poblaciones aisladas. En las últimas dos décadas se ha destacado la importancia de la conectividad del hábitat y se ha incrementado el número de estudios que abordan este tema. Revisamos y describimos los estudios de conectividad de hábitat del orden Carnívora en América, para identificar sesgos taxonómicos, geográficos y metodológicos, y examinamos el número de publicaciones sobre conectividad de hábitat y su relación con parámetros a nivel de país. Revisamos los estudios de conectividad del hábitat publicados entre 2000 y 2020. Cuantificamos los estudios por región, país, familia y especie. Identificamos los vacíos de información y analizamos a cada país en función de la proporción de territorio modificado por humanos, la riqueza de especies, el porcentaje de especies de mamíferos carnívoros que están en riesgo de extinción y el porcentaje de territorio que se encuentra dentro de las Áreas Protegidas. Se realizaron pruebas G para verificar si el número de estudios de conectividad publicados difería en función de estas variables. Hay una tendencia creciente en el número de estudios; sin embargo, este aumento no es proporcional entre países, entre familias o entre especies de mamíferos carnívoros. Identificamos que existe un sesgo regional, ya que más del 75% de los estudios se realizaron en Norteamérica, además, el sesgo taxonómico indica que los estudios se enfocaron en los grandes carnívoros. En cuanto al sesgo metodológico, la ruta de menor costo fue el enfoque más utilizado. Hay menor cantidad de estudios sobre conectividad de hábitat en países con mayores tasas de fragmentación, mayor porcentajes de especies en riesgo de extinción y menor porcentaje de territorio en Áreas Protegidas. La capacidad de los países para invertir en investigación, el estudio centrado en especies carismáticas de gran tamaño y la dificultad para obtener datos de dispersión son factores que han influido en el estudio de la conectividad del hábitat. We reviewed studies on habitat connectivity published between 2000 and 2020, and quantified them by region, country, family, and species. We analysed the proportion of land that is modified by humans, species richness, the percentage of carnivoran species that is at risk of extinction (Near Threatened, Vulnerable, Endangered, or Critically Endangered), and the percentage of land in Protected Areas in each country. There is an increasing trend in the number of studies in the last two decades; however, it is not proportional among countries, families, or among carnivorans species. There is a regional bias, as approximately 70% of the studies were conducted in North America, in addition, taxonomic bias was observed as the studies are focused primarily on jaguar Panthera onca, puma Puma concolor, and black bear Ursus americanus. Regarding the methodological bias, the least‐cost path has been the most used approach. There are fewer studies on habitat connectivity in countries with higher fragmentation rates, higher percentages of threatened species and less land in Protected Areas.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0305-1838</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1365-2907</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/mam.12312</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Americas ; América ; Bias ; Carnivora ; corredores ; dispersal corridors ; Dispersion ; Ecological effects ; Endangered &amp; extinct species ; fragmentación de hábitat ; Fragmentation ; Gene flow ; habitat fragmentation ; Habitats ; mammals ; mamíferos ; Protected Areas ; riqueza de especies ; Species extinction ; Species richness ; Taxonomy ; Áreas Protegidas</subject><ispartof>Mammal review, 2023-04, Vol.53 (2), p.99-115</ispartof><rights>2023 Mammal Society and John Wiley &amp; Sons Ltd.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2023 The Mammal Society and John Wiley &amp; Sons Ltd.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1722-6019d16ec9ca956df6bece12b457586ee319a9734fc70ea17c6ca888afa9adc73</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-4217-8272</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Balbuena‐Serrano, Ángel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zarco‐González, Martha Mariela</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Monroy‐Vilchis, Octavio</creatorcontrib><title>Biases and information gaps in the study of habitat connectivity in the Carnivora in the Americas</title><title>Mammal review</title><description>Habitat connectivity is essential to mitigate the effects of fragmentation by maintaining ecological processes, exchange of individuals, and gene flow among isolated populations. In the last two decades, the importance of habitat connectivity has been highlighted and the number of studies that address this issue has increased. We review and describe the habitat‐connectivity studies for the Carnivora in the Americas to identify taxonomic, geographic, and methodological biases, and we examine the number of publications on habitat connectivity and their relationship