Loading…

Enactivism Meets Mechanism: Tensions & Congruities in Cognitive Science

Enactivism advances an understanding of cognition rooted in the dynamic interaction between an embodied agent and their environment, whilst new mechanism suggests that cognition is explained by uncovering the organised components underlying cognitive capacities. On the face of it, the mechanistic mo...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Minds and machines (Dordrecht) 2023-03, Vol.33 (1), p.153-184
Main Author: Lee, Jonny
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c363t-a968c25b5cd4394090f7bff36d2b242a2e83a65f463c1b44c598b2f0b661312f3
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c363t-a968c25b5cd4394090f7bff36d2b242a2e83a65f463c1b44c598b2f0b661312f3
container_end_page 184
container_issue 1
container_start_page 153
container_title Minds and machines (Dordrecht)
container_volume 33
creator Lee, Jonny
description Enactivism advances an understanding of cognition rooted in the dynamic interaction between an embodied agent and their environment, whilst new mechanism suggests that cognition is explained by uncovering the organised components underlying cognitive capacities. On the face of it, the mechanistic model’s emphasis on localisable and decomposable mechanisms, often neural in nature, runs contrary to the enactivist ethos. Despite appearances, this paper argues that mechanistic explanations of cognition, being neither narrow nor reductive, and compatible with plausible iterations of ideas like emergence and downward causation, are congruent with enactivism. Attention to enactivist ideas, moreover, may serve as a heuristic for mechanistic investigations of cognition. Nevertheless, I show how enactivism and approaches that prioritise mechanistic modelling may diverge in starting assumptions about the nature of cognitive phenomena, such as where the constitutive boundaries of cognition lie.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s11023-022-09618-6
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2797659669</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2797659669</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c363t-a968c25b5cd4394090f7bff36d2b242a2e83a65f463c1b44c598b2f0b661312f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kEFLAzEUhIMoWGr_gKcFwVs0ecm-3XiTUqtQ8WA9h900qRGbrcluwX9vdAVvXt4wMDMPPkLOObvijFXXiXMGgjIAyhTymuIRmfCyAlqj5MdkwhRIilKVp2SWkm8Zk6DqSskJWS5CY3p_8GlXPFrbp3zNaxOyvynWNiTfhVRcFvMubOPge29T4UO225DNwRbPxttg7Bk5cc17srNfnZKXu8V6fk9XT8uH-e2KGoGip43C2kDZlmYjhZJMMVe1zgncQAsSGrC1aLB0EoXhrZSmVHULjrWIXHBwYkouxt197D4Gm3r91g0x5JcaKlVhqRBVTsGYMrFLKVqn99HvmvipOdPfzPTITGdm-oeZxlwSYynlcNja-Df9T-sLzZptjw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2797659669</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Enactivism Meets Mechanism: Tensions &amp; Congruities in Cognitive Science</title><source>Springer Nature</source><creator>Lee, Jonny</creator><creatorcontrib>Lee, Jonny</creatorcontrib><description>Enactivism advances an understanding of cognition rooted in the dynamic interaction between an embodied agent and their environment, whilst new mechanism suggests that cognition is explained by uncovering the organised components underlying cognitive capacities. On the face of it, the mechanistic model’s emphasis on localisable and decomposable mechanisms, often neural in nature, runs contrary to the enactivist ethos. Despite appearances, this paper argues that mechanistic explanations of cognition, being neither narrow nor reductive, and compatible with plausible iterations of ideas like emergence and downward causation, are congruent with enactivism. Attention to enactivist ideas, moreover, may serve as a heuristic for mechanistic investigations of cognition. Nevertheless, I show how enactivism and approaches that prioritise mechanistic modelling may diverge in starting assumptions about the nature of cognitive phenomena, such as where the constitutive boundaries of cognition lie.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0924-6495</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1572-8641</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s11023-022-09618-6</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands</publisher><subject>Artificial Intelligence ; Cognition ; Cognitive Psychology ; Cognitive science ; Computer Science ; Economics ; Game Theory ; Philosophy of Mind ; Philosophy of Science ; Social and Behav. Sciences ; Theory of Computation</subject><ispartof>Minds and machines (Dordrecht), 2023-03, Vol.33 (1), p.153-184</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2023</rights><rights>The Author(s) 2023. This work is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c363t-a968c25b5cd4394090f7bff36d2b242a2e83a65f463c1b44c598b2f0b661312f3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c363t-a968c25b5cd4394090f7bff36d2b242a2e83a65f463c1b44c598b2f0b661312f3</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-4453-2247</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Lee, Jonny</creatorcontrib><title>Enactivism Meets Mechanism: Tensions &amp; Congruities in Cognitive Science</title><title>Minds and machines (Dordrecht)</title><addtitle>Minds &amp; Machines</addtitle><description>Enactivism advances an understanding of cognition rooted in the dynamic interaction between an embodied agent and their environment, whilst new mechanism suggests that cognition is explained by uncovering the organised components underlying cognitive capacities. On the face of it, the mechanistic model’s emphasis on localisable and decomposable mechanisms, often neural in nature, runs contrary to the enactivist ethos. Despite appearances, this paper argues that mechanistic explanations of cognition, being neither narrow nor reductive, and compatible with plausible iterations of ideas like emergence and downward causation, are congruent with enactivism. Attention to enactivist ideas, moreover, may serve as a heuristic for mechanistic investigations of cognition. Nevertheless, I show how enactivism and approaches that prioritise mechanistic modelling may diverge in starting assumptions about the nature of cognitive phenomena, such as where the constitutive boundaries of cognition lie.