Loading…
Enactivism Meets Mechanism: Tensions & Congruities in Cognitive Science
Enactivism advances an understanding of cognition rooted in the dynamic interaction between an embodied agent and their environment, whilst new mechanism suggests that cognition is explained by uncovering the organised components underlying cognitive capacities. On the face of it, the mechanistic mo...
Saved in:
Published in: | Minds and machines (Dordrecht) 2023-03, Vol.33 (1), p.153-184 |
---|---|
Main Author: | |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c363t-a968c25b5cd4394090f7bff36d2b242a2e83a65f463c1b44c598b2f0b661312f3 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c363t-a968c25b5cd4394090f7bff36d2b242a2e83a65f463c1b44c598b2f0b661312f3 |
container_end_page | 184 |
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 153 |
container_title | Minds and machines (Dordrecht) |
container_volume | 33 |
creator | Lee, Jonny |
description | Enactivism advances an understanding of cognition rooted in the dynamic interaction between an embodied agent and their environment, whilst new mechanism suggests that cognition is explained by uncovering the organised components underlying cognitive capacities. On the face of it, the mechanistic model’s emphasis on localisable and decomposable mechanisms, often neural in nature, runs contrary to the enactivist ethos. Despite appearances, this paper argues that mechanistic explanations of cognition, being neither narrow nor reductive, and compatible with plausible iterations of ideas like emergence and downward causation, are congruent with enactivism. Attention to enactivist ideas, moreover, may serve as a heuristic for mechanistic investigations of cognition. Nevertheless, I show how enactivism and approaches that prioritise mechanistic modelling may diverge in starting assumptions about the nature of cognitive phenomena, such as where the constitutive boundaries of cognition lie. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s11023-022-09618-6 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2797659669</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2797659669</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c363t-a968c25b5cd4394090f7bff36d2b242a2e83a65f463c1b44c598b2f0b661312f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kEFLAzEUhIMoWGr_gKcFwVs0ecm-3XiTUqtQ8WA9h900qRGbrcluwX9vdAVvXt4wMDMPPkLOObvijFXXiXMGgjIAyhTymuIRmfCyAlqj5MdkwhRIilKVp2SWkm8Zk6DqSskJWS5CY3p_8GlXPFrbp3zNaxOyvynWNiTfhVRcFvMubOPge29T4UO225DNwRbPxttg7Bk5cc17srNfnZKXu8V6fk9XT8uH-e2KGoGip43C2kDZlmYjhZJMMVe1zgncQAsSGrC1aLB0EoXhrZSmVHULjrWIXHBwYkouxt197D4Gm3r91g0x5JcaKlVhqRBVTsGYMrFLKVqn99HvmvipOdPfzPTITGdm-oeZxlwSYynlcNja-Df9T-sLzZptjw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2797659669</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Enactivism Meets Mechanism: Tensions & Congruities in Cognitive Science</title><source>Springer Nature</source><creator>Lee, Jonny</creator><creatorcontrib>Lee, Jonny</creatorcontrib><description>Enactivism advances an understanding of cognition rooted in the dynamic interaction between an embodied agent and their environment, whilst new mechanism suggests that cognition is explained by uncovering the organised components underlying cognitive capacities. On the face of it, the mechanistic model’s emphasis on localisable and decomposable mechanisms, often neural in nature, runs contrary to the enactivist ethos. Despite appearances, this paper argues that mechanistic explanations of cognition, being neither narrow nor reductive, and compatible with plausible iterations of ideas like emergence and downward causation, are congruent with enactivism. Attention to enactivist ideas, moreover, may serve as a heuristic for mechanistic investigations of cognition. Nevertheless, I show how enactivism and approaches that prioritise mechanistic modelling may diverge in starting assumptions about the nature of cognitive phenomena, such as where the constitutive boundaries of cognition lie.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0924-6495</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1572-8641</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s11023-022-09618-6</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands</publisher><subject>Artificial Intelligence ; Cognition ; Cognitive Psychology ; Cognitive science ; Computer Science ; Economics ; Game Theory ; Philosophy of Mind ; Philosophy of Science ; Social and Behav. Sciences ; Theory of Computation</subject><ispartof>Minds and machines (Dordrecht), 2023-03, Vol.33 (1), p.153-184</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2023</rights><rights>The Author(s) 2023. This work is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c363t-a968c25b5cd4394090f7bff36d2b242a2e83a65f463c1b44c598b2f0b661312f3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c363t-a968c25b5cd4394090f7bff36d2b242a2e83a65f463c1b44c598b2f0b661312f3</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-4453-2247</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Lee, Jonny</creatorcontrib><title>Enactivism Meets Mechanism: Tensions & Congruities in Cognitive Science</title><title>Minds and machines (Dordrecht)</title><addtitle>Minds & Machines</addtitle><description>Enactivism advances an understanding of cognition rooted in the dynamic interaction between an embodied agent and their environment, whilst new mechanism suggests that cognition is explained by uncovering the organised components underlying cognitive capacities. On the face of it, the mechanistic model’s emphasis on localisable and decomposable mechanisms, often neural in nature, runs contrary to the enactivist ethos. Despite appearances, this paper argues that mechanistic explanations of cognition, being neither narrow nor reductive, and compatible with plausible iterations of ideas like emergence and downward causation, are congruent with enactivism. Attention to enactivist ideas, moreover, may serve as a heuristic for mechanistic investigations of cognition. Nevertheless, I show how enactivism and approaches that prioritise mechanistic modelling may diverge in starting assumptions about the nature of cognitive phenomena, such as where the constitutive boundaries of cognition lie.