Loading…
A joint Bayesian framework for missing data and measurement error using integrated nested Laplace approximations
Measurement error (ME) and missing values in covariates are often unavoidable in disciplines that deal with data, and both problems have separately received considerable attention during the past decades. However, while most researchers are familiar with methods for treating missing data, accounting...
Saved in:
Published in: | arXiv.org 2023-03 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | |
---|---|
cites | |
container_end_page | |
container_issue | |
container_start_page | |
container_title | arXiv.org |
container_volume | |
creator | Skarstein, Emma Sofie Martino, Sara Muff, Stefanie |
description | Measurement error (ME) and missing values in covariates are often unavoidable in disciplines that deal with data, and both problems have separately received considerable attention during the past decades. However, while most researchers are familiar with methods for treating missing data, accounting for ME in covariates of regression models is less common. In addition, ME and missing data are typically treated as two separate problems, despite practical and theoretical similarities. Here, we exploit the fact that missing data in a continuous covariate is an extreme case of classical ME, allowing us to use existing methodology that accounts for ME via a Bayesian framework that employs integrated nested Laplace approximations (INLA), and thus to simultaneously account for both ME and missing data in the same covariate. As a useful by-product, we present an approach to handle missing data in INLA, since this corresponds to the special case when no ME is present. In addition, we show how to account for Berkson ME in the same framework. In its broadest generality, the proposed joint Bayesian framework can thus account for Berkson ME, classical ME, and missing data, or for any combination of these in the same or different continuous covariates of the family of regression models that are feasible with INLA. The approach is exemplified using both simulated and real data. We provide extensive and fully reproducible Supplementary Material with thoroughly documented examples using {R-INLA} and {inlabru}. |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2791772209</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2791772209</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-proquest_journals_27917722093</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNjDEKwkAQRRdBMGjuMGAdSDZqtFRRLCztw2AmstHdjTMJ6u1dxQNYveK_9wcq0nmeJcuZ1iMVizRpmupFoefzPFLtGhpvXAcbfJEYdFAzWnp4vkLtGawRMe4CFXYI6CqwhNIzWQoNMQel_wrhgy6MHVXgSD44YnvDMwG2LfunsdgZ72SihjXehOIfx2q63522hyRI9z6UZeN7dmEqdbHKikLrdJX_Z70BPcdLzg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2791772209</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A joint Bayesian framework for missing data and measurement error using integrated nested Laplace approximations</title><source>Publicly Available Content Database (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)</source><creator>Skarstein, Emma Sofie ; Martino, Sara ; Muff, Stefanie</creator><creatorcontrib>Skarstein, Emma Sofie ; Martino, Sara ; Muff, Stefanie</creatorcontrib><description>Measurement error (ME) and missing values in covariates are often unavoidable in disciplines that deal with data, and both problems have separately received considerable attention during the past decades. However, while most researchers are familiar with methods for treating missing data, accounting for ME in covariates of regression models is less common. In addition, ME and missing data are typically treated as two separate problems, despite practical and theoretical similarities. Here, we exploit the fact that missing data in a continuous covariate is an extreme case of classical ME, allowing us to use existing methodology that accounts for ME via a Bayesian framework that employs integrated nested Laplace approximations (INLA), and thus to simultaneously account for both ME and missing data in the same covariate. As a useful by-product, we present an approach to handle missing data in INLA, since this corresponds to the special case when no ME is present. In addition, we show how to account for Berkson ME in the same framework. In its broadest generality, the proposed joint Bayesian framework can thus account for Berkson ME, classical ME, and missing data, or for any combination of these in the same or different continuous covariates of the family of regression models that are feasible with INLA. The approach is exemplified using both simulated and real data. We provide extensive and fully reproducible Supplementary Material with thoroughly documented examples using {R-INLA} and {inlabru}.</description><identifier>EISSN: 2331-8422</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Ithaca: Cornell University Library, arXiv.org</publisher><subject>Approximation ; Bayesian analysis ; Error analysis ; Missing data ; Regression models</subject><ispartof>arXiv.org, 2023-03</ispartof><rights>2023. This work is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2791772209?