with country‐level parameters. We reviewed habitat‐connectivity studies published between 2000 and 2020. We quantified studies by region, country, family, and species. We identified information gaps and analysed each country based on the proportion of land modified by humans, species richness, percentage of carnivoran species that are at risk of extinction, and the percentage of territory that is within Protected Areas. G‐tests were performed to verify if the number of published connectivity studies differed based on these variables. There is an increasing trend in the number of studies; however, this increasing is not proportional among countries, among families, or among carnivoran species. We identified that there is a regional bias, since more than 75% of the studies were carried out in North America, in addition, taxonomic bias indicates that the studies focused on large carnivorans. Regarding the methodological bias, the least‐cost path was the most used approach. There are fewer studies on habitat connectivity in countries with higher fragmentation rates, higher percentages of species that are at risk of extinction and less percentage of land in Protected Areas. The capability of countries to invest in research, the study focused on large charismatic species and the difficulty to obtaining dispersion data are factors that have influenced in the study of habitat connectivity. Resumen en Español La conectividad del hábitat es esencial para mitigar los efectos de la fragmentación al mantener los procesos ecológicos, el intercambio de individuos y el flujo de genes entre poblaciones aisladas. En las últimas dos décadas se ha destacado la importancia de la conectividad del hábitat y se ha incrementado el número de estudios que abordan este tema. Revisamos y describimos los estudios de conectividad de hábitat del orden Carnívora en América, para identificar sesgos taxonómicos, geográficos y metodológicos, y examinamos el número de publicaciones sobre conectividad de hábitat y su relación con parámetros a nivel de país. Revisamos los estudios de conectividad del hábitat publicados entre 2000 y 2020. Cuantificamos los estudios por región, país, familia y especie. Identificamos los vacíos de información y analizamos a cada país en función de la proporción de territorio modificado por humanos, la riqueza de especies, el porcentaje de especies de mamíferos carnívoros que están en riesgo de extinción y el porcentaje de territorio que se encuentra dentro de las Áreas Protegidas. Se realizaron pruebas G para verificar si el número de estudios de conectividad publicados difería en función de estas variables. Hay una tendencia creciente en el número de estudios; sin embargo, este aumento no es proporcional entre países, entre familias o entre especies de mamíferos carnívoros. Identificamos que existe un sesgo regional, ya que más del 75% de los estudios se realizaron en Norteamérica, además, el sesgo taxonómico indica que los estudios se enfocaron en los grandes carnívoros. En cuanto al sesgo metodológico, la ruta de menor costo fue el enfoque más utilizado. Hay menor cantidad de estudios sobre conectividad de hábitat en países con mayores tasas de fragmentación, mayor porcentajes de especies en riesgo de extinción y menor porcentaje de territorio en Áreas Protegidas. La capacidad de los países para invertir en investigación, el estudio centrado en especies carismáticas de gran tamaño y la dificultad para obtener datos de dispersión son factores que han influido en el estudio de la conectividad del hábitat. We reviewed studies on habitat connectivity published between 2000 and 2020, and quantified them by region, country, family, and species. We analysed the proportion of land that is modified by humans, species richness, the percentage of carnivoran species that is at risk of extinction (Near Threatened, Vulnerable, Endangered, or Critically Endangered), and the percentage of land in Protected Areas in each country. There is an increasing trend in the number of studies in the last two decades; however, it is not proportional among countries, families, or among carnivorans species. There is a regional bias, as approximately 70% of the studies were conducted in North America, in addition, taxonomic bias was observed as the studies are focused primarily on jaguar Panthera onca, puma Puma concolor, and black bear Ursus americanus. Regarding the methodological bias, the least‐cost path has been the most used approach. There are fewer studies on habitat connectivity in countries with higher fragmentation rates, higher percentages of threatened species and less land in Protected Areas.</description><subject>Americas</subject><subject>América</subject><subject>Bias</subject><subject>Carnivora</subject><subject>corredores</subject><subject>dispersal corridors</subject><subject>Dispersion</subject><subject>Ecological effects</subject><subject>Endangered &amp; extinct species</subject><subject>fragmentación de hábitat</subject><subject>Fragmentation</subject><subject>Gene flow</subject><subject>habitat fragmentation</subject><subject>Habitats</subject><subject>mammals</subject><subject>mamíferos</subject><subject>Protected Areas</subject><subject>riqueza de especies</subject><subject>Species extinction</subject><subject>Species richness</subject><subject>Taxonomy</subject><subject>Áreas Protegidas</subject><issn>0305-1838</issn><issn>1365-2907</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kE1LAzEQhoMoWKsH_0HAk4etSbabj2MtfkGLFz2HaTZrU7qbmqSV_fdG1x6dy8DL887Ag9A1JROa566FdkJZSdkJGtGSVwVTRJyiESlJVVBZynN0EeOGEMLElI0Q3DuINmLoauy6xocWkvMd_oBdzAFOa4tj2tc99g1ew8olSNj4rrMmuYNL_RGaQ-jcwQc4BrPWBmcgXqKzBrbRXv3tMXp_fHibPxeL16eX-WxRGCoYKzihqqbcGmVAVbxu-MoaS9lqWolKcmtLqkCJctoYQSxQYbgBKSU0oKA2ohyjm-HuLvjPvY1Jb_w-dPmlZkIqybMUmqnbgTLBxxhso3fBtRB6TYn-MaizQf1rMLN3A_vltrb_H9TL2XJofAPzOHLX</recordid><startdate>202304</startdate><enddate>202304</enddate><creator>Balbuena‐Serrano, Ángel</creator><creator>Zarco‐González, Martha Mariela</creator><creator>Monroy‐Vilchis, Octavio</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7QR</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>P64</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4217-8272</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202304</creationdate><title>Biases and information gaps in the study of habitat connectivity in the Carnivora in the Americas</title><author>Balbuena‐Serrano, Ángel ; Zarco‐González, Martha Mariela ; Monroy‐Vilchis, Octavio</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c1722-6019d16ec9ca956df6bece12b457586ee319a9734fc70ea17c6ca888afa9adc73</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Americas</topic><topic>América</topic><topic>Bias</topic><topic>Carnivora</topic><topic>corredores</topic><topic>dispersal corridors</topic><topic>Dispersion</topic><topic>Ecological effects</topic><topic>Endangered &amp; extinct species</topic><topic>fragmentación de hábitat</topic><topic>Fragmentation</topic><topic>Gene flow</topic><topic>habitat fragmentation</topic><topic>Habitats</topic><topic>mammals</topic><topic>mamíferos</topic><topic>Protected Areas</topic><topic>riqueza de especies</topic><topic>Species extinction</topic><topic>Species richness</topic><topic>Taxonomy</topic><topic>Áreas Protegidas</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Balbuena‐Serrano, Ángel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zarco‐González, Martha Mariela</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Monroy‐Vilchis, Octavio</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Chemoreception Abstracts</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Mammal review</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Balbuena‐Serrano, Ángel</au><au>Zarco‐González, Martha Mariela</au><au>Monroy‐Vilchis, Octavio</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Biases and information gaps in the study of habitat connectivity in the Carnivora in the Americas</atitle><jtitle>Mammal review</jtitle><date>2023-04</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>53</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>99</spage><epage>115</epage><pages>99-115</pages><issn>0305-1838</issn><eissn>1365-2907</eissn><abstract>Habitat connectivity is essential to mitigate the effects of fragmentation by maintaining ecological processes, exchange of individuals, and gene flow among isolated populations. In the last two decades, the importance of habitat connectivity has been highlighted and the number of studies that address this issue has increased. We review and describe the habitat‐connectivity studies for the Carnivora in the Americas to identify taxonomic, geographic, and methodological biases, and we examine the number of publications on habitat connectivity and their relationship with country‐level parameters. We reviewed habitat‐connectivity studies published between 2000 and 2020. We quantified studies by region, country, family, and species. We identified information gaps and analysed each country based on the proportion of land modified by humans, species richness, percentage of carnivoran species that are at risk of extinction, and the percentage of territory that is within Protected Areas. G‐tests were performed to verify if the number of published connectivity studies differed based on these variables. There is an increasing trend in the number of studies; however, this increasing is not proportional among countries, among families, or among carnivoran species. We identified that there is a regional bias, since more than 75% of the studies were carried out in North America, in addition, taxonomic bias indicates that the studies focused on large carnivorans. Regarding the methodological bias, the least‐cost path was the most used approach. There are fewer studies on habitat connectivity in countries with higher fragmentation rates, higher percentages of species that are at risk of extinction and less percentage of land in Protected Areas. The capability of countries to invest in research, the study focused on large charismatic species and the difficulty to obtaining dispersion data are factors that have influenced in the study of habitat connectivity. Resumen en Español La conectividad del hábitat es esencial para mitigar los efectos de la fragmentación al mantener los procesos ecológicos, el intercambio de individuos y el flujo de genes entre poblaciones aisladas. En las últimas dos décadas se ha destacado la importancia de la conectividad del hábitat y se ha incrementado el número de estudios que abordan este tema. Revisamos y describimos los estudios de conectividad de hábitat del orden Carnívora en América, para identificar sesgos taxonómicos, geográficos y metodológicos, y examinamos el número de publicaciones sobre conectividad de hábitat y su relación con parámetros a nivel de país. Revisamos los estudios de conectividad del hábitat publicados entre 2000 y 2020. Cuantificamos los estudios por región, país, familia y especie. Identificamos los vacíos de información y analizamos a cada país en función de la proporción de territorio modificado por humanos, la riqueza de especies, el porcentaje de especies de mamíferos carnívoros que están en riesgo de extinción y el porcentaje de territorio que se encuentra dentro de las Áreas Protegidas. Se realizaron pruebas G para verificar si el número de estudios de conectividad publicados difería en función de estas variables. Hay una tendencia creciente en el número de estudios; sin embargo, este aumento no es proporcional entre países, entre familias o entre especies de mamíferos carnívoros. Identificamos que existe un sesgo regional, ya que más del 75% de los estudios se realizaron en Norteamérica, además, el sesgo taxonómico indica que los estudios se enfocaron en los grandes carnívoros. En cuanto al sesgo metodológico, la ruta de menor costo fue el enfoque más utilizado. Hay menor cantidad de estudios sobre conectividad de hábitat en países con mayores tasas de fragmentación, mayor porcentajes de especies en riesgo de extinción y menor porcentaje de territorio en Áreas Protegidas. La capacidad de los países para invertir en investigación, el estudio centrado en especies carismáticas de gran tamaño y la dificultad para obtener datos de dispersión son factores que han influido en el estudio de la conectividad del hábitat. We reviewed studies on habitat connectivity published between 2000 and 2020, and quantified them by region, country, family, and species. We analysed the proportion of land that is modified by humans, species richness, the percentage of carnivoran species that is at risk of extinction (Near Threatened, Vulnerable, Endangered, or Critically Endangered), and the percentage of land in Protected Areas in each country. There is an increasing trend in the number of studies in the last two decades; however, it is not proportional among countries, families, or among carnivorans species. There is a regional bias, as approximately 70% of the studies were conducted in North America, in addition, taxonomic bias was observed as the studies are focused primarily on jaguar Panthera onca, puma Puma concolor, and black bear Ursus americanus. Regarding the methodological bias, the least‐cost path has been the most used approach. There are fewer studies on habitat connectivity in countries with higher fragmentation rates, higher percentages of threatened species and less land in Protected Areas.</abstract><cop>Oxford</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><doi>10.1111/mam.12312</doi><tpages>17</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4217-8272</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0305-1838
ispartof Mammal review, 2023-04, Vol.53 (2), p.99-115
issn 0305-1838
1365-2907
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2789863121
source Wiley-Blackwell Read & Publish Collection
subjects Americas
América
Bias
Carnivora
corredores
dispersal corridors
Dispersion
Ecological effects
Endangered & extinct species
fragmentación de hábitat
Fragmentation
Gene flow
habitat fragmentation
Habitats
mammals
mamíferos
Protected Areas
riqueza de especies
Species extinction
Species richness
Taxonomy
Áreas Protegidas
title Biases and information gaps in the study of habitat connectivity in the Carnivora in the Americas
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-26T06%3A01%3A09IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Biases%20and%20information%20gaps%20in%20the%20study%20of%20habitat%20connectivity%20in%20the%20Carnivora%20in%20the%20Americas&rft.jtitle=Mammal%20review&rft.au=Balbuena%E2%80%90Serrano,%20%C3%81ngel&rft.date=2023-04&rft.volume=53&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=99&rft.epage=115&rft.pages=99-115&rft.issn=0305-1838&rft.eissn=1365-2907&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/mam.12312&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2789863121%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c1722-6019d16ec9ca956df6bece12b457586ee319a9734fc70ea17c6ca888afa9adc73%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2789863121&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true