</description><subject>Artificial Intelligence</subject><subject>Cognition</subject><subject>Cognitive Psychology</subject><subject>Cognitive science</subject><subject>Computer Science</subject><subject>Economics</subject><subject>Game Theory</subject><subject>Philosophy of Mind</subject><subject>Philosophy of Science</subject><subject>Social and Behav. Sciences</subject><subject>Theory of Computation</subject><issn>0924-6495</issn><issn>1572-8641</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kEFLAzEUhIMoWGr_gKcFwVs0ecm-3XiTUqtQ8WA9h900qRGbrcluwX9vdAVvXt4wMDMPPkLOObvijFXXiXMGgjIAyhTymuIRmfCyAlqj5MdkwhRIilKVp2SWkm8Zk6DqSskJWS5CY3p_8GlXPFrbp3zNaxOyvynWNiTfhVRcFvMubOPge29T4UO225DNwRbPxttg7Bk5cc17srNfnZKXu8V6fk9XT8uH-e2KGoGip43C2kDZlmYjhZJMMVe1zgncQAsSGrC1aLB0EoXhrZSmVHULjrWIXHBwYkouxt197D4Gm3r91g0x5JcaKlVhqRBVTsGYMrFLKVqn99HvmvipOdPfzPTITGdm-oeZxlwSYynlcNja-Df9T-sLzZptjw</recordid><startdate>20230301</startdate><enddate>20230301</enddate><creator>Lee, Jonny</creator><general>Springer Netherlands</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>C6C</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4453-2247</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20230301</creationdate><title>Enactivism Meets Mechanism: Tensions &amp; Congruities in Cognitive Science</title><author>Lee, Jonny</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c363t-a968c25b5cd4394090f7bff36d2b242a2e83a65f463c1b44c598b2f0b661312f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Artificial Intelligence</topic><topic>Cognition</topic><topic>Cognitive Psychology</topic><topic>Cognitive science</topic><topic>Computer Science</topic><topic>Economics</topic><topic>Game Theory</topic><topic>Philosophy of Mind</topic><topic>Philosophy of Science</topic><topic>Social and Behav. Sciences</topic><topic>Theory of Computation</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Lee, Jonny</creatorcontrib><collection>Springer Nature OA Free Journals</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Minds and machines (Dordrecht)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Lee, Jonny</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Enactivism Meets Mechanism: Tensions &amp; Congruities in Cognitive Science</atitle><jtitle>Minds and machines (Dordrecht)</jtitle><stitle>Minds &amp; Machines</stitle><date>2023-03-01</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>33</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>153</spage><epage>184</epage><pages>153-184</pages><issn>0924-6495</issn><eissn>1572-8641</eissn><abstract>Enactivism advances an understanding of cognition rooted in the dynamic interaction between an embodied agent and their environment, whilst new mechanism suggests that cognition is explained by uncovering the organised components underlying cognitive capacities. On the face of it, the mechanistic model’s emphasis on localisable and decomposable mechanisms, often neural in nature, runs contrary to the enactivist ethos. Despite appearances, this paper argues that mechanistic explanations of cognition, being neither narrow nor reductive, and compatible with plausible iterations of ideas like emergence and downward causation, are congruent with enactivism. Attention to enactivist ideas, moreover, may serve as a heuristic for mechanistic investigations of cognition. Nevertheless, I show how enactivism and approaches that prioritise mechanistic modelling may diverge in starting assumptions about the nature of cognitive phenomena, such as where the constitutive boundaries of cognition lie.</abstract><cop>Dordrecht</cop><pub>Springer Netherlands</pub><doi>10.1007/s11023-022-09618-6</doi><tpages>32</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4453-2247</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0924-6495
ispartof Minds and machines (Dordrecht), 2023-03, Vol.33 (1), p.153-184
issn 0924-6495
1572-8641
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2797659669
source Springer Nature
subjects Artificial Intelligence
Cognition
Cognitive Psychology
Cognitive science
Computer Science
Economics
Game Theory
Philosophy of Mind
Philosophy of Science
Social and Behav. Sciences
Theory of Computation
title Enactivism Meets Mechanism: Tensions & Congruities in Cognitive Science
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-29T00%3A51%3A17IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Enactivism%20Meets%20Mechanism:%20Tensions%20&%20Congruities%20in%20Cognitive%20Science&rft.jtitle=Minds%20and%20machines%20(Dordrecht)&rft.au=Lee,%20Jonny&rft.date=2023-03-01&rft.volume=33&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=153&rft.epage=184&rft.pages=153-184&rft.issn=0924-6495&rft.eissn=1572-8641&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s11023-022-09618-6&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2797659669%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c363t-a968c25b5cd4394090f7bff36d2b242a2e83a65f463c1b44c598b2f0b661312f3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2797659669&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true