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>780,784,25753,37012,44590</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Skarstein, Emma Sofie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Martino, Sara</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Muff, Stefanie</creatorcontrib><title>A joint Bayesian framework for missing data and measurement error using integrated nested Laplace approximations</title><title>arXiv.org</title><description>Measurement error (ME) and missing values in covariates are often unavoidable in disciplines that deal with data, and both problems have separately received considerable attention during the past decades. However, while most researchers are familiar with methods for treating missing data, accounting for ME in covariates of regression models is less common. In addition, ME and missing data are typically treated as two separate problems, despite practical and theoretical similarities. Here, we exploit the fact that missing data in a continuous covariate is an extreme case of classical ME, allowing us to use existing methodology that accounts for ME via a Bayesian framework that employs integrated nested Laplace approximations (INLA), and thus to simultaneously account for both ME and missing data in the same covariate. As a useful by-product, we present an approach to handle missing data in INLA, since this corresponds to the special case when no ME is present. In addition, we show how to account for Berkson ME in the same framework. In its broadest generality, the proposed joint Bayesian framework can thus account for Berkson ME, classical ME, and missing data, or for any combination of these in the same or different continuous covariates of the family of regression models that are feasible with INLA. The approach is exemplified using both simulated and real data. We provide extensive and fully reproducible Supplementary Material with thoroughly documented examples using {R-INLA} and {inlabru}.</description><subject>Approximation</subject><subject>Bayesian analysis</subject><subject>Error analysis</subject><subject>Missing data</subject><subject>Regression models</subject><issn>2331-8422</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>PIMPY</sourceid><recordid>eNqNjDEKwkAQRRdBMGjuMGAdSDZqtFRRLCztw2AmstHdjTMJ6u1dxQNYveK_9wcq0nmeJcuZ1iMVizRpmupFoefzPFLtGhpvXAcbfJEYdFAzWnp4vkLtGawRMe4CFXYI6CqwhNIzWQoNMQel_wrhgy6MHVXgSD44YnvDMwG2LfunsdgZ72SihjXehOIfx2q63522hyRI9z6UZeN7dmEqdbHKikLrdJX_Z70BPcdLzg</recordid><startdate>20230327</startdate><enddate>20230327</enddate><creator>Skarstein, Emma Sofie</creator><creator>Martino, Sara</creator><creator>Muff, Stefanie</creator><general>Cornell University Library, arXiv.org</general><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20230327</creationdate><title>A joint Bayesian framework for missing data and measurement error using integrated nested Laplace approximations</title><author>Skarstein, Emma Sofie ; Martino, Sara ; Muff, Stefanie</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-proquest_journals_27917722093</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Approximation</topic><topic>Bayesian analysis</topic><topic>Error analysis</topic><topic>Missing data</topic><topic>Regression models</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Skarstein, Emma Sofie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Martino, Sara</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Muff, Stefanie</creatorcontrib><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>Materials Science & Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Engineering collection</collection></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Skarstein, Emma Sofie</au><au>Martino, Sara</au><au>Muff, Stefanie</au><format>book</format><genre>document</genre><ristype>GEN</ristype><atitle>A joint Bayesian framework for missing data and measurement error using integrated nested Laplace approximations</atitle><jtitle>arXiv.org</jtitle><date>2023-03-27</date><risdate>2023</risdate><eissn>2331-8422</eissn><abstract>Measurement error (ME) and missing values in covariates are often unavoidable in disciplines that deal with data, and both problems have separately received considerable attention during the past decades. However, while most researchers are familiar with methods for treating missing data, accounting for ME in covariates of regression models is less common. In addition, ME and missing data are typically treated as two separate problems, despite practical and theoretical similarities. Here, we exploit the fact that missing data in a continuous covariate is an extreme case of classical ME, allowing us to use existing methodology that accounts for ME via a Bayesian framework that employs integrated nested Laplace approximations (INLA), and thus to simultaneously account for both ME and missing data in the same covariate. As a useful by-product, we present an approach to handle missing data in INLA, since this corresponds to the special case when no ME is present. In addition, we show how to account for Berkson ME in the same framework. In its broadest generality, the proposed joint Bayesian framework can thus account for Berkson ME, classical ME, and missing data, or for any combination of these in the same or different continuous covariates of the family of regression models that are feasible with INLA. The approach is exemplified using both simulated and real data. We provide extensive and fully reproducible Supplementary Material with thoroughly documented examples using {R-INLA} and {inlabru}.</abstract><cop>Ithaca</cop><pub>Cornell University Library, arXiv.org</pub><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | EISSN: 2331-8422 |
ispartof | arXiv.org, 2023-03 |
issn | 2331-8422 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2791772209 |
source | Publicly Available Content Database (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3) |
subjects | Approximation Bayesian analysis Error analysis Missing data Regression models |
title | A joint Bayesian framework for missing data and measurement error using integrated nested Laplace approximations |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-28T15%3A33%3A26IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:book&rft.genre=document&rft.atitle=A%20joint%20Bayesian%20framework%20for%20missing%20data%20and%20measurement%20error%20using%20integrated%20nested%20Laplace%20approximations&rft.jtitle=arXiv.org&rft.au=Skarstein,%20Emma%20Sofie&rft.date=2023-03-27&rft.eissn=2331-8422&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cproquest%3E2791772209%3C/proquest%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-proquest_journals_27917722093%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2791772209&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |