Loading…

Evaluating modelled wildlife corridors for the movement of multiple arboreal species in a fragmented landscape

Context In highly fragmented landscapes, arboreal mammals are limited by their ability to move and disperse between core habitats. Connectivity modelling for multiple species allows scientists to identify the most efficient movement and/or dispersal pathway(s) to prioritise for conservation efforts....

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Landscape ecology 2023-05, Vol.38 (5), p.1321-1337
Main Authors: Gracanin, Ana, Mikac, Katarina M.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c363t-5f8b63234140455daa39363d4e3afc52da0c0afc9951d33fc9cc1f2f1c2c11963
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c363t-5f8b63234140455daa39363d4e3afc52da0c0afc9951d33fc9cc1f2f1c2c11963
container_end_page 1337
container_issue 5
container_start_page 1321
container_title Landscape ecology
container_volume 38
creator Gracanin, Ana
Mikac, Katarina M.
description Context In highly fragmented landscapes, arboreal mammals are limited by their ability to move and disperse between core habitats. Connectivity modelling for multiple species allows scientists to identify the most efficient movement and/or dispersal pathway(s) to prioritise for conservation efforts. Objectives In this study, we evaluated the most cost-effective corridor pathway for eight species of arboreal mammals, with particular emphasis on an endangered population of greater gliders ( Petauroides volans ). Methods We use species distribution modelling and circuit theory to calculate connectivity in the landscape for each species. An all-species corridor was then modelled using a least cost path analysis. The final corridor was evaluated for all species through ground-truthing accessible segments. Results We identified that some segments of the corridor had low suitability for highly specialised species, and those with tree hollow requirements for denning. The all-species corridor also utilised an artificial crossing structure over a highway, and monitoring of this rope bridge found only two species (sugar gliders; Petaurus breviceps and ringtail possums; Pseudocheirus peregrinus ) used the structure on occasion. Thus, the modelled corridor pathway was not suitable for all species, rather it was found to be more suitable for generalist species such as sugar gliders, ringtail possums, brown antechinus; Antechinus stuartii and brushtail possums; Trichosurus vulpecula . Conclusions Our study exemplifies the importance of ground-truthing in connectivity conservation studies to ensure conservation outcomes are realised. Furthermore, we provide detailed recommendations for relevant conservation managers, to improve the usage of these existing habitat corridors by arboreal species.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s10980-023-01628-8
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2799291366</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2799291366</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c363t-5f8b63234140455daa39363d4e3afc52da0c0afc9951d33fc9cc1f2f1c2c11963</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kMtKAzEUhoMoWKsv4CrgOnqSzC1LKfUCBTe6DmkudUpmMiYzFd_e1BHcuToHzvf_Bz6ErincUoD6LlEQDRBgnACtWEOaE7SgZc2IqCt6ihYgGCVM1PwcXaS0BwDOARaoXx-Un9TY9jvcBWO9twZ_tt741lmsQ4ytCTFhFyIe321mDraz_YiDw93kx3bwFqu4DdEqj9NgdWsTbnussItqd0RzoVe9SVoN9hKdOeWTvfqdS_T2sH5dPZHNy-Pz6n5DNK_4SErXbCvOeEELKMrSKMVFPpjCcuV0yYwCDXkToqSG87xoTR1zVDNNqaj4Et3MvUMMH5NNo9yHKfb5pWS1EExQXh0pNlM6hpSidXKIbafil6Qgj17l7FVmr_LHq2xyiM-hlOF-Z-Nf9T-pb14_fNo</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2799291366</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Evaluating modelled wildlife corridors for the movement of multiple arboreal species in a fragmented landscape</title><source>Springer Link</source><creator>Gracanin, Ana ; Mikac, Katarina M.</creator><creatorcontrib>Gracanin, Ana ; Mikac, Katarina M.</creatorcontrib><description>Context In highly fragmented landscapes, arboreal mammals are limited by their ability to move and disperse between core habitats. Connectivity modelling for multiple species allows scientists to identify the most efficient movement and/or dispersal pathway(s) to prioritise for conservation efforts. Objectives In this study, we evaluated the most cost-effective corridor pathway for eight species of arboreal mammals, with particular emphasis on an endangered population of greater gliders ( Petauroides volans ). Methods We use species distribution modelling and circuit theory to calculate connectivity in the landscape for each species. An all-species corridor was then modelled using a least cost path analysis. The final corridor was evaluated for all species through ground-truthing accessible segments. Results We identified that some segments of the corridor had low suitability for highly specialised species, and those with tree hollow requirements for denning. The all-species corridor also utilised an artificial crossing structure over a highway, and monitoring of this rope bridge found only two species (sugar gliders; Petaurus breviceps and ringtail possums; Pseudocheirus peregrinus ) used the structure on occasion. Thus, the modelled corridor pathway was not suitable for all species, rather it was found to be more suitable for generalist species such as sugar gliders, ringtail possums, brown antechinus; Antechinus stuartii and brushtail possums; Trichosurus vulpecula . Conclusions Our study exemplifies the importance of ground-truthing in connectivity conservation studies to ensure conservation outcomes are realised. Furthermore, we provide detailed recommendations for relevant conservation managers, to improve the usage of these existing habitat corridors by arboreal species.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0921-2973</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1572-9761</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s10980-023-01628-8</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands</publisher><subject>Biomedical and Life Sciences ; Circuits ; Connectivity ; Conservation ; Corridors ; Cost analysis ; Dispersion ; Ecology ; Endangered populations ; Environmental Management ; Geographical distribution ; Habitat corridors ; Landscape Ecology ; Landscape/Regional and Urban Planning ; Life Sciences ; Mammals ; Modelling ; Nature Conservation ; Research Article ; Segments ; Species ; Sugar ; Sustainable Development ; Trichosurus vulpecula ; Wildlife ; Wildlife habitats ; Wildlife management</subject><ispartof>Landscape ecology, 2023-05, Vol.38 (5), p.1321-1337</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2023</rights><rights>The Author(s) 2023. This work is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c363t-5f8b63234140455daa39363d4e3afc52da0c0afc9951d33fc9cc1f2f1c2c11963</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c363t-5f8b63234140455daa39363d4e3afc52da0c0afc9951d33fc9cc1f2f1c2c11963</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Gracanin, Ana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mikac, Katarina M.</creatorcontrib><title>Evaluating modelled wildlife corridors for the movement of multiple arboreal species in a fragmented landscape</title><title>Landscape ecology</title><addtitle>Landsc Ecol</addtitle><description>Context In highly fragmented landscapes, arboreal mammals are limited by their ability to move and disperse between core habitats. Connectivity modelling for multiple species allows scientists to identify the most efficient movement and/or dispersal pathway(s) to prioritise for conservation efforts. Objectives In this study, we evaluated the most cost-effective corridor pathway for eight species of arboreal mammals, with particular emphasis on an endangered population of greater gliders ( Petauroides volans ). Methods We use species distribution modelling and circuit theory to calculate connectivity in the landscape for each species. An all-species corridor was then modelled using a least cost path analysis. The final corridor was evaluated for all species through ground-truthing accessible segments. Results We identified that some segments of the corridor had low suitability for highly specialised species, and those with tree hollow requirements for denning. The all-species corridor also utilised an artificial crossing structure over a highway, and monitoring of this rope bridge found only two species (sugar gliders; Petaurus breviceps and ringtail possums; Pseudocheirus peregrinus ) used the structure on occasion. Thus, the modelled corridor pathway was not suitable for all species, rather it was found to be more suitable for generalist species such as sugar gliders, ringtail possums, brown antechinus; Antechinus stuartii and brushtail possums; Trichosurus vulpecula . Conclusions Our study exemplifies the importance of ground-truthing in connectivity conservation studies to ensure conservation outcomes are realised. Furthermore, we provide detailed recommendations for relevant conservation managers, to improve the usage of these existing habitat corridors by arboreal species.</description><subject>Biomedical and Life Sciences</subject><subject>Circuits</subject><subject>Connectivity</subject><subject>Conservation</subject><subject>Corridors</subject><subject>Cost analysis</subject><subject>Dispersion</subject><subject>Ecology</subject><subject>Endangered populations</subject><subject>Environmental Management</subject><subject>Geographical distribution</subject><subject>Habitat corridors</subject><subject>Landscape Ecology</subject><subject>Landscape/Regional and Urban Planning</subject><subject>Life Sciences</subject><subject>Mammals</subject><subject>Modelling</subject><subject>Nature Conservation</subject><subject>Research Article</subject><subject>Segments</subject><subject>Species</subject><subject>Sugar</subject><subject>Sustainable Development</subject><subject>Trichosurus vulpecula</subject><subject>Wildlife</subject><subject>Wildlife habitats</subject><subject>Wildlife management</subject><issn>0921-2973</issn><issn>1572-9761</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kMtKAzEUhoMoWKsv4CrgOnqSzC1LKfUCBTe6DmkudUpmMiYzFd_e1BHcuToHzvf_Bz6ErincUoD6LlEQDRBgnACtWEOaE7SgZc2IqCt6ihYgGCVM1PwcXaS0BwDOARaoXx-Un9TY9jvcBWO9twZ_tt741lmsQ4ytCTFhFyIe321mDraz_YiDw93kx3bwFqu4DdEqj9NgdWsTbnussItqd0RzoVe9SVoN9hKdOeWTvfqdS_T2sH5dPZHNy-Pz6n5DNK_4SErXbCvOeEELKMrSKMVFPpjCcuV0yYwCDXkToqSG87xoTR1zVDNNqaj4Et3MvUMMH5NNo9yHKfb5pWS1EExQXh0pNlM6hpSidXKIbafil6Qgj17l7FVmr_LHq2xyiM-hlOF-Z-Nf9T-pb14_fNo</recordid><startdate>20230501</startdate><enddate>20230501</enddate><creator>Gracanin, Ana</creator><creator>Mikac, Katarina M.</creator><general>Springer Netherlands</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>C6C</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>BKSAR</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PCBAR</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>SOI</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20230501</creationdate><title>Evaluating modelled wildlife corridors for the movement of multiple arboreal species in a fragmented landscape</title><author>Gracanin, Ana ; Mikac, Katarina M.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c363t-5f8b63234140455daa39363d4e3afc52da0c0afc9951d33fc9cc1f2f1c2c11963</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Biomedical and Life Sciences</topic><topic>Circuits</topic><topic>Connectivity</topic><topic>Conservation</topic><topic>Corridors</topic><topic>Cost analysis</topic><topic>Dispersion</topic><topic>Ecology</topic><topic>Endangered populations</topic><topic>Environmental Management</topic><topic>Geographical distribution</topic><topic>Habitat corridors</topic><topic>Landscape Ecology</topic><topic>Landscape/Regional and Urban Planning</topic><topic>Life Sciences</topic><topic>Mammals</topic><topic>Modelling</topic><topic>Nature Conservation</topic><topic>Research Article</topic><topic>Segments</topic><topic>Species</topic><topic>Sugar</topic><topic>Sustainable Development</topic><topic>Trichosurus vulpecula</topic><topic>Wildlife</topic><topic>Wildlife habitats</topic><topic>Wildlife management</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Gracanin, Ana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mikac, Katarina M.</creatorcontrib><collection>Springer Nature OA Free Journals</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Agricultural &amp; Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric &amp; Aquatic Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Journals</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric &amp; Aquatic Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Landscape ecology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Gracanin, Ana</au><au>Mikac, Katarina M.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Evaluating modelled wildlife corridors for the movement of multiple arboreal species in a fragmented landscape</atitle><jtitle>Landscape ecology</jtitle><stitle>Landsc Ecol</stitle><date>2023-05-01</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>38</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>1321</spage><epage>1337</epage><pages>1321-1337</pages><issn>0921-2973</issn><eissn>1572-9761</eissn><abstract>Context In highly fragmented landscapes, arboreal mammals are limited by their ability to move and disperse between core habitats. Connectivity modelling for multiple species allows scientists to identify the most efficient movement and/or dispersal pathway(s) to prioritise for conservation efforts. Objectives In this study, we evaluated the most cost-effective corridor pathway for eight species of arboreal mammals, with particular emphasis on an endangered population of greater gliders ( Petauroides volans ). Methods We use species distribution modelling and circuit theory to calculate connectivity in the landscape for each species. An all-species corridor was then modelled using a least cost path analysis. The final corridor was evaluated for all species through ground-truthing accessible segments. Results We identified that some segments of the corridor had low suitability for highly specialised species, and those with tree hollow requirements for denning. The all-species corridor also utilised an artificial crossing structure over a highway, and monitoring of this rope bridge found only two species (sugar gliders; Petaurus breviceps and ringtail possums; Pseudocheirus peregrinus ) used the structure on occasion. Thus, the modelled corridor pathway was not suitable for all species, rather it was found to be more suitable for generalist species such as sugar gliders, ringtail possums, brown antechinus; Antechinus stuartii and brushtail possums; Trichosurus vulpecula . Conclusions Our study exemplifies the importance of ground-truthing in connectivity conservation studies to ensure conservation outcomes are realised. Furthermore, we provide detailed recommendations for relevant conservation managers, to improve the usage of these existing habitat corridors by arboreal species.</abstract><cop>Dordrecht</cop><pub>Springer Netherlands</pub><doi>10.1007/s10980-023-01628-8</doi><tpages>17</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0921-2973
ispartof Landscape ecology, 2023-05, Vol.38 (5), p.1321-1337
issn 0921-2973
1572-9761
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2799291366
source Springer Link
subjects Biomedical and Life Sciences
Circuits
Connectivity
Conservation
Corridors
Cost analysis
Dispersion
Ecology
Endangered populations
Environmental Management
Geographical distribution
Habitat corridors
Landscape Ecology
Landscape/Regional and Urban Planning
Life Sciences
Mammals
Modelling
Nature Conservation
Research Article
Segments
Species
Sugar
Sustainable Development
Trichosurus vulpecula
Wildlife
Wildlife habitats
Wildlife management
title Evaluating modelled wildlife corridors for the movement of multiple arboreal species in a fragmented landscape
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-29T08%3A40%3A35IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Evaluating%20modelled%20wildlife%20corridors%20for%20the%20movement%20of%20multiple%20arboreal%20species%20in%20a%20fragmented%20landscape&rft.jtitle=Landscape%20ecology&rft.au=Gracanin,%20Ana&rft.date=2023-05-01&rft.volume=38&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=1321&rft.epage=1337&rft.pages=1321-1337&rft.issn=0921-2973&rft.eissn=1572-9761&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s10980-023-01628-8&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2799291366%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c363t-5f8b63234140455daa39363d4e3afc52da0c0afc9951d33fc9cc1f2f1c2c11963%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2799291366&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true