Implementing best practice occupational therapist‐led environmental assessment and modification to prevent falls: A qualitative study of two regional and rural public health services in Australia

• Published in: Australian occupational therapy journal 2023-04, Vol.70 (2), p.202-217
• Main Authors: Tynan, Anna, Pighills, Alison, White, Wendy, Eden, Alicia, Mickan, Sharon
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Australia; Behavior change; behaviour change; Best practice; Change agents; COVID-19; environmental assessment and modification; falls; Health services; High risk; Humans; Implementation; Interviews; Motivation; Occupational Therapists; Occupational Therapy; Pandemics; Public health; Qualitative Research; Rural Health Services; Teams; Therapists; Uptake
• ISSN: 0045-0766; 1440-1630
• DOI: 10.1111/1440-1630.12849

Background Occupational therapist‐led environmental assessment and modification (EAM) is effective in reducing falls for populations at high risk. Two regional and rural public health services in Queensland devised an implementation strategy to embed best practice occupational therapist‐led EAM. Methods A qualitative study was conducted to compare the determinants of implementation success across the different health services, using the COM‐B model of behaviour change. Six semi‐structured interviews were completed with occupational therapists involved at each site, following 12 months of implementation. Interview data were triangulated with minutes from three combined site steering committee meetings, eight local steering committee meetings, and field notes. Thematic analysis was completed to compare barriers and facilitators to best practice uptake of EAM and differences in outcomes between the two sites. Results Both sites commenced implementation with similar states of capability and motivation. After 12 months, one site considered that practice change had been embedded as noted in steering committee minutes and comments; however, the other site observed limited progress. According to the COM‐B analysis, opportunity (the factors that lie outside the individual's control) had a significant influence on how both sites were able to respond to the practice change and navigate some of the unexpected challenges that emerged, including the COVID‐19 pandemic. Existing team structure, multiple responsibilities of key stakeholders, differences in access to resources, and lack of connection between complementary services meant that COVID‐19 disruptions were only a catalyst for unveiling other systemic issues. Conclusion This study highlights the power of external factors on influencing behaviour change for best practice implementation. Learnings from the study will provide deeper understanding of completing implementation projects in regional and rural contexts and support the future implementation of EAM in occupational therapy clinical settings.