</description><subject>Artificial Intelligence</subject><subject>Cognition</subject><subject>Cognitive Psychology</subject><subject>Cognitive science</subject><subject>Computer Science</subject><subject>Economics</subject><subject>Game Theory</subject><subject>Philosophy of Mind</subject><subject>Philosophy of Science</subject><subject>Social and Behav. Sciences</subject><subject>Theory of Computation</subject><issn>0924-6495</issn><issn>1572-8641</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kEFLAzEUhIMoWGr_gKcFwVs0ecm-3XiTUqtQ8WA9h900qRGbrcluwX9vdAVvXt4wMDMPPkLOObvijFXXiXMGgjIAyhTymuIRmfCyAlqj5MdkwhRIilKVp2SWkm8Zk6DqSskJWS5CY3p_8GlXPFrbp3zNaxOyvynWNiTfhVRcFvMubOPge29T4UO225DNwRbPxttg7Bk5cc17srNfnZKXu8V6fk9XT8uH-e2KGoGip43C2kDZlmYjhZJMMVe1zgncQAsSGrC1aLB0EoXhrZSmVHULjrWIXHBwYkouxt197D4Gm3r91g0x5JcaKlVhqRBVTsGYMrFLKVqn99HvmvipOdPfzPTITGdm-oeZxlwSYynlcNja-Df9T-sLzZptjw</recordid><startdate>20230301</startdate><enddate>20230301</enddate><creator>Lee, Jonny</creator><general>Springer Netherlands</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>C6C</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4453-2247</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20230301</creationdate><title>Enactivism Meets Mechanism: Tensions & Congruities in Cognitive Science</title><author>Lee, Jonny</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c363t-a968c25b5cd4394090f7bff36d2b242a2e83a65f463c1b44c598b2f0b661312f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Artificial Intelligence</topic><topic>Cognition</topic><topic>Cognitive Psychology</topic><topic>Cognitive science</topic><topic>Computer Science</topic><topic>Economics</topic><topic>Game Theory</topic><topic>Philosophy of Mind</topic><topic>Philosophy of Science</topic><topic>Social and Behav. Sciences</topic><topic>Theory of Computation</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Lee, Jonny</creatorcontrib><collection>Springer Nature OA Free Journals</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Minds and machines (Dordrecht)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Lee, Jonny</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Enactivism Meets Mechanism: Tensions & Congruities in Cognitive Science</atitle><jtitle>Minds and machines (Dordrecht)</jtitle><stitle>Minds & Machines</stitle><date>2023-03-01</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>33</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>153</spage><epage>184</epage><pages>153-184</pages><issn>0924-6495</issn><eissn>1572-8641</eissn><abstract>Enactivism advances an understanding of cognition rooted in the dynamic interaction between an embodied agent and their environment, whilst new mechanism suggests that cognition is explained by uncovering the organised components underlying cognitive capacities. On the face of it, the mechanistic model’s emphasis on localisable and decomposable mechanisms, often neural in nature, runs contrary to the enactivist ethos. Despite appearances, this paper argues that mechanistic explanations of cognition, being neither narrow nor reductive, and compatible with plausible iterations of ideas like emergence and downward causation, are congruent with enactivism. Attention to enactivist ideas, moreover, may serve as a heuristic for mechanistic investigations of cognition. Nevertheless, I show how enactivism and approaches that prioritise mechanistic modelling may diverge in starting assumptions about the nature of cognitive phenomena, such as where the constitutive boundaries of cognition lie.</abstract><cop>Dordrecht</cop><pub>Springer Netherlands</pub><doi>10.1007/s11023-022-09618-6</doi><tpages>32</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4453-2247</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0924-6495 |
ispartof | Minds and machines (Dordrecht), 2023-03, Vol.33 (1), p.153-184 |
issn | 0924-6495 1572-8641 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2797659669 |
source | Springer Nature |
subjects | Artificial Intelligence Cognition Cognitive Psychology Cognitive science Computer Science Economics Game Theory Philosophy of Mind Philosophy of Science Social and Behav. Sciences Theory of Computation |
title | Enactivism Meets Mechanism: Tensions & Congruities in Cognitive Science |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-29T00%3A51%3A17IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Enactivism%20Meets%20Mechanism:%20Tensions%20&%20Congruities%20in%20Cognitive%20Science&rft.jtitle=Minds%20and%20machines%20(Dordrecht)&rft.au=Lee,%20Jonny&rft.date=2023-03-01&rft.volume=33&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=153&rft.epage=184&rft.pages=153-184&rft.issn=0924-6495&rft.eissn=1572-8641&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s11023-022-09618-6&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2797659669%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c363t-a968c25b5cd4394090f7bff36d2b242a2e83a65f463c1b44c598b2f0b661312f3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2797659669&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |